Outcome comparison of the most commonly employed wound coverage techniques in patients with massive burns ≥50% TBSA - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Early wound coverage is one of the most essential factors influencing the survival of extensively burned patients, especially those with a total body surface area (TBSA) burned greater than 50 %. In patients with limited donor sites available for autografting, techniques such as the Meek micrograft procedure or cultured epidermal allografts (CEA) have proven to be viable alternatives. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we analyzed the outcomes of different wound coverage techniques in patients with massive burn injuries ≥ 50 % TBSA in the past 17 years. METHODS: The EMBASE, PUBMED, Google Scholar and MEDLINE databases were searched from inception to December 2022 for studies investigating major burn reconstruction (>50 % TBSA) with the use of one of: a) autografts, b) allografts, c) cell-based therapies, and d) Meek micrografting. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The outcomes evaluated were mortality, length of hospital stay, graft take and number of operations performed. RESULTS: Following a two-stage review process, 30 studies with 1369 patients were identified for analysis. Methods of coverage comprised the original autografting, and the newer Meek micrografting, CEA autografting, and allografting. Pooled mean age of the entire cohort was 32.5 years ( ± SE 3.6) with mean burn size of 66.1 % ( ± 2.5). After pooling the data, advantages in terms of mortality rate, length of stay, graft take and number of required surgeries were seen for the Meek and CEA groups. Mortality was highest in patients treated with autografts (50 %) and lowest with cell-based therapy (11 %). Length of stay was longest with cell-based therapy (91 ± 16 days) and shortest with Meek micrografting (50 ± 24 days). Graft take was highest with autografts (96 ± 2 %) and lowest with cell-based therapy (72 ± 9 %). Average number of operations was highest with cell-based therapy (9 ± 4) and lowest with Meek micrografting (4 ± 2). CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the four techniques highlighted differences in terms of all outcomes assessed, and each technique was associated with different advantages. Interestingly autografting, the option with the highest graft take rate, was also associated with the highest mortality. This study not only serves to provide the first comparison of the most commonly used techniques in major burn reconstruction, but also highlights the need for prospective studies that directly compare the efficacy of the different techniques to ultimately establish whether a true superior option exists.

Frailty as a sequela of burn injury: a post hoc analysis of the "RE-ENERGIZE" multicenter randomized-controlled trial and the National Health Interview Survey.

BACKGROUND: With advancements in burn treatment and intensive care leading to decreased mortality rates, a growing cohort of burn survivors is emerging. These individuals may be susceptible to frailty, characterized by reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors commonly associated with aging, which significantly complicates their recovery process. To date, no study has investigated burns as a potential risk factor for frailty. This study aimed to determine the short-term prevalence of frailty among burn survivors' months after injury and compare it with that of the general population. METHODS: A post hoc analysis was conducted on the Randomized Trial of Enteral Glutamine to Minimize the Effects of Burn Injury (RE-ENERGIZE) trial, an international randomized-controlled trial involving 1200 burn injury patients with partial- or full-thickness burns. Participants who did not complete the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire were excluded. Data for the general population were obtained from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Frailty was assessed using the FRAIL (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness, Loss of weight) scale. Due to lack of data on loss of weight, for the purposes of this study, malnutrition was used as the fifth variable. Illness and malnutrition were based on admission data, while fatigue, resistance, and ambulation were determined from post-discharge responses to the SF-36. The burn cohort and general population groups were matched using propensity score matching and compared in terms of frailty status. Within the burn group, patients were divided into different subgroups based on their frailty status, and the differences in their (instrumental) activities of daily living (iADL and ADL) were compared. A multivariable analysis was performed within the burn cohort to identify factors predisposing to frailty as well as compromised iADL and ADL. RESULTS: Out of the 1200 burn patients involved in the study, 600 completed the required questionnaires [follow-up time: (5.5 ± 2.3) months] and were matched to 1200 adults from the general population in the U.S. In comparison to the general population, burn patients exhibited a significantly higher likelihood of being pre-frail (42.3% vs. 19.8%, P < 0.0001), or frail (13.0% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.0001). When focusing on specific components, burn patients were more prone to experiencing fatigue (25.8% vs. 13.5%, P < 0.0001), limited resistance (34.0% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.0001), and restricted ambulation (41.8% vs. 3.8%, P < 0.0001). Conversely, the incidence rate of illness was observed to be higher in the general population (1.2% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.03), while no significant difference was detected regarding malnutrition (2.3% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.75). Furthermore, in comparison with robust burn patients, it was significantly more likely for pre-frail and frail patients to disclose compromise in ADL and iADL. The frail cohort reported the most pronounced limitation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a higher incidence of post-discharge frailty among burn survivors in the short-term following injury. Burn survivors experience compromised fatigue, resistance, and ambulation, while rates of illness and malnutrition were lower or unchanged, respectively. These results underscore the critical need for early identification of frailty after a burn injury, with timely and comprehensive involvement of a multidisciplinary team including burn and pain specialists, community physicians, physiotherapists, nutritionists, and social workers. This collaborative effort can ensure holistic care to address and mitigate frailty in this patient population.

The Epidemiology and Outcomes of Perineal and Genital Burn Injury in Low- and Middle- Income Countries: A Global Burn Registry Study.

INTRODUCTION: The epidemiology, care, and outcomes of perineal and genital burns (PG) in high-income countries have been previously described, but an analysis of this topic in LMICs has yet to be performed. We use the World Health Organization's Global Burn Registry to fill this gap. METHODS: The GBR was searched from inception to November 2023 to identify all burn patients, excluding cases from high-income countries. Demographics and mechanism of injury were retrieved. Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOHS), surgical intervention, discharge with physical impairment, and mortality. A multivariate regression analysis was performed controlling for burnt total body surface area (TBSA), age, sex, inhalation injury, mechanism of burn and care center characteristics. RESULTS: Of 9041 patients identified, 1213 (13.4 %) had PG burns with 136 (1.6 %) isolated to the PG region. PG patients had higher TBSA (p < 0.001) and more inhalation injury (p < 0.001). They had better access to rehabilitation and lower access to theater space for burns (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that PG patients had longer LOHS (p = 0.001), greater mortality (p < 0.001), were less likely to undergo surgery (p = 0.01) or be discharged home with physical impairment (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Similarities and differences exist between high- and low/middle-income countries in terms of the patterns of injury, care, and recovery in patients with PG burns. The longer LOHS and higher mortality among PG patients, previously reported in high-income countries, are verified. This highlights the importance of greater vigilance when caring for such patients.

A new surgical concept for the efficient treatment of large and deep burns.

Effective burn surgery is based on two fundamental principles: prompt excision of necrotic tissue and definitive coverage preserving functional dermis and body contour. There is often compromise, either prioritizing the urgency of excision or opting for patient stability and optimal conditions prior to autografting. We propose a surgical concept that addresses this critical treatment gap. In 2022 we implemented a new three-phase protocol, EDM: (Excision phase, E) Immediate excision of the burn wound preserving body contour; (Dermis phase, D) definitive temporization of the wound bed, using Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM), to prepare it for successful grafting. (Meek phase, M): Upon complete dermal temporization, full autologous coverage in a single micrografting procedure. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study to characterize the EDM protocol compared to the prior standard of care (>40%TBSA, n=5 in EDM vs. n=10 matched controls). Primary outcomes were total surgeries required, total surgeries to achieve>90% healing, uninterrupted recovery time without surgery, and time on mechanical ventilation. The EDM group required fewer surgeries in total (5 vs. 9.5 ; p=0.01) and to achieve>90% healing (3 vs. 6.5; p=0.001). EDM patients experienced longer uninterrupted recovery (24 vs. 14 days, p=0.001). Additionally, EDM patients spent less time on mechanical ventilation (210 vs. 1136 hours, p=0.005). The EDM protocol could improve surgical efficiency, ultimately having the potential to expedite rehabilitation in severely burned patients. The study underscores the potential of combining fundamentals of burn surgery, with innovative surgical techniques and materials, in order to bridge the gap between excision and grafting.

The Application of a Synthetic Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix in Extensive Burn Injury: A Unicenter Experience of 175 Cases.

Objectives: Addressing extensive and deep burn wounds poses considerable challenges for both patients and surgeons. The NovoSorb® Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) emerged as a novel dermal substitute and has been subjected to evaluation in large burn wound cases, with a specific focus on identifying risk factors associated with suboptimal take rates. Methods: All patients with burn wounds greater than 10% body surface that underwent BTM treatment between March 2020 and November 2023 were eligible for inclusion. Univariate analyses and linear regression models were employed to discern risk factors and predictors influencing the take rates of both the BTM and split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs). Results: A total of 175 patients (mean age 56.2 ± 19.8 years, 70.3% male) were evaluated. The mean take rates of the BTM and STSGs were 82.0 ± 24.7% and 87.3 ± 19.0%, respectively. There were significant negative correlations between BTM take and the number of surgeries before BTM application (r = -0.19, p = 0.01), %TBSA and STSG take (r = -0.36, p = <0.001) and significant positive correlations between BTM and STSG take (r = 0.41, p ≤ 0.001) in addition to NPWT and STSG take (r = 0.21, p = 0.01). Multivariate regression analyses showed that a larger number of surgeries prior to BTM application (OR -3.41, 95% CI -6.82, -0.03, p = 0.04) was associated with poorer BTM take. Allograft treatment before BTM application (OR -14.7, 95% CI -23.0, -6.43,p = 0.01) and failed treatment with STSG before BTM application (OR -20.8, 95% CI -36.3, -5.23, p ≤ 0.01) were associated with poorer STSG take, whereas higher BTM take rates were associated with overall higher STSG take (OR -0.15, 95% 0.05, 0.26, p = 0.01). The Meek technique was used in 24 patients and showed similar take rates (BTM: 76.3 ± 28.0%, p = 0.22; STSG: 80.7 ± 21.1, p = 0.07). Conclusions: This study summarizes our findings on the application of a BTM in the context of large burn wounds. The results demonstrate that successful treatment can be achieved even in patients with extensive burns, resulting in satisfying take rates for both the BTM and STSG. The data underscore the importance of promptly applying a BTM to debrided wounds and indicate good results when using Meek.

Administration and effects of beta blockers and oxandrolone in severely burned adults: a post hoc analysis of the RE-ENERGIZE trial.

Background: Prospective randomized trials in severely burned children have shown the positive effects of oxandrolone (OX), beta blockers (BB) and a combination of the two (BBOX) on hypermetabolism, catabolism and hyperinflammation short- and long-term post-burn. Although data on severely burned adults are lacking in comparison, BB, OX and BBOX appear to be commonly employed in this patient population. In this study, we perform a secondary analysis of an international prospective randomized trial dataset to provide descriptive evidence regarding the current utilization patterns and potential treatment effects of OX, BB and BBOX. Methods: The RE-ENERGIZE (RandomizEd Trial of ENtERal Glutamine to minimIZE Thermal Injury, NCT00985205) trial included 1200 adult patients with severe burns. We stratified patients according to their receipt of OX, BB, BBOX or none of these drugs (None) during acute hospitalization. Descriptive statistics describe the details of drug therapy and unadjusted analyses identify predisposing factors for drug use per group. Association between OX, BB and BBOX and clinical outcomes such as time to discharge alive and 6-month mortality were modeled using adjusted multivariable Cox regressions. Results: More than half of all patients in the trial received either OX (n = 138), BB (n = 293) or BBOX (n = 282), as opposed to None (n = 487, 40.6%). Per study site and geographical region, use of OX, BB and BBOX was highly variable. Predisposing factors for the use of OX, BB and BBOX included larger total body surface area (TBSA) burned, higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores on admission and younger patient age. After adjustment for multiple covariates, the use of OX was associated with a longer time to discharge alive [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, confidence interval (CI) (0.47-0.82) per 100% increase, p = 0.001]. A higher proportion of days on BB was associated with lower in-hospital-mortality (HR: 0.5, CI 0.28-0.87, p = 0.015) and 6-month mortality (HR: 0.44, CI 0.24-0.82, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The use of OX, BB and BBOX is common within the adult burn patient population, with its use varying considerably across sites worldwide. Our findings found mixed associations between outcomes and the use of BB and OX in adult burn patients, with lower acute and 6-month-mortality with BB and longer times to discharge with OX. Further research into these pharmacological modulators of the pathophysiological response to severe burn injury is indicated.

NovoSorb® Biodegradable Temporising Matrix (BTM): What we learned from the first 300 consecutive cases.

INTRODUCTION: Extensive full-thickness soft-tissue defects remain a challenge in reconstructive surgery. NovoSorb® Biodegradable Temporising Matrix (BTM) represents a novel dermal substitute and was evaluated in wounds deriving from different aetiologies and to highlight risk factors for poor take rates. METHODS: All patients treated with BTM at our department between March 2020 and October 2022 were included. Differences in univariate and linear regression models identified predictors and risk factors for take rates of BTM and split-thickness skin grafts (STSG). RESULTS: Three hundred patients (mean age 54.2 ± 20.1 years, 66.3% male, 59.7% burns, 19.7% trauma and 20.6% others) were evaluated. Mean take rates of BTM and STSG after BTM delamination were 82.7 ± 25.2% and 86.0 ± 22.6%, respectively. Multiple regression analyses showed that higher body mass index (BMI, OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.86, -0.01, p = 0.44), prior allograft transplantation (OR 15.12, 95% CI 26.98, -3.31, p = 0.041), longer trauma-to-BTM-application intervals (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.001, -0.001, p = 0.038), positive wound swabs before BTM (OR 7.15, 95% CI 13.50, -0.80, p = 0.028) and peripheral artery disease (OR 10.80, 95% CI 18.63, -2.96, p = 0.007) were associated with poorer BTM take. Higher BMI (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.76, -0.08, p = 0.026), increasing BTM graft surface areas (OR 0.58, 95% CI -1.00, -0.17, p = 0.005), prior allograft (OR 12.20, 95% CI -21.99, -2.41, p = 0.015) or autograft transplantations (OR 22.42, 95% CI 38.69, -6.14, p = 0.001), tumour as the aetiology of the wound (OR 37.42, 95% CI 57.41, -17.83, p = 0.001), diabetes (OR 6.64, 95% CI 12.80, -0.48, p = 0.035) and impaired kidney function (OR 5.90, 95% CI 10.94, -0.86, p = 0.021) were associated with poorer STSG take after delamination of BTM, whereas higher BTM take rates were associated with better STSG take (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.31,0.50, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Extensive complex wounds of different aetiologies unsuitable for immediate STSG can be successfully reconstructed by means of two-staged BTM application and subsequent skin grafting. Importantly, presence of wound contamination or infection and prior allograft coverage appear to jeopardise good BTM and STSG take.

The long-term intercorrelation between post-burn pain, anxiety, and depression: a post hoc analysis of the "RE-ENERGIZE" double-blind, randomized, multicenter placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing prevalence of burn survivors, a gap persists in our understanding of the correlation between acute burn trauma and the long-term impact on psychosocial health. This study set out to investigate the prevalence of long-term pain and symptoms of anxiety and depression in survivors of extensive burns, comparing this to the general population, and identify injury and demographic-related factors predisposing individuals to psychosocial compromise. METHODS: RE-ENERGIZE was an international, double-blinded, randomized-controlled trial that enrolled 1200 patients with partial- or full-thickness burns that required surgical treatment. For the post hoc analysis, we excluded participants who did not complete the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Normative data were taken from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey dataset. Propensity score matching was performed using the nearest-neighbor 1-to-1 method, and the two cohorts were compared in terms of chronic pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. A multivariable analysis was performed on the burns cohort to identify factors predicting post-discharge pain and symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESULTS: A total of 600 burn patients and 26,666 general population adults were included in this study. Following propensity score matching, both groups comprised 478 participants each, who were predominately male, white, overweight and between 20 and 60 years old. Compared to the general population, burn patients were significantly more likely to report the presence of moderate and a lot of pain (p = 0.002). Symptoms of anxiety were significantly higher in the burn population in two of four levels (most of the time; some of the time; p < 0.0001 for both). Responders in the burn population were significantly less likely to report the absence of depressive symptoms (p < 0.0001). Burn patients were also significantly more likely to report that their mental health affects their social life. TBSA, history of depression, and female sex were identified as independently associated factors for pain, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. The presence of chronic pain and anxiety symptoms independently predicted for symptoms of depression. CONCLUSIONS: Analyzing the largest multicenter cohort of patients with extensive burns, we find that burn injury is associated with chronic pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. In addition, TBSA-burned and history of depression directly correlate with the prevalence of chronic pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Finally, pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression are interrelated and may have interactive effects on the process of recovery following burn injury. Burn patients would, therefore, benefit from a multidisciplinary team approach with early mobilization of pain and mental health experts, in order to promptly prevent the development of psychosocial challenges and their consequences.

Patient-reported Outcomes Utilizing the Breast-Q Questionnaire After Breast Conserving Surgery With and Without Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) arose to decrease the deformity following breast conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer. In this meta-analysis (MA), we pool Breast-Q™ questionnaire data to compare quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients who received BCS alone or in combination with Level I or II oncoplastic breast surgery (BCS+OBS). All relevant databases were searched following the PRISMA and QUOROM guidelines. All prospective or retrospective studies with a BCS or BCS+OBS cohort that reported QOL as assessed with the Breast-Q™ questionnaire were eligible. Fifty-five studies (75 distinct patient cohorts; 11,186 patients) were included in the MA, with 12 studies reporting both pre- and postoperative values and eligible for a pairwise MA. The pairwise MA showed a significant postoperative improvement in the overall satisfaction with the breast (MD +8.0%, p=0.003) and in the psychosocial well-being (MD +9.2%, 3.5-14.8, p=0.001) of the entire cohort (BCS and BCS+OBS). A subgroup MA of proportions highlighted a superiority of BCS+OBS to BCS in terms of overall satisfaction with the breast (72.0%, 68.0-76.1, versus 62.9%, 58.3-67.5; p=0.02) and psychosocial well-being (78.9%, 71.5-86.4, versus 73.3%, 67.3-76.5, p=0.0001). A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis confirmed the results of the pairwise MA and the MA of proportions. Oncoplastic breast surgery effectively improves QoL based on the patient-reported outcomes assessed using the Breast-Q™ questionnaire. The improvements were associated with acceptable complication rates, further supporting the use of BCS followed by OBS where mastectomy would otherwise be necessary.

Outcomes in patients with burns to the perineum, buttocks and genitalia: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Burns that involve the perineum, buttocks and genitals (PBG) have been associated with more challenging therapeutic needs and worse clinical outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether PBG burns are an independent predictor for mortality, morbidity and complications in a large, heterogenous patient collective and in comparison to patients without PBG burns. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to a level one burn center between August 2014 and July 2022 were included and stratified based on the presence of PBG burns on admission (PBG & control group = CTR). Demographic baseline data, burn aetiology, inhalation trauma (IHT), full-thickness burns (FT), number of operations (NOR), mortality, length of ICU stay (LOS-ICU), length of in-hospital stay (LOHS) and bacteraemia were assessed to compare key clinical characteristics and outcomes between the groups. Multivariate regression analyses and a 1:1 propensity score matching were conducted for key clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1024 patients were included in the analysis (PBG: n = 227; CTR: n = 797). PBG burns were older (median (IQR) 54 (34-72) vs. 44, (30-61) years, p < 0.0001), more frequently female (35% vs. 23%, p = 0.002) presented with larger total body surface area (TBSA) burns overall (27 (32-39) vs. 10 (13-15) %, p < 0.0001) and sustained FT burns more frequently (69% vs. 26% p < 0.0001). Scald burns were more frequently the cause of PBG burns (45% vs. 15%, p < 0.0001), PBG patients needed twice as many surgical procedures (Mean (SD) 2 (2.84) vs. 1 (1.6), p < 0.0001) as CTR. In multivariate analyses, a significant correlation was identified between length of ICU stay and presence of PBG burns. Following strict cohort matching to account for sex, age, cause of burn, TBSA %, presence of FT burn, inhalation trauma and bacteraemia, PBG burns were an independent predictor for mortality (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: PBG burns are at risk for prolonged intensive care, hospitalization and complications during treatment. Furthermore, the presence of PBG burns appears to be a risk factor for mortality, irrespective of patient age, TBSA affected and other relevant covariates.

The Impact of Facial Burns on Short- and Long-Term Quality of Life and Psychological Distress-A Prospective Matched Cohort Study.

Burn injuries are a major healthcare challenge worldwide, with up to 50% of all minor burns located on the head and neck. With this study, we sought to describe the effect of facial burns (FB) on health-related quality of life through a prospective and matched cohort study design. Patients completed the 36 Item Short Form (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results were analyzed based on the distribution of datasets. In total, 55 patients with FB and 55 age-and sex-matched candidates were recruited. The most common mechanism of thermal injury was burns from flames. The FB group scored lower in physical and psychological dimensions than the control group, both acutely and one year after injury. An analysis of each domain showed that subjects in the FB group trended toward improvements in their score after one-year post-burn in physical functioning (acute: 71.0 ± 29.2; one-year: 83.7 ± 23.9; p = 0.02) and bodily pain (acute: 58.5 ± 30.3; one-year: 77.9 ± 30.5; p = 0.01) domains. Additionally, the FB group had significanlyt higher scores for anxiety (FB: 4.8 ± 3.2; control: 2.5 ± 2.8; p = <0.002) and depression (FB: 3.9 ± 3.5; control: 2.1 ± 2.7; p = 0.01) compared to the control. In conclusion, facial burns are associated with physical and psychosocial deficits, as well as elevated levels of psychological distress.

Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients-A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal.

The treatment of geriatric burn patients represents a major challenge in burn care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of enzymatic debridement (ED) in geriatric burn patients. Adult patients who received ED for treatment of mixed pattern and full thickness burns (August 2017-October 2022) were included in this study and grouped in the younger (18-65 years) and geriatric (≥65 years) groups. Primary outcome was a necessity of surgery subsequent to ED. Both groups (patient characteristics, surgical and non-surgical treatment) were compared. Multiple logistic and linear regression models were used to identify the effect of age on the outcomes. A total of 169 patients were included (younger group: 135 patients, geriatric group: 34 patients). The burn size as indicated by %TBSA (24.2 ± 20.4% vs. 26.8 ± 17.1%, p = 0.499) was similar in both groups. The ASA (2.5 ± 1.1 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and ABSI scores (6.1 ± 2.8 vs. 8.6 ± 2.3, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the geriatric group. The %TBSA treated with ED (5.4 ± 5.0% vs. 4.4 ± 4.3%, p = 0.245) were similar in both groups. The necessity of additional surgical interventions (63.0 % vs. 58.8 %, p = 0.763) and the wound size debrided and grafted (2.9 ± 3.5% vs. 2.2 ± 2.1%; p = 0.301) were similar in both groups. Regression models yielded that age did not have an effect on efficacy of ED. We showed that ED is reliable and safe to use in geriatric patients. Age did not have a significant influence on the surgical outcomes of ED. In both groups, the size of the grafted area was reduced and, in many patients, surgery was avoided completely.

Short- and long term hyposmia, hypogeusia, dysphagia and dysphonia after facial burn injury - A prospective matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Facial burns frequently occur in occupational or household accidents. While dysphagia and dysphonia are known sequelae, little is known about impaired smell and taste after facial burns. METHODS: In a prospective observational controlled study, we evaluated hyposmia via the Sniffin' Stick Test (SnS), hypogeusia via a taste strip test, and dysphonia and dysphagia via validated questionnaires acutely and one-year after burn, respectively. A matched control group consisting of a convenience sample of healthy volunteers underwent the same assessments. RESULTS: Fifty-five facial burn patients (FB) and 55 healthy controls (CTR) were enrolled. Mean burn size was 11 (IQR: 29) % total body surface area (TBSA); CTR and FB were comparable regarding age, sex and smoking status. Acutely, hyposmia was present in 29% of the FB group (CTR: 9%, p = 0.014) and burn patients scored worse on the SnS than CTR (FB: 10; CTR: 11; IQR: 2; p = 0.013). Hyposmia per SnS correlated with subjective self-assessment. Hyposmia and SnS scores improved over time (FB acute: 10.5 IQR: 2; FB one year: 11; IQR: 2; p = 0.042) and returned to normal at one-year post burn in most patients who completed the study (lost to follow-up: 21 patients). Taste strip scores were comparable between FB and CTR, as was the acute prevalence of dysphagia and dysphonia. CONCLUSION: Hyposmia acutely after facial thermal trauma appeared frequently in this study, especially when complicated by inhalation trauma or large TBSA involvement. Of all complete assessments, a fraction of burn patients retained hyposmia after one year while most improved over time to normal. Prevalence of dysphonia, dysphagia and hypogeusia was comparable to healthy controls in this study, perhaps due to overall minor burn severity.

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Reduction Mammoplasty Using BREAST-Q: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The BREAST-Q questionnaire reduction module is an established tool for outcomes after reduction mammoplasty. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis assess key parameters affecting pre- and postoperative scores, with specific foci on patient characteristics and tissue resection weights. METHODS: This study was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED (National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, MD), Google Scholar (Google; Mountain View, CA), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics; Philadelphia, PA) were searched. All studies published before August 1, 2021, were assessed for eligibility by 2 independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria were prospective or retrospective studies in 6 languages that reported quality of life after reduction mammoplasty employing the BREAST-Q questionnaire reduction module. Quality of included studies was assessed employing the Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale. Analysis was performed per Cochrane Collaboration and the Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 28 papers were included in the systematic review, 13 for preoperative meta-analysis, and 17 for postoperative meta-analysis. Postoperative scores in all 3 quality of life domains (psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being) and satisfaction with breasts increased significantly after reduction mammoplasty compared with preoperative scores. Satisfaction with breasts showed the greatest improvement, from 22.9 to 73.0. Preoperative scores were lower than normative data, with improvement to comparable scores as the healthy population postoperatively. Improvements in BREAST-Q scores did not correlate with patient comorbidities, complication rates, or amount of breast tissue resected. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction mammoplasty provides marked improvement in BREAST-Q patient-reported quality of life as well established in literature. However, these improvements do not correlate with tissue resection weights, warranting further inquiry of insurance-defined resection requirements.

Current understanding of thermo(dys)regulation in severe burn injury and the pathophysiological influence of hypermetabolism, adrenergic stress and hypothalamic regulation-a systematic review.

Background: In this systematic review, we summarize the aetiology as well as the current knowledge regarding thermo(dys)regulation and hypothermia after severe burn trauma and aim to present key concepts of pathophysiology and treatment options. Severe burn injuries with >20% total body surface area (TBSA) affected commonly leave the patient requiring several surgical procedures, prolonged hospital stays and cause substantial changes to body composition and metabolism in the acute and long-term phase. Particularly in severely burned patients, the loss of intact skin and the dysregulation of peripheral and central thermoregulatory processes may lead to substantial complications. Methods: A systematic and protocol-based search for suitable publications was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened and included if deemed eligible. This encompasses animal-based in vivo studies as well as clinical studies examining the control-loops of thermoregulation and metabolic stability within burn patients. Results: Both experimental animal studies and clinical studies examining thermoregulation and metabolic functions within burn patients have produced a general understanding of core concepts which are, nonetheless, lacking in detail. We describe the wide range of pathophysiological alterations observed after severe burn trauma and highlight the association between thermoregulation and hypermetabolism as well as the interactions between nearly all organ systems. Lastly, the current clinical standards of mitigating the negative effects of thermodysregulation and hypothermia are summarized, as a comprehensive understanding and implementation of the key concepts is critical for patient survival and long-term well-being. Conclusions: The available in vivo animal models have provided many insights into the interwoven pathophysiology of severe burn injury, especially concerning thermoregulation. We offer an outlook on concepts of altered central thermoregulation from non-burn research as potential areas of future research interest and aim to provide an overview of the clinical implications of temperature management in burn patients.

The physiologic responses to a fluid bolus administration in old and young healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Organ function is known to decline with age. Optimizing cardiac, pulmonary and renal function in older adults has led to significant improvements in perioperative care. However, when substantial blood loss and fluid shifts occur, perioperative outcomes still remains poor, especially in older adults. We suspect that this could be due to age-related changes in endothelial function-an organ controlling the transport of fluid and solutes. The capillary filtration coefficient (CFC) is an important determinant of fluid transport. The CFC can be measured in vivo, which provides a tool to estimate endothelial barrier function. We have previously shown that the CFC increases when giving a fluid bolus resulting in increased vascular and extravascular volume expansion, in young adults. This study aimed to compare the physiologic determinants of fluid distribution in young versus older adults so that clinicians can best optimize perioperative fluid therapy. METHODS: Ten healthy young volunteers (ages 21-35) and nine healthy older volunteers (ages 60-75) received a 10 mL/kg fluid bolus over the course of twenty minutes. Hemodynamics, systolic and diastolic heart function, fluid volumetrics and microcirculatory determinants were measured before, during, and after the fluid bolus. RESULTS: Diastolic function was reduced in older versus younger adults before and after fluid bolus (P < 0.01). Basal CFC and plasma oncotic pressure were lower in the older versus younger adults. Further, CFC did not increase in older adults following the fluid bolus, whereas it did in younger adults (p < 0.05). Cumulative urinary output, while lower in older adults, was not significantly different (p = 0.059). Mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance were elevated in the older versus younger adults (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Older adults show a less reactive CFC to a fluid bolus, which could reduce blood to tissue transport of fluid. Diastolic dysfunction likely contributes to fluid maldistribution in older adults.

Evaluation of Variability in Operative Efficiency in Plastic Surgery Procedures.

BACKGROUND: As the cost of healthcare rises, it is imperative to assess value delivered to patients and impact on the economic viability of institutions. We aimed to characterize plastic surgery operative time management and identified areas for efficiency improvement. METHODS: Procedures from a US academic plastic surgery division from September 2017 to August 2018 were reviewed. Times were categorized into preparation (patient in room to incision), procedure (incision to closure), exit (closure to patient exiting room), and turnover (patient out of room to next patient in room). Median and interquartile ranges were calculated. Procedures were classified by relative value units (RVUs) for comparison of procedure complexities and resources. Components were plotted against RVUs; r2 values were calculated. RESULTS: We analyzed 522 cases; 69 were excluded for missing data, primary surgeon not a plastic surgeon, emergent cases, or burn procedures; a total of 453 cases were analyzed. Median and interquartile range (in minutes) for preparation was (34, 18 minutes; 23% of total), procedure (53, 75 minutes; 36% of total), exit (30, 27 minutes; 20% of total), and turnover (30, 26 minutes; 20% of total). Normalized to RVUs, preparation demonstrated the most variability (r2 = 0.19), followed by exit (r2 = 0.38), and procedure (r2 = 0.57). Average work RVUs per month was 678.1 ± 158.7. Average work RVUs per OR hour was 7.2. CONCLUSIONS: The largest component with greatest variability was preparation for surgery in the OR. Improved efficiency by decreasing variability increases the value of healthcare delivered to patients and OR throughput.

The Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy on the Medial Thigh Donor Site in Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis Flap Breast Reconstruction.

The objective of this study was to examine the impact of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CINPT) on donor site complications and patient perceptions in transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap breast reconstruction. Our institution conducted a retrospective cohort study, including all patients with TMG flap breast reconstruction from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021. Patients were grouped according to conventional wound management or CINPT. Outcomes were surgical site complications, fluid drainage, time to drain removal, and in-hospital stay length. A patient survey was created. A total of 56 patients with 83 TMG flaps were included (control group: 35 patients with 53 TMG flaps; CINPT group: 21 patients with 30 TMG flaps). Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. The flap width was significantly larger in the CINPT group (8.0 cm vs. 7.0 cm, p = 0.013). Surgical site complications were reduced in the CINPT group without statistical difference (30.0% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.064). Fluid drainage and time to drain removal were similar in both groups. The average in-hospital stay was significantly shortened in the CINPT group (10.0 days vs. 13.0 days, p = 0.030). The survey excluded pain, skin irritations, and discomfort during sleep and movement in the CINPT group and showed that the patients felt well protected. This study fails to provide compelling evidence for CINPT to enhance incision healing on the donor site in TMG flap breast reconstruction. There was a trend toward reduced surgical site complications on the donor thigh and the in-hospital stay was shortened. Prophylactic CINPT increases patient comfort and provides a feeling of additional wound protection.

Hepatic Functional Pathophysiology and Morphological Damage Following Severe Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Severe burns are devastating injuries affecting multiple organ systems. Little is known about the influence on the hepatic system and its physiology. This systematic review aimed to assess the current state of research on morphologic liver damage following severe burns. A search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases using PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes included serum levels of transaminases, fatty infiltration, and necrosis. Weighted individual study estimates were used to calculate pooled transaminase levels and necrosis/fatty infiltration rates using a random-effects approach. Risk ratios or odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to describe pooled estimates for risk factors. The literature search retrieved 2548 hits, of which 59 studies were included in qualitative synthesis, and finally 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Studies were divided into those reporting autopsies and those reporting changes of serum transaminase levels. The majority of liver autopsies showed fatty infiltration, 82% (95% CI 39-97%) or necrosis of the liver, 18% (95% CI 13-24%). Heterogeneity in studies on hepatic functional damage following severe burns was high. Only a few were well-designed and published in recent years. Many studies could not be included because of insufficient numerical data. There is a high number of patients dying from burns that present with fatty infiltration or necrosis of hepatic tissue. Transaminases were elevated during the initial days postburn. Further research on how severe burns affect the hepatic function and outcome, especially long-term, is necessary. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO:CRD42020206061.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare and severe skin and mucosal reactions that are associated with high mortality. Despite the severity, an evidence-based treatment protocol for SJS/TEN is still lacking. METHOD: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the PubMed database was searched using the following terms: [Stevens-Johnson syndrome] OR [toxic epidermal necrolysis] AND [therapy] OR [treatment] over a 20-year period (1999-2019) in the German and English language. All clinical studies reporting on the treatment of SJS/TEN were included, and epidemiological and diagnostic aspects of treatment were analysed. A meta-analysis was conducted on all comparative clinical studies that met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 88 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 2647 patients. Treatment was either supportive or used systemic corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, cyclosporine, thalidomide or cyclophosphamide therapy. The meta-analysis included 16 (18%) studies, reporting outcomes in 976 (37%) patients. Systemic glucocorticoids showed a survival benefit for SJS/TEN patients in all analyses compared with other forms of treatment. Cyclosporine treatment also showed promising results, despite being used in a small cohort of patients. No beneficial effects on mortality could be demonstrated for intravenous immunoglobulins. CONCLUSION: Glucocorticoids and cyclosporine may be tentatively recommended as the most promising immunomodulatory therapies for SJS/TEN, but these results should be investigated in future prospective controlled trials.