Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Neurol ; 267(7): 2002-2006, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32198714

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar punctures (LPs) are important for obtaining CSF in neurology studies but are associated with adverse events and feared by many patients. We determined adverse event rates and pain scores in patients prospectively enrolled in two cohort studies who underwent LPs using a standardized protocol and 25 g needle. METHODS: Eight hundred and nine LPs performed in 262 patients age ≥ 60 years in the MADCO-PC and INTUIT studies were analyzed. Medical records were monitored for LP-related adverse events, and patients were queried about subjective complaints. We analyzed adverse event rates, including headaches and pain scores. RESULTS: There were 22 adverse events among 809 LPs performed, a rate of 2.72% (95% CI 1.71-4.09%). Patient hospital stay did not increase due to adverse events. Four patients (0.49%) developed a post-lumbar puncture headache (PLPH). Twelve patients (1.48%) developed nausea, vasovagal responses, or headaches that did not meet PLPH criteria. Six patients (0.74%) reported lower back pain at the LP site not associated with muscular weakness or paresthesia. The median pain score was 1 [0, 3]; the mode was 0 out of 10. CONCLUSIONS: The LP protocol described herein may reduce adverse event rates and improve patient comfort in future studies.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/prevención & control , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Punción Espinal , Anciano , Protocolos Clínicos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autoinforme , Punción Espinal/efectos adversos , Punción Espinal/normas , Punción Espinal/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Anesth Analg ; 129(5): e150-e154, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31085945

RESUMEN

Animal models suggest postoperative cognitive dysfunction may be caused by brain monocyte influx. To study this in humans, we developed a flow cytometry panel to profile cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples collected before and after major noncardiac surgery in 5 patients ≥60 years of age who developed postoperative cognitive dysfunction and 5 matched controls who did not. We detected 12,654 ± 4895 cells/10 mL of CSF sample (mean ± SD). Patients who developed postoperative cognitive dysfunction showed an increased CSF monocyte/lymphocyte ratio and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 receptor downregulation on CSF monocytes 24 hours after surgery. These pilot data demonstrate that CSF flow cytometry can be used to study mechanisms of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction.


Asunto(s)
Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Monocitos/inmunología , Complicaciones Cognitivas Postoperatorias/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/citología , Proteínas Ligadas a GPI/análisis , Humanos , Receptores de Lipopolisacáridos/análisis , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Cognitivas Postoperatorias/etiología , Receptores de IgG/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...