Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 53
Filtrar
1.
J Sci Med Sport ; 2024 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960811

RESUMEN

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most prevalent endocrine condition amongst females of reproductive age, leading to lifelong cardiometabolic, reproductive, psychological, and dermatologic symptoms as well as a reduced quality of life. Lifestyle interventions, which can include structured exercise programmes delivered by appropriately trained exercise professionals such as clinical exercise physiologists, are considered first-line strategies in PCOS management due to their therapeutic effects on various health outcomes and quality of life. This position statement builds on the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of PCOS and describes the role of the exercise professional in the context of the multidisciplinary care team which includes physicians and allied health professionals. This position statement aims to equip exercise professionals with a broad understanding of the pathophysiology of PCOS, how it is diagnosed and managed in clinical practice, and evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for physical activity and exercise in PCOS management. In line with the physical activity recommendations for the general public, individuals with PCOS should aim to undertake between 150 to 300min of moderate-intensity or 75 to 150min of vigorous-intensity aerobic activity per week, or an equivalent combination of both spread throughout the week. Additionally, muscle-strengthening activities on two non-consecutive days per week are recommended to maintain health and prevent weight gain. For further health benefits and to achieve modest weight loss, individuals with PCOS should aim for a minimum of 250min of moderate-intensity or 150min of vigorous-intensity aerobic activity per week, or an equivalent combination of both spread throughout the week, plus muscle-strengthening activities on two non-consecutive days per week. Adolescents with PCOS should aim for a minimum of 60min moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity each day, incorporating muscle- and bone-strengthening activities three times per week. Finally, exercise professionals should consider the significant psychological burden, including weight stigma, and the high prevalence of comorbidities amongst individuals with PCOS and take appropriate measures to deliver safe and efficacious exercise interventions.

2.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 5591, 2024 Jul 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965226

RESUMEN

Screening for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in antenatal care is inadequate, largely owing to the lack of clarity around whether PCOS is an independent risk factor for pregnancy complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis include 104 studies and 106,690 pregnancies in women with and without PCOS from inception until 13th July 2022. We report that women with PCOS are younger and have higher body mass index (BMI) around conception and have greater gestational weight gain. The odds of miscarriage, gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia and cesarean section are higher in women with PCOS. The increased odds of adverse outcomes in PCOS remain significant when age and BMI are matched and when analyses are restricted to high-quality studies. This work informed the recommendations from the 2023 international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome, emphasizing that PCOS status should be captured in all women who are planning to, or have recently become pregnant to facilitate prevention of adverse outcomes and improve pregnancy outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Diabetes Gestacional , Preeclampsia , Cesárea , Ganancia de Peso Gestacional
3.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 5592, 2024 Jul 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965241

RESUMEN

It is unclear whether polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an independent risk factor for adverse birth outcomes in the offspring of affected women. Here, we investigate the association of PCOS with birth outcomes in the offspring of women with PCOS overall and by potential confounders. This systematic review and meta-analysis included 73 studies and 92,881 offspring of women with and without PCOS from inception until 13th July 2022. We report that mothers with PCOS are younger and have higher body mass index (BMI) around conception and have greater gestational weight gain. The odds of preterm birth, fetal growth restriction and low birth weight are higher and mean birthweight is lower in PCOS of which a lower mean birthweight and a higher small for gestational age are probably independent of BMI. This work informed the recommendations from the 2023 international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome, emphasizing that PCOS status should be captured at pregnancy to identify risk and improve birth outcomes in the offspring.


Asunto(s)
Peso al Nacer , Índice de Masa Corporal , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Nacimiento Prematuro , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Ganancia de Peso Gestacional , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Fertil Steril ; 2024 Jun 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944177

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: As part of the 2023 International Evidence-based PCOS Guideline, this meta-analysis investigated the inclusion of Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) in the diagnostic criteria for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and three meta-analyses were performed to answer the following three questions: 1) Is AMH effective to diagnose PCOS in adult women? 2) Is AMH effective to diagnose PCOS in adolescents? 3) Is AMH effective to diagnose PCOM? DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted in six databases until July 31st 2023. STUDY SELECTION AND SYNTHESIS: Eligible studies were those conducted in humans, published in English and reported sensitivity, specificity, and/or area under the curve. Extracted data included study population, age, body mass index (BMI), AMH assay, cut off value of AMH, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Random effects model were used to test diagnostic accuracy. MAIN OUTCOMES: Pooled sensitivity and specificity to use AMH for PCOS diagnosis in adults and adolescents, and for detecting PCOM in adults. RESULTS: Eighty-two studies were included. The adult AMH-PCOS meta-analyses (n = 68) showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.79 [95% CI 0.76; 0.82; I2 = 86%] and 0.87 [95% CI 0.84; 0.89; I2 = 91%]. The adolescent AMH-PCOS meta-analysis (n = 11) showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.66 [95% CI 0.58; 0.73; I2 = 74%] and 0.78 [95% CI 0.71; 0.83; I2 = 45%]. The adult AMH-PCOM meta-analysis (n = 7) showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.79 [95% CI 0.72; 0.85; I2 = 94%] and 0.87 [95% CI 0.78; 0.93; I2 = 94%]. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This study investigated the most profound change in the 2023 International Evidence-based PCOS Guideline, which now recommends AMH for defining PCOM in adults, in accordance with the diagnostic algorithm. AMH alone is insufficient for PCOS diagnosis and is nonspecific for PCOM in adolescents. Multiple factors influence AMH levels and caused heterogeneity and limitations in this study. Consequently, no international cut off value could be recommended, emphasizing the need for research on more individualized cut offs.

7.
JAMA Dermatol ; 2024 Apr 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630483

RESUMEN

Importance: Hirsutism represents a significant concern for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), with deleterious psychological effects warranting acknowledgment and a clear imperative to provide effective management. To our knowledge, this is the first review to exclusively examine the effectiveness of laser and light-based therapies in addressing hirsutism in women with PCOS. Objective: To synthesize the existing literature regarding the effectiveness of laser and light hair reduction therapies, either as stand-alone treatments or in combination with systemic agents, in treating hirsutism for women with PCOS. Evidence Review: A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, EMCARE, and CINAHL according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Articles written in English, reporting on patients who met pre-established inclusion criteria were selected. Objective and subjectively measured outcomes relating to the effect of laser or light-based hair reduction therapies on hirsutism were abstracted. Heterogeneity among included studies precluded a meta-analysis, necessitating a narrative synthesis. Findings: Six studies reporting data on 423 individual patients with PCOS who underwent laser or light-based hair reduction therapies were included: 4 randomized clinical trials and 2 cohort studies. Alexandrite laser demonstrated significant improvements in hirsutism severity and psychological outcomes, particularly at high-fluence application. Alexandrite laser was also found to be more effective than intense pulsed light (IPL). The combination of diode laser with either metformin or combined oral contraceptive pill was superior to the application of diode laser alone, just as the addition of metformin to IPL demonstrated superior results to IPL treatment alone. Overall, most interventions were well tolerated. The overall certainty of evidence across all outcomes and comparisons was limited in part due to the observational nature of some studies. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review highlights the potential of laser and light hair reduction therapies, both as stand-alone treatments and in combination with other pharmacological agents in PCOS. However, this review was limited by low certainty of the evidence, few studies evaluating effectiveness and safety in those with skin of color, and heterogeneity in outcome assessment. Future studies are needed to provide more robust evidence among diverse individuals with PCOS and hirsutism.

8.
Obes Rev ; 25(6): e13737, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38491863

RESUMEN

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder in females. Modest weight loss improves reproductive and metabolic PCOS features. While lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapies remain first-line weight loss strategies, bariatric surgery is emerging as a potentially effective treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature to examine the impact of bariatric surgery in PCOS to inform the 2023 International PCOS Evidence-based Guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for observational studies and trials comparing pharmacologic or lifestyle treatments to bariatric surgery in women with PCOS or bariatric surgery in women with or without PCOS. Anthropometric, reproductive, hormonal, and metabolic outcomes were included and, where possible, meta-analyzed using random-effects models. Risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed. Ten studies were included involving 432 women with and 590 women without PCOS. Comparisons between bariatric surgery and pharmacologic or lifestyle treatments were only reported in one study each, and most reproductive outcomes were limited to a single study; therefore, meta-analyses could not be performed. Meta-analysis found that women with PCOS experience similar improvements in anthropometric, hormonal, and metabolic outcomes after bariatric surgery compared to those without PCOS. Existing research is limited and of low quality with high risk of bias, especially in comparison to existing PCOS treatments and with respect to reproductive outcomes including pregnancy, highlighting the need for additional studies to inform clinical recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Humanos , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/terapia , Femenino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Embarazo , Obesidad/cirugía , Obesidad/complicaciones , Pérdida de Peso/fisiología
9.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 18(3): 102970, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442646

RESUMEN

AIMS: To inform international guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the performance of diagnostic methods for type 2 diabetes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: An updated systematic search was conducted on five databases from 2017 until October 2023 and combined with prior searches (from inception). Meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy tests were conducted. RESULTS: Nine studies comprising 2628 women with PCOS were included. Against the oral glucose tolerance test, a haemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5% had a pooled sensitivity of 50.00% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.53-64.47), specificity of 99.86% (95%CI: 99.49-99.98), and positive and negative predictive values of 92.59% (95%CI: 75.27-98.09) and 98.27% (95%CI: 97.73-98.68), respectively, with an accuracy of 98.17% (95%CI: 97.34-98.79). Fasting plasma glucose values ≥ 7.0 mmol/L had a pooled sensitivity of 58.14% (95%CI: 42.13-72.99), specificity of 92.59% (95%CI: 75.35-98.08), positive and negative predictive values of 92.59% (95%CI: 75.35-98.08) and 99.09% (95%CI: 98.71-99.36), respectively, and an accuracy of 99.00% (95%CI: 98.46-99.39) against the oral glucose tolerance test. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review assessing the performance of diagnostic methods for type 2 diabetes in women with PCOS. We demonstrate that using a cut-off for HbA1c of ≥6.5% in this population may result in misdiagnosis of half of the women with type 2 diabetes. Our results directly informed the recommendations of the 2023 International PCOS Guideline, suggesting that the oral glucose tolerance test is the optimal method for screening and diagnosing type 2 diabetes in women with PCOS and is superior to fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Ayuno , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Hemoglobina Glucada , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Humanos , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/sangre , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Femenino , Glucemia/análisis , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Ayuno/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/análisis , Pronóstico
10.
Obes Rev ; 25(5): e13704, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38355887

RESUMEN

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of anti-obesity agents for hormonal, reproductive, metabolic, and psychological outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to inform the 2023 update of the International Evidence-based Guideline on PCOS. We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL until July 2022 with a 10-year limit to focus on newer agents. Eleven trials (545 and 451 participants in intervention and control arms respectively, 12 comparisons) were included. On descriptive analyses, most agents improved anthropometric outcomes; liraglutide, semaglutide and orlistat appeared superior to placebo for anthropometric outcomes. Meta-analyses were possible for two comparisons (exenatide vs. metformin and orlistat + combined oral contraceptive pill [COCP] vs. COCP alone). On meta-analysis, no differences were identified between exenatide versus metformin for anthropometric, biochemical hyperandrogenism, and metabolic outcomes, other than lower fasting blood glucose more with metformin than exenatide (MD: 0.10 mmol/L, CI 0.02-0.17, I2 = 18%, 2 trials). Orlistat + COCP did not improve metabolic outcomes compared with COCP alone (fasting insulin MD: -8.65 pmol/L, -33.55 to 16.26, I2 = 67%, 2 trials). Published data examining the effects of anti-obesity agents in women with PCOS are very limited. The role of these agents in PCOS should be a high priority for future research.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Antiobesidad , Metformina , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Femenino , Humanos , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Antiobesidad/uso terapéutico , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/uso terapéutico , Orlistat/uso terapéutico , Exenatida/uso terapéutico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico
11.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 109(6): 1630-1655, 2024 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38163998

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Insulin resistance is common in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Inositol may have insulin sensitizing effects; however, its efficacy in the management of PCOS remains indeterminate. OBJECTIVE: To inform the 2023 international evidence-based guidelines in PCOS, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of inositol, alone or in combination with other therapies, in the management of PCOS. DATA SOURCES: Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, All EBM, and CINAHL from inception until August 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Thirty trials (n = 2230; 1093 intervention, 1137 control), with 19 pooled in meta-analyses were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted for hormonal, metabolic, lipids, psychological, anthropometric, reproductive outcomes, and adverse effects by 1 reviewer, independently verified by a second. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirteen comparisons were assessed, with 3 in meta-analyses. Evidence suggests benefits for myo-inositol or D-chiro-inositol (DCI) for some metabolic measures and potential benefits from DCI for ovulation, but inositol may have no effect on other outcomes. Metformin may improve waist-hip ratio and hirsutism compared to inositol, but there is likely no difference for reproductive outcomes, and the evidence is very uncertain for body mass indexI. Myo-inositol likely causes fewer gastrointestinal adverse events compared with metformin; however, these are typically mild and self-limited. CONCLUSION: The evidence supporting the use of inositol in the management of PCOS is limited and inconclusive. Clinicians and their patients should consider the uncertainty of the evidence together with individual values and preferences when engaging in shared decision-making regarding the use of inositol for PCOS.


Asunto(s)
Inositol , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inositol/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Resistencia a la Insulina , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia
12.
Hum Reprod Update ; 30(3): 243-261, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38237150

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The last decade has seen increased research on the relationship between diet and male fertility, but there are no clearly defined nutritional recommendations for men in the preconception period to support clinical fertility outcomes. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The purpose of this scoping review is to examine the extent and range of research undertaken to evaluate the effect(s) of diet in the preconception period on male clinical fertility and reproductive outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE via Ovid, CAB Direct, and CINAHL via EBSCO) were searched from inception to July 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (prospective/retrospective, case-control, and cross-sectional). Intervention studies in male participants or couples aiming to achieve dietary or nutritional change, or non-intervention studies examining dietary or nutritional components (whole diets, dietary patterns, food groups or individual foods) in the preconception period were included. Controls were defined as any comparison group for RCTs, and any/no comparison for observational studies. Primary outcomes of interest included the effect(s) of male preconception diet on clinical outcomes such as conception (natural or via ART), pregnancy rates and live birth rates. Secondary outcomes included time to conception and sperm parameters. OUTCOMES: A total of 37 studies were eligible, including one RCT and 36 observational studies (prospective, cross-sectional, and case-control studies; four studies in non-ART populations) published between 2008 and 2023. Eight reported clinical outcomes, 26 reported on secondary outcomes, and three reported on both. The RCT did not assess clinical outcomes but found that tomato juice may benefit sperm motility. In observational studies, some evidence suggested that increasing fish or reducing sugar-sweetened beverages, processed meat or total fat may improve fecundability. Evidence for other clinical outcomes, such as pregnancy rates or live birth rates, showed no relationship with cereals, soy and dairy, and inconsistent relationships with consuming red meat or a 'healthy diet' pattern. For improved sperm parameters, limited evidence supported increasing fish, fats/fatty acids, carbohydrates and dairy, and reducing processed meat, while the evidence for fruits, vegetables, cereals, legumes, eggs, red meat and protein was inconsistent. Healthy diet patterns in general were shown to improve sperm health. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Specific dietary recommendations for improving male fertility are precluded by the lack of reporting on clinical pregnancy outcomes, heterogeneity of the available literature and the paucity of RCTs to determine causation or to rule out reverse causation. There may be some benefit from increasing fish, adopting a healthy dietary pattern, and reducing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed meat, but it is unclear whether these benefits extend beyond sperm parameters to improve clinical fertility. More studies exploring whole diets rather than singular foods or nutritional components in the context of male fertility are encouraged, particularly by means of RCTs where feasible. Further assessment of core fertility outcomes is warranted and requires careful planning in high-quality prospective studies and RCTs. These studies can lay the groundwork for targeted dietary guidelines and enhance the prospects of successful fertility outcomes for men in the preconception period. Systematic search of preconception diet suggests that increasing fish and reducing sugary drinks, processed meats and total fat may improve male fertility, while consuming healthy diets, fish, fats/fatty acids, carbohydrates and dairy and reducing processed meat can improve sperm health.


Asunto(s)
Dieta , Fertilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Femenino , Fertilidad/efectos de los fármacos , Atención Preconceptiva/métodos , Índice de Embarazo
13.
Hum Reprod Update ; 30(3): 323-340, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38237144

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common and distressing endocrine disorder associated with lower quality of life, subfertility, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, depression, anxiety, and eating disorders. PCOS characteristics, its comorbidities, and its treatment can potentially influence sexual function. However, studies on sexual function in women with PCOS are limited and contradictory. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The aim was to perform a systematic review of the published literature on sexual function in women with PCOS and assess the quality of the research and certainty of outcomes, to inform the 2023 International Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of PCOS. SEARCH METHODS: Eight electronic databases were searched until 1 June 2023. Studies reporting on sexual function using validated sexuality questionnaires or visual analogue scales (VAS) in PCOS populations were included. Random-effects models were used for meta-analysis comparing PCOS and non-PCOS groups with Hedges' g as the standardized mean difference. Study quality and certainty of outcomes were assessed by risk of bias assessments and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method according to Cochrane. Funnel plots were visually inspected for publication bias. OUTCOMES: There were 32 articles included, of which 28 used validated questionnaires and four used VAS. Pooled Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores in random-effects models showed worse sexual function across most subdomains in women with PCOS, including arousal (Hedges's g [Hg] [95% CI] = -0.35 [-0.53, -0.17], I2 = 82%, P < 0.001), lubrication (Hg [95% CI] = -0.54 [-0.79, -0.30], I2 = 90%, P < 0.001), orgasm (Hg [95% CI] = -0.37 [-0.56, -0.19], I2 = 83%, P < 0.001), and pain (Hg [95% CI] = -0.36 [-0.59, -0.13] I2 = 90%, P < 0.001), as well as total sexual function (Hg [95% CI] = -0.75 [-1.37, -0.12], I2 = 98%, P = 0.02) and sexual satisfaction (Hg [95% CI] = -0.31 [-0.45, -0.18], I2 = 68%, P < 0.001). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on fertility status and body mass index (BMI) did not alter the direction or significance of the results. Meta-analysis on the VAS studies demonstrated the negative impact of excess body hair on sexuality, lower sexual attractiveness, and lower sexual satisfaction in women with PCOS compared to controls, with no differences in the perceived importance of a satisfying sex life. No studies assessed sexual distress. GRADE assessments showed low certainty across all outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Psychosexual function appears to be impaired in those with PCOS, but there is a lack of evidence on the related distress scores, which are required to meet the criteria for psychosexual dysfunction. Health care professionals should discuss sexual function and distress and be aware of the multifactorial influences on sexual function in PCOS. Future research needs to assess both psychosexual function and distress to aid in understanding the degree of psychosexual dysfunction in PCOS. Finally, more diverse populations (e.g. non-heterosexual and more ethnically diverse groups) should be included in future studies and the efficacy of treatments for sexual dysfunction should also be assessed (e.g. lifestyle and pharmacological interventions).


Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas , Humanos , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/psicología , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/fisiopatología , Femenino , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/etiología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/psicología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/epidemiología , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Calidad de Vida
14.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 109(2): e817-e836, 2024 Jan 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37554096

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affects more than 1 in 10 women. OBJECTIVE: As part of the 2023 International PCOS Guidelines update, comparisons between combined oral contraceptive pills (COCP), metformin, and combination treatment were evaluated. DATA SOURCES: Ovid Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, All EBM, and CINAHL were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Women with PCOS included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA EXTRACTION: We calculated mean differences and 95% CIs regarding anthropometrics, metabolic, and hyperandrogenic outcomes. Meta-analyses and quality assessment using GRADE were performed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search identified 1660 publications; 36 RCTs were included. For hirsutism, no differences were seen when comparing metformin vs COCP, nor when comparing COCP vs combination treatment with metformin and COCP. Metformin was inferior on free androgen index (FAI) (7.08; 95% CI 4.81, 9.36), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) (-118.61 nmol/L; 95% CI -174.46, -62.75) and testosterone (0.48 nmol/L; 95% CI 0.32, 0.64) compared with COCP. COCP was inferior for FAI (0.58; 95% CI 0.36, 0.80) and SHBG (-16.61 nmol/L; 95% CI -28.51, -4.71) compared with combination treatment, whereas testosterone did not differ. Metformin lowered insulin (-27.12 pmol/L; 95% CI -40.65, -13.59) and triglycerides (-0.15 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.29, -0.01) compared with COCP. COCP was inferior for insulin (17.03 pmol/L; 95% CI 7.79, 26.26) and insulin resistance (0.44; 95% CI 0.17, 0.70) compared with combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of metformin or COCP treatment should be based on symptoms, noting some biochemical benefits from combination treatment targeting both major endocrine disturbances seen in PCOS (hyperinsulinemia and hyperandrogenism).


Asunto(s)
Insulinas , Metformina , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Femenino , Humanos , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Testosterona
15.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ; 100(2): 149-163, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37933831

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Characteristic features of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) include insulin resistance and an increased risk for type 2 diabetes. To promote improved insulin sensitivity, insulin sensitisers have been used in PCOS. However, direct comparisons across these agents are limited. This study compared the effects of metformin, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in the management of PCOS to inform the 2023 International Evidence-based PCOS Guideline. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. PATIENTS: Women with PCOS and treatment with insulin sensitisers. MEASUREMENTS: Hormonal and clinical outcomes, as well as side effects. RESULTS: Of 1660 publications identified, 13 randomised controlled trials were included. Metformin was superior in lowering weight (mean difference [MD]: -4.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.69 to -1.08 kg), body mass index (MD: -0.95, 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.49 kg/m2 ) and testosterone (MD: -0.10, 95% CI: -0.18 to -0.03 nmol/L) versus rosiglitazone, whereas there was no difference when comparing metformin to pioglitazone. Adding rosiglitazone or pioglitazone to metformin did not improve metabolic outcomes. However, rosiglitazone seemed superior to metformin in lowering lipid concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin should remain the first-line insulin sensitising treatment in adults with PCOS for the prevention and management of weight and metabolic features. The addition of thiazolidinediones appears to offer little benefit.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Resistencia a la Insulina , Metformina , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Tiazolidinedionas , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Rosiglitazona/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Pioglitazona/uso terapéutico , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/tratamiento farmacológico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Tiazolidinedionas/uso terapéutico
16.
Semin Reprod Med ; 41(1-02): 12-19, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38052244

RESUMEN

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex endocrinopathy with wide-ranging implications for affected individuals. Literature has shown that patients with PCOS are dissatisfied with the health information provided to them and that healthcare professionals lack adequate knowledge. In this narrative review with systematic approach, we explored the unmet information needs in PCOS care for both patients and healthcare professionals. A comprehensive search of databases yielded 41 relevant studies, predominantly of observational and qualitative design. Adults and adolescents with PCOS desire wide ranging health information and express a keen desire for weight management guidance. Importantly, discussions surrounding weight should be addressed knowledgeably and without weight bias. Therefore, healthcare professionals should facilitate access to comprehensive evidence-based resources. Lack of information drives PCOS-related online searches. Referral to support groups that promote individual agency in the self-management aspects of PCOS can furthermore guide patient resource acquisition. Patients prefer guidance from professionals that understand the psychosocial complexity of PCOS and can empathize with experiences of stigmatization or even marginalization depending on the cultural context of the individual. The findings informed the 2023 International Evidence-Based PCOS Guideline, recommending patient-centered communication, evidence-based information resources, and culturally sensitive approaches to optimize PCOS care.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Comunicación , Personal de Salud , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/terapia
18.
Hum Reprod ; 38(11): 2267-2276, 2023 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37740685

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: What are the pre-existing medical conditions and lifestyle behaviours of women with and without PCOS during the preconception period? SUMMARY ANSWER: During the preconception period, medical conditions of obesity, depression, anxiety, and a history of infertility were more highly prevalent in women with than without PCOS, and more women with than without PCOS were engaged in unhealthy lifestyle behaviours. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Women with PCOS are predisposed to infertility and pregnancy complications. Optimizing preconception medical health and lifestyle behaviours can improve maternal and pregnancy outcomes but, to the best of our knowledge, no study has examined the preconception medical conditions and lifestyle behaviours of women with PCOS. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE DURATION: This is a cross-sectional study on 942 women with PCOS and 7024 women without PCOS, aged 24-30 years from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women's Health, an ongoing, national survey-based prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The current study analysed self-reported data from Survey 6 collected in 2019 of the cohort of women born between 1989 and 1995. Explored outcomes included BMI, pre-existing medical conditions, and modifiable lifestyle behaviours, including smoking, recreational drug use, alcohol intake, and physical activity level, during the preconception period. Differences between subgroups were tested using Student's t-test, χ2 test, or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. The associations of pregnancy intention with medical conditions and lifestyle behaviours were examined using logistic regression. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Obesity, depression, anxiety, and infertility were highly prevalent in women actively planning for pregnancy. Among women with PCOS, the prevalence of obesity was 47.02%, followed by depression at 32.70%, anxiety at 39.62%, and infertility at 47.17%. Conversely among women without PCOS, the corresponding prevalence was lower, at 22.33% for obesity, 18.98% for depression, 23.93% for anxiety, and 16.42% for infertility. In women actively planning for pregnancy, only those without PCOS demonstrated a lower prevalence of unhealthy lifestyle behaviours compared to non-planning women. The prevalence of unhealthy lifestyle behaviours was similar in women with PCOS regardless of their pregnancy intentions. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that only moderate/high stress with motherhood/children (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.31, 95% CI 1.60-6.85) and history of infertility (adjusted OR 9.67, 95% CI 5.02-18.64) were significantly associated with active pregnancy planning in women with PCOS. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The findings were based on self-reported data. The cohort of women surveyed may have a higher level of education than women in the community, therefore our findings may underestimate the true prevalence of pre-existing medical conditions and lifestyle challenges faced by the broader population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: A higher proportion of women with than without PCOS had pre-existing medical conditions and engaged in potentially modifiable unhealthy lifestyle behaviours during preconception despite their risk for subfertility and pregnancy complications. Healthcare professionals play a pivotal role in guiding this high-risk group of women during this period, offering counselling, education, and support for the adoption of healthy lifestyles to improve fertility, pregnancy outcomes, and intergenerational health. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): C.T.T. holds a seed grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) through the Centre of Research Excellence in Women's Health in Reproductive Life (CRE WHiRL) and Royal Australasian College of Physician Foundation Roger Bartop Research Establishment Fellowship. H.T. holds an NHMRC Medical Research Fellowship. C.L.H. holds an NHMRC CRE Health in Preconconception and Pregnancy Senior Postdoctoral Fellowship. A.E.J. holds a CRE WhiRL Early to Mid-career Fellowship. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Femenina , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Longitudinales , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Prevalencia , Australia , Estilo de Vida , Salud de la Mujer , Obesidad/complicaciones , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología
19.
Eur J Endocrinol ; 189(2): R1-R9, 2023 Aug 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37619990

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in body image concerns among women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). DESIGN: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsychInfo, PUBMED, Web-of-Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials [CENTRAL]) were searched from inception through July 2022. Outcome measures included validated questionnaires reporting on body image concerns. Methodological quality was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system, and included studies were assessed for risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using the inverse variance method based on random or fixed effects models (Review Manager, Version 5). RESULTS: A total of 918 women with PCOS and 865 women without PCOS from 9 studies were included. Meta-analysis of 3 studies using Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire Appearance Scale (MBSRQ-AS) showed those with PCOS reported higher dissatisfaction with appearance evaluation and appearance orientation compared to those without PCOS (mean difference [MD] = -0.78, I2 = 0%, P < .00001, and MD = 0.22, I2 = 54%, P = .004, respectively). Meta-analysis of 2 studies showed higher dissatisfaction with overweight preoccupation, lower body area satisfaction, and body weight classification on MBSRQ-AS subscales in those with PCOS compared to those without PCOS (all P < .001). Meta-analysis of 2 studies using the Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults (BESAA) showed significantly lower scores for the weight subscale in those with PCOS compared to those without PCOS (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Those with PCOS experience more significant body image concerns, emphasising the importance of awareness in the clinical care of PCOS. Considering the limited evidence, further studies are warranted to identify drivers and mitigating factors.


Asunto(s)
Imagen Corporal , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Bases de Datos Factuales , Sobrepeso , PubMed
20.
Hum Reprod ; 38(9): 1655-1679, 2023 09 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37580037

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: What is the recommended assessment and management of those with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), based on the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and consumer preference? SUMMARY ANSWER: International evidence-based guidelines address prioritized questions and outcomes and include 254 recommendations and practice points, to promote consistent, evidence-based care and improve the experience and health outcomes in PCOS. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The 2018 International PCOS Guideline was independently evaluated as high quality and integrated multidisciplinary and consumer perspectives from six continents; it is now used in 196 countries and is widely cited. It was based on best available, but generally very low to low quality, evidence. It applied robust methodological processes and addressed shared priorities. The guideline transitioned from consensus based to evidence-based diagnostic criteria and enhanced accuracy of diagnosis, whilst promoting consistency of care. However, diagnosis is still delayed, the needs of those with PCOS are not being adequately met, evidence quality was low and evidence-practice gaps persist. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline update reengaged the 2018 network across professional societies and consumer organizations, with multidisciplinary experts and women with PCOS directly involved at all stages. Extensive evidence synthesis was completed. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-II (AGREEII)-compliant processes were followed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was applied across evidence quality, feasibility, acceptability, cost, implementation and ultimately recommendation strength and diversity and inclusion were considered throughout. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This summary should be read in conjunction with the full Guideline for detailed participants and methods. Governance included a six-continent international advisory and management committee, five guideline development groups, and paediatric, consumer, and translation committees. Extensive consumer engagement and guideline experts informed the update scope and priorities. Engaged international society-nominated panels included paediatrics, endocrinology, gynaecology, primary care, reproductive endocrinology, obstetrics, psychiatry, psychology, dietetics, exercise physiology, obesity care, public health and other experts, alongside consumers, project management, evidence synthesis, statisticians and translation experts. Thirty-nine professional and consumer organizations covering 71 countries engaged in the process. Twenty meetings and five face-to-face forums over 12 months addressed 58 prioritized clinical questions involving 52 systematic and 3 narrative reviews. Evidence-based recommendations were developed and approved via consensus across five guideline panels, modified based on international feedback and peer review, independently reviewed for methodological rigour, and approved by the Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The evidence in the assessment and management of PCOS has generally improved in the past five years, but remains of low to moderate quality. The technical evidence report and analyses (∼6000 pages) underpins 77 evidence-based and 54 consensus recommendations, with 123 practice points. Key updates include: i) further refinement of individual diagnostic criteria, a simplified diagnostic algorithm and inclusion of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels as an alternative to ultrasound in adults only; ii) strengthening recognition of broader features of PCOS including metabolic risk factors, cardiovascular disease, sleep apnea, very high prevalence of psychological features, and high risk status for adverse outcomes during pregnancy; iii) emphasizing the poorly recognized, diverse burden of disease and the need for greater healthcare professional education, evidence-based patient information, improved models of care and shared decision making to improve patient experience, alongside greater research; iv) maintained emphasis on healthy lifestyle, emotional wellbeing and quality of life, with awareness and consideration of weight stigma; and v) emphasizing evidence-based medical therapy and cheaper and safer fertility management. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Overall, recommendations are strengthened and evidence is improved, but remains generally low to moderate quality. Significantly greater research is now needed in this neglected, yet common condition. Regional health system variation was considered and acknowledged, with a further process for guideline and translation resource adaptation provided. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The 2023 International Guideline for the Assessment and Management of PCOS provides clinicians and patients with clear advice on best practice, based on the best available evidence, expert multidisciplinary input and consumer preferences. Research recommendations have been generated and a comprehensive multifaceted dissemination and translation program supports the Guideline with an integrated evaluation program. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This effort was primarily funded by the Australian Government via the National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (APP1171592), supported by a partnership with American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Endocrine Society, European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, and European Society for Endocrinology. The Commonwealth Government of Australia also supported Guideline translation through the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFCRI000266). HJT and AM are funded by NHMRC fellowships. JT is funded by a Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) fellowship. Guideline development group members were volunteers. Travel expenses were covered by the partnering organizations. Disclosures of interest were strictly managed according to NHMRC policy and are available with the full guideline, technical evidence report, peer review and responses (www.monash.edu/medicine/mchri/pcos). Of named authors HJT, CTT, AD, LM, LR, JBoyle, AM have no conflicts of interest to declare. JL declares grant from Ferring and Merck; consulting fees from Ferring and Titus Health Care; speaker's fees from Ferring; unpaid consultancy for Ferring, Roche Diagnostics and Ansh Labs; and sits on advisory boards for Ferring, Roche Diagnostics, Ansh Labs, and Gedeon Richter. TP declares a grant from Roche; consulting fees from Gedeon Richter and Organon; speaker's fees from Gedeon Richter and Exeltis; travel support from Gedeon Richter and Exeltis; unpaid consultancy for Roche Diagnostics; and sits on advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics. MC declares travels support from Merck; and sits on an advisory board for Merck. JBoivin declares grants from Merck Serono Ltd.; consulting fees from Ferring B.V; speaker's fees from Ferring Arzneimittell GmbH; travel support from Organon; and sits on an advisory board for the Office of Health Economics. RJN has received speaker's fees from Merck and sits on an advisory board for Ferring. AJoham has received speaker's fees from Novo Nordisk and Boehringer Ingelheim. The guideline was peer reviewed by special interest groups across our 39 partner and collaborating organizations, was independently methodologically assessed against AGREEII criteria and was approved by all members of the guideline development groups and by the NHMRC.


Asunto(s)
Ginecología , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Embarazo , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/terapia , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Australia , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...