Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancers: Treatment optimization - Part I.

A multitude of TKI has been developed and approved targeting various oncogenetic alterations. While these have provided improvements in efficacy compared with conventional chemotherapies, resistance to targeted therapies occurs. Mutations in the kinase domain result in the inability of TKI to inactivate the protein kinase. Also, gene amplification, increased protein expression and downstream activation or bypassing of signalling pathways are commonly reported mechanisms of resistance. Improved understanding of mechanisms involved in TKI resistance has resulted in the development of new generations of targeted agents. In a race against time, the search for new, more potent and efficient drugs, and/or combinations of drugs, remains necessary as new resistance mechanisms to the latest generation of TKI emerge. This review examines the various generations of TKI approved to date and their common mechanisms of resistance, focusing on TKI targeting BCR-ABL, epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase and BRAF/MEK tyrosine kinases.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancers: Treatment optimization - Part II.

Real-life populations are more heterogeneous than those included in prospective clinical studies. In cancer patients, comorbidities and co-medications favor the appearance of severe adverse effects which can significantly impact quality of life and treatment effectiveness. Most of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have been developed with flat oral dosing exposing patients to the risk of poor adherence due to side effects. Additionally, genetic or physiological factors, differences in diet, and drug-drug interactions can lead to inter-individual variability affecting treatment outcomes and increasing the risk of adverse events. Knowledge of the different factors of variability allows individualized patient management. This review examines the effects of adherence, food intake, and pharmaceutical form on the pharmacokinetics of oral TKI, as well as evaluating pharmacokinetics considerations improving TKI management. Concentration-effectiveness and concentration-toxicity data are presented for the selected TKI, and a simple therapeutic drug monitoring schema is outlined to help individualize dosing of oral TKI.

Sonidegib in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: a Retrospective Study.

Sonidegib, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, is indicated for treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma, based on the results of the BOLT study. However, to date, no real-world study of sonidegib has been reported. An observational, retrospective, single-centre study (PaSoS study) was conducted. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of sonidegib for treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma in a real-world setting. Secondary objectives included modalities of use, tolerability, tumour evolution, and management after discontinuation. A total of 21 patients treated with sonidegib were included from March 2018 to January 2021. The median follow-up was 18.7 months and median exposure 7.0 months. Objective response (OR) rate was 81.0% (n = 17) including 6 (29%) patients with a complete response (CR). Disease control rate was 100%. First tumour response was rapid, with a median time of 2.3 months. Nine (43%) patients underwent surgery after sonidegib discontinuation, and no relapse was observed. All the patients experienced at least 1 adverse event (AE). Muscle spasms were the most frequent AE (n = 14; 67%), followed by dysgeusia (n = 8; 38%) and alopecia (n = 12; 57%). The efficacy and safety profile of sonidegib in this first-to-date real-life trial are consistent with prior results. Overall, real-world evidence corroborated sonidegib efficacy and tolerability as a first-line treatment for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors increase T cell immunity during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The COVID-19 pandemic has spread worldwide, yet the role of antiviral T cell immunity during infection and the contribution of immune checkpoints remain unclear. By prospectively following a cohort of 292 patients with melanoma, half of which treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), we identified 15 patients with acute or convalescent COVID-19 and investigated their transcriptomic, proteomic, and cellular profiles. We found that ICI treatment was not associated with severe COVID-19 and did not alter the induction of inflammatory and type I interferon responses. In-depth phenotyping demonstrated expansion of CD8 effector memory T cells, enhanced T cell activation, and impaired plasmablast induction in ICI-treated COVID-19 patients. The evaluation of specific adaptive immunity in convalescent patients showed higher spike (S), nucleoprotein (N), and membrane (M) antigen-specific T cell responses and similar induction of spike-specific antibody responses. Our findings provide evidence that ICI during COVID-19 enhanced T cell immunity without exacerbating inflammation.

Case Report: Clinical Experience With Avelumab in Patients With Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma and Brain Metastases Treated in Europe.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer that can metastasize rapidly. In patients with metastatic MCC (mMCC), brain metastases are uncommon but are associated with poor prognosis; furthermore, there is limited published literature regarding treatment of these patients, and no specific regimens are currently recommended by guidelines. Avelumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 monoclonal antibody, was the first approved treatment for patients with mMCC. Here, we present 4 cases of patients with mMCC and brain metastases treated with avelumab. Patient age ranged from 48 to 70 years, and all patients received avelumab as second-line therapy following disease progression with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patient cases 1 and 2 received avelumab alone and experienced rapid disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). In patient case 3, avelumab alone resulted in a prolonged complete response by RECIST 1.1 of 1 brain metastasis and partial response by RECIST 1.1 of a second brain metastasis. After 11 months of avelumab treatment, the patient received concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery that resulted in complete response of the second metastasis. Patient case 4 achieved a partial response by RECIST 1.1 with avelumab plus stereotactic radiosurgery. These results suggest that avelumab followed by radiotherapy or with concurrent radiotherapy may be an effective treatment option for patients with mMCC and brain metastases.

Mitogen-activated protein kinase blockade in melanoma: intermittent versus continuous therapy, from preclinical to clinical data.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although targeted therapy provides a high response rate and rapid disease control in advanced melanoma, most patients experience disease progression due to acquired resistance mechanisms leading to reactivation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. The purpose of this article is to review the recently published data on the impact of an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule of BRAF and MEK inhibition in advanced melanoma to determine the best approach in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Some preclinical studies have highlighted the concept that drug-resistant cells may also display drug dependency, such that intermittent dosing of targeted therapy may prevent the emergence of lethal drug resistance. Moreover, clinical observations have suggested that repeated treatment after a break or an intervening therapy may provide clinical benefit. However, recent preclinical and clinical studies have also failed to demonstrate an advantage of intermittent dosing and showed a similar efficacy of the intermittent versus continuous regimens of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in mice models and phase 2 clinical trial. SUMMARY: Owing to these discordant results, continuous dosing of BRAF and MEK inhibitors remains the optimal therapeutic approach until additional clinical data demonstrate the superiority of another combination or dosing regimen.

A Melanoma-Tailored Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Coupled with a Comprehensive Analysis to Improve Routine Melanoma Genotyping.

BACKGROUND: Tumor molecular deciphering is crucial in clinical management. Pan-cancer next-generation sequencing panels have moved towards exhaustive molecular characterization. However, because of treatment resistance and the growing emergence of pharmacological targets, tumor-specific customized panels are needed to guide therapeutic strategies. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to present such a customized next-generation sequencing panel in melanoma. METHODS: Melanoma patients with somatic molecular profiling performed as part of routine care were included. High-throughput sequencing was performed with a melanoma tailored next-generation sequencing panel of 64 genes involved in molecular classification, prognosis, theranostic, and therapeutic resistance. Single nucleotide variants and copy number variations were screened, and a comprehensive molecular analysis identified clinically relevant alterations. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-one melanoma cases were analyzed (before any treatment initiation for 94.8% of patients). After bioinformatic prioritization, we uncovered 561 single nucleotide variants, 164 copy number variations, and four splice-site mutations. At least one alteration was detected in 368 (87.4%) lesions, with BRAF, NRAS, CDKN2A, CCND1, and MET as the most frequently altered genes. Among patients with BRAFV600 mutated melanoma, 44.5% (77 of 173) harbored at least one concurrent alteration driving potential resistance to mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors. In patients with RAS hotspot mutated lesions and in patients with neither BRAFV600 nor RAS hotspot mutations, alterations constituting potential pharmacological targets were found in 56.9% (66 of 116) and 47.7% (63 of 132) of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our tailored next-generation sequencing assay coupled with a comprehensive analysis may improve therapeutic management in a significant number of patients with melanoma. Updating such a panel and implementing multi-omic approaches will further enhance patients' clinical management.

Impact of New Systemic Treatment and Radiotherapy in Melanoma Patients with Leptomeningeal Metastases.

IMPORTANCE: Few data are available on patients with leptomeningeal disease (LM) from melanoma treated with new systemic therapies. OBJECTIVE: To gain a better understanding of patients, disease characteristics, and therapeutic interventions in melanoma patients with LM in the era of new systemic treatment. DESIGN: Clinical characteristics, treatments, and survival of melanoma patients diagnosed with LM, isolated or associated with brain metastases, were collected. The Cox regression model assessed the influence of patient and melanoma characteristics on survival. SETTING: Monocentric, retrospective, real-life cohort of patients with LM from melanoma. PARTICIPANTS: All patients followed up at Saint-Louis University Hospital and diagnosed with LM between December 2013 and February 2020 were included. For each patient identified, a central review by dermato-oncologist and neuro-oncologist experts was performed to confirm the diagnosis of LM. EXPOSURE: Impact of new systemic therapies and radiotherapy. RESULTS: Among the 452 advanced melanoma patients followed at St Louis Hospital between 2013 and 2020, 41 patients with LM from melanoma were identified. Among them, 29 patients with a diagnosis of LM "confirmed" or "probable" after central neuro-oncologists reviewing were included. Nineteen patients had known melanoma brain metastases at LM diagnosis. Among the 27 patients treated with systemic therapy, 17 patients were treated with immunotherapy, 5 patients received targeted therapy, 1 was treated with chemotherapy, and 4 patients were treated with anti-PD-1 in combination with BRAF inhibitor. The median overall survival (OS) from LM diagnosis was 5.1 months. Median OS was 7.1 months for the 9 patients receiving systemic therapy combined with radiotherapy, and 3.2 months for the 20 patients not receiving combined radiotherapy. Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.09-1.90, p < 0.01) and presence of neurological symptoms at LM diagnosis (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.25-6.99, p = 0.01) were associated with poor survival. At the time of data analysis, five patients were still alive with a median follow-up of 47.4 months and had persistent complete response. CONCLUSION: Targeted therapy and immunotherapy are promising new treatment options in LM from melanoma that can increase overall survival, and may induce long lasting remission in some patients.

Reintroduction of immune-checkpoint inhibitors after immune-related meningitis: a case series of melanoma patients.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 and programmed cell death ligand-1) are associated with several immune-related neurological disorders. Cases of meningitis related to ICIs are poorly described in literature and probably underestimated. Several guidelines are available for the acute management of these adverse events, but the safety of resuming ICIs in these patients remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective case series of immune-related meningitis associated with ICIs that occurred between October 1 2015 and October 31 2019 in two centers: Saint-Louis and Cochin hospitals, Paris, France. Diagnosis was defined by a (1) high count of lymphocytes (>8 cells/mm3) and/or high level of proteins (>0.45 g/L) without bacteria/virus or tumor cells detection, in cerebrospinal fluid and (2) normal brain and spine imaging. Patients were followed-up for at least 6 months from the meningitis onset. Seven cases of immune-related meningitis are here reported. Median delay of meningitis occurrence after ICIs onset was 9 days. Steroid treatment was introduced in four patients at a dose of 1 mg/kg (prednisone), allowing a complete recovery within 2 weeks. The other three patients spontaneously improved within 3 weeks. Given the favorable outcome, ICIs were reintroduced in all patients. The rechallenge was well tolerated and no patients experienced meningitis recurrence. In conclusion, in our series, the clinical course was favorable and steroids were not always required. Resuming ICIs in these patients appeared safe and can thus be considered in case of isolated meningitis. However, a careful analysis of the risk/benefit ratio should be done on a case-by-case basis.

FGF2 Induces Resistance to Nilotinib through MAPK Pathway Activation in KIT Mutated Melanoma.

KIT is a bona fide oncogene in a subset of melanoma and, ex vivo, KIT inhibitors are very efficient at killing KIT-mutant melanoma cell lines. However, KIT-mutant melanoma tumors tend to show a de novo resistance in most cases and a limited duration of response when response is achieved. We performed pharmacodynamic studies on patients with KIT-mutated melanoma treated with nilotinib, which suggested that the FGF2 axis may be a mechanism of resistance in this subset of melanoma. Using several melanoma cell lines, which are dependent on oncogenic KIT, we showed that although KIT inhibition markedly decreased cell viability in melanoma cell lines with distinct KIT mutations, this effect was lessened in the presence of FGF2 due to inhibition of BIM expression by MAPK pathway activation. Addition of a MEK inhibitor reversed the FGF2-driven resistance for all KIT mutants. We confirmed the expression of FGF2 and activation of MEK-ERK in melanoma patients using in situ data from a clinical trial. Therefore, the combined inhibition of KIT with FGFR or MEK may be a next-step effective clinical strategy in KIT-mutant melanoma.

Targeting BRAF and MEK inhibitors in melanoma in the metastatic, neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Better understanding of the biology of BRAF-mutated melanoma has led to the development of highly effective therapy, BRAF and MEK inhibitors, targeting abnormally activated protein kinases for patient with BRAF-mutated melanoma. The purpose of this article was to review the recent published data on BRAF and MEK inhibitors in melanoma in the metastatic, adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting to facilitate the management of melanoma patients in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: The spectacular outcomes of targeted therapy in advanced melanoma patients have led to their development in the adjuvant setting with substantial improvements in recurrence-free and overall survival. The neoadjuvant strategy is already used in many cancers to decrease tumor load, improve resectability and prevent relapse. Targeted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting is a therapeutic approach being explored in subsequent studies. SUMMARY: We hope that this review will help clinicians to manage melanoma patients in routine practice.

Impact of radiotherapy administered simultaneously with systemic treatment in patients with melanoma brain metastases within MelBase, a French multicentric prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) are historically associated with poor prognosis. Radiation therapy is conventionally associated with a high local control rate. Development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has improved overall survival (OS) and intracranial response rate, but about 50% of patients failed to respond to these novel therapies. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of combined radiotherapy (cRT) on overall survival in a large multicenter real-life prospective cohort of patients with MBM treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data from 262 patients with MBM were collected via MelBase, a French multicentric biobank prospectively enrolling unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Two groups were defined: patients receiving cRT (cRT group) or not receiving cRT (no-cRT group). Primary end-point was OS. Propensity score weighting was used to correct for indication bias. RESULTS: Among the 262 patients, 93 (35%) received cRT (cRT group). The patients were treated with immunotherapy in 69% and 60% and with targeted therapy in 31% and 40% of the cRT and no-cRT groups, respectively. With a median follow-up of 6.9 months, median OS was 16.8 months and 6.9 months in the cRT and no-cRT groups, respectively. After propensity score weighting, cRT was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio = 0.6, 95% confidence interval: 0.4-0.8; p=0.007). Median OS after ponderation was 15.3 months and 6.2 months in the cRT and no-cRT groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows that cRT may be associated with a significant decrease of 40% in the risk of death in patients with MBM treated with systemic therapy.

[Update in treatment for Merkel Cell Carcinoma and clinical practice guide]. / Avancées thérapeutiques récentes dans la prise en charge du carcinome à cellules de Merkel.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) is a rare neuroendocrine skin cancer that is associated with frequent recurrences and a high mortality rate. In the recent past years, incidence rates of MCC have increased in the USA, Australia and Europe. About one third of patients present metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis or will develop metastases in the course of their disease. Although advanced MCC is chemosensitive, responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy are mostly of short duration and toxicity is potentially high. Recently, considerable progress has been made in the MCC field with the arrival of immunotherapy, particularly anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies which have demonstrated impressive frequency and durability of response and were well-tolerated. However, about 50 % of advanced patients do not respond to immunotherapy and urgent need exists to identify biomarkers and predictive factors. Moreover, many randomized prospective studies are evaluating the efficacy and safety of novel therapeutics and patients with advanced stages are encouraged to participate in clinical trials. This article synthetizes the actual clinical practice guidelines, the safety and efficacy data from the recent clinical trials and the on-going clinical trials to help clinicians in the treatment of MCC patients.

Optimal cut-off for neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: Fact or Fantasy? A prospective cohort study in metastatic cancer patients.

This study assessed the prognostic value of pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Clinical and biological data for patients with metastatic solid tumors treated in an oncology outpatient department and prospectively followed by a call center (PROCHE program) between January 2008 and December 2011 were analyzed. All patients with an NLR value within 28 days before the first cycle of first-line of chemotherapy were included (cohort 1). To assess influence of chemotherapy line on NLR prognostic value, data from patients treated with later chemotherapy lines were also analyzed (cohort 2). Adjusted multivariate Cox regressions with or without non-linear and time-dependent effects were performed. Optimal NLR cut-off was investigated by time-dependent sensitivity analysis using several indices. There were 317 and 134 patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Elevated NLR was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 1.35 [95% confidence interval 1.19-1.54]; p<0.0001). The optimal NLR cut-off in cohort 1 was dependent on index used and time of assessment: HR values were non-significant at a cut-off of 3.0 (1.34 [0.99-1.32], but significant when the cut-off was 4.0 (1.53 [1.11-2.10]). NLR was linearly related to mortality risk; in subgroup analysis, no significant interaction was found with co-variables or tumor localization overall (cohorts 1+2). Pre-treatment NLR is a useful prognostic tool in patients with metastatic solid tumors, irrespective of primary tumor site, chemotherapy line, age, gender and performance status. However, using an NLR cut-off value for clinical decision-making requires extreme caution.