RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Incidence and manifestations of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) are poorly defined among immunosuppressed populations. We reported, phenotyped, and assessed risk factors for PASC in adults with systemic autoimmune diseases. METHODS: Persons ≥18 years with systemic autoimmune diseases were recruited into a national, prospective cohort of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination between 12/2020-4/2021. Serial surveys assessed vaccination status, SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence, and disease flares. Participants reporting SARS-CoV-2 infection received a questionnaire assessing symptom duration, severity, and quality of life (QoL) impact; PASC was defined as ≥1 symptom persisting for >12 weeks. PASC syndromes were mapped via overlapping symptom domains. Characteristics were compared between participants who did versus did not report PASC. RESULTS: Among 1615 participants, 590 (36.5%) reported SARS-CoV-2 infection and were sent PASC surveys, 299 (50.7%) of whom responded >12 weeks following reported infection. Respondents were 1.62% female, 90.2% white, median (IQR) age 48(40-60) years with median (IQR) 3 (2-3) vaccine doses at time of first infection. Common diagnoses included inflammatory arthritis (38.5%) and inflammatory bowel disease (14.4%). 89/299 (29.8%) reported PASC, with the most reported symptom domain being neurological/psychological (83.1%); 84% reported an impact on QoL. Participants with PASC reported lower number of preceding vaccines (median [IQR] 2[2-3] versus 3[2-3]; p<0.001) and more reinfections (16.9% versus 5.7%; p=0.004). CONCLUSION: 29.8% of persons with systemic autoimmune disease in a large real-world cohort reported PASC, often affecting QoL. Preceding vaccination may reduce PASC, whereas multiple infections may increase risk, supporting ongoing booster vaccine campaigns and efforts to limit breakthrough infections.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cognitive impairment (CI) among liver transplant (LT) candidates is associated with increased risk of waitlist mortality and inferior outcomes. While formal neurocognitive evaluation is the gold standard for CI diagnosis, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is often used for first-line cognitive screening. However, MoCA requires specialized training and may be too lengthy for a busy evaluation appointment. An alternate approach may be the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS), which is patient- and informant-based and can be administered quickly. We compared potential LT candidates identified by MoCA and QDRS as potentially benefiting from further formal cognitive evaluation. METHODS: We identified 46 potential LT candidates enrolled at a single center of a prospective, observational cohort study who were administered MoCA and QDRS during transplant evaluation (12/2021-12/2022). Scores were dichotomized as (1) normal versus abnormal and (2) normal/mild impairment versus more-than-mild impairment. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of QDRS compared to MoCA. RESULTS: By MoCA, this population had a prevalence of 48% normal cognition, 48% mild, 4% moderate, and 0% severe impairment. This was categorized as 96% normal/mild and 4% more-than-mild impairment. When comparing to MoCA cognitive screening, QDRS had a sensitivity of 61%, specificity of 56%, NPV of 56%, and PPV of 61%. When identifying more-than-mild impairment, QDRS had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 73%, NPV of 100%, and PPV of 10%. CONCLUSION: The high sensitivity and NPV of QDRS in identifying more-than-mild impairment suggests it could identify potential LT candidates who would benefit from further formal cognitive evaluation. The ability to administer QDRS quickly and remotely makes it a pragmatic option for pre-transplant screening.
