Patient Frustration with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Education Met with Resilient Response.

INTRODUCTION: Limited patient understanding due to challenges in physician-patient communication and inadequate patient education materials (PEMs) can result in poor outcomes after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. Our objective was to identify how patients learned about POP and review their perception of available educational tools. METHODS: Patients with a history of POP were recruited using ResearchMatch and invited to participate in a virtual semi-structured interview where they were shown a website, brochure, and video pertaining to POP. Information regarding patient preference for PEMs was obtained. The interviews were transcribed, coded, and qualitative data analysis was performed using grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis of interviews of 13 participants averaging 58 years old yielded several preliminary themes including: insufficient information to guide treatment decisions, preference for multimodal, dynamic, and comprehensive materials, and lack of support leading to avoidance of care, misinformation, and self-advocacy mechanisms. Emerging concepts included: lack of complete information regarding POP treatment resulted in misinformation, stress and desperation, distrust of healthcare providers leading to feelings of isolation, desire of support groups, and loss of follow up, and a desire for well-organized, detailed, multimodal, and destigmatizing materials as a guide to their disease process, prevention and risk factors, its natural progression, and treatment decisions. Participants developed self-reliant strategies for making treatment decisions, including the use of online resources, advice from friends, and independent search for more specialized physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Women with POP reported a lack of information and support which resulted in the generation of self-coping mechanisms. This led to significant anxiety surrounding their diagnosis and treatment and poor satisfaction. Developing a reproducible methodology to create evidence-based PEMs will significantly decrease patient misinformation, apprehension, and use of inaccurate sources of information.

Outcomes after ultramassive transfusion in the modern era: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread institution of modern massive transfusion protocols with balanced blood product ratios, survival for patients with traumatic hemorrhage receiving ultramassive transfusion (UMT) (defined as ≥20 U of packed red blood cells [RBCs]) in 24 hours) remains low and resource consumption remains high. Therefore, we aimed to identify factors associated with mortality in trauma patients receiving UMT in the modern resuscitation era. METHODS: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter retrospective study of 461 trauma patients from 17 trauma centers who received ≥20 U of RBCs in 24 hours was performed (2014-2019). Multivariable logistic regression and Classification and Regression Tree analysis were used to identify clinical characteristics associated with mortality. RESULTS: The 461 patients were young (median age, 35 years), male (82%), severely injured (median Injury Severity Score, 33), in shock (median shock index, 1.2; base excess, -9), and transfused a median of 29 U of RBCs, 22 U of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and 24 U of platelets (PLT). Mortality was 46% at 24 hours and 65% at discharge. Transfusion of RBC/FFP ≥1.5:1 or RBC/PLT ≥1.5:1 was significantly associated with mortality, most pronounced for the 18% of patients who received both RBC/PLT and RBC/FFP ≥1.5:1 (odds ratios, 3.11 and 2.81 for mortality at 24 hours and discharge; both p < 0.01). Classification and Regression Tree identified that age older than 50 years, low initial Glasgow Coma Scale, thrombocytopenia, and resuscitative thoracotomy were associated with low likelihood of survival (14-26%), while absence of these factors was associated with the highest survival (71%). CONCLUSION: Despite modern massive transfusion protocols, one half of trauma patients receiving UMT are transfused with either RBC/FFP or RBC/PLT in unbalanced ratios ≥1.5:1, with increased associated mortality. Maintaining focus on balanced ratios during UMT is critical, and consideration of advanced age, poor initial mental status, thrombocytopenia, and resuscitative thoracotomy can aid in prognostication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level III.

Rethinking diversity, equity and inclusion in an acute care surgery setting.

N/A - This is the first place essay contest winner for the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee's 2020 essay contest in response to the prompt 'How can diversity, equity, and inclusion be improved in acute care surgery/the AAST?' The essay does not have an attached abstract.

Role of Von Willebrand Factor after Injury: It May Do More Than We Think.

ABSTRACT: Acute traumatic coagulopathy is a complex phenomenon following injury and a main contributor to hemorrhage. It remains a leading cause of preventable death in trauma patients. This phenomenon is initiated by systemic injury to the vascular endothelium that is exacerbated by hypoperfusion, acidosis, and hypothermia and leads to systemic activation of the coagulation cascades and resultant coagulopathy. Many previous studies have focused on endotheliopathy with targeted markers such as syndecan-1, soluble thrombomodulin, and plasma adrenaline as potential culprits for initiation and propagation of this state. However, in more recent studies, hyperadhesive von Willebrand factor (VWF), which is released following endothelial injury, and its cleaving metalloprotease ADAMTS13 have emerged as significant targets of the downstream effect of endothelial breakdown and coagulation dysregulation. Elucidation of the mechanism by which the dysregulated VWF-ADAMTS13 axis leads to endothelial dysfunction and coagulopathy after trauma can help identify new targets for therapy and sites for intervention. Much of what is known mechanistically regarding VWF stems from work done in traumatic brain injury. Following localized brain injury, brain-derived extracellular vesicles are released into circulation where they induce a hypercoagulable state that rapidly turns into consumptive coagulopathy. VWF released from injured endothelial cells binds to these extracellular vesicles to enhance their activity in promoting coagulopathy and increasing endothelial permeability. However, there are numerous gaps in our knowledge of VWF following injury, providing a platform for further investigation.