Non-surgical correction of knee flexion deformity in persons with haemophilia: A staged multidisciplinary approach.

INTRODUCTION: Flexion deformity of the knee is a common complication following recurrent haemarthrosis in persons with haemophilia (PWH) on episodic factor replacement therapy, restricting independent mobility. There is limited literature on the comprehensive management of this condition. This report provides the outcome of a staged multidisciplinary approach for the correction of knee flexion deformity (KFD) even in limited resource settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of 49 consecutive PWH who were treated for KFD were analysed. The approach included graded physical therapy (PT), followed by serial casting and/or mobilisation under anaesthesia (MUA). MUA was done in carefully selected knees. Surgical correction was opted when non-surgical methods failed. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients (55 knees), with a median KFD of 40 degrees (range: 10-90), 26/55 (47%) were corrected by graded PT. With serial casting, 9/19 (47%) knees had their KFD corrected. MUA was done for 11 knees of which five achieved correction (45%). Surgical correction was required for only seven knees (12.7%). Following this approach, KFD improved from 40 degrees (range: 10-90) to 15 degrees (range: 0-40), with only minor loss of flexion from 105 (range: 60-155) to 90 degrees (range: 30-150). Out of 55 KFD, 46 (83.6%) KFD were corrected; non-surgical, 39 (70.9%) and surgery, seven (12.7%). The remaining patients (nine KFD; 16.4%) were able to achieve their functional goal despite not meeting the correction criteria. CONCLUSION: This study shows that in PWH, functionally significant KFD correction can be achieved in about 71%, through non-surgical methods, even without prophylactic factor replacement.

Mobilization under anaesthesia for correction of knee flexion deformity in haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia patients not treated with primary or secondary prophylaxis, often present with recurrent haemarthrosis. Knee is the most frequently involved joint leading to disabling knee flexion deformity (KFD). Here, we present a retrospective study of our experience on the role of mobilization under general anaesthesia in the correction of KFD. AIM: To study the effectiveness of mobilization under anaesthesia (MUA) for correction of knee flexion deformity (KFD) in persons with haemophilia (PWH). METHODS: Outcome of all patients managed with MUA in our multidisciplinary haemophilia clinic from 2008 to 2019 were included for analysis. PWH with KFD > 20 degree who underwent MUA were included in the study. Under general anaesthesia and cover of clotting factor replacement, gentle joint mobilization was done to achieve maximal correction in flexion deformity, followed by above knee casting in this position. The outcome measures assessed were reduction in knee flexion deformity following MUA and complications, if any. RESULTS: Thirty patients (34 knees) with knee flexion deformity were included in the study. Mean age of the study population was 14.23 years ± 8.3. Study population was analysed in two groups, Group 1 included patients who underwent single MUA and Group 2, patients who underwent two or more MUA. There was significant improvement in KFD correction in both groups. [Group 1; Mean difference: 22 ± 13.7, p value -0.01, 95% CI (16.4-27.5) and Group 2; Mean difference 48.8 ± 19.8, p value -0.00, 95% CI (34.2-64.5)]. CONCLUSION: MUA can be effective in the short-term correction of KFD in PWH particularly those below 15 years of age. It should be done judiciously when target correction is not achieved with other physical methods.

The Hemophilia Joint Health Score version 2.1 Validation in Adult Patients Study: A multicenter international study.

Background: The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was developed and validated to detect arthropathy in children. Additional evidence is required to show validity in adults. We studied the convergent and discriminant construct validity of the HJHS version 2.1(HJHSv2.1) in adults with hemophilia. A secondary aim was to define age-related normative adult HJHSv2.1 reference values. Methods: We studied 192 adults with hemophilia, and 120 healthy adults in four age-matched groups-18 to 29, 30 to 40, 41 to 50, and >50 years-at nine centers. Trained physiotherapists scored the HJHS and World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) joint score. Health history, the Functional Independence Scale of Hemophilia (FISH), Hemophilia Activities List (HAL), and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) were also collected. Results: The median age was 35.0 years. Of participants with hemophilia, 68% had severe, 14% moderate, and 18% mild disease. The HJHS correlated strongly with WFH score (Spearman's rho [rs ] = .95, P < .001). Moderate correlations were seen between the FISH (rs  = .50, P < .001) and SF-MPQ Present Pain Intensity (rs  = .50, P < .001), while a modest correlation was found with the HAL (rs  = -.37, P < .001). The HJHS significantly differentiated between age groups (Kruskal-Wallis T = 35.02, P < .001) and disease severity in participants with hemophilia. The HJHS had high internal reliability (Cronbach's α = .88). We identified duration of swelling as a redundant item in the HJHS. Conclusions: The HJHS shows evidence of strong convergent and discriminant construct validity to detect arthropathy in adults with hemophilia and is well suited for use in this population.

Mirror Therapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Management of Phantom Limb Pain in Amputees - A Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Phantom limb pain (PLP) can be disabling for nearly two thirds of amputees. Hence, there is a need to find an effective and inexpensive treatment that can be self administered. Among the non-pharmacological treatment for PLP, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) applied to the contralateral extremity and mirror therapy are two promising options. However, there are no studies to compare the two treatments. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare mirror therapy and TENS in the management of PLP in subjects with amputation. METHODS: The study was an assessor blinded randomized controlled trial conducted at Physiotherapy Gymnasium of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Christian Medical College, Vellore. Twenty-six subjects with PLP consented to participate. An initial assessment of pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) and universal pain score (UPS) was performed by a therapist blinded to the treatment given. Random allocation into Group I-mirror therapy and Group II-TENS was carried out. After 4 days of treatment, pain was re-assessed by the same therapist. The mean difference in Pre and Post values were compared among the groups. The change in pre-post score was analyzed using the paired t test. RESULTS: Participants of Group I had significant decrease in pain [VAS ( p = 0.003) and UPS ( p = 0.001)]. Group II also showed a significant reduction in pain [VAS ( p = 0.003) and UPS ( p = 0.002)]. However, no difference was observed between the two groups [VAS ( p = 0.223 and UPS ( p = 0.956)]. DISCUSSION: Both Mirror Therapy and TENS were found to be effective in pain reduction on a short-term basis. However, no difference between the two groups was found. Substantiation with long-term follow-up is essential to find its long-term effectiveness. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.