Erosive Progression by High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography and Conventional Radiography in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess erosive progression during one year compared to conventional radiography (CR) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This prospective study included 359 patients with RA (disease duration ≥ 5 years) between March 2018 and October 2020. HR-pQCT and CR were obtained at inclusion and after one year. Erosive assessment was performed at two metacarpophalangeal joints of the dominant hand using HR-pQCT and progression was defined as an increase in erosion number ≥ 1 or an increase in erosive volume > least significant change. CR of hands, wrists, and feet were evaluated using Sharp/van der Heijde scores and erosive progression was defined as a 1.1-point increase in erosion score according to the smallest detectable change. RESULTS: In paired analyses (n = 310), erosive progression was identified in 30 patients using CR and in 40 patients using HR-pQCT. In the 40 patients with erosive progression on HR-pQCT, progression was not identified by CR in 33 patients. Adding HR-pQCT to CR doubled the proportion of patients identified with progression from 30 (10%) to 63 (20%) patients. Using CR as the reference, the sensitivity (% (95% CI)) of HR-pQCT for identifying erosive progression was 23.3 (9.9-42.3) and the specificity was 88.2 (83.8-91.7). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients with erosive progression are overlooked using CR only to monitor erosive progression. Adding high-resolution peripheral CT to CR doubles the proportion of patients, who may benefit from individualised therapy targeting erosive progression in RA.

High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for the assessment of acro-osteolysis and calcinosis in patients with systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To assist the development of future treatments in systemic sclerosis (SSc), the development of reliable outcome measures is pivotal. We aimed to evaluate the use of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) for visualization and gradation of acro-osteolysis (AO) and calcinosis compared to conventional hand radiographs (CR) in patients with SSc. METHODS: HR-pQCT scans of the 2nd to 4th fingers, CR, nail fold capillaroscopy, and a clinical examination were conducted. Images were reviewed for the presence and degree of AO and calcinosis according to semiquantitative grading scales. RESULTS: Forty patients were included. Fourteen had AO according to CR, whereas HR-pQCT revealed AO in 18 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of classifying patients as having AO by HR-pQCT when CR was used as reference were 93% (95% CI: 66-99%) and 80% (95% CI: 59-93%), respectively. By CR and with HR-pQCT as reference, the sensitivity and specificity were 72% (95% CI: 47-90%) and 95% (95% CI: 76-99%). Patients with AO had more or larger calcifications than patients without AO according to the proposed HR-pQCT grading system, with a median grade of 2 (IQR: 1-3) versus 0 (IQR: 0-1) (P<0.01). Grade 3 changes were observed exclusively in patients with AO (n=6/14, 42.9%). Assessment of AO and calcinosis by HR-pQCT demonstrated moderate to excellent test-retest reliability. CONCLUSION: HR-pQCT allowed precise and reliable classification and grading of acro-osteolysis and acral calcinosis. The modality could prove helpful for detecting and monitoring these lesions as well as facilitating early diagnosis and guide treatment of these patients.

Bony proliferations in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and osteoarthritis using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography-A systematic literature review.

PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can all lead to the formation of bony proliferations (BP). This systematic review aimed to examine the characteristics of BPs in patients with RA, PsA, OA, and healthy controls (HC) using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Secondarily, we examined any treatment-related effect on BP number and size. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase, and a total of 15 studies were included. RESULTS: Seven studies demonstrated a disease-specific variation in BP location. One study showed no difference in the number of BPs between patients with PsA and OA. The number of BPs was greater in patients with PsA compared to RA in one study, and to HC in another study, while one study documented no difference in the number of BPs between patients with RA and HC. Five studies showed larger BPs in patients with PsA compared to HC, and one study larger BPs in patients with PsA compared to RA. One study showed no difference in BP size between patients with PsA and OA. Secukinumab may have a potential effect on arresting BP progression. Otherwise, no other treatment was reported to influence BP size and progression. No standard definitions or measurement techniques for BPs using HR-pQCT have been identified. CONCLUSION: BPs showed disease-specific variations in location, size, and number. Results regarding treatment-related effects are sparse. An agreement on the definition and measurement technique for BPs using HR-pQCT is warranted for diagnostic accuracy, disease comparability, and monitoring potential.

Bone Mineral Density Derived from Cardiac CT Scans: Using Contrast Enhanced Scans for Opportunistic Screening.

PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is under-diagnosed and often co-exists with other diseases. Very low bone mineral density (BMD) indicates risk of osteoporosis and opportunistic screening for low BMD in CT-scans has been suggested. In a non-contrast enhanced thoracic CT scan, the scan-field-of-view includes vertebrae enabling BMD estimation. However, many CT scans are obtained by administration of contrast material. If the impact of contrast enhancement on BMD measurements could be quantified, considerably more patients are eligible for screening. METHODS: This study investigated the impact of intravenous contrast on thoracic BMD measurements in cardiac CT scans pre- and post-contrast, including different contrast trigger levels of 130 and 180 Hounsfield units (HU). BMD was measured using quantitative CT with asynchronous calibration. RESULTS: In 195 participants undergoing cardiac CT (mean age 57±9 years, 37 % females) contrast increased mean thoracic BMD from 116±33 mg/cm3 (non-enhanced CT) to 130±38 mg/cm3 (contrast-enhanced CT) (p<0.001). Using clinical cut-off values for very low (<80 mg/cm3) and low BMD (<120 mg/cm3) showed that 24 % (47/195 participants) were misclassified when BMD was measured on contrast-enhanced CT-scans. Of the misclassified patients, 6 % (12/195 participants) were categorized as having low BMD despite having very low BMD on the non-enhanced images. Contrast-CT using a higher contrast trigger level showed a significant increase in BMD compared to the lower trigger level (119±32 vs. 135±40 mg/cm3, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing cardiac CT, using contrast-enhanced images to assess BMD entails substantial overestimation. Contrast protocol trigger levels also affect BMD measurements. Adjusting for these factors is needed before contrast-enhanced images can be used clinically. MINI ABSTRACT: Osteoporosis is under-diagnosed. Contrast-enhanced CT made to examine other diseases might be utilized simultaneously for bone mineral density (BMD) screening. These scans, however, likely entails overestimation of BMD due to the effect of contrast. Adjusting for this effect is needed before contrast-enhanced images can be implemented clinically for BMD screening.

High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for the evaluation of bone erosions of metatarsophalangeal joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare if the 4th and 5th metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints evaluated by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) could classify more patients with erosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with conventional radiography (CR) of the hands, wrists, and feet. Furthermore, we characterize and quantify bone erosions in the two MTP joints by HR-pQCT. METHODS: This single-center cross-sectional study included patients with established RA (disease duration ≥5 years). Blinded to patient data, the number and volume of erosions in the 4th and 5th MTP joints were measured by HR-pQCT, whereas the erosive scores by CR of 44 joints in the hands, wrists, and feet were assessed according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. RESULTS: Among 42 participants, 30 patients were classified with erosive RA and 12 with non-erosive RA by CR. HR-pQCT of two MTP joints could classify more patients with erosive RA compared with CR of 44 joints (p = .03). The optimal cut-off value for the number and volume of erosions per patient in the 4th and 5th MTP joints by HR-pQCT was 7.5 erosions and 11.7 mm3 , respectively, for detecting erosive disease by CR. Erosions in the two MTP joints by HR-pQCT were found most frequently and were largest at the lateral quadrant of the 5th metatarsal head. CONCLUSION: The superiority of HR-pQCT of the 4th and 5th MTP joints compared with CR of 44 joints for classifying erosive RA provides a basis for larger studies evaluating if HR-pQCT could be used for diagnosing erosive RA in the future.

The Minimal Erosive Volume Needed for Radiographic Identification of Erosions in the Metacarpophalangeal Joints in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare in images, obtained by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and conventional radiography (CR) of the second and third metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, the minimal erosive cortical break needed to differentiate between pathological and physiological cortical breaks. METHODS: In this single-center cross-sectional study, patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (disease duration ≥ 5 yrs) had their second and third MCP joints of the dominant hand investigated by HR-pQCT and CR. Empirical estimation was used to find the optimal cut-off value for the number of erosions and total erosive volume, which were detectable between patients with and without erosions in the second and third MCP joints according to CR. RESULTS: The total erosive volume in the second and third MCP joints by HR-pQCT for CR-detected erosive disease was estimated to be 56.4 mm3 (95% CI 3.5-109.3). The sensitivity and specificity at this cutpoint were 78% and 83%, respectively, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81. The optimal cut-off value for the number of erosions by HR-pQCT was 8.5 (95% CI 5.9-11.1) for CR-detected erosive disease in the second and third MCP joints. The sensitivity and specificity at this cutpoint were 74% and 88%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.81. CONCLUSION: Erosions by HR-pQCT were larger in patients with erosive damage in the second and third MCP joints by CR. We found that CR had poor sensitivity for detecting erosive disease when the erosive volume was < 56.4 mm3 or the number of erosions was < 8.5.

Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography and X-ray for classifying erosive rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) of two metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints can more accurately classify patients as having erosive RA compared with conventional radiography (CR) of 44 joints in the hands, wrists and feet. METHODS: In this single-centre cross-sectional study, patients with established RA (disease duration ≥5 years) were investigated by HR-pQCT and CR. The second and third MCP joints of the dominant hand were assessed for erosions by HR-pQCT. CR of the hands, wrists and feet were scored according to the Sharp-van der Heijde (SHS) method. RESULTS: In total, 353 patients were included; 66 (18.7%) patients were classified as having non-erosive RA, and 287 (81.3%) had erosive RA by CR. The sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of HR-pQCT for classifying patients as having erosive RA when standard CR of hands, wrists and feet was used as the reference was 89% (84, 92%) and 30% (20, 43%), respectively. Using HR-pQCT as the reference, the sensitivity and specificity of CR for classifying patients having erosive RA were 85% (80, 89%) and 38% (25, 52%), respectively. McNemar's χ2 test showed no significant difference between the sensitivities of patients classified as having erosive RA by HR-pQCT or by CR (2.14, P = 0.177). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of HR-pQCT scanning of only two MCP joints and CR of 44 joints suggests the two modalities were comparable for classifying patients with established RA as having erosive disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03429426).

Sex Differences in the Association Between Bone Mineral Density and Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Referred for Cardiac Computed Tomography.

Atherosclerosis and osteoporosis are both common and preventable diseases. Evidence supports a link between coronary artery disease (CAD) and low bone mineral density (BMD). This study aimed to assess the association between thoracic spine BMD and CAD in men and women with symptoms suggestive of CAD. This cross-sectional study included 1487 (mean age 57 years (range 40-80), 47% men) patients referred for cardiac computed tomography (CT). Agatston coronary artery calcium score (CACS), CAD severity (no, mild, moderate, and severe), vessel involvement (no, 1-, 2-, and 3/left main disease), and invasive measurements were evaluated. BMD of three thoracic vertebrae was measured using quantitative CT. We used the American college of radiology cut-off values for lumbar spine BMD to categorize patients into very low (<80 mg/cm3), low (80-120 mg/cm3), or normal BMD (>120 mg/cm3). BMD as a continuous variable was included in the linear regression analyses to assess associations between CACS (CACS=0, CACS 1- 399, and CACS ≥ 400) and BMD, and CAD severity and BMD. Significant lower BMD was present with increasing CACS and stenosis degree unadjusted. Multivariate linear regression analyses in women revealed a significant correlation between BMD and CACS groups (ß = -4.06, p<0.05), but no correlation between BMD and CAD severity (ß = -1.59, p = 0.14). No association was found between BMD and CACS (ß = -1.50, p = 0.36) and CAD severity (ß = 0.07, p = 0.94) in men. BMD is significantly correlated to CACS after adjusting for confounders in women, but not in men, suggesting a possible sex difference in pathophysiology.

Rheumatoid Arthritis as a Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Calcification and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Chest Pain: A Registry Based Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: To examine the occurrence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to non-RA patients in a population referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) due to chest pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 46,210 patients from a national CTA database were included. Patients with RA were stratified on serology, treatment with conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and the need for relapse or flare treatment with intraarticular or -muscular glucocorticoid injections (GCIs). Primary outcomes were coronary artery calcium score (CACS) >0 and CACS ≥400, and secondary outcome was obstructive CAD. Associations between RA and outcomes were examined using logistic regression and results were adjusted for age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 395 (0.9%) RA patients were identified. In overall RA, crude odds ratio (OR) for having CACS >0 was 1.48 (1.21-1.82) and 1.52 (1.15-2.01) for CACS ≥400, whereas adjusted ORs were 1.08 (0.86-1.36) and 1.21 (0.89-1.65), respectively. Seropositive RA patients had adjusted OR of 1.16 (0.89-1.50) for CACS >0 and 1.37 (0.98-1.90) for CACS ≥400. Patients who had received ≥1 GCI in the period of 3 years prior to the CTA had an adjusted OR of 1.37 (0.94-2.00) for having CACS >0 and 1.46 (0.92-2.31) for CACS ≥400. CONCLUSION: This is the first large-scale, CTA-based study examining the occurrence and severity of CAD in RA patients with symptoms suggestive of cardiovascular disease. A higher prevalence of coronary artery calcification was found in RA patients. After adjusting for age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, the tendency was less pronounced. We found a trend for increased coronary calcification in RA patients being seropositive or needing treatment with GCI for a relapse or flare.

Thoracic Bone Mineral Density Derived from Cardiac CT Is Associated with Greater Fracture Rate.

Background Osteoporosis is a prevalent, under-diagnosed, and treatable disease associated with increased fracture risk. Bone mineral density (BMD) derived from cardiac CT may be used to determine fracture rate. Purpose To assess the association between fracture rate and thoracic BMD derived from cardiac CT. Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study included consecutive participants referred for cardiac CT for evaluation of ischemic heart disease between September 2014 and March 2016. End of follow-up was June 30, 2018. In all participants, volumetric BMD of three thoracic vertebrae was measured by using quantitative CT software. The primary and secondary outcomes were any incident fracture and any incident osteoporosis-related fracture registered in the National Patient Registry, respectively. Hazard ratios were assessed by using BMD categorized as very low (<80 mg/cm3), low (80-120 mg/cm3), or normal (>120 mg/cm3). The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02264717). Results In total, 1487 participants (mean age, 57 years ± 9; age range, 40-80 years; 52.5% women) were included, of whom 179 (12.0%) had very low BMD. During follow-up (median follow-up, 3.1 years; interquartile range, 2.7-3.4 years; range, 0.2-3.8 years), 80 of 1487 (5.3%) participants were diagnosed with an incident fracture and in 31 of 80 participants, the fracture was osteoporosis related. In unadjusted Cox regressions analyses, very low BMD was association with a greater rate of any fracture (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4, 4.7; P = .002) and any osteoporosis-related fracture (hazard ratio, 8.1; 95% CI: 2.4, 26.7; P = .001) compared with normal BMD. After adjusting for age and sex, very low BMD remained associated with any fracture (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1, 4.2) and any osteoporosis-related fracture (hazard ratio, 4.0; 95% CI: 1.1, 14.6). Conclusion Routine cardiac CT can be used to help measure thoracic bone mineral density (BMD) to identify individuals who have low BMD and a greater fracture rate. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bredella in this issue.

​Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with rheumatoid arthritis after initial CT-based diagnosis and treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a known risk factor for developing coronary artery disease (CAD). The influence of RA on the prognosis after initial CAD diagnosis and treatment is however largely unknown. We examined the risk of major cardiovascular events among RA and non-RA patients with chest pain referred to cardiac CT. METHODS: This was a follow-up study, using data from the Western Denmark Heart Registry, containing data on CT angiography examinations (Cardiac CT). Information on RA diagnosis and covariates were identified through nationwide administrative registers. The primary outcome was a combined outcome including, myocardial infarction, ischaemic or unspecified stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, and all-cause mortality. Median time until events or censoring was 3.5 years (min/max: 0.0: 9.2). Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between RA/non-RA patients and outcomes. RESULTS: Among 42 257 patients, referred between 2008 and 2016, we identified 358 (0.8%) with RA. An increased risk was seen in RA compared with non-RA (adjusted HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.96). Among patients who had received flare treatment more than once prior to cardiac CT the adjusted HR 1.80 (95% CI 1.08 to 3.00), and among patients with seropositive RA the adjusted HR 1.42 (95% CI 0.93 to 2.16). CONCLUSION: In patients referred to cardiac CT due to chest pain, we found a trend of an association between RA and the combined primary outcome, supporting that RA per se, but in particular seropositive and active RA, may increase the risk of CAD even after initial CAD diagnosis and treatment.

Feasibility of Opportunistic Screening for Low Thoracic Bone Mineral Density in Patients Referred for Routine Cardiac CT.

Despite being a frequent and treatable disease, osteoporosis remains under-diagnosed worldwide. Our study aim was to characterize the bone mineral density (BMD) status in a group of patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) with low/intermediate risk profile undergoing routine cardiac computed tomography (CT) to rule out CAD. This cross-sectional study used prospectively acquired data from a large consecutively included cohort. Participants were referred for cardiac CT based on symptoms of CAD. Quantitative CT (QCT) dedicated software was used to obtain BMD measurements in 3 vertebrae starting from the level of the left main coronary artery. We used the American College of Radiology cut-off values for lumbar spine QCT to categorize patients into very low (<80 mg/cm3), low (80-120 mg/cm3), or normal BMD (>120 mg/cm3). Analyses included 1487 patients. Mean age was 57 years (range 40-80), and 52% were women. The number of patients with very low BMD was 105 women (14%, 105/773) and 74 men (10%, 74/714). The majority of patients with very low BMD was not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis (87%) and received no anti-osteoporotic treatment (90%). Opportunistic screening in patients referred for cardiac CT revealed a substantial number of patients with very low BMD. The majority of these patients was not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis and received no anti-osteoporotic treatment. Identification of these patients could facilitate initiation of anti-osteoporotic treatment and reduce the occurrence of osteoporosis-related complications.

Vertebral Bone Mineral Density Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography With and Without a Calibration Phantom: A Comparison Between 2 Different Software Solutions.

Quantitative computed tomography (CT) can be used to quantify bone mineral density (BMD) in the spine from clinical CT scans. We aimed to determine agreement and precision of BMD measurements by 2 different methods: phantom-less internal tissue calibration and asynchronous phantom-based calibration in a cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with CKD were recruited for CT angiography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. BMD was analyzed by 2 different software solutions using different calibration techniques; phantom-based by QCT Pro (Mindways Inc.) and phantom-less by Extended Brilliance Workspace (Philips Healthcare). Intraoperator reanalysis was performed on 53 patients (36%) for both methods. An interoperator reanalysis on 30 patients (20%) using the phantom-based method and 29 patients (19%) using the phantom-less method was made. XY- and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate method agreement. Phantom-based measured BMD was systematically higher than phantom-less measured BMD. Despite a small absolute difference of 3.3 mg/cm3 (CI: -0.2-6.9 mg/cm3) and a relative difference of 5.1% (CI: 2.2%-8.1%), interindividual differences were large, as seen by a wide prediction interval (PI: -47-40 mg/cm3). The Bland-Altman plot showed no systematic bias, apart from 5 outliers. Intraoperator variability was high for the phantom-less method (5.8%) compared to the phantom-based (0.8%) and the interoperator variability was also high for the phantom-less method (5.8%) compared to the phantom-based (1.8%). Despite high correlation between methods, the between-method difference on an individual level showed great variability. Our results suggest agreement between these 2 methods is insufficient to allow them to be used interchangeably in patients with CKD.