RESUMEN
Gastric signet-ring cell gastric carcinoma (GSRC) is an unfavorable subtype of gastric cancer (GC) that presents with greater invasiveness and poorer prognosis in advanced stage than other types of GC. However, GSRC in early stage is often considered an indicator of less lymph node metastasis and more satisfying clinical outcome compared to poorly differentiated GC. Therefore, the detection and diagnosis of GSRC at early stage undoubtedly play a crucial role in the management of GSRC patients. In recent years, technological advancement in endoscopy including narrow-band imaging and magnifying endoscopy has significantly improved the accuracy and sensitivity of the diagnosis under endoscopy for GSRC patients. Researches have confirmed that early stage GSRC that meets the expanded criteria of endoscopic resection showed comparable outcomes to surgery after receiving endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), indicating that ESD could be considered standard treatment for GSRC after thorough selection and evaluation. This article summarizes the current knowledge and updates pertaining to the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early stage signet-ring cell gastric carcinoma.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC), patients with non-curative resection (NCR) of ESD may still require gastrectomy. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) showed great potential in predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. This study aims to investigate the predictive validity of SII of NCR in EGC patients. METHODS: We reviewed data from EGC patients who underwent ESD in the past. The relationship between SII and clinicopathologic features was investigated. We used Receiver operating characteristic curves to compare the predictive values of NCR between SII and other inflammation indices. Binary logistic analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for NCR. These factors were then used to construct a predictive nomogram. RESULTS: SII was associated with larger tumor size, male gender, older age, submucosal invasion, and a greater risk of NCR. SII showed better predictivity of NCR than platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). SII [odds ratio (OR) = 1.003, P = 0.001], NLR (OR = 1.520, P = 0.029), PLR (OR = 1.009, P = 0.010), upper stomach tumors (OR = 16.393, P < 0.001), poorly differentiated type (OR = 29.754, P < 0.001), ulceration (OR = 4.814, P = 0.001), and submucosal invasion (OR = 48.91, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for NCR. The nomogram model based on these factors exhibited superior concordance and accuracy. CONCLUSION: SII could be considered a simple and effective predictor of NCR of ESD in EGC patients.
