RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To correlate the resistance mechanisms and the susceptibility to new antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. RECENT FINDINGS: Definition of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is still debated. Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DTR-PA) are used but which of them better correlate with the risk of mortality remains debated. Mechanisms underlying resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa are complex and may be combined, resulting in unpredictable phenotype and cross-resistance. Thus, not all CRPA are alike and tailoring antibiotic therapy on resistance mechanisms is challenging. SUMMARY: Current guidelines recommend the use of new antipseudomonal agents for CRPA or DTR-PA infections but they don't provide specific information on how tailoring antibiotic therapy on underlying resistance mechanisms. This review may be useful to understand which mechanisms are involved in CRPA and may have practical implications helping clinicians to select an appropriate antibiotic regimen. Several antibiotics are now available for Pseudomonas aeruginosa but their rational use is important to avoid development of future resistance. The knowledge of local epidemiology and most common resistance mechanisms may guide empirical therapy, but targeted antibiotic therapy should be re-evaluated as soon as susceptibility testing profile is available and selected according to Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenotype.
RESUMEN
We emulated a hypothetical target trial in which hematological subjects cared at the University Hospital of Pisa (Italy) received or not SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab. Subjects who received prophylaxis (cases) were compared to those who did not (controls). The main outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the subsequent 6 months. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to adjust for confounders. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify variables associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We recruited 462 patients: 228 received prophylaxis, 234 were controls. COVID-19 was lower in cases compared to controls (16.7% vs 24.8%, p = 0.03, after IPW 14.3% vs 24.6%, p = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, B-cell depleting therapies (HR 2.09, 95%CI 1.05-4.18, p = 0.037) were associated with increased risk of COVID-19, while tixagevimab/cilgavimab prophylaxis (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.27-0.73, p = 0.001) and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (HR 0.27, 95%CI 0.14-0.51, p < 0.001) were protective. In conclusion, prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies may reduce the risk of COVID-19 in hematological patients.
RESUMEN
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are one of the most important classes of biologics with high therapeutic and diagnostic value, but traditional methods for mAbs generation, such as hybridoma screening and phage display, have limitations, including low efficiency and loss of natural chain pairing. To overcome these challenges, novel single B cell antibody technologies have emerged, but they also have limitations such as in vitro differentiation of memory B cells and expensive cell sorters. In this study, we present a rapid and efficient workflow for obtaining human recombinant monoclonal antibodies directly from single antigen-specific antibody secreting cells (ASCs) in the peripheral blood of convalescent COVID-19 patients using ferrofluid technology. This process allows the identification and expression of recombinant antigen-specific mAbs in less than 10 days, using RT-PCR to generate linear Ig heavy and light chain gene expression cassettes, called "minigenes", for rapid expression of recombinant antibodies without cloning procedures. This approach has several advantages. First, it saves time and resources by eliminating the need for in vitro differentiation. It also allows individual antigen-specific ASCs to be screened for effector function prior to recombinant antibody cloning, enabling the selection of mAbs with desired characteristics and functional activity. In addition, the method allows comprehensive analysis of variable region repertoires in combination with functional assays to evaluate the specificity and function of the generated antigen-specific antibodies. Our approach, which rapidly generates recombinant monoclonal antibodies from single antigen-specific ASCs, could help to identify functional antibodies and deepen our understanding of antibody dynamics in the immune response through combined antibody repertoire sequence analysis and functional reactivity testing.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Células Productoras de Anticuerpos , COVID-19 , Proteínas Recombinantes , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/genética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/biosíntesis , Proteínas Recombinantes/inmunología , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Células Productoras de Anticuerpos/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , FemeninoRESUMEN
Background: In vitro-in vivo discordance in ß-lactams' activities against metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales has been described. We aimed to assess whether this discordance is attributed to the supra-physiologic zinc concentration in in vitro testing media. Methods: A clinical and microbiological observational study of patients with bloodstream infections due to New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae was performed. Outcomes of patients treated empirically with non-MBL-active ß-lactam therapy (carbapenems and ceftazidime/avibactam) and MBL-active ß-lactam therapy (ceftazidime/avibactam + aztreonam) were documented. The patients' isolates were used to induce septicemia in mice, and survival upon meropenem treatment was recorded. Meropenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in standard media and in the presence of physiological zinc concentrations. Results: Twenty-nine patients receiving empiric non-MBL-active ß-lactams (median duration, 4 days) were compared with 29 receiving MBL-active ß-lactams. The 14-day mortality rates were 21% and 14%, respectively. In the murine septicemia model, meropenem treatment resulted in protection from mortality (P < .0001). Meropenem MICs in the physiologic zinc concentration broth were 1- to >16-fold lower vs MICs in zinc-unadjusted broth (≥64â mg/L). Conclusions: Our data provide foundational support to establish pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships using MICs derived in physiologic zinc concentration, which may better predict ß-lactam therapy outcome.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and the development of new antibiotics have complicated the selection of optimal regimens. International guidelines are valuable tools, but are limited by the scarcity of high-quality randomized trials in many situations. METHODS: A panel of experts from the French and Italian Societies of Infectious Diseases aimed to address unresolved issues in clinical practice based on their experience, an updated literature review and open discussions. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus for the following 'first choices': (i) cefepime for ventilator-acquired pneumonia due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (ii) the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination most active in vitro, or cefiderocol combined with fosfomycin, and aerosolized colistin or aminoglycosides, for severe pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam; (iii) high-dose piperacillin-tazobactam (including loading dose and continuous infusion) for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales with piperacillin-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤8 mg/L; (iv) high-dose cefepime for cUTIs due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales other than Enterobacter spp. if cefepime MIC ≤2 mg/L; (v) ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole for intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) due to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales; (vi) ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam plus metronidazole for IAIs due to metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (vii) ampicillin-sulbactam plus colistin for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; (viii) meropenem-vaborbactam for BSIs caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales; and (ix) ceftazidime-avibactam plus fosfomycin for neurological infections caused by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: These expert choices were based on the necessary balance between antimicrobial stewardship principles and the need to provide optimal treatment for individual patients in each situation.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Italia , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Francia , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Cefepima/uso terapéutico , Cefepima/farmacología , Fosfomicina/uso terapéutico , Fosfomicina/farmacología , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Colistina/farmacología , Tazobactam , Ceftazidima , Compuestos de AzabicicloRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Real-world experience with meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) is limited. Our aim is to report a clinical experience of M/V in the treatment of resistant Gram-negative bacilli. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study including patients hospitalized in the University Hospital of Pisa (March 2021-Jan 2023) with infections by both extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) treated with M/V. The primary outcome measure was clinical success, defined as a composite of survival, resolution of signs and symptoms and absence of microbiological failure at day 30 from infection onset. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with clinical failure. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients who received M/V were included: 24/104 (23.1%) infections were caused by ESBL non-hypervirulent Enterobacterales, 17/104 (16.3%) by ESBL-producing hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp) and 63/104 (60.6%) by CRE. The most common infections were bloodstream infections, followed by urinary tract infections, hospital-acquired pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections and others. Septic shock occurred in 16/104 (15.4%) patients. Clinical success was achieved in 77% of patients, and 30-day mortality rate was 15.4%. In patients with KPC-producing Kp infections, clinical success and 30-day mortality rates were 82% and 11.5%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, SOFA score (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.02-1.7, p=0.032) was independently associated with clinical failure, while source control (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.89, p=0.036) was protective. CONCLUSIONS: M/V is a promising therapeutic option against infections caused by difficult-to-treat ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and CR-Kp.