Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oncologist ; 29(3): e337-e344, 2024 Mar 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38071748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy (LB) is a non-invasive tool to evaluate the heterogeneity of tumors. Since RAS mutations (RAS-mut) play a major role in resistance to antiepidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (Mabs), serial monitoring of RAS-mut with LB may be useful to guide treatment. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the loss of RAS-mut (NeoRAS-wt) in LB, during the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with mCRC between January 2018 and December 2021. RAS-mut were examined in tissue biopsy, at mCRC diagnosis, and with LB, during treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with RAS-mut mCRC were studied. LB was performed after a median of 3 lines (0-7) of systemic treatment including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) Mabs. NeoRAS-wt was detected in 13 patients (33.3%); 9 (69.2%) of them received further treatment with anti-EGFR Mabs with a disease control rate of 44.4%. Median overall survival (OS), from the date of LB testing, was 20 months in the NeoRAS-wt group and 9 months in the persistent RAS-mut group (log-rank 2.985; P = .08), with a 12-month OS of 84.6% and 57.7%, respectively. NeoRAS-wt was identified as a predictor of survival (HR = 0.29; P = .007), with an 11-month improvement in median OS and a 71% decrease in risk of death, in heavily pretreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, monitoring clonal evolution in mCRC by LB may provide an additional treatment line for patients with NeoRAS-wt in advanced disease.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Biopsia Líquida , Mutación
2.
Cureus ; 15(11): e48385, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38060735

RESUMEN

We report the case of a 32-year-old male diagnosed with a left-sided testicular seminoma treated with radical inguinal orchiectomy and staged as pT1bN0M0S0 (rete testis invasion) - stage IA. Adjuvant treatment options were discussed, and active surveillance was chosen. Two years later, he presented with urinary retention alternating with pollakiuria, a feeling of incomplete bladder emptying, dyspareunia, and anejaculation. A rectal examination documented an enlarged, nodular, painful prostate. Blood and urine analyses, including serum tumor markers, were unremarkable. Pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) documented a central, nodular, solid, hypermetabolic, prostatic tumor with a size of 40x50x25 mm, invasion of the right seminal vesicle, right anterolateral wall of the rectum, and postero-inferior bladder wall, and an absent lymph node and visceral disease. A transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsy documented prostatic metastasis of the seminoma. The patient was treated with four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy (ChT) with a complete (clinical, radiologic, metabolic, and pathological) response. After five years of follow-up, he remains asymptomatic without a recurrence of the disease.

3.
Cureus ; 14(2): e22428, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35273890

RESUMEN

At the time of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with cancer were considered to be at high risk of serious illness and had a higher exposure risk since they needed frequent and nondeferrable hospital visits. Serological tests were not routinely used, and seroprevalence in this population was unknown. A single-center, cross-sectional study was developed to determine the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (Abs) in patients with cancer undergoing systemic antineoplastic treatment. One hundred patients were consecutively recruited in a two-week period (6th-20th May 2020), and serum samples were tested for the presence of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) Abs directed against both spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) SARS-CoV-2 proteins in two distinct time points (at recruitment and 4-8 weeks later). IgG-positive results were subject to confirmation, in the same serum sample, using two distinct assays. At the time of the first study visit, no patient had a previously confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, one reported previous contact with a COVID-19 patient, and all had a baseline SARS-CoV-2-negative RT-PCR. Two patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG in the first study visit, which was not confirmed in either of the two confirmatory assays. Seventy-two patients were tested at the second study visit, all with negative IgG tests. IgM was persistently positive at both study visits in one patient and was positive in another patient at the second study visit, both with negative RT-PCR and serum IgG. No patient tested positive for RT-PCR within the study timeframe. No evidence of prior or acute SARS-CoV-2 infection was documented in this cohort of patients with cancer undergoing systemic treatment, and no additional exposure risk was documented compared to general population seroprevalence studies. The study was inconclusive regarding the role of SARS-CoV-2 serology in patients with cancer in the early phase of the pandemic. This study did show that, with adherence to recommended preventive measures, it was safe to maintain systemic cancer therapy.

4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20172017 Feb 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28219911

RESUMEN

A woman aged 35 years was diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer in October 2012. During the investigation, it was discovered that she was pregnant, the patient decided to have an abortion. She was submitted to a radical modified mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy followed by adjuvant breast radiotherapy of the left breast. 2 months after the adjuvant treatment, she began to have headaches and dizziness. The cranial MRI (head MRI) showed brain metastasis. She was then treated with whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery and concomitant temozolomide which resulted in complete response. 1.5 year later, she was able to get pregnant and gave birth to a baby without complications. The previous imaging reassessment performed in September 2016 shows no evidence of recurrent breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/secundario , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Aborto Inducido , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/terapia , Femenino , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Embarazo , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...