Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 95: 111472, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38613938

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Evidence for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion thresholds in the intraoperative setting is limited, and current perioperative recommendations may not correspond with individual intraoperative physiological demands. Hemodynamics relevant for the decision to transfuse may include peripheral perfusion index (PPI). The objective of this prospective study was to assess the associations of PPI and hemoglobin levels with the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. DESIGN: Multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Bispebjerg and Hvidovre University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark. PATIENTS: We included 741 patients who underwent acute high risk abdominal surgery or hip fracture surgery. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were carried out. MEASUREMENTS: Principal values collected included measurements of peripheral perfusion index and hemoglobin values. METHODS: The study was conducted using prospectively obtained data on adults who underwent emergency high-risk surgery. Subjects were categorized into high vs. low subgroups stratified by pre-defined PPI levels (PPI: > 1.5 vs. < 1.5) and Hb levels (Hb: > 9.7 g/dL vs. < 9.7 g/dL). The study assessed mortality and severe postoperative complications within 90 days. MAIN RESULTS: We included 741 patients. 90-day mortality was 21% (n = 154), frequency of severe postoperative complications was 31% (n = 231). Patients with both low PPI and low Hb had the highest adjusted odds ratio for both 90-day severe postoperative complications (2.95, [1.62-5.45]) and 90-day mortality (3.13, [1.45-7.11]). A comparison of patients with low PPI and low Hb to those with high PPI and low Hb detected significantly higher 90-day mortality risk in the low PPI and low Hb group (OR 8.6, [1.57-162.10]). CONCLUSION: High PPI in acute surgical patients who also presents with anemia was associated with a significantly better outcome when compared with patients with both low PPI and anemia. PPI should therefore be further investigated as a potential parameter to guide intraoperative RBC transfusion therapy.


Asunto(s)
Anemia , Hemoglobinas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anemia/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Índice de Perfusión , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Abdomen/cirugía , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/sangre , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/mortalidad
3.
Br J Anaesth ; 127(3): 396-404, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34226038

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We hypothesised that in acute high-risk surgical patients, a lower intraoperative peripheral perfusion index (PPI) would indicate a higher risk of postoperative complications and mortality. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 1338 acute high-risk surgical patients from November 2017 until October 2018 at two University Hospitals in Denmark. Intraoperative PPI was the primary exposure variable and the primary outcome was severe postoperative complications defined as a Clavien-Dindo Class ≥III or death, within 30 days. RESULTS: intraoperative PPI was associated with severe postoperative complications or death: odds ratio (OR) 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.19; P<0.001), with an association of intraoperative mean PPI ≤0.5 and PPI ≤1.5 with the primary outcome: OR 1.79 (95% CI 1.09-2.91; P=0.02) and OR 1.65 (95% CI 1.20-2.27; P=0.002), respectively. Each 15-min increase in intraoperative time spend with low PPI was associated with the primary outcome (per 15 min with PPI ≤0.5: OR 1.11 (95% CI 1.05-1.17; P<0.001) and with PPI ≤1.5: OR 1.06 (95% CI 1.02-1.09; P=0.002)). Thirty-day mortality in patients with PPI ≤0.5 was 19% vs 10% for PPI >0.5, P=0.003. If PPI was ≤1.5, 30-day mortality was 16% vs 8% in patients with a PPI >1.5 (P<0.001). In contrast, intraoperative mean MAP ≤65 mm Hg was not significantly associated with severe postoperative complications or death (OR 1.21 [95% CI 0.92-1.58; P=0.2]). CONCLUSIONS: Low intraoperative PPI was associated with severe postoperative complications or death in acute high-risk surgical patients. To guide intraoperative haemodynamic management, the PPI should be further investigated.


Asunto(s)
Monitorización Hemodinámica , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Oximetría , Pletismografía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...