RESUMEN
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection can cause serious illness including haemolytic uraemic syndrome. The role of socio-economic status (SES) in differential clinical presentation and exposure to potential risk factors amongst STEC cases has not previously been reported in England. We conducted an observational study using a dataset of all STEC cases identified in England, 2010-2015. Odds ratios for clinical characteristics of cases and foodborne, waterborne and environmental risk factors were estimated using logistic regression, stratified by SES, adjusting for baseline demographic factors. Incidence was higher in the highest SES group compared to the lowest (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.19-2.00). Odds of Accident and Emergency attendance (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.75) and hospitalisation (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.36-2.15) because of illness were higher in the most disadvantaged compared to the least, suggesting potential lower ascertainment of milder cases or delayed care-seeking behaviour in disadvantaged groups. Advantaged individuals were significantly more likely to report salad/fruit/vegetable/herb consumption (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.16-2.17), non-UK or UK travel (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.40-2.27; OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.35-2.56) and environmental exposures (walking in a paddock, OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.22-2.70; soil contact, OR 1.52, 95% CI 2.13-1.09) suggesting other unmeasured risks, such as person-to-person transmission, could be more important in the most disadvantaged group.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urémico/epidemiología , Toxina Shiga/efectos adversos , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diarrea/epidemiología , Diarrea/microbiología , Escherichia coli Enterohemorrágica/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Femenino , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urémico/microbiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Evaluación de Necesidades , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Clase Social , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Childhood unintentional injuries (UI) are common but continue to happen more often to children living in less advantaged socioeconomic circumstances (SEC). Our aim was to explore how early life factors mediate the association between SEC and UIs, using the UK Millennium Cohort Study. METHODS: We calculated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for parental report of UI occurring between age 3 and 5 years, using Poisson regression according to family income as a measure of SEC. We explored potentially mediating pathways by controlling associations between SEC and UI for groups of early life risks in three domains: factors that may influence environmental safety, supervision and the MCS child's abilities and behaviours. RESULTS: Twenty eight percent of children had a UI from 3 to 5 years old. Children from the lowest income quintile were more likely to be injured compared to those from the highest (RR 1.20 95%CI 1.05, 1.37). Sequentially controlling for early life factors that may influence environmental safety (RR 1.19 95%CI 1.02, 1.38), then supervision (RR 1.18, 95%CI 1.02, 1.36), and finally adding child's behaviour and abilities (RR 1.15, 95%CI 1.00, 1.34) into the model reduced the RR by 5, 10 and 25% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing factors that may influence environmental safety and supervision, and the child's abilities and behaviours only partly explains the increased UI risk between the highest and lowest income quintiles. Further research is required to explore factors mediating associations between SEC and specific mechanisms and types of injuries.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Accidentales/diagnóstico , Lesiones Accidentales/epidemiología , Protección a la Infancia , Renta , Factores de Edad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Prevalencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (eczema) in childhood is socially patterned, with higher incidence in more advantaged populations. However, it is unclear what factors explain the social differences. OBJECTIVES: To identify early-life risk factors for eczema, and to explore how early-life risk factors explain any differences in eczema. METHODS: We estimated odds ratios (ORs) for ever having had eczema by age 5 years in 14 499 children from the U.K. Millennium Cohort Study (MCS), with a focus on maternal, antenatal and early-life risk factors and socioeconomic circumstances (SECs). Risk factors were explored to assess whether they attenuated associations between SECs and eczema. RESULTS: Overall 35·1% of children had ever had eczema by age 5 years. Children of mothers with degree-level qualifications vs. no educational qualifications were more likely to have eczema (OR 1·52, 95% confidence interval 1·31-1·76), and there was a gradient across the socioeconomic spectrum. Maternal atopy, breastfeeding (1-6 weeks and ≥ 6 months), introduction of solids under 4 months or cow's milk under 9 months, antibiotic exposure in the first year of life and grime exposure were associated with an increased odds of having eczema. Female sex, Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnicity, smoking during pregnancy, exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and having more siblings were associated with reduced odds for eczema. Controlling for maternal, antenatal and early-life characteristics (particularly maternal smoking during pregnancy, breastfeeding and number of siblings) reduced the OR for eczema to 1·26 (95% confidence interval 1·03-1·50) in the group with the highest educational qualifications compared with the least. CONCLUSIONS: In a representative U.K. child cohort, eczema was more common in more advantaged children. This was explained partially by early-life factors including not smoking during pregnancy, breastfeeding and having fewer siblings.
Asunto(s)
Eccema/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Preescolar , Escolaridad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Edad Materna , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In January 2006, an outbreak of hepatitis A occurred in a socio-economically deprived area of Liverpool, in the United Kingdom (UK), where extensive community outbreaks of hepatitis had previously occurred. A total of nine cases were confirmed. Five of these were linked within a primary school. The outbreak initially occurred among a close social contact group, but there was evidence of subsequent person-to-person transmission within a local primary school. The school was attended by 221 pupils (age range 4-12 years) with a total of 37 teaching and other staff (age range 22-71 years). Following local risk assessment, mass hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination was offered to all staff and pupils, as all were judged to be likely to have been in close contact with the affected pupils. A total of 188 of 217 eligible children (87%), and 33 of 37 staff (89%) were vaccinated. A salivary seroprevalence survey was conducted at the same time as vaccination to assess the benefit of this intervention in the school population. The survey confirmed high levels of susceptibility to hepatitis A in this setting (97.8%, 95% CI 91.6 to 99.62). The direct costs of intervention were estimated as euro5,000. The cost effectiveness of intervention varies widely (euro60.50 to euro2,099 per case avoided) depending on the expected attack rate, which is difficult to estimate due to heterogeneity in published studies.
Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/economía , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis A/economía , Hepatitis A/prevención & control , Servicios de Salud Escolar/economía , Vacunación/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Brotes de Enfermedades/economía , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Docentes/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicios de Salud Escolar/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , VacunasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In areas where intestinal worm infections occur, the World Health Organization recommends treating all school children at regular intervals with deworming drugs to improve growth and school performance. The evidence base for this policy needs to be established for countries to commit resources to implement these programmes. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the effects of deworming drugs used to treat soil-transmitted intestinal worms (nematode geohelminths) on growth and school performance in children. SEARCH STRATEGY: In May 2007, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, mRCT, and reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing deworming drugs for geohelminth worms with placebo or no treatment in children aged 16 years or less, reporting on growth, nutritional status, school performance, or cognition tests. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the trials and evaluated methodological quality; one author extracted data, and another checked a sample. Continuous data were analysed using the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The random-effects model (RE model) was used in the presence of statistically significant heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-four RCTs, including six cluster-RCTs, met the inclusion criteria. Four trials had adequate allocation concealment, and three cluster-RCTs failed to take design effects into account in their analysis. Weight increased after one dose of a deworming drug (WMD 0.34 kg, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.64, RE model; 2448 children, 9 trials); however, there was considerable heterogeneity between trials that was not explained by background intestinal worm infection or intensity. A meta-analysis of multiple dose trials reporting on outcomes within a year of starting treatment showed no significant difference in weight gain (1714 children, 6 trials); however, one cluster-RCT did show effects on weight at one year in a subgroup analysis. In the seven multiple dose trials with follow up beyond 12 months, only one showed a significant increase in weight. Six of seven trials reported clear data on cognitive tests and school performance: five reported no significant effects, and one showed some improvements in three out of 10 cognitive tests. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Deworming drugs used in targeted community programmes may be effective in relation to weight gain in some circumstances but not in others. No effect on cognition or school performance has been demonstrated.