Improving the In-Hospital Mortality Prediction of Diabetes ICU Patients Using a Process Mining/Deep Learning Architecture.

Diabetes intensive care unit (ICU) patients are at increased risk of complications leading to in-hospital mortality. Assessing the likelihood of death is a challenging and time-consuming task due to a large number of influencing factors. Healthcare providers are interested in the detection of ICU patients at higher risk, such that risk factors can possibly be mitigated. While such severity scoring methods exist, they are commonly based on a snapshot of the health conditions of a patient during the ICU stay and do not specifically consider a patient's prior medical history. In this paper, a process mining/deep learning architecture is proposed to improve established severity scoring methods by incorporating the medical history of diabetes patients. First, health records of past hospital encounters are converted to event logs suitable for process mining. The event logs are then used to discover a process model that describes the past hospital encounters of patients. An adaptation of Decay Replay Mining is proposed to combine medical and demographic information with established severity scores to predict the in-hospital mortality of diabetes ICU patients. Significant performance improvements are demonstrated compared to established risk severity scoring methods and machine learning approaches using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III dataset.

Predicting clinical outcomes among hospitalized COVID-19 patients using both local and published models.

BACKGROUND: Many models are published which predict outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The generalizability of many is unknown. We evaluated the performance of selected models from the literature and our own models to predict outcomes in patients at our institution. METHODS: We searched the literature for models predicting outcomes in inpatients with COVID-19. We produced models of mortality or criticality (mortality or ICU admission) in a development cohort. We tested external models which provided sufficient information and our models using a test cohort of our most recent patients. The performance of models was compared using the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC). RESULTS: Our literature review yielded 41 papers. Of those, 8 were found to have sufficient documentation and concordance with features available in our cohort to implement in our test cohort. All models were from Chinese patients. One model predicted criticality and seven mortality. Tested against the test cohort, internal models had an AUC of 0.84 (0.74-0.94) for mortality and 0.83 (0.76-0.90) for criticality. The best external model had an AUC of 0.89 (0.82-0.96) using three variables, another an AUC of 0.84 (0.78-0.91) using ten variables. AUC's ranged from 0.68 to 0.89. On average, models tested were unable to produce predictions in 27% of patients due to missing lab data. CONCLUSION: Despite differences in pandemic timeline, race, and socio-cultural healthcare context some models derived in China performed well. For healthcare organizations considering implementation of an external model, concordance between the features used in the model and features available in their own patients may be important. Analysis of both local and external models should be done to help decide on what prediction method is used to provide clinical decision support to clinicians treating COVID-19 patients as well as what lab tests should be included in order sets.