Point-of-care ultrasound associated with shorter length of stay than computed tomography for renal colic.

BACKGROUND: Despite similar diagnostic effectiveness for renal colic, computed tomography (CT) is more resource intensive than point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS). We sought to compare Emergency Department (ED) length of stay (LOS) among patients with renal colic according to imaging modality utilized. We secondarily compared rates of infection, return ED visits, missed significant pathology, and urologic intervention. METHODS: This was a 12-month (1/1/22-12/31/22) multi-site retrospective cohort study of all patients diagnosed with renal colic who presented to the ED on days when at least one patient had a billable renal PoCUS examination performed. Patients with a history of genitourinary malignancy, pregnancy, renal transplant, hemodialysis, single kidney, prior visit for renal colic in the previous 30 days, or an incomplete workup were excluded. Median ED LOS was compared using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, and the 95% confidence limits for the difference between medians was calculated. Secondary outcomes were compared using a Fisher's Exact test. RESULTS: Of 415 patients screened, 325 were included for analysis: 150 had CT alone, 80 had PoCUS alone, 54 had PoCUS plus CT, and 41 had neither. Median LOS for PoCUS alone was 75.0 (95% CI 39.3-110.7) minutes shorter than CT alone (231.5 vs. 307.0 min, p < 0.0001). Similar rates of infection, return visits, and missed pathology occurred across all groups (p > 0.10). Urologic interventions were higher in the PoCUS plus CT (25.9%) group compared to CT alone (7.3%), PoCUS alone (2.5%), and neither (7.3%), p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Among patients with renal colic, PoCUS was associated with shorter ED LOS compared to CT, without differences in infection rates, return visits, or missed pathology. Patients with PoCUS plus CT had a higher rate of urologic interventions, suggesting PoCUS may have a role in identifying patients who would most benefit from CT.

Sir Rickman John Godlee-Contributions in Addition to His 1884 Tumor Resection, A Review.

BACKGROUND: Sir Rickman John Godlee (1849-1925) was widely known for performing the first documented surgery to resect a tumor from the brain. METHODS: The case was performed on November 25, 1884, on a 25-year-old farmer who presented with a left-sided Jacksonian March seizure. RESULTS: The case was highly publicized because the tumor was localized by Dr. Hughes Bennett and subsequently resected by Sir Godlee based on the patient's clinical presentation and physical examination alone. CONCLUSIONS: Aside from this widely publicized case, little has been written about Sir Godlee. Sir Godlee was also known to be an outstanding anatomist who displayed exceptional skills in surgical dissection. He was known for being an excellent teacher. Sir Godlee was deeply influenced by his uncle, Lord Joseph Lister, a renowned physician who popularized antiseptic methods. Sir Godlee was also known for publishing his uncle's biography, Lord Lister.

Redefining the Treatment of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae for Bertolotti Syndrome: Long-Term Outcomes Utilizing the Jenkins Classification to Determine Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Using the Jenkins classification, we propose a strategy of shaving down hypertrophic bone, unilateral fusion, or bilateral fusion procedures to achieve pain reduction and improve quality of life for patients with Bertolotti syndrome. METHODS: We reviewed 103 patients from 2012 through 2021 who had surgically treated Bertolotti syndrome. We identified 56 patients with Bertolotti syndrome and at least 6 months of follow-up. Patients with iliac contact preoperatively were presumed to be more likely to have hip pain that could respond to surgical treatment, and those patients were tracked for those outcomes as well. RESULTS: Type 1 patients (n = 13) underwent resection. Eleven (85%) had improvement, 7 (54%) had good outcome, 1 (7%) had subsequent surgery, 1 (7%) was suggested additional surgery, and 2 (14%) were lost to follow-up. In Type 2 patients (n = 36), 18 underwent decompressions and 18 underwent fusions as a first line. Of the 18 patients treated with resection an interim analysis saw 10 (55%) with failure and needing subsequent procedures. With subsequent procedure, 14 (78%) saw improvement. For fusion surgical patients, 16 (88%) saw some improvement and 13 (72%) had a good outcome. In Type 4 patients (n = 7), 6 (86%) did well with unilateral fusion, with durable benefit at 2 years. In patients who had hip pain preoperatively (n = 27), 21 (78%) had improvement of hip pain postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The Jenkins classification system provides a strategy for patients with Bertolotti syndrome who fail conservative therapy. Patients with Type 1 anatomy respond well to resection procedures. Patients with Type 2 and Type 4 anatomy respond well to fusion procedures. These patients respond well in regard to hip pain.

Redefining the Classification for Bertolotti Syndrome: Anatomical Findings in Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae Guide Treatment Selection.

OBJECTIVE: We present the Jenkins classification for Bertolotti syndrome or symptomatic lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) and compare this with the existing Castellvi classification for patients presenting for treatment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 150 new patients presenting for treatment of back, hip, groin, and/or leg pain from July 2012 through February 2022. Using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and radiography, the patients with a radiographic finding of LSTV, an appropriate clinical presentation, and identification of LSTV as the primary pain generator via diagnostic injections were diagnosed with Bertolotti syndrome. Patients for whom conservative treatment had failed and who underwent surgery to address their LSTV were included in the present study. RESULTS: The Castellvi classification excludes 2 types of anatomic variants: the prominent anatomic side and the potential transverse process and iliac crest contact. Of 150 patients with transitional anatomy, 103 (69%) were identified with Bertolotti syndrome using the Jenkins classification and received surgery (46 men [45%] and 57 women [55%]). Of the 103 patients, 90 (87%) underwent minimally invasive surgery. The patients presented with pain localized to the back (n = 101; 98%), leg (n = 79; 77%), hip (n = 51; 49%), and buttock (n = 52; 50%). Only 84 of the Jenkins classification patients (82%) met any of the Castellvi criteria. All 19 patients for whom the Castellvi classification failed had had type 1 anatomy using the Jenkins system and underwent surgery (decompression, n = 16 [84%]; fusion, n = 1 [5%]; fusion plus decompression, n = 2 [11%]). Of these 19 patients, 17 (89%) had improved pain scores. The 19 patients exclusively diagnosed via the Jenkins classification had no significant differences in improved pain compared with those diagnosed using the Castellvi classification. CONCLUSIONS: The Jenkins classification improves on the prior Castellvi classification to more comprehensively describe the functional anatomy, identify uncaptured anatomy, and better predict optimal surgical procedures to treat those with Bertolotti syndrome.

Spinal Lymphoma Presenting as an Epidural and Retropleural Mass With Concomitant Pathologic Compression Fracture: A Case Report.

Lymphoma has traditionally earned the nickname "the great mimicker". Its presentation as a primary spinal tumor is rare, and therefore seldom included in the differential diagnosis. However, its mimicking nature and diverse presentation make it very difficult to exclude entirely. Here, we present an elderly patient with histology-confirmed spinal lymphoma presenting as both an epidural mass with transforaminal extension into the retropleural space as well as vertebral body compression fracture, together leading to severe spinal stenosis and compressive myelopathy. Additional non-malignant compression fractures found in our patient allow for an interesting discussion on disease presentation and imaging-based diagnosis. We discuss our approach to diagnosis, surgical treatment, and post-operative medical care.