Avoidance and Endurance Responses to Pain Before and with Advanced Chronification: Preliminary Results from a Questionnaire Survey in Adult Patients with Non-Cancer Pain Conditions.

Purpose: The Avoidance-Endurance Model postulates fear-avoidance responses and endurance responses as important psychological mechanisms in the development and maintenance of chronic pain. The present study aims to investigate potential differences in avoidance and endurance responses to pain before and with advanced chronification. Patients and Methods: Two samples of adults with non-cancer pain at two different stages of chronicity were compared: One with pain and risk factors for chronicity (n=26, part of the PAIN2020 project) and one with chronic pain (n=33 from a pain day care clinic). The German Pain Questionnaire, the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) and medical reports were used to measure duration and severity of pain. Responses to pain were assessed with the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ) and psychological strain with the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). Results: Both groups were primarily affected by musculoskeletal pain. Although not yet chronified, the risk group reported comparable GCPS levels of pain intensity and disability. Depression and stress ratings were also similar, except for anxiety, which was significantly elevated in the chronic pain sample (p<.001). The AEQ scales did not differ between groups, neither on any of the fear-avoidance- nor endurance-related dimensions. A post-hoc regression analysis revealed a significant prediction of fear-avoidance by pain-related disability (p<.001). The regression model for endurance responses was not significant. Conclusion: Patients with risk factors of chronification experience substantial pain-related burden. Responses to pain in the realm of the Avoidance-Endurance model do not appear to vary as a function of chronification. While fear-avoidance and pain-related disability correlate positively, endurance could not be associated to any of our variables.

[Booster treatments in interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy : Preparing structural and process parameters for the implementation of cross-sectoral booster treatments]. / Boosterbehandlungen in der interdisziplinären multimodalen Schmerztherapie : Vorbereitung von Struktur- und Prozessparametern zur Umsetzung von sektorenübergreifenden Boosterbehandlungen.

Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) is an established procedure in the treatment of chronic pain. In daily practice, many institutions regard so-called booster units as an integral part of IMPT. However, no consensual recommendations and evidence for booster concepts are available to date. This article uses the results of a discussion between clinical experts in the field of IMPT at the German Pain Congress in 2022 in order to show the status quo in care. It has been shown that currently applied booster offers vary greatly in terms of time intervals, intensities, therapy content and patient selection and that there is a need for structural and process parameters for the implementation of cross-sectoral booster treatments. In conclusion, the authors outline how the development of these parameters will be planned as an expert consensus with the participation of interested institutions and the inclusion of the patient perspective and offer opportunities for participation in this process.

Pain, disability, and lifestyle: Patients with complex regional pain syndrome compared to chronic musculoskeletal pain-A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is an orphan disease occurring as a complication after trauma. Due to its acute onset and the typical clinical presentation of the inflammatory and autonomous signs, it is an eye-catching chronic pain disease affecting also young and working people. In social media and the internet, high pain severity and the unfavourable prognosis are often empathized. METHODS: Here, we compared epidemiological, pain and lifestyle factors of 223 CPRS patients from the "ncRNAPain" cohort with 255 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (MSK). MSK patients were recruited at the beginning of a multimodal pain therapy programme. We searched for factors predicting pain intensity. RESULTS: Both chronic pain diseases affected women in middle age. Patients with MSK were more obese, drank more alcohol, and were less educated (Pearson chi-square Test or Mann-Whitney/U-Test). Both groups smoked more than healthy people in the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Mann-Whitney/U-Test confirmed that CRPS patients did not have more severe pain and did not suffer more from pain-related disability than patients with MSK. CRPS patients also had less psychiatric comorbidities. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that group assignment, depressive characteristics, body mass index, average alcohol consumption and smoking predicted higher pain ratings, while disease duration, anxiety symptoms or gender had no influence on pain intensity. CONCLUSION: In summary, our study supports a more optimistic view on pain in CRPS patients in comparison to MSK and identifies lifestyle factors that might contribute to the pathophysiology like smoking and drinking. Important next steps are the identification of CRPS patients at risk for chronification or-vice versa-with protective factors for pain resolution. SIGNIFICANCE: This study compares complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and chronic musculoskeletal pain and questions previously reported pain, disability and lifestyle factors associated with CRPS.