A retrospective cohort study of clinical characteristics and outcomes of type 2 diabetic patients with kidney disease.

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a serious health threat and becomes a new challenge. T2DM patients with CKD fall into three categories, diabetic nephropathy (DN), non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD), and diabetic nephropathy plus non-diabetic kidney disease (DN + NDKD), according to kidney biopsy. The purpose of our study was to compare the clinical characteristics and kidney outcomes of DN, NDKD, and DN + NDKD patients. Methods: Data on clinical characteristics, pathological findings, and prognosis were collected from June 2016 to July 2022 in patients with previously diagnosed T2DM and confirmed DN and or NDKD by kidney biopsy at Tongji Hospital in Wuhan, China. The endpoint was defined as kidney transplantation, dialysis, or a twofold increase in serum creatinine. Results: In our 6-year retrospective cohort research, a total of 268 diabetic patients were admitted and categorized into three groups by kidney biopsy. The 268 patients were assigned to DN (n = 74), NDKD (n = 109), and DN + NDKD (n = 85) groups. The most frequent NDKD was membranous nephropathy (MN) (n = 45,41.28%). Hypertensive nephropathy was the most common subtype in the DN+NDKD group (n = 34,40%). A total of 34 patients (12.7%) reached the endpoint. The difference between the Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the DN, NDKD, and DN + NDKD groups was significant (p < 0.05). Multifactorial analysis showed that increased SBP [HR (95% CI): 1.018(1.002-1.035), p = 0.025], lower Hb [HR(95% CI): 0.979(0.961-0.997), p = 0.023], higher glycosylated hemoglobin [HR(95% CI): 1.338(1.080-1.658), p = 0.008] and reduced serum ALB [HR(95% CI): 0.952(0.910-0.996), p = 0.032] were risk factors for outcomes in the T2DM patients with CKD. Conclusions: This research based on a Chinese cohort demonstrated that the risk of endpoint events differed among DN, NDKD, and DN+NDKD patients. In T2DM patients with CKD, DN patients displayed worse kidney prognosis than those with NDKD or DN + NDKD. Increased SBP, higher glycosylated hemoglobin, lower Hb, and decreased serum ALB may be correlated with adverse kidney outcomes in T2DM patients.

Glutamine Metabolism Promotes Renal Fibrosis through Regulation of Mitochondrial Energy Generation and Mitochondrial Fission.

Fibroblast activation and proliferation is an essential phase in the progression of renal fibrosis. Despite the recognized significance of glutamine metabolism in cellular growth and proliferation, its precise pathophysiological relevance in renal fibrosis remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the involvement of glutamine metabolism in fibroblast activation and its possible mechanism. Our findings highlight the importance of glutamine metabolism in fibroblast activation and reveal that patients with severe fibrosis exhibit elevated serum glutamine levels and increased expression of kidney glutamine synthetase. Furthermore, the deprivation of glutamine metabolism in vitro and in vivo could inhibit fibroblast activation, thereby ameliorating renal fibrosis. It was also detected that glutamine metabolism is crucial for maintaining mitochondrial function and morphology. These effects may partially depend on the metabolic intermediate α-ketoglutaric acid. Moreover, glutamine deprivation led to upregulated mitochondrial fission in fibroblasts and the activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin / mitochondrial fission process 1 / dynamin-related protein 1 pathway. Thus, these results provide compelling evidence that the modulation of glutamine metabolism initiates the regulation of mitochondrial function, thereby facilitating the progression of renal fibrosis. Consequently, targeting glutamine metabolism emerges as a novel and promising avenue for therapeutic intervention and prevention of renal fibrosis.

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and renin-angiotensin system blockers in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of combination therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and renin-angiotensin system blockers such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to May 2020. Two authors independently performed study selection, risk-of-bias assessment and data extraction. The quality and risk of bias were assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Statistical heterogeneity was determined by the I2 statistics. RESULTS: Seven studies including 1757 patients were analysed. Compared with ACEI/ARB alone, combination therapy with SGLT2 inhibitors and ACEIs/ARBs produced a reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) [weighted mean difference (WMD) -3.84 mmHg], diastolic blood pressure (DBP; WMD -1.06 mmHg), 24 h ambulatory SBP (WMD -4.59 mmHg), 24-h ambulatory DBP (WMD -2.08 mmHg), urine albumin:creatinine ratio (WMD -29.70%), evaluated glomerular filtration rate (WMD -3.46 mL/min/1.73 m2), haemoglobin A1c [standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.48], fasting plasma glucose (SMD -0.28), uric acid (SMD -0.35) and body weight (SMD -0.29). The risk of hypoglycaemia with combination therapy was higher than in the control group (risk ratio 1.37). As for the risks of total adverse events, genital infection and urinary tract infection, no significant difference was revealed. CONCLUSION: Compared with ACEI/ARB alone, the combination therapy with SGLT2 inhibitors and ACEIs/ARBs in T2DM was effective and well-tolerated and could achieve additional effects including better control of blood pressure, improvement of renal outcomes, alleviation of long-term renal function and a decrease in blood glucose and body weight. The combination therapy showed an increased risk of hypoglycaemia.

[Construction methods of urban ecological corridor for birds: A review]. / åŸºäºŽé¸Ÿç±»è§†è§’çš„åŸŽå¸‚ç”Ÿæ€å»Šé“æž„å»ºæ–¹æ³•ç ”ç©¶ç»¼è¿°.

The ecological corridors considering bird movement characteristics and habitat requirements would mitigate species extinction caused by habitat loss or habitat fragmentation and facilitate species gene dispersal and exchange. These functions may in turn benefit urban residents' physical and mental health as well as appreciation of real estates. Nonetheless, main ecological corridor construction methods developed by foreign scholars have not internally considered the movement and habitat characteristics of birds, while corridor research for birds by domestic scholars have focused on explorations of foreign technical methods yet lacked enough knowledge on studied birds' characteristics. Therefore, there is still much room for improvement in the study of urban ecological corridor construction from the perspective of birds. Based on the analyses of domestic and foreign related research from 1975 to 2020, we identified seven corridor construction methods and three corridor optimization methods within which bird ecology can be integrated. The advantages, drawbacks, and applicable scenarios of all the methods were explored accordingly. Finally, we argued that the develop-ment of computational models, which could not only combine bird species' observation data and spatial movement data with landscape structures but could also possess efficient computation power as well as simulate corridor's ecological benefits, would be a trend for constructing ecological corridor for birds.