Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Respir Med ; 175: 106190, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33217537

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend mucolytic agents as add-on therapy in selected patients with COPD because they may reduce exacerbations and improve health status. As the evidence varies among mucolytic agents, we used the Delphi method to assess consensus amongst an international panel of COPD experts on mucolytics use in COPD. METHODS: 53 COPD experts from 12 countries were asked to complete an online questionnaire and rate their agreement with 15 statements using a 5-point scale. The mucolytic agents evaluated were carbocysteine, erdosteine and N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Data were collected anonymously and consensus presented using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The 47 respondents reached consensus on the statements. They agreed that regular treatment with mucolytic agents effectively reduces the frequency of exacerbations, reduces the duration of mild-to-moderate exacerbations, and can increase the time to first exacerbation and symptom-free time in COPD patients. Consensus was consistently highest for erdosteine. The experts agreed that all three mucolytics display antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity. Erdosteine and NAC were thought to improve the efficacy of some classes of antibacterial drugs. All three mucolytics were considered effective for the short-term treatment of symptoms of acute exacerbations when added to other drugs. The panel agreed that approved doses of mucolytic agents have favorable side-effect profiles and can be recommended for regular use in patients with a bronchitic phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus findings support the wider use of mucolytic agents as add-on therapy for COPD. However, the differences in pharmacological actions and clinical effectiveness must be considered when deciding which mucolytic to use.


Asunto(s)
Acetilcisteína/uso terapéutico , Carbocisteína/uso terapéutico , Consenso , Expectorantes/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Brote de los Síntomas , Tioglicolatos/uso terapéutico , Tiofenos/uso terapéutico , Acetilcisteína/administración & dosificación , Acetilcisteína/efectos adversos , Carbocisteína/administración & dosificación , Carbocisteína/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Expectorantes/administración & dosificación , Expectorantes/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tioglicolatos/administración & dosificación , Tioglicolatos/efectos adversos , Tiofenos/administración & dosificación , Tiofenos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Asthma ; 57(2): 160-166, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30592242

RESUMEN

Objective: Real-world studies on the effectiveness of omalizumab in Egyptian population with asthma are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of omalizumab as an add-on treatment in pediatric and adult patients with severe, persistent allergic asthma in Egypt. Methods: The primary endpoint of this 16-week, prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-interventional study was the reduction in oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose. Secondary endpoints included reduction in exacerbation, improvements in quality of life and global assessment of omalizumab therapy. Results: Of the 59 patients, 53 completed the study. Add-on omalizumab significantly reduced the proportion of patients receiving OCS at Week 16 versus baseline (81.1% at baseline versus 52.8% at Week 16; p < 0.001). A 55% decrease in the total daily prednisolone-equivalent dose of OCS was observed at the end of the study compared to baseline (p < 0.001). No patients reported exacerbations or missed days from work or school after receiving omalizumab for 16 weeks compared to baseline (both p < 0.001). A statistically significant decrease was observed in asthma control questionnaire-5 scores (p < 0.001). Almost all physicians and patients rated omalizumab therapy as 'good,' 'very good' or 'excellent' in tolerability and effectiveness. No new safety signals were observed in the safety analysis of omalizumab as add-on treatment. Conclusions: Outcomes of this real-world study were consistent with previous effectiveness and safety studies of omalizumab. Omalizumab was effective and well tolerated for the management of severe, persistent IgE-mediated asthma in pediatric and adult patients in Egypt.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Hipergammaglobulinemia/epidemiología , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Absentismo , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Niño , Quimioterapia Combinada , Egipto , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omalizumab/administración & dosificación , Omalizumab/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Adulto Joven
3.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 13(3): 298-304, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30801995

RESUMEN

The Middle-East and Africa Influenza Surveillance Network (MENA-ISN), established in 2014, includes 15 countries at present. Country representatives presented their influenza surveillance programmes, vaccine coverage and influenza control actions achieved, and provided a list of country surveillance/control objectives for the upcoming 3 years. This report details the current situation of influenza surveillance and action plans to move forward in MENA-ISN countries. Data were presented at the 8th MENA-ISN meeting, organized by the Mérieux Foundation that was held on 10-11 April 2018 in Cairo, Egypt. The meeting included MENA-ISN representatives from 12 countries (Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Tunisia and United Arab Emirates) and experts from the Canadian Centre for Vaccinology, and the World Health Organization. Meeting participants concluded that influenza remains a significant threat especially in high-risk groups (children under-5, elderly, pregnant women and immunosuppressed individuals) in the MENA-ISN region. Additional funding and planning are required by member countries to contain this threat. Future meetings will need to focus on creative and innovative ways to inform policy and initiatives for vaccination, surveillance and management of influenza-related morbidity and mortality especially among the most vulnerable groups of the population.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , África/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/organización & administración , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Cooperación Internacional , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Cobertura de Vacunación
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30473712

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The SNAPSHOT program provides current data on the allergic rhinitis burden in the adult general population of five Middle Eastern countries (Egypt, Turkey, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, the latter three grouped into a Gulf cluster). METHODS: A multi-country, cross-sectional, epidemiological program conducted by telephone in a random sample of the adult general population; quotas were defined per country demographics. Subjects were screened for allergic rhinitis using the Score For Allergic Rhinitis questionnaire. Current prevalence (last 12 months) was estimated. Disease severity and control were assessed using the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma classification and Rhinitis Control Assessment Test respectively. Quality of sleep, impact on daily activities and quality of life were measured using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Sheehan Disability Scale and EuroQol Five-Dimension questionnaire respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate risk factors and co-morbidities. RESULTS: 1808 of 33,486 subjects enrolled in the SNAPSHOT program fulfilled the case definition for allergic rhinitis. Prevalence was 3.6% [95% CI 3.2-4.0%] in Egypt, 6.4% [95% CI 5.9-6.9%] in Turkey and 6.4% [95% CI 6.0-6.9%] in the Gulf cluster. Risk factors identified were country, co-morbid asthma and income. Subjects with allergic rhinitis reported a significantly lower quality of life compared to the general population (p < 0.0001). Overall, 55% of allergic rhinitis subjects were moderate/severe and 33% were uncontrolled. Both these groups reported impaired quality of life and quality of sleep and increased impairment of daily activities compared to mild/well-controlled subjects (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the observed prevalence of allergic rhinitis in these Middle Eastern countries is low compared to western countries, its burden is considerable. Allergic rhinitis in general, and specifically uncontrolled and severe disease, results in a negative impact on quality of life, quality of sleep and daily activities.

5.
J Infect Public Health ; 11(6): 845-850, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30126699

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region faces a dual challenge with regard to influenza infection due to severe zoonotic influenza outbreaks episodes and the circulation of Northern Hemisphere human influenza viruses among pilgrims. METHODS: The MENA Influenza Stakeholder Network (MENA-ISN) was set-up with the aim of increasing seasonal influenza vaccination coverage by (i) enhancing evidence-based exchanges, and (ii) increasing awareness on the safety and benefits of seasonal vaccination. During the 7th MENA-ISN meeting, representatives from 8 countries presented their influenza surveillance, vaccination coverage and actions achieved and provided a list of country objectives for the upcoming 3 years. RESULTS: MENA-ISN countries share the goal to reduce influenza related morbidity and mortality. Participants admitted that lack of knowledge about influenza, its consequences in terms of morbidity, mortality and economy are the major barrier to attaining higher influenza vaccination coverage in their countries. The cost of the vaccine is another key barrier that could contribute to low vaccination coverage. Participants drew a list of strategic interventions to bridge gaps in the knowledge of influenza burden in this region. CONCLUSIONS: Participating countries concluded that despite an increase in vaccine uptake observed during the last few years, influenza vaccination coverage remains relatively low. Priority areas should be identified and action plans tailored to each country situation set-up to investigate the best way to move forward.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Cobertura de Vacunación , África del Norte/epidemiología , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Medio Oriente/epidemiología
6.
Respir Med ; 139: 55-64, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29858002

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Asthma affects millions worldwide resulting in a significant disease burden. However, data on asthma burden from the Middle East is limited. This analysis describes the asthma burden in Egypt, Turkey and a Gulf cluster (Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates) as part of the SNAPSHOT program. METHODS: SNAPSHOT was an observational, cross-sectional program carried out by telephone in a random sample of the adult general population of the five above mentioned countries. Quotas were defined per country demographics. Subjects were considered to have asthma if they fulfilled the screening criteria, based on the global Asthma Insights and Reality studies. Data collected included demographics, physician consultations, and asthma control (measured by the Asthma Control Test; ACT). Quality of life was assessed using the EuroQol Five-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D); and limitations to daily activities using the modified Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). RESULTS: 939 subjects answered questions related to asthma burden. Overall, 367 (44.2%) reported uncontrolled asthma (ACT≤19), and reported significantly lower EQ-5D-3L utility values (0.6 ±â€¯0.4) and EQ-VAS scores (60.7 ±â€¯24.2) compared to controlled subjects (0.8 ±â€¯0.3 and 75.3 ±â€¯19.8 respectively) (p < 0.0001). A significantly higher proportion with uncontrolled asthma also reported experiencing impact on activities of daily living compared to subjects with controlled asthma (p < 0.0001). Overall, 355 (37.8%) asthma subjects were followed by a physician. However, most visits were unscheduled (695;78.0%). CONCLUSION: Uncontrolled asthma imposes a significant burden in these Middle Eastern countries resulting in increased frequency of healthcare use, lower quality of life, and a higher impact on daily life compared to controlled asthma.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Asma/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Asma/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Egipto/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Kuwait/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Turquía/epidemiología , Emiratos Árabes Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
Respir Med ; 138: 64-73, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29724395

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low levels of asthma control are reported in many countries worldwide. Improved knowledge of asthma control in the Middle East and Africa and predictive factors is needed to address this major public healthcare burden. OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of asthma control in patients attending a routine consultation for asthma in the Middle East and North Africa, and the relationship between level of control and patient and disease characteristics, adherence, and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: A large-scale cross-sectional epidemiological study (ESMAA: Assessment of Asthma Control in Adult Asthma Population in the Middle East and North Africa) was performed in adults suffering from asthma for at least 1 year and without an acute asthma episode within 4 weeks. Asthma control was assessed per the 2012 GINA guidelines and the ACT questionnaire. QoL and adherence were assessed with the SF-8 and Morisky questionnaires respectively. Predictive factors of asthma control were analysed with univariate and multivariate logistic regressions analyses. RESULTS: Overall 7236 eligible patients were included in 577 sites between June 2014 and December 2015 (median 10 patients/site). Mean age was 45 years (±14), 57% were female, mean BMI was 28.5 kg/m2 (±6.0), and 11% were active smokers. Reliever medication was prescribed in 96% of patients with 65% having fixed-dose combined inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting beta agonists. Good medication adherence was reported in 24% of patients. Among 7179 patients evaluable for GINA, asthma was controlled in 29.4% (95% CI, 28.4%-30.5%), partly controlled in 29.1% (95% CI, 28.1%-30.2%), and uncontrolled in 41.5% (95% CI, 40.3% to 42.6). The mean global ACT score was 17.8 (±5.0), with 16% of patients considering their asthma as controlled. Poor medication adherence, active smoking, absence of medical insurance, lower level of education, or diagnosis at least 5 years earlier were significantly associated with uncontrolled asthma in multivariate analyses (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Asthma control in the Middle East and North Africa is unsatisfactory with less than one-third of asthma patients having controlled disease, highlighting the need to improve treatment access and medication adherence, along with better follow-up and education among healthcare providers and patients.


Asunto(s)
Asma/prevención & control , Adulto , África del Norte/epidemiología , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Asma/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Fumar/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
BMC Pulm Med ; 18(1): 68, 2018 May 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29751756

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a common chronic respiratory disease leading to morbidity, mortality and impaired quality of life worldwide. Information on asthma prevalence in the Middle East is fragmented and relatively out-dated. The SNAPSHOT program was conducted to obtain updated information. METHODS: SNAPSHOT is a cross-sectional epidemiological program carried out in five Middle Eastern countries (Egypt, Turkey, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, the latter three grouped into a Gulf cluster) to collect data on asthma, allergic rhinitis, benign prostatic hyperplasia and bipolar disorder. The survey was carried out by telephone in a random sample of the adult general population with quotas defined according to country demographics. The analysis presented in this paper focuses on asthma. Subjects were screened for asthma based on criteria from the global Asthma Insights and Reality studies. Current prevalence (last 12 months) was estimated. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate risk factors related to asthma and the association with allergic rhinitis and other co-morbidities. Quality of life was assessed using the three-level EQ-5D questionnaire. RESULTS: 2124 out of the 33,486 subjects enrolled in the SNAPSHOT program fulfilled the criteria for asthma. The adjusted prevalence of asthma ranged from 4.4% [95% CI: 4.0-4.8%] in Turkey, to 6.7% [95% CI: 6.2-7.2%] in Egypt and 7.6% [95% CI: 7.1-8.0%] in the Gulf cluster. Prevalence was higher (p < 0.0001) in women than men and increased with age (p < 0.0001). Co-morbidities occurred more frequently in asthma subjects compared to the non-asthma population (38% vs. 15% p < 0.0001). Subjects with asthma reported a lower (p < 0.0001) EQ-VAS score (68.2 ± 22.9) compared to the general population (78.1 ± 17.5). The risk factors associated with asthma were age, gender, country, and certain co-morbidities, namely respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous, and neurological diseases. CONCLUSION: The observed adjusted prevalence of asthma in the Middle East ranges from 4.4% to 7.6%, which is comparatively lower than the reported prevalence in Europe and North America. Asthma has a negative impact on quality of life, and is associated with high levels of co-morbid diseases, indicating a need for physicians to check for co-morbidities and ensure they are managed correctly in all asthma patients.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/fisiopatología , Asma/psicología , Asma/terapia , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Prevalencia , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...