Pre-phase strategy to mitigate first cycle effect in diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

CONTEXT: Treatment-related toxicities in DLBCL (diffuse large B cell lymphoma) patients are higher in the initial phase of treatment (first cycle effect). Implementation of pre-phase treatment before definitive chemotherapy had been shown to alleviate some of these side-effects in a non-randomized study conducted earlier in our institute (Lakshmaiah et. al., Eur J Haematol 100:644-8, 2018). AIMS: This study was aimed at validating the role of pre-phase treatment in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: All newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL above the age of 18 years were evaluated for eligibility and prospectively enrolled. A single-arm prospective study was conducted at the Department of Medical Oncology, in our institute from July 2015 to December 2019. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Patients received vincristine and prednisolone as pre-phase treatment for 7 days after which definitive chemotherapy was instituted on day 1. They were followed up for 30 days post-first cycle chemotherapy. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Paired Student's t tests and Wilcoxon signed-ranks test were used for comparison of various clinical variables as appropriate. P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Among the 180 patients who were included in study, performance status improvement was noted in significant number of patients (p < 0.001). 38.4% achieved an ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 0 post-pre-phase therapy. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 12.8% in the present cohort as compared to the historical non-pre-phase cohort (34%). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-phase therapy significantly improves the performance status and diminishes neutropenia rates in DLBCL patients.

Discordance in clinical versus pathological staging in breast cancer: Are we undermining the significance of accurate preoperative staging in the present era?

BACKGROUND: The present era of individualized treatment for breast cancer is influenced by the initial disease status including the anatomical extent, grade, and receptor status. An accurate preoperative staging is the basis of treatment planning and prognostication. Our study aims to determine the discordance between the preoperative clinical and the postoperative pathological stages of breast cancer patients. METHODOLOGY: The medical records of all non-metastatic breast cancer patients from January 2017 to December 2018 who underwent upfront surgery were reviewed. They were staged as per the eighth AJCC and the concordance between the clinical (c) and pathological T (tumor), N (nodal), and final AJCC stage was studied. A Chi-square test was used to determine factors that significantly correlate with disease discordance. RESULTS: A total of 307 breast cancer patients were analyzed. Among these, 43.3% were hormone receptor-positive, 30.6% were Her2 positive and 26% were triple-negative. Overall stage discordance was seen in 48.5% (n = 149) patients (upstaging in 22.1%, downstaging in 26.4%). The discordance rate was 48.9% for T stage (cT versus pT) and 57.4% for N stage (cN versus pN). Among patients with clinically node-negative disease, 53.4% were found to have positive nodes on histopathology, while 27.2% had vice versa. Overall, the factors associated with upstaging were ER-positive, Her2 positive and triple-negative status (all p < 0.05), while none of the factors showed significant association with downstaging. CONCLUSIONS: About half of breast cancer patients had discordance between clinical and pathological staging with higher discordance in the nodal stage. This changes the disease prognosis, and may also affect the offered surgical treatment and radiotherapy. Thus highlighting the need for a precise pre-operative staging. Also, this information will aid clinicians in discussions with patients, keeping in mind the likelihood of change in disease staging and management.

Socioeconomic and administrative factors associated with treatment delay of esophageal and gastric carcinoma: Prospective study from a tertiary care centre in a developing country.

This study was aimed to analyze the spectrum of time intervals, from the onset of symptoms to the commencement of treatment in esophagogastric cancers. Factors influencing these time delays and correlation between these time points with variables including socioeconomic strata, educational level, histopathology, location of tumor and the initial modality of treatment were assessed. STUDY SETTING AND METHODS: A prospective analysis of patients with esophagogastric cancer presenting to a single tertiary care unit over a period of 12 months was performed. Histopathology other than adenocarcinoma and squamous cell were excluded. RESULTS: 202 patients were enrolled in the study. Most patients presented with advanced disease, i.e. 91.5 % of esophageal and 90 % of gastric malignancies belonged to either stage 3 or stage 4 as per American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. The median delay from the appearance of the first symptoms to initiation of treatment was 15 weeks (range 4-64). Patient related factors contributed to a significant delay [median of 5 weeks (range 1-24)]. Administrative factors were responsible for median delay of 3 weeks (range 0.5-20). Curative multimodality treatment was administered in 62.5 % of patients. Significant longer delay was influenced by socioeconomic strata, educational level, evaluation by non-specialist (p < 0.05). No relationship was noted between histopathology, location of tumor or initial modality of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Delays in our setting is much more than that is seen in Western and even some Asian countries. An important component of delay is administrative related factors. These may be intervened at the hospital level compared to other factors which may need long term community oriented approaches.