RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Older adults with an acute moderate-to-severe lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) or pneumonia are generally treated in hospitals causing risk of iatrogenic harm such as functional decline and delirium. These hospitalisations are often a consequence of poor collaboration between regional care partners, the lack of (acute) diagnostic and treatment possibilities in primary care, and the presence of financial barriers. We will evaluate the implementation of an integrated regional care pathway ('The Hague RTI Care Bridge') developed with the aim to treat and coordinate care for these patients outside the hospital. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective mixed methods study. Participants will be older adults (age≥65 years) with an acute moderate-to-severe LRTI or pneumonia treated outside the hospital (care pathway group) versus those treated in the hospital (control group). In addition, patients, their informal caregivers and treating physicians will be asked about their experiences with the care pathway. The primary outcome of this study will be the feasibility of the care pathway, which is defined as the percentage of patients treated outside the hospital, according to the care pathway, whom fully complete their treatment without the need for hospitalisation within 30 days of follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the safety of the care pathway (30-day mortality and occurrence of complications (readmissions, delirium, falls) within 30 days); the satisfaction, usability and acceptance of the care pathway; the total number of days of bedridden status or hospitalisation; sleep quantity and quality; functional outcomes and quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden The Hague Delft (reference number N22.078) has confirmed that the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act does not apply to this study. The results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN68786381.
Asunto(s)
Delirio , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Neumonía , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Humanos , Anciano , Vías Clínicas , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Neumonía/terapia , Hospitales , Delirio/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the yield of preoperative screening for COVID-19 with chest CT and RT-PCR in patients without COVID-19 symptoms. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many centers are currently screening surgical patients for COVID-19 using either chest CT, RT-PCR or both, due to the risk for worsened surgical outcomes and nosocomial spread. The optimal design and yield of such a strategy are currently unknown. METHODS: This multicenter study included consecutive adult patients without COVID-19 symptoms who underwent preoperative screening using chest CT and RT-PCR before elective or emergency surgery under general anesthesia. RESULTS: A total of 2093 patients without COVID-19 symptoms were included in 14 participating centers; 1224 were screened by CT and RT-PCR and 869 by chest CT only. The positive yield of screening using a combination of chest CT and RT-PCR was 1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-2.1]. Individual yields were 0.7% (95% CI: 0.2-1.1) for chest CT and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6-1.7) for RT-PCR; the incremental yield of chest CT was 0.4%. In relation to COVID-19 community prevalence, up to â¼6% positive RT-PCR was found for a daily hospital admission rate >1.5 per 100,000 inhabitants, and around 1.0% for lower prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: One in every 100 patients without COVID-19 symptoms tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR; this yield increased in conjunction with community prevalence. The added value of chest CT was limited. Preoperative screening allowed us to take adequate precautions for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients in a surgical population, whereas negative patients needed only routine procedures.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Asintomáticas , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , SARS-CoV-2 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Islet alpha- and delta-cells are spared autoimmune destruction directed at beta-cells in type 1 diabetes resulting in an apparent increase of non-beta endocrine cells in the islet core. We determined how islet remodeling in autoimmune diabetes compares to streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes. Islet cell mass, proliferation, and immune cell infiltration in pancreas sections from diabetic NOD mice and mice with STZ-induced diabetes was assessed using quantitative image analysis. Serial sections were stained for various beta-cell markers and Ngn3, typically restricted to embryonic tissue, was only upregulated in diabetic NOD mouse islets. Serum levels of insulin, glucagon and GLP-1 were measured to compare hormone levels with respect to disease state. Total pancreatic alpha-cell mass did not change as autoimmune diabetes developed in NOD mice despite the proportion of islet area comprised of alpha- and delta-cells increased. By contrast, alpha- and delta-cell mass was increased in mice with STZ-induced diabetes. Serum levels of glucagon reflected these changes in alpha-cell mass: glucagon levels remained constant in NOD mice over time but increased significantly in STZ-induced diabetes. Increased serum GLP-1 levels were found in both models of diabetes, likely due to alpha-cell expression of prohormone convertase 1/3. Alpha- or delta-cell mass in STZ-diabetic mice did not normalize by replacement of insulin via osmotic mini-pumps or islet transplantation. Hence, the inflammatory milieu in NOD mouse islets may restrict alpha-cell expansion highlighting important differences between these two diabetes models and raising the possibility that increased alpha-cell mass might contribute to the hyperglycemia observed in the STZ model.