Impact of Referral Center Pathology Review on Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Appendiceal Neoplasms.

CONTEXT.­: Data regarding the clinical impact of subspecialist pathology review of appendiceal neoplasms are limited. OBJECTIVE.­: To determine whether pathology review by gastrointestinal pathologists at a tertiary-care referral center resulted in significant changes in the diagnosis and clinical management of appendiceal neoplastic lesions. DESIGN.­: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with an initial diagnosis of appendiceal neoplasm referred to a tertiary-care referral center in Ontario, Canada, from 2010-2016. The discordance rate between original and review pathology reports, the nature of discordances, and the impact of any discordance on patient management were recorded. RESULTS.­: A total of 145 patients with appendiceal lesions were identified (low-grade mucinous appendiceal neoplasm [n = 79], invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma [n = 12], "colorectal type" adenocarcinoma [n = 12], goblet cell carcinoid and adenocarcinomas ex goblet cell carcinoid [n = 24], and other lesions/neoplasms [n = 20]). One or more changes in diagnoses were found in 36 of 145 cases (24.8%), with changes within the same category of interpretation (n = 10), stage (n = 7), grade (n = 6), and categoric interpretation (n = 5) being the most common. In 10 of 36 patients (28%), the diagnostic change led to a significant change in management, including recommendation for additional surveillance, systemic chemotherapy, additional surgery, or discontinuation of surveillance. CONCLUSIONS.­: Subspecialist pathology review of appendiceal neoplastic lesions led to a change in diagnosis in 36 of 145 cases (24.8%), of which nearly 30% (10 of 36 cases) led to a change in clinical management. The overall rate of clinically significant discordances was 7% (10 of 145). Our findings suggest that subspecialist pathology review of appendiceal neoplasms referred to specialized centers is justified.

Impairments in Bowel Function, Social Function and Quality of Life After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) can be associated with decreases in quality of life (QOL). Bowel-related QOL (BR-QOL) after CRS-HIPEC has not been previously studied. The objectives of the current study were to examine the effect of different types of bowel resection during CRS-HIPEC on overall QOL and BR-QOL. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed. QOL data were collected using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and CR-29 questionnaires at 3, 6, and 12 months after CRS-HIPEC. Patients were divided into groups that underwent no bowel resection, non-low anterior resection (LAR) bowel resection, LAR, and LAR with stoma. Primary outcomes were global QOL and BR-QOL. RESULTS: Overall, 158 patients were included in this study. Bowel resections were performed in 77% of patients, with 31% undergoing LAR. Global QOL was not significantly different between groups. LAR patients (with and without stoma) had significantly worse BR-QOL, embarrassment, and altered body image, with LAR + stoma patients having the largest impairments in these domains. Trends toward higher levels of impotence and anxiety were also seen in LAR patients. Although global QOL improved over time, impairments in BR-QOL and sexual and social function did not significantly improve over time. CONCLUSIONS: Although global QOL after CRS-HIPEC was not affected by the type of bowel resection, the use of LAR and ostomies was associated with clinically meaningful and persistent impairments in BR-QOL and related functional domains. Generic QOL questionnaires may not adequately capture these domains; however, targeted questionnaires in these patients may help improve QOL after CRS-HIPEC.

Impact of Major Complications on Patients' Quality of Life After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective treatment for selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM). Although it can have significant morbidity, perioperative mortality is low. Little is known about whether major complications after CRS/HIPEC have a lasting impact on patients' quality of life (QOL). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from a prospectively collected database on patients treated with CRS/HIPEC for PSM (2011-2014). Patients with CRS/HIPEC and 6-month QOL evaluation were included. Major perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3/4) were the primary independent variable. QOL was evaluated using the validated EORTC QLQ-C30 score. The primary outcome was 6-month global health score. Secondary outcomes were individual functional and symptom domains. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were analyzed. Median age was 57.5; 64 % were female. Origin of PSM was appendix (55 %), colorectal (38 %), mesothelioma (5 %), and small bowel (2 %). Fourteen patients (33 %) had major (grade 3/4) complications. Median length of stay was 16 days; patients experiencing major complications had significantly increased length of stay (35.5 vs. 13 days, p < 0.01). Major complications included intra-abdominal abscess (9.5 %), bleeding (9.5 %), symptomatic pleural effusion (7.1 %), anastomotic leaks (7.1 %), and renal failure (2.4 %). The average global health score at 6 months was 68.1. The worst-rated symptom scores at 6 months were diarrhea (39.8) and fatigue (35.4). There were no significant differences in 6-month QOL scores between patients with and without major complications, globally or in specific domains. CONCLUSIONS: Although major complications are common after CRS/HIPEC, QOL at 6 months recovers and is similar to those without major complications.