Diabetes Mellitus and Fluid Imbalance: The Need for Adequate Hydration.

The effect of hydration in modulating metabolic disease risk is a comparatively recent concept. Diabetic patients are at increased risk of dehydration due to osmotic diuresis. Undiagnosed or undertreated hyperglycemia may lead to electrolyte imbalance and elevated renal burden of glucose excretion, which may alter fluid reabsorption in the kidney. Also, the presence of one or more contributory factors, such as inadequate fluid intake, strenuous exercise, high temperatures, alcohol consumption, diarrhea, acute illnesses, fever, nausea, and vomiting, may put diabetic patients at increased risk of dehydration and electrolyte imbalance. Certain antidiabetic agents used by diabetic patients may cause fluid retention/deficits and/or electrolyte abnormalities in a few patients. Thus, drinking ample amounts of water and fluids with appropriate electrolyte composition is important to prevent dehydration. Successful management of dehydration in patients with diabetes is an unmet need and can best be accomplished by maintaining adequate hydration status.

Connecting the Dots: Hydration, Micronutrients, and Immunity.

Dehydration, often unnoticed, can occur in adults due to heat-related illnesses, viral infections, and upper respiratory tract infections, leading to deficits in fluids, electrolytes, and energy (FEE), even without diarrhea. This fluid deficit, in turn, impairs immunity at cellular and molecular levels. Physiologically, the immune system rapidly reacts to threats by adjusting its structural permeability, allowing water and small solutes to be passed, facilitated by proteins like aquaporins (AQPs). These AQPs are also essential for immune cell communication and adjustments of the cytoskeleton for functions like chemotaxis and phagocytosis. Apart from hydration, maintaining an optimal intake of essential micronutrients, including vitamins C and E, copper, zinc, and selenium, is also critical for supporting immune function and acting as antioxidants. Transient alterations in immune function caused by acute stressors or nondiarrheal conditions heighten vulnerability to coexisting illnesses, particularly cold and upper respiratory tract infections, while also elevating the likelihood of recurrent health issues. Supplementing fluids with known FEE content according to quality standards and enhanced taste is recommended during acute illness and until complete recovery. Thus, dehydration, caused by various acute conditions, can impair immunity and delay recovery. Prioritizing hydration and nutrition in healthcare and general settings is imperative, even when diarrhea is absent.

Assessment of Hydration Status Using Conventional Method and Salivary Osmolarity as a Point-of-care Tool.

Dehydration is a well-known problem worldwide, and its assessment can be challenging due to confusing physical signs. The most effective way to assess hydration status is through the costly stable isotope methodology, but this approach has practical limitations. More commonly accepted and utilized indicators of hydration status are hematological and urinary parameters. However, hematological markers require invasive methods, and urinary markers have varying degrees of success in tracking hydration changes. While alterations in body weight can serve as a means of promptly evaluating hydration status, various factors such as food consumption, fluid intake, fecal losses, and urine production can impact these changes. Researchers have turned their attention to saliva as a potential marker and point-of-care (POC) testing to address the limitations of existing biomarkers. Saliva is appealing due to its easy collection process and similarities to extracellular fluid in terms of water and ion concentrations. Recent studies have shown that saliva flow rate, osmolarity/osmolality, and total protein concentration can effectively monitor changes in body mass during acute dehydration. Misdiagnosing dehydration can have severe clinical consequences, leading to morbidity and even mortality. This narrative review focuses on recognizing the significance of hydration assessment, monitoring, and the potential of salivary osmolarity (SOSM) as an assessment tool. Healthcare professionals can improve their practices and interventions to optimize hydration and promote overall wellness using such tools.

Oral Fluid, Electrolytes, and Energy Management in Various Adult and Geriatric Illnesses beyond Diarrhea: An Indian Expert Panel Delphi Consensus Recommendation.

BACKGROUND: Dehydration is a highly prevalent clinical challenge in adults which can go undetected. Although dehydration is commonly associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality, only a few international guidelines provide recommendations regarding oral fluids, electrolytes, and energy (FEE) management in adults/geriatrics with dehydration due to nondiarrheal causes. Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive recommendations on the role of oral FEE in nondiarrheal dehydration in adult and geriatric Indian patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was designed using an online questionnaire-based survey followed by a virtual meeting, and another round of online surveys was used to develop this consensus recommendation. In round one, 130 statements, including 21 open-ended questions, were circulated among ten national experts who were asked to either strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with statements and provide responses to open-ended questions. The consensus was predefined at 75% agreement (pooling "strongly agree" and "agree" responses). Presentation of relevant literature was done during a virtual discussion, and some statements (the ones that did not achieve predefined agreement) were actively discussed and deliberately debated to arrive at conclusive statements. Those statements that did not reach consensus were revised and recirculated during round two. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for 130/130 statements covering various domains such as assessment of dehydration, dehydration in geriatrics, energy requirement, impact of oral FEE on patient outcome, and fluid recommendations in acute and chronic nondiarrheal illness. However, one statement was not added as a recommendation in the final consensus (129/130) as further literature review did not find any supporting data. Oral FEE should be recommended as part of core treatment from day 1 of acute nondiarrheal illness and started at the earliest feasibility in chronic illnesses for improved patient outcomes. Appropriately formulated fluids with known electrolyte and energy content, quality standards, and improved palatability may further impact patient compliance and could be a good option. CONCLUSION: These consensus recommendations provide guidance for oral FEE recommendations in Indian adult/geriatric patients with various nondiarrheal illnesses.

Effectiveness of ORSL® Variants as an Adjuvant along with Standard-of-care Treatment in the Restoration of Oral Fluid, Electrolytes, and Energy in Patients with Fever and/or General Weakness in Indian Patients in an Outpatient Setting.

BACKGROUND: Dehydration due to reduced intake or increased losses including insensible losses in patients with acute nondiarrheal diseases may lead to fluid, electrolytes, and energy (FEE) deficits. The impact of oral FEE supplementation adjuvant to standard of care (SOC) treatment on recovery in patients with acute nondiarrheal diseases is yet to be evaluated. AIM: To determine the effectiveness of ORSL® variants (ORSL® Apple Drink and ORSL® PLUS Orange Drink), fruit juice-based electrolyte drinks as an adjuvant along with SOC in the restoration of oral FEE in patients with acute nondiarrheal disease with fever and/or general weakness who attended an outpatient department (OPD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, interventional, open-label, multicenter, real-world, study conducted at eight sites across India. Patients with fever and/or general weakness due to an acute nondiarrheal illness were given either ORSL® Apple Drink or ORSL® PLUS Orange Drink as an adjuvant along with SOC treatment per physician's discretion. The primary endpoint of the study was to assess improvement from baseline in energy or hydration levels after ORSL® variants consumption at 6, 24, and 48 hours measured by a new aided recovery scale (ARS). Secondary endpoints were to assess the improvement in energy and hydration levels at 20, 40, and 60 minutes, as well as energy levels and hydration levels at 20, 40, and 60 minutes, 6, 24, and 48 hours after the consumption of ORSL® Apple Drink or ORSL® PLUS Orange Drink. The patient's consumption of ORSL® variants and treatment experience, physician's experience of recommending ORSL® variants, and product safety were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 612 patients were enrolled with mean age 38.3 years, of whom 62.9% were male. The mean baseline level of energy and hydration was 1.59 (range 1.0-2.0) on ARS. Statistically significant (p < 0.0001) improvements were observed in energy or hydration 6 hours after first consumption of ORSL formulations. Furthermore, improvement was observed from 40 minutes, and in levels of energy, hydration, and both energy and hydration from 60 minutes. Patients and physicians reported a positive experience with ORSL® variants. CONCLUSION: ORSL® Apple Drink and ORSL® PLUS Orange Drink are clinically proven to provide hydration and/or energy to patients with fever and/or general weakness.

Association of Physicians of India Expert Recommendations on Oral Fluid, Electrolytes, and Energy Management during Transition Care and Discharge for Hospitalized Patients with Nondiarrheal Illnesses.

Acute nondiarrheal illnesses (NDIs) involve overt or subclinical dehydration, requiring rehydration and electrolyte repletion. Dehydration is frequently under-recognized and under-managed, both in outpatient departments (OPDs) and inpatient departments (IPDs). Postadmission dehydration is associated with longer hospital stays and higher inhospital mortality rates. Recognizing and understanding dehydration in hospitalized patients is necessary due to the adverse outcomes associated with this condition. In this article, we aimed to develop practical consensus recommendations on the role of oral fluid, electrolyte, and energy (FEE) management in hospitalized patients with FEE deficits in NDI. The modified Delphi consensus methodology was utilized to reach a consensus. A scientific committee comprising eight experts from India formed the panel. Relevant clinical questions within three major domains were formulated for presentation and discussion: (1) burden and factors contributing to dehydration in hospitalized patients; (2) assessment of fluid and electrolyte losses and increased energy requirements in hospitalized patients; and (3) management of FEE deficits in hospitalized patients [at admission, during intravenous (IV) therapy, IV to oral de-escalation, and discharge]. The consensus level was classified into agreement (mean score ≥4), no consensus (mean score <4), and exclusion (mean score <4 after the third round of discussion). The questions that lacked agreement were discussed during the virtual meeting. The experts agreed that the most common factors contributing to dehydration in patients with NDI hospitalized in IPDs include decreased oral fluid intake, increased fluid loss due to the illness, insensible fluid loss, and a lack of awareness among doctors about dehydration, which can result in poor fluid intake. Time constraints, discontinuity of care, lack of awareness of the principles of fluid balance, lack of formal procedures for enforcing hydration schemes, and lack of adequate training are most often barriers to the assessment of hydration status in hospital settings. Experts used hydration biomarkers, such as changes in body weight, serum, or plasma osmolality; fluid intake; and fluid balance charts; along with urine output, frequency, quantity, and color, to determine hydration status in hospital settings. Experts agreed that appropriate FEE supplementation in the form of ready-to-drink (RTD) fluids can restore FEE deficits and shorten the length of hospital stays in hospitalized patients at admission, during de-escalation from IV to oral therapy, and at discharge. RTD electrolyte solutions with known concentrations of electrolytes and energy are good choices to avoid taste fatigue and replenish FEE in hospitalized patients during transition care and at discharge.

Evidence-Based Consensus Recommendations for Skin Care in Healthy, Full-Term Neonates in India.

Purpose: Neonatal skin care practices guided by personal experience and preferences might be substantially different across different hospital settings. The aim of this consensus recommendation is to provide clinical practice guidance to healthcare practitioners on evidence-based neonatal skin care practices from delivery-to-discharge, in hospital settings. Patients and Methods: A Scientific Advisory Board meeting on "Evidence-based Neonatal Skin Care Practices and Protocols" was held in December 2020 with an expert panel comprising neonatologists, pediatricians, obstetricians and gynecologists and pediatric dermatologist. Comprehensive literature search was performed up to 23 March 2021 using PubMed and Google Scholar to retrieve relevant evidence. Results: Recommendations were developed on critical aspects of skin care in healthy full-term neonates including cleansing at birth, skin-to-skin care, cord care, diaper area care, initial and routine bathing, cleansers and emollients use, and criteria to choose appropriate skin care products. Recommendations include inclusion of skin assessment in routine neonatal care, first bath timing after cardio-respiratory and thermal stabilization, 6-24 hours after birth; bathing with water alone or adding a mild liquid cleanser could be considered appropriate as it does not impact the developing skin barrier; use of emollients is recommended for neonates with higher risk of development of eczema to maintain and enhance skin barrier function and integrity; and inclusion of skin care advice in neonatal discharge checklist. Importance of rigorous quality control, high-quality clinical trials for assessment of baby products, usage of products that are formulated appropriately for newborns, and full label transparency for baby products were highlighted. The panel identified gaps in literature and discussed the scope for future research. Conclusion: These recommendations may help to standardize evidence-based skin care for healthy full-term neonates in Indian hospital settings to improve the quality of care that neonates receive in hospital and facilitate improvement in overall neonatal health outcomes.

Fluid Imbalance in Geriatrics: The Need for Optimal Hydration.

In the elderly, increased morbidity and mortality are often linked to fluid and electrolyte imbalances due to age-related physiological changes, hence monitoring and maintaining healthy hydration levels is important for the geriatric patient population. Patients recuperating from an illness at home maybe likely to neglect proper fluid intake and energy management, which hampers their timely recovery. In elderly patients with concurrent illnesses and therapies, dehydration is a common condition that often remains unnoticed despite persistent disease symptoms. Oral nutritional supplements such as scientifically formulated oral rehydration therapies (ORTs) have been recommended in such cases. These supplements can be further suggested by nutritional counseling, diet modification, nursing interventions, and educating the patients. The main aim of this review is to generate a greater understanding of the fluid intake requirements for the elderly, thus contributing to the prevention of the negative effects of dehydration. This review comprehensively highlights the need for treatment, recovery from illness to supportive care to address a patient's needs. Maintaining an optimal hydration level aids the efficacy of therapy in elderly patients. Hospitalized patients are considered to be at risk of dehydration, whereas patients at home completely ignore the need for fluid and energy management, leading to hospital readmissions and delayed recovery. Guidelines are available for treating, managing, and maintaining ideal hydration levels, these are considered to be imperative in managing elderly patients with chronic illnesses.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices regarding Oral Fluid, Electrolyte, and Energy Management in Acute Nondiarrheal Illnesses among Physicians in India.

BACKGROUND: Fluid, electrolytes, and energy (FEE) management is important in the treatment of acute nondiarrheal illnesses. However, the use of FEE drinks in managing such illnesses is not well-documented. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand physicians' knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) and perceived patient outcomes in treating FEE deficits in acute nondiarrheal illnesses using FEE drinks in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional respondent-blinded survey was designed and administered among practicing physicians across various specialties and prescribing statuses in India. KAP among groups of physicians was assessed, and the correlations between knowledge- attitudes, knowledge-practice, and knowledge-perceived outcomes were explored. RESULTS: A total of 494 physicians participated in the study from September to October 2021. Overall, knowledge scores were moderate. Prescribers had a higher average knowledge score and more proactive attitudes and practices as compared to nonprescribers. Most physicians agreed that FEE management recommendations could improve patients' recovery speed. There were significant positive correlations between knowledge scores and physicians' attitudes toward the importance of FEE management awareness, the importance of FEE management for patient recovery, and a physician's perception that FEE drinks improved patients' recovery time. There was no significant correlation between knowledge score and practices. CONCLUSION: There may be benefits from improving the knowledge of physicians in India in FEE management and developing guidelines for the use of FEE drinks in acute nondiarrheal illnesses. Further research exploring the knowledge-practice gap and evaluating the clinical benefit of FEE drinks in acute nondiarrheal illnesses should also be undertaken to develop such guidelines.

Comparing the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices on Oral Fluids, Electrolytes, and Energy Management in Non-diarrheal Illnesses across Different Physician Specialties in India.

Background: The management of non-diarrheal illnesses requires careful attention to maintaining the proper balance of fluids, electrolytes, and energy (FEE). Nevertheless, there is a limited amount of information accessible regarding the utilization of oral FEE formulations in the treatment of these conditions. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess and contrast the levels of knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) among various medical specialties in India when it comes to addressing FEE imbalances in non-diarrheal illnesses through the use of oral FEE formulations, as well as to examine how these approaches influence perceived patient outcomes. We also present a subgroup analysis of KAP in healthcare personnels (HCPs) whose practices include 25% or more diabetic or geriatric patients. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional online assessment was created and conducted among physicians (n = 494) representing different medical specialties in India, which include general practitioners (GPs) (n = 128), MD physicians (n = 121), gynecologists (n = 122), and pediatricians (n = 123). Results: A total of 494 physicians across specialties, including GPs, MDs (MD internal medicine physicians), obstetrics and gynecologists (OB-GYN), and pediatricians, participated in the online assessment from September to October 2021. Knowledge scores were moderate across specialties, and there was no significant difference in knowledge level across specialties. More pediatricians and GPs than other HCPs consider FEE deficit to have a high impact on recovery. Further, pediatrician prescribers consider FEE management to be of high importance compared to other specialties. A significantly higher percentage of pediatricians assess all their patients (100%) for hydration levels, and significantly more gynecologists spend >5 minutes providing hydration advice to their patients. Among all specialties, MD and gynecologist prescribers are more likely to recommend oral FEE for patient recovery. HCPs with diabetes practices agree slightly more than HCPs with geriatric practices that oral FEE management recommendations facilitate the speed of the recovery process from non-diarrheal illnesses in their patients. However, only approximately 30% of them recommend FEE to 70% of their eligible patients, of which approximately 70% of these HCPs give formal (written/electronic) prescriptions of ready-to-drink (RTD) fluids to their patients. Conclusion: Enhancing the understanding of physicians across diverse specialties in India regarding oral FEE management and formulating recommendations for the utilization of oral FEE formulations in non-diarrheal conditions could lead to better outcomes. While knowledge and awareness of oral FEE management are similar across specialties, their practice behaviors vary. Additional research into this disparity and the assessment of the clinical advantages of oral FEE formulations in non-diarrheal illnesses among various specialties should be conducted. How to cite this article: Sathe P, Chakravarty P, Tesado C, et al. Comparing the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices on Oral Fluids, Electrolytes, and Energy Management in Non-diarrheal Illnesses across Different Physician Specialties in India. J Assoc Physicians India 2023;71(10):19-30.

Evolving Landscape of Multiple Sclerosis in India: Challenges in the Management.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease which often leads to disability. The complex etiology and progressive nature pose challenges in the management of patients with MS, particularly in developing countries like India. Lack of data on prevalence further complicates estimation of the magnitude of MS in India. There are various other challenges associated with management of patients with MS due to which the therapy is utilized by only a small segment of population in India. This article encapsulates the gaps and challenges in the management of patients with MS and presents suggestions and recommendations of the members of advisory boards held to discuss these challenges. The advisory board members suggested that an early diagnosis of MS and an early initiation of treatment are essential to achieve better results for tackling MS-related challenges. In addition, awareness and education about MS among people, regular training to physicians, emphasis on the use of revised 2010 McDonald criteria, and utilization of advanced diagnostic modalities in magnetic resonance imaging would help to achieve desirable as well as effective therapeutic outcomes. Further, access to an easy-to-use therapy delivery system could also be beneficial in attaining an adequate treatment adherence and related health benefits.

Association Between Progesterone Elevation on the Day of Human Chronic Gonadotropin Trigger and Pregnancy Outcomes After Fresh Embryo Transfer in In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles.

Progesterone elevation (PE) during the late follicular phase of controlled ovarian stimulation in fresh embryo transfer in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles has been claimed to be associated with decreased pregnancy rates. However, the evidence is not unequivocal, and clinicians still have questions about the clinical validity of measuring P levels during the follicular phase of stimulated cycles. We reviewed the existing literature aimed at answering four relevant clinical questions, namely (i) Is gonadotropin type associated with PE during the follicular phase of stimulated cycles? (ii) Is PE on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) associated with negative fresh embryo transfer IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles outcomes in all patient subgroups? (iii) Which P thresholds are best to identify patients at risk of implantation failure due to PE in a fresh embryo transfer? and (iv) Should a freeze all policy be adopted in all the cycles with PE on the day of hCG? The existing evidence indicates that late follicular phase progesterone rise in gonadotropin releasing analog cycles is mainly caused by the supraphysiological stimulation of granulosa cells with exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone. Yet, the type of gonadotropin used for stimulation seems to play no significant role on progesterone levels at the end of stimulation. Furthermore, PE is not a universal phenomenon with evidence indicating that its detrimental consequences on pregnancy outcomes do not affect all patient populations equally. Patients with high ovarian response to control ovarian stimulation are more prone to exhibit PE at the late follicular phase. However, in studies showing an overall detrimental effect of PE on pregnancy rates, the adverse effect of PE on endometrial receptivity seems to be offset, at least in part, by the availability of good quality embryo for transfer in women with a high ovarian response. Given the limitations of the currently available assays to measure progesterone at low ranges, caution should be applied to adopt specific cutoff values above which the effect of progesterone rise could be considered detrimental and to recommend "freeze-all" based solely on pre-defined cutoff points.

Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Purpose. To improve success of in vitro fertilization (IVF), assisted reproductive technology (ART) experts addressed four questions. What is optimum oocytes number leading to highest live birth rate (LBR)? Are cohort size and embryo quality correlated? Does gonadotropin type affect oocyte yield? Should "freeze-all" policy be adopted in cycles with progesterone >1.5 ng/mL on day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration? Methods. Electronic database search included ten studies on which panel gave opinions for improving current practice in controlled ovarian stimulation for ART. Results. Strong association existed between retrieved oocytes number (RON) and LBRs. RON impacted likelihood of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Embryo euploidy decreased with age, not with cohort size. Progesterone > 1.5 ng/dL did not impair cycle outcomes in patients with high cohorts and showed disparate results on day of hCG administration. Conclusions. Ovarian stimulation should be designed to retrieve 10-15 oocytes/treatment. Accurate dosage, gonadotropin type, should be selected as per prediction markers of ovarian response. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist based protocols are advised to avoid OHSS. Cumulative pregnancy rate was most relevant pregnancy endpoint in ART. Cycles with serum progesterone ≥1.5 ng/dL on day of hCG administration should not adopt "freeze-all" policy. Further research is needed due to lack of data availability on progesterone threshold or index.