Reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure.

PURPOSE: Empathy is the ability to communicate an understanding of an individual's subjective experience. It plays a vital role in the physician-patient relationship and improves clinical outcomes. This increases the importance of measuring and studying empathy in the clinical setting. The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) is a 10-item questionnaire that measures patient assessment of physician's empathy in primary care. To our knowledge, there are no validated measures of empathy in the clinical setting in Arabic. This study aims at validating the CARE in Arabic. METHODS: Data collection took place between October 2019 and February 2020. A total of 220 patients completed the questionnaire which consisted of the 10 CARE items, participants' opinions regarding the importance of each item, demographic information, and information about the consultation. The reliability and validity of the Arabic CARE were measured using Cronbach alpha, item-total correlations, and factor analysis. Construct validity was measured based on the overall patient satisfaction, and their satisfaction with the length of the consultation. RESULTS: High Cronbach alpha and item-total correlation reveal the internal consistency and homogeneity of the Arabic version. Our findings showed significant positive correlations between CARE score and each of the characteristics: overall satisfaction with the consultation, duration of the consultation, patients' satisfaction with consultation duration and whether they would recommend the doctor to others. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of the CARE measure appears to be valid and reliable. It is available for use in research, education, and assessment of physicians' empathy.

Bowel wall thickening on computed tomography scan: Inter-observer agreement and correlation with endoscopic findings.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Bowel wall thickening (BWT) on computed tomography (CT) has been frequently reported by radiologists. There are no clear guidelines regarding the level of thickening that is correlated with definite pathology. Radiologists usually rely on their overall subjective impression, and studies on inter-observer agreement (IOA) are lacking. This study evaluated IOA concerning BWT found on abdominal CT and identified the corresponding findings on endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Reports of abdominal CTs performed between January 2000 and December 2015 containing the term 'thickening' were retrieved from the radiology department database. Corresponding patients who later underwent endoscopy were included. IOA concerning BWT was evaluated using a randomly mixed sample of 80 patients with normal findings or pathological BWT on endoscopy. A search for predictive factors for the subsequent finding of malignancy on endoscopy was performed using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 6142 CT scans described thickening, equivalent to a BWT prevalence of 13.7%. Ninety-one patients (mean age, 58 years) were included in the analysis. Thickening was found most commonly in the stomach (38.5%), followed by the rectum (22%) and small intestine (14%). Twenty-seven patients (29.7%) exhibited diffuse BWT, whereas 64 patients showed localised BWT (70.3%). Biopsy was performed for 64 of 91 patients with endoscopies. Among these patients, 8.8% exhibited normal findings, whereas inflammation and malignancy were discovered in 25 and 51.6% of patients, respectively, with a positive predictive value for malignancy of 0.36. The IOA concerning CT for predicting significantly pathological BWT was moderate (mean κ = 0.6). A strong association was evident between the presence of lymph nodes on CT and the presence of neoplastic lesions. CONCLUSION: Our study strongly recommends endoscopic follow-up of patients exhibiting BWT irrespective of the thickening location, especially if it is associated with lymphadenopathy. IOA between radiologists was moderate.

The acute scrotum: Frequency and range of etiologies in a Middle Eastern setting.

AIM: To investigate the frequency of different etiologies of acute scrotal pain in males presenting to the emergency department at American University of Beirut Medical Center in Beirut, Lebanon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 94 patients between the ages 18 and 40 years presenting to the emergency room at American University of Beirut Medical Center with acute scrotum were recruited. The scrotum was inspected with palpation, and Doppler Ultrasound of the testicle was performed by a radiology resident to confirm the diagnosis. The study results were then collected after the official reports were signed by a board-certified radiology attending with expertise in ultrasound. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients presenting with acute scrotal pain, 23.4% (95% confidence interval (0.70-0.87)) had no ultrasound findings and were considered normal. On the other hand, 54.3% (95% confidence interval (0.45-0.66)) were diagnosed with varicocele, 9.6% (95% confidence interval (0.04-0.16)) were diagnosed with epididymo-orchitis, and 9.6% (95% confidence interval (0.04-0.16)) had a history of trauma to the testicle. Patients presenting with acute scrotum had a pain duration of 13.2 ± 4.5 h, with 10.6% (95% confidence interval (0.04-0.17)) having associated urinary symptoms, 18.1% (95% confidence interval (0.09-0.25)) have had sexual activity within 48 h of presentation, and 10.6% (95% confidence interval (0.04-0.17)) were pre-diagnosed with varicocele. CONCLUSION: Varicocele is the most common cause of acute scrotal pain in patients presenting to American University of Beirut Medical Center in Beirut. This should direct varicocele to the top of our differential when a patient with acute scrotum presents to the emergency department. Nevertheless, ruling out torsion remains the first step in the workup.

Qualitative and quantitative radiological analysis of non-contrast CT is a strong indicator in patients with acute pyelonephritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of non-contrast computed tomography (CT) by reporting the difference in attenuation between normal and inflamed renal parenchyma in patients clinically diagnosed with acute pyelonephritis (APN). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study concerned with non-contrast CT evaluation of 74 patients, admitted with a clinical diagnosis of APN and failed to respond to 48h antibiotics treatment. Mean attenuation values in Hounsfield units (HU) were measured in the upper, middle and lower segments of the inflamed and the normal kidney of the same patient. Independent t-test was performed for statistical analysis. Image evaluation included receiver operating characteristic (ROC), visual grading characteristic (VGC) and kappa analyses. RESULTS: The mean attenuation in the upper, middle and lower segments of the inflamed renal cortex was 32%, 25%, and 29% lower than the mean attenuation of the corresponding cortical segments of the contralateral normal kidney, respectively (p<0.01). The mean attenuation in the upper, middle, and lower segments of the inflamed renal medulla was 48%, 21%, and 30%, lower than the mean attenuation of the corresponding medullary segments of the contralateral normal kidney (p<0.02). The mean attenuation between the inflamed and non-inflamed renal cortex and medulla was 29% and 30% lower respectively (p<0.001). The AUCROC (p<0.001) analysis demonstrated significantly higher scores for pathology detection, irrespective of image quality, compared to clinical and laboratory results with an increased inter-reader agreement from poor to substantial. CONCLUSION: Non-contrast CT showed a significant decrease in the parenchymal density of the kidney affected with APN in comparison to the contralateral normal kidney of the same patient. This can be incorporated in the diagnostic criteria of APN in NCCT in the emergency setting.