Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Med Leg J ; : 258172211053697, 2021 Nov 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34763550

RESUMEN

The aim of this retrospective socio-demographic analysis is to identify those at higher risk of suicidal hanging in the region of Delhi and the National Capital Region. All deaths due to suicidal hanging from January 2016 to December 2019 reported in the Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital were included. Suicidal hanging accounted for 2.67% of total autopsied cases; 21-30 years old represented 42.62% of the victims. Male:female ratio was 1.7:1 and 38.37% of cases were from the adjoining areas of Vasant Kunj and Vasant Vihar. Therefore, a preventive strategy should focus concern on young adults, the male sex, and areas of Vasant Kunj and Vasant Vihar.

3.
J Robot Surg ; 10(3): 187-200, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27251473

RESUMEN

Nerve-sparing procedures during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) have demonstrated improved postoperative functional outcomes. This article provides an overview of clinically applied prostatic neuro-anatomy, various techniques of nerve sparing (NS), and recent innovations in NS and potency outcomes of NS RARP. We retrieved and reviewed all listed publications within PubMed using keywords: nerve sparing, robotic radical prostatectomy, prostate cancer, outcomes, pelvic neuroanatomy and potency. Studies reporting potency outcomes of NS RARP (comparative and non-comparative) were analysed using the Delphi method with an expert panel of urological robotic surgeons. Herein, we outline the published techniques of NS during RARP. Potency and continence outcomes of individual series are discussed in light of the evidence provided by case series and published trials. The potency outcomes of various comparative and non-comparative series of NS RARP have also been mentioned. There are numerous NS techniques reported for RARP. Each method is complimented with benefits and constrained by idiosyncratic caveats, and thus, careful patient selection, a wise intraoperative clinical judgment and tailored approach for each patient is required, when decision for nerve sparing is made. Further large prospective multi-institutional randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate potency and continence outcomes of these techniques, using a rigid standard patient selection criteria and definition of potency are warranted in the new era of functional outcome-driven research.


Asunto(s)
Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Traumatismos del Sistema Nervioso/prevención & control , Anciano , Apósitos Biológicos , Colorantes , Disfunción Eréctil/prevención & control , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Óptica/métodos , Compuestos Orgánicos , Erección Peniana/fisiología , Próstata/irrigación sanguínea , Próstata/inervación , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...