Time to diagnosis among young patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with diagnostic delays in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancers are poorly understood. METHODS: Using the Optum Labs Data Warehouse's de-identified claims data for commercial health plan enrollees, we identified children (0-14 years) and adolescents/young adults (AYAs) (15-39 years) diagnosed with one of 10 common cancers from 2001 to 2017, who were continuously enrolled for 6 months preceding diagnosis. Time to diagnosis was calculated as days between first medical encounter with possible cancer symptoms and cancer diagnosis date. Median times from first symptom to diagnosis were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression identified sociodemographic factors associated with longer time (>3 months) to cancer diagnosis (from symptom onset). RESULTS: Of 47,296 patients, 87% presented prior to diagnosis with symptoms. Patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors were most likely to present with symptoms (93%), whereas patients with cervical cancer were least likely (70%). Symptoms varied by malignancy. Of patients with symptoms, thyroid (105 days [range: 50-154]) and cervical (104 days [range: 41-151]) cancer had the longest median time to diagnosis. Females and patients at either end of the age spectrum were more likely to experience diagnosis delays of more than 3 months. CONCLUSION: In a commercially insured population, time to diagnosis varies by cancer type, age, and sex. Further work is needed to understand the patient, provider, and health system-level factors contributing to time from symptom onset to diagnosis, specifically in the very young children and the young adult patient population going forward.

Novel scoring tool of hypoxemic respiratory failure and pulmonary hypertension for defining severity of persistent pulmonary hypertension of newborn.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain preliminary validity data for a hypoxemic respiratory failure/pulmonary hypertension (HRF/PH) score for classifying persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of 100 consecutive neonates admitted to a Children's hospital from 2016-2021 with PPHN, gestational age ≥34 weeks, and echocardiograms in the first week. We assessed the correlation between HRF/PH score and short-term outcomes using linear and logistic regressions. RESULTS: HRF/PH scores ranged 2-12 (mean 8.5), and were classified mild (0-5), moderate (6-10), and severe (11-15), with 6%, 77% and 17% infants in respective categories. HRF/PH score category correlated with invasive ventilation, nitric oxide, high frequency ventilation, vasoactive infusions, extracorporeal life support and death. HRF/PH score category did not correlate with duration of support or length of stay. CONCLUSION: The HRF/PH score offers a promising representation of disease severity for PPHN. The tool requires further validation in prospective studies and evaluation for long-term outcomes.

Factors to Consider to Study Preductal Oxygen Saturation Targets in Neonatal Pulmonary Hypertension.

There are potential benefits and risks to the infant with higher and lower oxygen saturation (SpO2) targets, and the ideal range for infants with pulmonary hypertension (PH) remains unknown. Targeting high SpO2 can promote pulmonary vasodilation but cause oxygen toxicity. Targeting lower SpO2 may increase pulmonary vascular resistance, especially in the presence of acidosis and hypothermia. We will conduct a randomized pilot trial to compare two ranges of target preductal SpO2 in late-preterm and term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF) and acute pulmonary hypertension (aPH) of the newborn. We will assess the reliability of a newly created HRF/PH score that could be used in larger trials. We will assess trial feasibility and obtain preliminary estimates of outcomes. Our primary hypothesis is that in neonates with PH and HRF, targeting preductal SpO2 of 95-99% (intervention) will result in lower pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressures, and lower the need for pulmonary vasodilators (inhaled nitric oxide-iNO, milrinone and sildenafil) compared to targeting SpO2 at 91-95% (standard). We also speculate that a higher SpO2 target can potentially induce oxidative stress and decrease response to iNO (oxygenation and pulmonary vasodilation) for those patients that still require iNO in this range. We present considerations in planning this trial as well as some of the details of the protocol design (Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04938167)).