Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

BACKGROUND: Cataract, defined as an opacity of the lens in one or both eyes, is the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Cataract may initially be treated with new spectacles, but often surgery is required, which involves removing the cataract and placing a new artificial lens, usually made from hydrophobic acrylic. Recent advancements in intraocular lens (IOL) technology have led to the emergence of a diverse array of implantable lenses that aim to minimise spectacle dependence at all distances (near, intermediate, and distance). To assess the relative merits of these lenses, measurements of visual acuity are needed. Visual acuity is a measurement of the sharpness of vision at a distance of 6 metres (or 20 feet). Normal vision is 6/6 (or 20/20). The Jaegar eye card is used to measure near visual acuity. J1 is the smallest text and J2 is considered equivalent to 6/6 (or 20/20) for near vision. OBJECTIVES: To compare visual outcomes after implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) to those of extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. To produce a brief economic commentary summarising recent economic evaluations that compare trifocal IOLs with EDOF IOLs. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), MEDLINE, Embase, and three trial registries on 15 June 2022. For our economic evaluation, we also searched MEDLINE and Embase using economic search filters to 15 June 2022, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) from 1968 up to and including 31 December 2014. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies comparing trifocal and EDOF IOLs in adults undergoing cataract surgery. We did not include studies involving people receiving IOLs for correction of refractive error alone (or refractive lens exchange in the absence of cataract). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Two review authors working independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data from the reports. We assessed the risk of bias in the studies, and we assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included five studies that compared trifocal and EDOF lenses in people undergoing cataract surgery. Three trifocal lenses (AcrySof IQ PanOptix, ATLISA Tri 839MP, FineVision Micro F) and one EDOF lens (TECNIS Symfony ZXR00) were evaluated. The studies took place in Europe and North America. Follow-up ranged from three to six months. Of the 239 enroled participants, 233 (466 eyes) completed follow-up and were included in the analyses. The mean age of participants was 68.2 years, and 64% of participants were female. In general, the risk of bias in the studies was unclear as methods for random sequence generation and allocation concealment were poorly reported, and we judged one study to be at high risk of performance and detection bias. We assessed the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes as low, downgrading for the risk of bias and for imprecision. In two studies involving a total of 254 people, there was little or no difference between trifocal and EDOF lenses for uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity worse than 6/6. Sixty per cent of participants in both groups had uncorrected distance visual acuity worse than 6/6 (risk ratio (RR) 1.06, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.88 to 1.27). Thirty-one per cent of the trifocal group and 38% of the EDOF group had corrected distance visual acuity worse than 6/6 (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.39). In one study of 60 people, there were fewer cases of uncorrected near visual acuity worse than J2 in the trifocal group (3%) compared with the EDOF group (30%) (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.65). In two studies, participants were asked about spectacle independence using subjective questionnaires. There was no evidence of either lens type being superior. One further study of 60 participants reported, "overall, 90% of patients achieved spectacle independence", but did not categorise this by lens type. All studies included postoperative patient-reported visual function, which was measured using different questionnaires. Irrespective of the questionnaire used, both types of lenses scored well, and there was little evidence of any important differences between them. Two studies included patient-reported ocular aberrations (glare and halos). The outcomes were reported in different ways and could not be pooled; individually, these studies were too small to detect meaningful differences in glare and halos between groups. One study reported no surgical complications. Three studies did not mention surgical complications. One study reported YAG capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification (PCO) in one participant (one eye) in each group. One study reported no PCO. Two studies did not report PCO. One study reported that three participants (one trifocal and two EDOF) underwent laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) to correct residual myopic refractive error or astigmatism. One study reported a subset of participants who were considering laser enhancement at the end of the study period (nine trifocal and two EDOF). Two studies did not report laser enhancement rates. No economic evaluation studies were identified for inclusion in this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Distance visual acuity after cataract surgery may be similar whether the lenses implanted are trifocal IOLs or EDOF (TECNIS Symfony) IOLs. People receiving trifocal IOLs may achieve better near vision and may be less dependent on spectacles for near vision. Both lenses were reported to have adverse subjective visual phenomena, such as glare and halos, with no meaningful difference detected between lenses.

Management of Stromal Corneal Dystrophies; Review of the Literature with a Focus on Phototherapeutic Keratectomy and Keratoplasty.

Corneal dystrophies are a group of non-inflammatory inherited disorders of the cornea. This review considers treatment options for epithelial-stromal and stromal corneal dystrophies: namely Reis-Bücklers, Thiel-Behnke, lattice, Avellino, granular, macular and Schnyder corneal dystrophies. Where there is visual reduction, treatment options may include either phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) or corneal transplantation. Due to the anterior location of the deposits in Reis-Bücklers and Thiel-Behnke dystrophies, PTK is considered the treatment of choice. For lattice, Avellino, granular and macular corneal dystrophies, PTK provides temporary visual improvement; however, with recurrences, repeat PTK or a corneal transplant would be needed. For Schnyder dystrophy, should treatment be required, PTK may be the preferred option due to the potential for recurrence of the disease in corneal transplantation. This review discusses the literature and evidence base for the treatment of corneal dystrophies in terms of visual outcomes and recurrence rate.

Ocular manifestations of rosacea: A clinical review.

Ocular rosacea is a chronic inflammatory condition that can occur in the absence of cutaneous features. The most common ocular features are chronic blepharoconjunctivitis with eyelid margin inflammation and meibomian gland dysfunction. Corneal complications include corneal vascularization, ulceration, scarring and, rarely, perforation. Diagnosis is largely based on clinical signs, although it is often delayed in the absence of cutaneous changes, particularly in children. It can also be associated with systemic disorders such as cardiovascular disease. Management ranges from local therapy to systemic treatment, depending on the severity of the disease. In this review, we describe the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features and treatment of rosacea and ocular rosacea.

Assessment of the accuracy of new and updated intraocular lens power calculation formulas in 10 930 eyes from the UK National Health Service.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of new/updated methods of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation (Kane, Hill-RBF 2.0, and Holladay 2 with new axial length adjustment) with that of established methods (Barrett Universal II, Olsen, Haigis, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T). SETTING: Bristol Eye Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service, Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case series. METHODS: Data from patients having uneventful cataract surgery with the insertion of 1 of 4 IOL types were included. Optimized IOL constants were used to calculate the predicted refraction of each formula for each patient. This was compared with the actual refractive outcome to give the prediction error. A subgroup analysis occurred based on the axial length and IOL type. RESULTS: The study included 10 930 eyes of 10 930 patients with the Kane formula having the lowest mean absolute prediction error (MAE), which was statistically significant (P < .001 in all cases) followed by the Hill 2.0, Olsen, Holladay 2, Barrett Universal 2, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis, and Hoffer Q formula. The percentage of eyes predicted within ±0.5 D was Kane, 72%; Hill 2.0, 71.2%; Olsen, 70.6%; Holladay 2, 71%; Barrett 2, 70.7%; SRK/T, 69.1%; Haigis, 69%; and Hoffer Q, 68.1%. The Kane formula had the lowest MAE for short, medium, and long axial length subgroups and for each IOL type assessed. The updated versions of the Holladay 2 and Hill 2.0 formulas have resulted in improved accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall and in each axial length subgroup, the Kane formula was more accurate than the other formulas.

An 11-year analysis of microbial keratitis in the South West of England using brain-heart infusion broth.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to identify the organisms responsible for microbial keratitis, as identified by corneal scrape using brain-heart infusion broth, trends over time and antimicrobial sensitivities, over an 11-year period at two eye units in the South West of England; Bristol Eye Hospital and Royal United Hospital, Bath. METHODS: All corneal scrapes performed and sent for microbiological analysis between 4th April 2006 and 31st October 2017 at the two eye units were retrospectively reviewed. First-line treatment was monotherapy with levofloxacin 0.5% and second-line treatment was a combination of cefuroxime 5% and gentamicin 1.5%. Both direct and enrichment cultures were used. RESULTS: In total, 2614 corneal scrapes from 2116 patients (1082 female, mean age 47.7 ± 21.2 years) were identified. 38.1% (n = 996) were culture positive and 1195 organisms were cultured. In all, 91.6% were bacteria (69.4% were gram-positive, 30.6% gram-negative). Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) were the most commonly cultured organism (n = 430). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most commonly identified gram-negative organism (n = 189). In total, 6.9% (n = 83) of organisms cultured were fungi. In all, 1.4% (n = 17) were acanthamoeba. There was no statistically significant trend in the organisms observed over the study period. Sensitivity testing confirmed reasonable sensitivity to the empiric antibiotics used in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on microbial keratitis trends in the South West of England. Virulent organisms were likely to be detected on direct culture, whereas low virulent organisms such as CoNS were more likely to be detected on enrichment alone. Antibiotic sensitivity testing confirmed fluoroquinolone monotherapy as appropriate first-line treatment.

Peripheral ulcerative keratitis with corneal melt as the primary presentation in a case of human immunodeficiency virus.

Peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK) is an aggressive, potentially sight-threatening cause for peripheral corneal thinning. It is thought to be the result of immune complex deposition at the limbus, resulting in corneal inflammation and stromal melt. We present a case of a 43-year-old female patient of African origin, presenting with PUK and associated corneal perforation as the primary presentation of HIV infection. An urgent tectonic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty was performed under general anaesthesia with excellent outcome. The patient was referred to the sexual health clinic and anti-retroviral treatment was initiated. This case is to the best of our knowledge the first report from the UK of PUK with corneal perforation as the primary presentation of HIV infection. As highlighted in this report, infection with HIV may initially be silent; therefore, it is vital to consider HIV infection when dealing with PUK of unknown aetiology.

Estimate of incidence of ROP requiring treatment in extreme preterms and impact on service-7 year review in tertiary unit.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a potentially blinding disorder affecting premature infants. Our Eye Unit supports two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), one provides neonatal surgical and medical facilities and the other is exclusively medical. Our objectives were to (1) to identify the annual rate of ROP treatments during the period 2009-2015 and (2) to estimate the incidence of ROP treatment in babies born very prematurely (<27 weeks). SUBJECTS/METHODS: Records for all infants treated for ROP by our unit during the period 2009-2015 were reviewed. We calculated numbers treated in each year. Records of babies born under 27 weeks of gestation and cared for in the non-surgical NICU were also reviewed. Their requirement for laser treatments for ROP was calculated by the week of gestation at birth. RESULTS: In the two NICUs combined, 95 infants were treated for ROP between 2009 and 2015. The numbers treated increased from 9/158 (5.7%) of babies screened in 2009 to 22/159 (13.8%) in 2015 (ptrend = 0.004). The rate of laser treatment for ROP increased as gestation at birth decreased: from 12/100 (12%) of babies born at 26 weeks to 17/29 (59%) of babies born at 23 weeks (ptrend = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The number of laser treatments for ROP carried out by this unit has increased steadily between 2009 and 2015 and this may in part be due to the increased need for ROP treatment in extremely preterm babies, whose survival has increased in the same period. These data may aid planning for ROP services.

The successful treatment of a multidrug-resistant Achromobacter xylosoxidans corneal ulcer with topical meropenem.

Microbial keratitis is a common corneal condition, with many known risk factors. We present a case of an 88-year-old female patient with a multidrug-resistant Achromobacter xylosoxidans corneal ulcer in a previously failed second penetrating keratoplasty, successfully managed with topical meropenem drops administered hourly around the clock, for five days preceding and then hourly day only, for five days following a repeat third penetrating keratoplasty. Topical meropenem 50 mg/mL was prepared by mixing a 500 mg vial of meropenem with 10 mL of sterile water with pharmacy advice that administration should be within an hour. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of topical meropenem in the management of A.xylosoxidans keratitis. This case highlights the importance of the mean inhibitory concentrations for antibiotics when considering sensitivities. Topical meropenem may be a useful treatment option for multidrug-resistant bacterial corneal ulcers that are resistant to conventional therapy.

Outcomes of sphincterotomy for small pupil phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE: Sphincterotomy, an alternative to iris hooks or pupil stretching, is a technique that can aid in small pupil phacoemulsification. The incidence of post-operative complications of this procedure, however, has not been studied. Our study evaluates the post-operative outcomes of phacoemulsification surgery with adjunctive pupillary sphincterotomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of case notes and Medisoft ® electronic record of patients that had undergone simultaneous sphincterotomy, phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation by a single surgeon between March 2012 and February 2017. Our main outcome measures were post-operative ocular hypertension (IOP > 21 mmHg), uveitis and cystoid macular oedema (CMO). RESULTS: A total of 114 eyes of 114 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 81.2 years (range: 26-100). All patients had uncomplicated surgery. Transient (<1 month) ocular hypertension developed in five (4%) eyes. Sustained ocular hypertension (>1 month) occurred in one (1%) eye, which had pre-existing glaucoma. All four (4%) eyes that developed a persistent uveitis (>1 month) resolved with topical therapy except for one eye with a history of uveitis. The 6 (5%) eyes that developed CMO had a history significant for uveitis (n = 4), diabetic macular oedema (n = 1) and epiretinal membrane (n = 1). All CMO maculae resolved to their baseline. CONCLUSION: The incidence of post-operative complications following uncomplicated phacoemulsification and IOL implantation with pupillary sphincterotomy is low. The most important predisposing factors for development of a complication are ocular co-morbidities such as glaucoma, uveitis and the presence of a macular pathology.

The use of miltefosine in the management of refractory Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a sight threatening infection most commonly affecting contact lens wearers. The authors report a case of intractable A.polyphaga and A.castellanii, with extensive intraocular spread, managed using oral miltefosine. A 59-year old male contact lens wearer was referred to the tertiary corneal service at Bristol Eye Hospital. Vision was hand movements on the left and 6/6 on the right. Clinical examination was consistent with left AK (confirmed by corneal scrape). Management included biguanide (polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) 0.02%, later 0.06%) and diamidine (hexamidine 0.1%). Further treatment included imidazole (guttae voriconazole, oral posaconazole) and fortified biguanide (chlorhexidine 0.2%). Therapeutic PKP was performed. Microscopy revealed Acanthamoeba throughout host stroma. Corneal scrape and anterior chamber tap revealed persistent infection with Acanthamoeba. Intracameral voriconazole was administered twice. Clinically there was scleritis, with concerns regarding posterior segment involvement. There was a severe necrotic keratitis with almost complete corneal melt, requiring enucleation. Oral miltefosine was commenced to reduce the risk of transmission of Acanthamoeba beyond ocular structures at the time of the enucleation. Histopathological analysis detected A.polyphaga and A.castellanii in vitreous but not retina, choroid or optic nerve suggesting that infection had not progressed posteriorly through the ocular structures and the central nervous system was not involved. The use of miltefosine as a component of combination anti-parasitic therapy is associated with long-term survival in cases of Acanthamoeba infection of the central nervous system. This case reports its first systemic use in the United Kingdom in a case of severe intractable AK with intraocular spread.

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Findings in Dengue-Related Maculopathy: A Case Report.

The ophthalmic manifestations of dengue fever include a visually impairing maculopathy, where patients are left with a central or paracentral relative scotoma. The authors present a case of a 26-year-old female patient returning from Thailand with unilateral reduction in visual acuity and a central scotoma associated with dengue fever. The authors report the use of the optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) as a noninvasive imaging platform to demonstrate its value in showing the persistent changes corresponding to the functional central scotoma in dengue-related maculopathy, which often cannot be visualized clinically or by standard OCT and fundus fluorescein angiography. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:1057-1060.].

Intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone for treatment of cystoid macular oedema associated with chronic myeloid leukaemia and imatinib therapy.

Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone in the treatment of cystoid macular oedema in a case with chronic myeloid leukaemia on imatinib treatment. Methods. We treated a 78-year-old man with bilateral cystoid macular oedema with intravitreal triamcinolone and subsequent bevacizumab in one eye and intravitreal bevacizumab, alone, in the fellow eye. Results. Serial intravitreal bevacizumab with and without triamcinolone treated cystoid macular oedema in both eyes and improved the vision. Conclusion. Intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone could be viable options to treat cystoid macular oedema due to chronic myeloid leukaemia and imatinib therapy.