A cost-consequence analysis comparing three cardiac ablation strategies for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cardiac ablation is a well-established method for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal therapeutic alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CRYO). PFA uses high-voltage electric pulses to target cells. The present analysis aims to quantify the costs, outcomes, and resources associated with these three ablation strategies for paroxysmal AF. METHODS: Real-world clinical data were prospectively collected during index hospitalization by three European medical centers (Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands) specialized in cardiac ablation. These data included procedure times (pre-procedural, skin-to-skin and post-procedural), resource use, and staff burden. Data regarding complications associated with each of the three treatment options and redo procedures were extracted from the literature. Costs were collected from hospital economic formularies and published cost databases. A cost-consequence model from the hospital perspective was built to estimate the impact of the three treatment options in terms of effectiveness and costs. RESULTS: Across the three centers, N = 91 patients were included over a period of 12 months. A significant difference was seen in pre-procedural time (mean ± SD, PFA: 13.6 ± 3.7 min, CRYO: 18.8 ± 6.6 min, RFA: 20.4 ± 6.4 min; p < .001). Procedural time (skin-to-skin) was also different across alternatives (PFA: 50.9 ± 22.4 min, CRYO: 74.5 ± 24.5 min, RFA: 140.2 ± 82.4 min; p < .0001). The model reported an overall cost of €216,535 per 100 patients treated with PFA, €301,510 per 100 patients treated with CRYO and €346,594 per 100 patients treated with RFA. Overall, the cumulative savings associated with PFA (excluding kit costs) were €850 and €1,301 per patient compared to CRYO and RFA, respectively. CONCLUSION: PFA demonstrated shorter procedure time compared to CRYO and RFA. Model estimates indicate that these time savings result in cost savings for hospitals and reduce outlay on redo procedures. Clinical practice in individual hospitals varies and may impact the ability to transfer the results of this analysis to other settings.

Comparison of contemporary devices used for transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure can be performed with various devices. However, their handling, safety, presence of residual shunt and impact on recurrent thromboembolic events (TEs) are rarely compared with one another. Our goal was to compare the clinical performance of contemporary devices designed for PFO closure. METHODS: PFO closure with the Cardia PFO occluder (n = 405), Intrasept (n = 301) and Amplatzer PFO occluder (n = 89) was attempted in 795 patients with presumed paradoxical embolism. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in all patients. The periprocedural complication rate of 1.8% was comparable among the three groups. Residual shunting immediately following the procedure was higher in patients treated with the Cardia PFO occluder (24% vs. 14% [Intrasept] and 16% [Amplatzer]; p = 0.004). After a mean follow-up period of 26 months, no difference in residual shunting was seen (8% [Cardia] vs. 7% [Intrasept] vs. 8% [Amplatzer]; p = 0.736). The annual incidence of recurrent TE was 1.4%, which was not affected by the presence of a residual shunt or the type of device used. New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) following PFO closure was the only predictor of recurrent TE and was more common in patients treated with the Amplatzer (10% vs. 5% [Cardia]) and 5% [Intrasept]; p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical performance of the three PFO occluders evaluated in this study seems comparable. Device design does not seem to impact the success of the PFO closure procedure. AF was the only predictor of recurrent TEs, underscoring the importance of aggressive therapy for atrial arrhythmias early following PFO closure.

Incidence of atrial fibrillation following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in adults.

Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) has become a routine procedure. Little is known about the effect of atrial septal device implantation on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated the frequency of AF occurring after transcatheter PFO and ASD closure in a large population. From 1994 until 2007 a total of 1,062 patients underwent transcatheter closure of an interatrial communication. New-onset AF was defined by 12-lead electrocardiogram or Holter monitoring in patients without a history of AF at baseline. Of the 1,062 patients, 822 had a PFO and 240 had an ASD. During a median follow up of 20 months, new-onset AF was documented in 8% of patients. New-onset AF occurred in 7% of patients after PFO closure and in 12% of patients with underlying ASD. The annual incidence of new-onset AF was 2.5% and 4.1% in patients with PFO and ASD, respectively. Generally, patients with new-onset AF were older than those without AF. Device type or size did not influence the occurrence of AF. In the group of patients with PFO, residual shunt was more common in patients with AF compared with the non-AF group. In conclusion, AF is more common after PFO and ASD closure compared with the general population; although device type or size did not impact the occurrence of AF, residual shunt may influence the occurrence of AF after intervention in patients with underlying PFO.

Patent foramen ovale closure with the Intrasept occluder: Complete 6-56 months follow-up of 247 patients after presumed paradoxical embolism.

OBJECTIVE: We report our experience of transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure with the new Intrasept occluder. BACKGROUND: The Intrasept device is the fourth generation of the Cardia occluder family. Developed for transcatheter closure of PFO, the main difference between the Intrasept and prior generations of the Cardia occluder is its articulating center post. This modification allows better alignment of the umbrellas on both sides of the atrial septum. We report our experience with this new PFO occluder. METHODS: From July 2002 until October 2006, PFO closure with the Intrasept occluder was attempted in 247 patients with presumed paradoxical embolism. Prior to PFO closure, a total of 269 cerebrovascular thromboembolic events (TEs) had occurred. Implantation of the device was guided by fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography with conscious sedation. RESULTS: Median age was 53 years (range, 21-77). One hundred twenty-seven (51%) patients had an atrial septal aneurysm. The device was implanted successfully in all cases. Acute complications occurred in 4 (1.6%) patients (air embolism = 2, pericardial effusion = 1, supraventricular tachycardia = 1). Follow-up information is available for all 247 (100%) patients. Median follow-up time was 14 months (range 6-56). Residual shunt at 6 months follow-up was 13%. After 1 year, the presence of residual shunt rate decreased to 10%. Following PFO closure, seven recurrent TEs (TIA = 4, CVA = 3) were observed in 6 patients. No wire fractures or device-associated thrombi were seen. CONCLUSIONS: PFO closure with the Intrasept occluder is safe and efficient. Rates of residual shunt and recurrent TE compare favorably with other contemporary devices.

Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects in adults with the Amplatzer septal occluder: intermediate and long-term results.

AIMS: Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects (ASD) with the Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) has become a standard procedure in most pediatric and adult patients. However, data addressing success rates and outcome in adults is limited. We sought to define the safety profile of the ASO in the community setting and identify the percentage of adults with ASD amenable to percutaneous closure with the ASO. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients' records referred for transcatheter ASD closure from 1999 through 2005 at a single institution. Patients were evaluated with right heart catheterization and underwent closure of the ASD according to standard indications under transesophageal and fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: Two hundred and seven consecutive patients were taken to the catheterization laboratory for hemodynamic evaluation and possible interventional closure of an ASD. Of those patients, 18 were excluded because the defect and the left-to-right shunt were hemodynamically insignificant (n = 7) or because there was no distinct defect, but instead a multi-perforated septum (n = 11). Nineteen cases were excluded for anatomic reasons. Of the remaining 170 patients, ASO implantation was attempted and successfully performed in 166 (83% of 200 patients with hemodynamically significant ASD). Complications occurred in 11 cases (6.5%) (device dislocation = 4, transient ST-segment elevation = 4, TIA = 1, hemoptysis = 1, pericardial effusion = 1); none of these events were associated with long-term sequelae. During a median follow-up period of 13 months (range 6-80) there were no major clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: More than 80% of adults with a distinct, hemodynamically significant secundum ASD can be successfully treated with the ASO. The immediate success rates are excellent and follow-up data suggest that the ASO is a safe device well suited for transcatheter ASD closure.

Patent foramen ovale closure in patients with cryptogenic thrombo-embolic events using the Cardia PFO occluder.

AIMS: We report our experience with three generations of the Cardia patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder in patients with cryptogenic thrombo-embolic events (TE). METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2004, interventional PFO closure was attempted in 403 patients. Prior to PFO closure, 605 TE occurred, translating into an annual incidence of 3.1%. PFO closure was successful in all patients. Peri-procedural complications occurred in eight patients (2.0%). At 6 months follow-up, residual shunt was present in 10.8% of patients. Transient thrombi developed on 10 devices (predominantly generation II) and asymptomatic wire fractures were detected in 14 cases (generation I and II). The annual incidence of recurrent TE was 2.0% (n=13). Atrial septal aneurysm and prior device-related thrombus formation were identified as predictors of recurrent TE. CONCLUSION: Owing to technical improvements and modified adjunctive pharmacotherapy, the rate of thrombus formation has declined and wire fractures are virtually absent in generation III devices. The overall rate of recurrent TE is reduced by transcatheter PFO closure with the Cardia PFO occluder, and seems comparable to recurrence rates reported for other devices used for this purpose.