Structural failure in bridging stentgrafts for branched endovascular aneurysm repair: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To present a case series of spontaneous structural failure of bridging stentgrafts (BSGs) after branched endovascular aortic repair (bEVAR), as well as their failure types and their detection. While bEVAR is a safe and effective procedure, one main limitation is the reintervention rate associated with the BSGs. Structural failure of BSGs, defined as fabric disruption, stent fracture with leak or complete separation is a major cause for reinterventions and difficult to detect in computed tomography angiography (CTA). METHODS: From a multicenter bEVAR complication database, structural BSG failures were identified. Patient and BSG characteristics, detection mode, failure type, treatment and outcome were recorded and compared with bEVAR patients with intact BSGs. RESULTS: Twenty-three BSG failures were detected in 12 patients with only 43% directly identified in CTA, after a mean of 21.4 months after implantation. The BSGs were Advanta (n = 4), E-Ventus (n = 16) and BeGraft (n = 3) in 10 renal, 9 superior mesenteric, and 4 celiac branches. Religning with another BSG was successful in 20/22 cases, one BSG failure necessitated renal branch embolization (organ loss), and one mesenteric bypass surgery. Two reintervention-related mortalities occurred. CONCLUSION: Structural failure of BSGs is a serious limitation for bEVAR, which can result in high reintervention rates and serious complications. BSG failure typically occurs in single-layer types and events are clustered in patients. The necessary reinterventions carry serious morbidity and mortality. Since the use as BSG in bEVAR is off-label with all current BSG manufacturers, caution is advised regarding patient-informed consent.

Endovascular conversion into aorto-uniiliac configuration of acute failed endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with better one-year survival rates compared to open conversion.

BACKGROUND: Open conversions (OC) due to failed endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) are technically demanding because of preexisting prostheses and advanced aortic disease. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of aorto-uniiliac endografting (AUI) as an alternative treatment option in acute failed EVAR. METHODS: From March 1995 through February 2012, 26 patients underwent acute conversion of failed EVAR at our tertiary care university center. All data were prospectively entered in our institutional database. Outcomes included 30-day or in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and mid-term survival. RESULTS: During the investigation period, a total of 692 patients received EVAR at our institution, while five of the 26 patients with acute conversion (19.2%) had an initial EVAR at an outlying institution and were referred for treatment. Therefore, our estimated institutional rate of acute conversions was 3% (21 of 692 EVAR). OC were performed in 14 patients (53.8%), while 12 patients underwent AUI (46.2%). An average time of 20.3 months (median: 18.6; interquartile range Q1-Q3: 0.0-38.6) elapsed between the initial EVAR and the acute conversion. All acute AUI conversion procedures were completed successfully. The 30-day mortality following acute conversions was 42.3% and since the use of AUI, it could be reduced to 33.3%. Kaplan-Meier estimates revealed a survival advantage for AUI at one year (p = 0.046), but the benefit was lost by mid-term follow-up (p = 0.103). CONCLUSIONS: AUI for the treatment of acute failed EVAR represents a feasible and less invasive alternative to OC, and is associated with better one-year survival rates.

Rates of adverse events and correction procedures after elective versus emergent aortouni-iliac endografting during mid-term follow-up: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Due to preferential implantation of bifurcated devices during endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), longer-term results following aortouni-iliac (AUI) endografting are scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of endoleaks as well as frequency of secondary correction procedures after elective and emergent AUI endografting. METHODS: A prospectively gathered database at a tertiary care university hospital was retrospectively reviewed from January 2000 until January 2012. This interrogation identified 61 patients who had undergone AUI endografting to treat their AAA. Data retrieval obtained 47 patients with elective AAA repairs while 14 patients received emergent AUI endografting in case of rupture. Procedural outcomes, endoleaks, complications, and secondary interventions during mid-term follow-up were recorded for analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients of the study cohort were male (90.2%) and mean age was 76.5 years (median: 77.2, Q1-Q3: 72.1-81.6). Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural characteristics, as well as median follow-up length (39.8 months versus 34.9 months) were similar between groups. Endoleaks, complications, and rate of secondary correction procedures were not increased following emergent AUI endografting. The majority of these interventions comprised catheter-based or less invasive surgical procedures. All patients requiring major surgery (three open surgical conversions with endograft explantation and one open aortic banding) survived, while one patient sustained fatal myocardial infarction after a transluminal correction procedure. CONCLUSION: Emergent AUI endografting was not associated with higher rates of adverse events or correction procedures during mid-term follow-up. Secondary interventions to maintain aneurysm exclusion could be carried out with low mortality.

Secondary modification into aortouniiliac configuration to salvage failed endovascular aneurysm repair is safe and effective but not associated with higher intervention rates during long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Reports of secondary modifications into aortouniiliac configuration to salvage-failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are limited. We evaluated long-term results after these procedures and compared them with those after primary aortouniiliac endografting (AUE). METHODS: A retrospective review of all EVAR performed from March 1995 until July 2011 was conducted. Patients were included when primary AUE (group I) or modification into aortouniiliac configuration (group II) was done. RESULTS: Data analysis obtained 27 group I and 23 group II patients. Salvage of failed EVAR could be achieved in 96% of group II patients, and mortality was zero. Frequency of adverse events and amount of interventions to maintain aneurysm exclusion were not increased after secondary AUE. Kaplan-Meier estimates for long-term survival between groups were comparable (P = .36). CONCLUSIONS: Secondary AUE allows correction of graft-related endoleaks potentially leading to late aneurysm rupture. Complications and adverse events throughout long-term follow-up were not necessarily increased when compared with primary AUE.

Aortouni-iliac endografting as an alternative salvage procedure to open conversion in failed endovascular aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: To present a single-center experience with failed EVAR requiring conversions comparing open surgery to a minimally invasive procedure modifying the existing stent-graft into an aortouni-iliac (AUI) configuration. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database at our tertiary care university hospital was interrogated to identify all patients with failed EVAR who had undergone either stent-graft modification into an AUI configuration or open conversion between March 1995 and January 2012. Patients with late aneurysm ruptures were excluded. The search found 30 patients (one had initial treatment elsewhere) who required conversion among the 688 patients who had undergone EVAR in that time period. Before conversion, 16 (53%) patients had prior endovascular corrections to maintain aneurysm exclusion. RESULTS: An average time of 52.2 months (median 46.9, IQR 0.0-92.5) elapsed between initial EVAR and conversion. There were 11 early conversions (including 7 on-table), while 19 procedures were done >30 days post EVAR. Twenty-two (73%) patients underwent AUI endografting, while open conversions were carried out in 8 (27%). Mean hospital stay after conversion was 19.5 days (median 13.0, IQR 8.0-17.0). Overall mortality after conversion was 3.3% (1 patient after on-table open conversion), but since the introduction of AUI endografting as an alternative treatment approach, 30-day mortality following conversions fell to zero. CONCLUSION: Modification of a failed stent-graft into an AUI configuration serves as a less invasive treatment option compared to open conversion and allows salvage of the failed device. With the implementation of this alternative approach, mortality after conversion parallels the mortality of elective abdominal aneurysm repair.

Endovascular treatment of delayed rupture following prior abdominal aortic aneurysm repair achieves better survival rates.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that endovascular treatment of delayed aneurysm rupture achieves significantly better survival rates compared to surgical conversion. METHODS: All patients sustaining delayed rupture following prior exclusion of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) either by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or open graft replacement from March 1995 through December 2011 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database at a tertiary care university hospital. During the study period, 35 patients (32 men; mean age 72.9 years) presented with delayed rupture at a median 2.4 years (interquartile range 1.3-4.3) after initial AAA repair by EVAR (n=22) or open surgery (n=13). Causes of post-EVAR rupture were graft-related endoleaks, while ruptures after open repair occurred at anastomotic suture sites. Patients were divided into groups regarding type of treatment for delayed rupture: 20/35 (57%) underwent successful EVAR (10 redo procedures), 13/35 (37%) had surgery (3 redo procedures), and 2/35 (6%) patients received comfort care only. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality after curative treatment was 25% (5/20) for endovascular treatment compared to 54% (7/13) for surgery (p=0.14). Including additional deaths beyond 30 days, the overall in-hospital mortality was 52% (17/33). The Kaplan-Meier survival estimate for patients undergoing endovascular treatment was significantly higher (p=0.011). CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of delayed rupture is feasible and helps to reduce mortality. Our data suggest that endovascular procedures are a superior treatment option for EVAR-suitable patients with delayed rupture compared with surgical conversion.

Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: fate of the aneurysm sac and neck changes during long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and to compare sac diameter and neck changes in patients with type II endoleak to endoleak-free patients with at least 3-year imaging follow-up. METHODS: Among 407 consecutive EVAR patients, 109 patients (101 men; mean age 72.1 years, range 55-86) had at least 3-year computed tomography (CT) data and no type I or III endoleak. In this cohort, 49 patients presented with a type II endoleak at some time and 60 patients had no endoleak. Patients with type II endoleaks were further divided into subgroups based on the vessel origin and the perfusion status (persistent or transient). The course of the perfusion status of type II endoleaks and changes in the aneurysm sac diameters, neck diameters, and renal to stent-graft distances (RSD) were evaluated in the defined groups. Reintervention and death rates were also reported. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 68.1 ± 23.8 months. Compared to the no endoleak group, overall sac diameter increased significantly in the type II endoleak group (p = 0.007), but vessel origin did not have any influence. With regard to the perfusion status of type II endoleaks, aneurysm sac changes were significantly higher (p = 0.002) in the persistent endoleak group. During the study period, the increase in the proximal neck diameter was significantly higher in the no endoleak group compared to the type II endoleak group (p = 0.025). No significant difference was found in RSD changes between the defined groups. Reinterventions were performed in 20 (18.3%) patients (13 for type II endoleak); 2 (1.8%) patients without type II endoleak died of ruptured aneurysm. CONCLUSION: Persistent type II endoleaks led to significant aneurysm sac enlargement, but without increased mortality or rupture rates.

Complete ten-year follow-up after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: survival and causes of death.

PURPOSE: To analyze the hazard and causes of death after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms during a complete ten year follow-up. METHODS: This is a retrospective clinical study of 130 consecutive patients undergoing EVAR between 1995 and 1998. One-hundred twenty-one patients (93.1%) were treated with first-generation stentgrafts and nine patients (6.9%) received second-generation devices. All patients completed a follow-up of at least 10 years, unless death occurred before then. Time and causes of death were provided by the Austrian central register of deaths. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 7.6 years, and the 130 patients had 968.5 person-years of follow-up. The ten-year mortality rate was 62.3%. Cardiovascular events were the most frequent causes of death, with a 3.9 incidence rate per 100 person-years. Cancer death and death due to other causes occurred in 2.1 and 1.8 cases per 100 person-years, respectively. Lethal late aneurysm rupture happened in 4.6% (n=6), which corresponds to an annual incidence rate of 0.6 per 100 person-years. All of those patients had been treated with first-generation devices. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular events were the most frequent cause of death after EVAR, followed by malignancy and other diseases. The risk of dying from secondary rupture was clearly lower than that of death due to other reasons during ten years after EVAR, even in patients with first-generation stentgrafts.

Anastomotic pseudoaneurysms after surgical reconstruction: outcomes after endovascular repair of symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients.

PURPOSE: To compare perioperative and follow-up outcomes of symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients following endovascular repair of anastomotic pseudoaneurysms (APAs) of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 17 patients (two women), with a mean age of 66.2 years (range 30-83 years). Endovascular treatment was performed in ten symptomatic, and seven asymptomatic patients electively. Data included technical success, perioperative (within 30 days) mortality and morbidity, as well as stent graft-related complications, reinterventions, and survival in follow-up. RESULTS: Bifurcated (n = 13), aortomonoiliac (n = 3) endoprosthesis and one aortic cuff were implanted with a primary technical success rate of 100%. The overall in-hospital mortality and morbidity rate was 11.8% and 35.3%. The mean survival was 36.5 (range 0-111) months. There was a clear trend toward a lower overall survival within hospital and at one and three years for symptomatic patients compared to asymptomatic patients. (47.7 (CI: 0-138.8) versus 52.6 (CI: 28.5-76.8) months (p = 0.274)). During follow-up, late stent graft related complications were observed in six patients (35.3%) necessitating eight endovascular reinterventions. Additional three patients with primary fistulas between the APA and the intestine were treated by late surgical revision. CONCLUSION: Endovascular therapy of APAs represents a considerable alternative to open surgical repair. Short proximal anchoring zones still pose a risk for endoleaks and unintentional overstenting of side branches with commercially available devices, but this might be overcome by use of fenestrated and branched stent grafts in elective cases.

The influence of comorbidities and etiologies on the success of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic soft tissue wounds: midterm results.

Possible effects of comorbidities and of different wound etiologies on the success of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) of chronic soft tissue wounds were investigated. From September 2003 until February 2007, 282 patients, being previously treated unsuccessfully were enrolled. Treatment consisted of ESWT occurring at defined intervals. At each treatment session a wound bed score was recorded, also at initial presentation a detailed patient history and wound etiology. Observed comorbidities were pooled according to the chapters of the ICD-10 system. Two hunderd fifty-eight patients were analyzed (91.49%) and underwent follow-up for a median of 31.8 months. Wound closure occurred in 191 patients (74.03%) by a median of two treatment sessions. No wound reappeared at the same location. A multivariate logistic regression model showed that pooled comorbidities and wound etiologies did not have a significant influence on success. Comorbidities and wound etiologies have surprisingly no significant influence on the success of ESWT.

Improved survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture by offering both open and endovascular repair.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA), the results of open graft replacement (OGR) have remained constant but discouraging for the last 4 decades. Provided suitable anatomy, elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is less invasive and leads to improved perioperative mortality. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that endovascular treatment should improve the results of rAAA therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of both endovascular and open repair of rAAA leads to improved results. DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective analysis of 89 patients suffering from rAAA treated either by EVAR or OGR. PATIENTS: From October 1999 until July 2006, a consecutive series of patients with rAAA were analyzed. Time was divided into 2 periods of 41 months. During the first period, 42 patients were treated by OGR exclusively. Period 2 started with the availability of an EVAR protocol to treat rAAA; 31 patients received open repair while 16 patients underwent EVAR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated and compared. RESULTS: Survival estimates showed a statistically significant reduction in overall postoperative mortality following the introduction of EVAR (P < .03). The 90-day overall mortality rate was reduced from 54.8% to 27.7% during the second period (P < .01). Survival of patients older than 75.5 years was especially improved (75% vs 28.6%; P < .01). There was a parallel pattern of significant reduction of the mortality rate after OGR to 29% (P < .03). CONCLUSION: Offering both EVAR and OGR to patients with rAAA leads to significant improvements in postoperative survival.

Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the benefits of offering both endovascular and open surgical techniques.

Two treatment options are available for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs): open surgical technique with graft replacement and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) as a minimally invasive procedure. The intention of this review is to highlight the advantages of both procedures and to demonstrate that offering both procedures is beneficial for the patient when he or she makes the important decision regarding which treatment to select. A comparative evaluation of both treatment options is offered as well as a short description of the risk of rupture and its consequences. The authors discuss the latest literature as well as their own experiences. An innovative statistical approach-the propensity score-based Cox model-is presented to evaluate the 2 treatment options. The benefits of offering both EVAR and open surgery permit optimal management of AAA for the individual patient and tailor the treatment to his or her organ dysfunctions and impaired physical status. In addition, EVAR offers a treatment option for otherwise incurable high-risk patients.

Effect of body armor on simulated landmine blasts to cadaveric legs.

BACKGROUND: Antipersonnel landmine protective footwear relies on blast deflection or on exaggerated standoff between the foot and the explosive. Neither design has been tested for clinical effectiveness. METHODS: 4 cadaveric lower extremities--3 fitted with a Koflach boot incorporating TABRE (Technology for Attenuating Blast Related Energy) were subjected to controlled blast with charges of up to 100 g trinitrotoluene (TNT). The blasts were recorded by a digital recording system. All legs were X-rayed and underwent computed tomography scanning before and after testing. RESULTS: TABRE-protected limbs directly subjected to the blast hyperextended at the knee during firing. Injuries showed a pattern of open tibial fractures (Gustilo grade I, II), of multiple calcaneal (Sanders Type III, IV), and fibular fractures and of the tibial plateau, but showed no traumatic amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Development of protective footwear against landmine blast is feasible. From medium mines up to charges of 100 g TNT limb salvage may be possible.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms and concomitant diseases requiring surgical intervention: simultaneous operation vs staged treatment using endoluminal stent grafting.

HYPOTHESIS: To investigate whether staged or synchronous treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and concomitant diseases (CDs) requiring surgical repair plays a clinical role. We considered endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in particular. DESIGN: Review of a prospectively gathered database. SETTING: Tertiary care university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: We reviewed a total of 946 patients receiving elective AAA exclusion from 1980 through 2002. We divided the period into 2 observation intervals: 1980-1994, when only open graft replacement was available (n = 331), and 1995-2002, with 615 patients (326 who had open graft replacement and 289 who had EVAR). With regard to the physical status, expressed by the score from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (Park Ridge, Ill), we recorded in-hospital mortality rates and checked possible differences. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Indications for therapy and mortality rates before and after the availability of EVAR. RESULTS: During the first interval, 14 simultaneous operations were carried out. During the second period, 19 patients received simultaneous operations while 49 underwent staged treatment using EVAR. The overall mortality rate was 3.7%. Irrespective of the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, the mortality rate for patients who had EVAR was 0% in comparison with 13.6% for patients in American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or 4 after open graft replacement (P<.03). CONCLUSIONS: The coincidence of a patient having both an AAA and a CD is rare but should not be neglected. Staged treatment of AAAs using EVAR followed by surgical therapy for CDs can be an effective causal therapy with an acceptable mortality rate provided that suitable aneurysm anatomy exists.

Endografting increases total volume of AAA repairs but not at the expense of open surgery: experience in more than 1000 patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the volume of open graft replacements (OGR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) versus endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVAR) over time and after modifying selection criteria. METHODS: A review was conducted of 1021 consecutive patients who underwent AAA repair from 1989 through 2002: 496 elective OGRs for infrarenal AAAs (STANDARD), 289 elective EVARs for infrarenal AAAs, 59 complex OGRs for suprarenal AAAs, and 177 emergent OGRs for ruptured AAAs. Patients from 1995 to 2002 were divided into 2 groups based on shifting treatment strategies; 454 patients were treated by STANDARD or EVAR at the surgeon's discretion between 1995 and 2000 (post EVAR). The second group comprised 161 patients treated in 2001-2002 after the introduction of "high-risk" screening criteria (age > or = 72 years, diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, impaired pulmonary function, or ASA class IV) that dictated EVAR whenever anatomically feasible. For comparison, 170 STANDARD repairs performed in the 6 years prior to EVAR served as a control. RESULTS: While surgery for ruptured AAAs remained fairly stable over the 14-year period, the number of patients undergoing elective repair increased due to the implementation of EVAR. During the 6 years after its introduction, EVAR averaged 34.3 patients per year; after 2001, the annual frequency of EVAR increased to 41.5 (p > 0.05). In like fashion, the rate of STANDARD repairs increased to 41.3 patients per year versus 28.3 before EVAR (p = 0.032). ASA class IV patients increased by almost 9 fold in the recent period versus pre EVAR (p = 0.006). The overall mortality after elective infrarenal AAA repair decreased between the pre and post EVAR periods (6.5% versus 3.7%, p > 0.05) and fell still further to 1.2% in the most recent period (p = 0.021 versus pre EVAR). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an EVAR program increases the total volume of AAA repairs but does not reduce open surgical procedures. By allocating patients to EVAR or open repair based their risk factors, mortality was markedly reduced.

[Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: status quo after a quarter century of treatment experience]. / Rupturierte abdominelle Aortenaneurysmen: Status quo nach einem Vierteljahrhundert Behandlungserfahrung.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative mortality rates between 40% and 50% have been invariably reported for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) over the last 50 years. The aim of this analysis was to investigate which patient subgroups benefit from open surgery and in which subgroups a change of treatment strategies should be considered due to lack of improvement despite optimal patient management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1980 to 2002 a total of 230 patients underwent surgery because of a ruptured AAA. The observation period was divided into 3 intervals to achieve an approximately equal distribution of patients. The effect of the observation period and of baseline parameters on mortality rates were investigated. RESULTS: Between 1980 and 1990, 72 patients were operated with a mortality rate of 38.9% (n = 28). During the second period (1991-1996) surgery was performed in 72 patients with a mortality rate of 40.3% (n = 29). In the third observation interval (1997-2002) 86 patients underwent surgery with an unvaried high mortality rate of 40.7% (n = 35). By applying a logistic regression model including age, gender, modality of rupture, location of cross-clamping and type of operation, only the modality of rupture and the patient's age, which are uncontrollable by the surgeon, could be shown to have a significant impact. CONCLUSION: Summing up these findings, open surgical repair of rAAA only leads to acceptable results when performed in younger patients without supposed comorbidities. Survival appears to be accidental in patients with advanced age and increased prevalence of relevant comorbidities/underlying diseases. Minimally invasive techniques may offer promising treatment options to those patients, as they do in elective interventions.

Collagen- versus gelatine-coated Dacron versus stretch PTFE bifurcation grafts for aortoiliac occlusive disease: long-term results of a prospective, randomized multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective randomized multicenter trial, knitted gelatine-coated Dacron, knitted collagen-coated Dacron, and stretch polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) aortic bifurcation grafts were compared for their long-term results. METHODS: Between 1991 and 1998, 149 patients undergoing elective revascularization for aortoiliac occlusive disease were prospectively randomized at 3 tertiary referral centers of vascular surgery. The patients received either gelatine-coated Dacron (GEL-D) grafts (n = 52), collagen-coated Dacron (COL-D) grafts (n = 49), or stretch PTFE grafts (n = 48). RESULTS: No intraoperative deaths were recorded. The 30-day mortality was 4%. The mean follow-up time was 97 months. Primary patency rates were 77% for GEL-D, 78% for COL-D, and 79% for PTFE at 8 years. The differences were not different (P >.8). Secondary corrected 8-year patency rates were also not significantly different (P >.5): 91% for GEL-D, 96% for COL-Dm and 90% for PTFE. Five Dacron and 1 PTFE grafts were affected by infections. CONCLUSIONS: Bifurcation grafts for revascularization of aortoiliac occlusive disease using these 3 materials were comparable in terms of primary and secondary patency and long-term complication rates.

Endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical operation in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms: a propensity score-adjusted analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management (TEAM) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is widely performed, open graft replacement is still considered the standard of care. The aim of this study was to investigate whether clear indications for TEAM can be established in patients with significant comorbidities without investigating differences in relative procedure efficacy or durability. METHODS AND RESULTS: A propensity score-based analysis of 454 consecutive patients treated electively for AAA from January 1995 through December 2000 was performed. Of those 454 patients, 248 received open surgery and 206 received TEAM. In-hospital mortality rates (MRs) were compared. After adjusting for propensity scores, a Cox proportional hazard model (COX) was employed to test the influence of the respective treatment on postoperative 900-day survival estimates (SEs). Several potential preoperative risk factors were used as covariates. The MR of all patients was 3.7%. Explorative analysis demonstrated that patients treated by TEAM presented with significantly more risk factors. In American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV patients, a significant difference in MR was detected (4.7% for TEAM versus 19.2% for open surgery; P<0.02). After adjusting for the propensity to receive TEAM or open surgery, a regression analysis of survival based on COX revealed predictive influences of impaired kidney (P<0.047) or pulmonary function (P<0.001), increased age (P<0.05), and selection of treatment modality (P<0.002) on SE. CONCLUSIONS: TEAM represents a less invasive procedure for AAA therapy in patients with significant preoperative risk factors. Especially in geriatric patients with multiple morbidities, TEAM offers a method of therapy with acceptable MRs and SEs, making active treatment possible in otherwise incurable patients.

Endovascular treatment of a multimorbid patient with late AAA rupture after stent-graft placement: 1-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: To report successful endovascular management of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a multimorbid patient 40 months after primary stent-grafting. CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old man presented with hypotension, severe back pain, and abdominal distension. Immediate computed tomography revealed a proximal type I endoleak due to distal migration of the stent-graft with subsequent rupture of the aneurysm. The patient was hemodynamically unstable, and open surgery was refused because of severe comorbidities that were the indications for initial endovascular repair. The diameter of the proximal aneurysm neck required the use of a thoracic stent-graft that was overly long, which led to occlusion of the contralateral stent-graft limb supplying not only the left leg but also a left kidney transplant. A crossover bypass was implanted to revascularize both. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive strategies, even when challenged by complex vascular reconstructions, offer the possibility of managing ruptured aortic aneurysms in patients unsuitable for open surgery.