RESUMEN
We aimed to compare serum biomarkers of inflammation, redox status and cartilage degradation between chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients with and without Modic 1 changes. We used a convenience sample of patients recruited from a single center, case-control study, conducted in a tertiary care center. From December, 2014 to May, 2016, 2,292 patients were consecutively screened, 34 met inclusion criteria and were prospectively enrolled in the present study. Cases (n = 13) were defined as patients with Modic 1 changes detected on MRI and controls (n = 21) as cLBP patients without (Modic 0). To assess serum biomarkers of inflammation, redox status and cartilage degradation, fasting serum samples were collected in a standardized manner and analyzed by immunoassays and spectrophotometry. Mean (95% CI) age was 44.1 (40.0-48.1) years and mean LBP duration was 72.5 (53.0-91.9) months. Serum biomarkers of inflammation (IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α), redox status (total thiols, advanced oxidation protein products and carbonyl groups) and cartilage degradation (Coll2-1 and Coll2-1NO2) did not differ between cLBP patients with and without Modic 1 changes. In summary, we did not find any differences in serum biomarkers between cLBP patients with and without Modic 1 changes. Interpretation is limited by convenience sampling and small sample size.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Dolor Crónico/sangre , Citocinas/sangre , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/sangre , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxidación-Reducción , Estudios Prospectivos , Tamaño de la Muestra , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare bone mineral density (BMD) and bone remodeling markers in chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients with and without active discopathy (Modic 1 changes). DESIGN: We conducted a single center case-control exploratory study. For 18 months, all patients referred to a tertiary care physical medicine and rehabilitation department in France were consecutively screened. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled. Cases were defined as cLBP patients with lumbar active discopathy detected on MRI and controls as cLBP patients without active discopathy. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine, femoral neck and total femur was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and bone remodeling markers were assessed in fasting serum samples. Overall, 37 cLBP patients (13 cases and 24 controls) fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included. RESULTS: The median age was 42.0 years (Q1-Q3: 36.0-51.0) and mean (SD) LBP duration 72.3 (57.4) months. We found that BMD and levels of bone remodeling markers in cLBP patients did not differ with and without active discopathy. CONCLUSION: Our results do not support the association between active discopathy and systemic bone fragility.
Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea , Remodelación Ósea , Dolor Crónico/metabolismo , Cuello Femoral/metabolismo , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/metabolismo , Columna Vertebral/metabolismo , Absorciometría de Fotón , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the bone imaging features of lipodystrophies in the largest cohort ever published. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined bone imaging data in 24 patients with lipodystrophic syndromes. Twenty-two had genetic lipodystrophy: 12/22 familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD) and 10/22 congenital generalized lipodystrophy (CGL), 8 with AGPAT2-linked CGL1 and 2 with seipin-linked CGL2. Two patients had acquired generalized lipodystrophy (AGL) in a context of non-specific autoimmune disorders. Skeletal radiographs were available for all patients, with radiographic follow-up for two. Four patients with CGL1 underwent MRI, and two of them also underwent CT. RESULTS: Patients with FPLD showed non-specific degenerative radiographic abnormalities. Conversely, CGL patients showed three types of specific radiographic alterations: diffuse osteosclerosis (in 7 patients, 6 with CGL1 and 1 with CGL2), well-defined osteolytic lesions sparing the axial skeleton (7 CGL1 and 1 CGL2), and pseudo-osteopoikilosis (4 CGL1). Pseudo-osteopoikilosis was the sole bone abnormality observed in one of the two patients with AGL. Osteolytic lesions showed homogeneous low signal intensity (SI) on T1-weighted and high SI on T2-weighted MR images. Most of them were asymptomatic, although one osteolytic lesion resulted in a spontaneous knee fracture and secondary osteoarthritis in a patient with CGL1. MRI also showed diffuse fatty bone marrow alterations in patients with CGL1, with intermediate T1 and high T2 SI, notably in radiographically normal areas. CONCLUSIONS: The three types of peculiar imaging bone abnormalities observed in generalized lipodystrophic syndromes (diffuse osteosclerosis, lytic lesions and/or pseudo-osteopoikilosis) may help clinicians with an early diagnosis in pauci-symptomatic patients.