Does Adopting Western Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Targets Expose Indians to a Higher Risk of Cardiovascular Events? Expert Opinion From the Lipid Association of India.

Adverse cardiovascular (CV) events have declined in Western countries due at least in part to aggressive risk factor control, including dyslipidemia management. The American and European (Western) dyslipidemia treatment guidelines have contributed significantly to the reduction in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) incidence in the respective populations. However, their direct extrapolation to Indian patients does not seem appropriate for the reasons described below. In the US, mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels have markedly declined over the last 2 decades, correlating with a proportional reduction in CV events. Conversely, poor risk factor control and dyslipidemia management have led to increased CV and coronary artery disease (CAD) mortality rates in India. The population-attributable risk of dyslipidemia is about 50% for myocardial infarction, signifying its major role in CV events. In addition, the pattern of dyslipidemia in Indians differs considerably from that in Western populations, requiring unique strategies for lipid management in Indians and modified treatment targets. The Lipid Association of India (LAI) recognized the need for tailored LDL-C targets for Indians and recommended lower targets compared to Western guidelines. For individuals with established ASCVD or diabetes with additional risk factors, an LDL-C target of <50 mg/dL was recommended, with an optional target of ≤30 mg/dL for individuals at extremely high risk. There are several reasons that necessitate these lower targets. In Indian subjects, CAD develops 10 years earlier than in Western populations and is more malignant. Additionally, Indians experience higher CAD mortality despite having lower basal LDL-C levels, requiring greater LDL-C reduction to achieve a comparable CV event reduction. The Indian Council for Medical Research-India Diabetes study described a high prevalence of dyslipidemia among Indians, characterized by relatively lower LDL-C levels, higher triglyceride levels, and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels compared to Western populations. About 30% of Indians have hypertriglyceridemia, aggravating ASCVD risk and complicating dyslipidemia management. The levels of atherogenic triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, including remnant lipoproteins, are increased in hypertriglyceridemia and are predictive of CV events. Hypertriglyceridemia is also associated with higher levels of small, dense LDL particles, which are more atherogenic, and higher levels of apolipoprotein B (Apo B), reflecting a higher burden of circulating atherogenic lipoprotein particles. A high prevalence of low HDL-C, which is often dysfunctional, and elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels further contribute to the heightened atherogenicity and premature CAD in Indians. Considering the unique characteristics of atherogenic dyslipidemia in Indians, lower LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and Apo B goals compared to Western guidelines are required for effective control of ASCVD risk in Indians. South Asian ancestry is identified as a risk enhancer in the American lipid management guidelines, highlighting the elevated ASCVD risk of Indian and other South Asian individuals, suggesting a need for more aggressive LDL-C lowering in such individuals. Hence, the LDL-C goals recommended by the Western guidelines may be excessively high for Indians and could result in significant residual ASCVD risk attributable to inadequate LDL-C lowering. Further, the results of Mendelian randomization studies have shown that lowering LDL-C by 5-10 mg/dL reduces CV risk by 8-18%. The lower LDL-C targets proposed by LAI can yield these incremental benefits. In conclusion, Western LDL-C targets may not be suitable for Indian subjects, given the earlier presentation of ASCVD at lower LDL-C levels. They may result in greater CV events that could otherwise be prevented with lower LDL-C targets. The atherogenic dyslipidemia in Indian individuals necessitates more aggressive LDL-C and non-HDL-C lowering, as recommended by the LAI, in order to stem the epidemic of ASCVD in India.

Association of Physicians of India: National Expert Opinion and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Primary Care Cough Management in India.

INTRODUCTION: Pathological cough in primary care is a significant concern. With a prevalence ranging from 5 to 10% in India, cough is the second most common symptom seen by general practitioners (GPs). The existing algorithms and tools that are available are generally meant for cough categorization in specialized fields; their limited adoption by GPs results in insufficient screening and categorization of cough, which results in the use of irrational fixed drug combination formulations. OBJECTIVES: Formulation of recommendations for GPs to enable them to appropriately screen and categorize cough for efficient management and avoid irrational treatments. METHODS: An expert panel (seven experts specializing in pulmonology and internal medicine) held a virtual discussion to assess the necessity for cough categorization and develop user-friendly tools, along with a simplified format for history taking in cough evaluation and management. Panel discussions were based on a questionnaire that contained items related to the categorization of cough, assessment tools, and approaches to treating cough. RESULTS: After deliberations, simplified clinical practice recommendations and assessment tools were developed by the experts to facilitate the categorization of cough into wet or dry categories, thereby helping in the symptom-based management of cough. CONCLUSION: By adhering to these principles and using assessment tools, primary care practitioners can optimize cough management, avoid irrational drug combinations, minimize potential risks, and improve patient well-being.

Indian Consensus on the Role and Position of Angiotensin Receptor-neprilysin Inhibitors in the Management of Heart Failure.

The incidence of heart failure (HF) in India is estimated to be 0.5-1.7 cases per 1,000 people per year, and approximately 4,92,000-1.8 million new cases are detected every year. Despite the high rate of mortality associated with HF, most patients do not receive maximal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Current guidelines advocate early multidrug combination therapy with four classes of drugs, namely, beta-blockers (BBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), particularly in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). ARNIs reduce cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients with HFrEF. However, recent data indicated that only 4.8% of patients with HFrEF receive ARNI in India. Hence, at a national consensus on HF meeting, cardiology experts from India formulated a national consensus on the use of ARNI in HF based on current evidence and guidelines. The consensus states that ARNI should be used early in HF, particularly in de novo patients with HFrEF, and those with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), irrespective of the presence of low systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diabetes. Moreover, those with HFrEF on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors should be switched to ARNI to reduce the risk of repeated hospitalization for HF, worsening HF, and cardiac death, and to improve the quality of life (QoL). Starting ARNI during the first hospitalization is preferable, and it is safe and effective across all doses. ARNIs can also be used for secondary benefits in patients with preserved ejection fraction [heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)] and HF with mildly reduced EF [heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF)].

Unique Pharmacological Properties and Safety Profiles of Loop Diuretics.

Loop diuretics are regarded as essential for the treatment of edematous conditions in heart failure, cirrhosis, and renal disease. The principal mechanism of action involves inhibiting the reabsorption of ions (Na+, 2Cl-, and K+) from the ascending loop of Henle. The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) features of the commonly used diuretics (torsemide, furosemide, and bumetanide) influence the selection of diuretics in various disease states and dosing regimens. However, torsemide demonstrates superior PK and PD qualities, making it the preferred choice. Genetic polymorphisms must be explored to better understand the diversity of PK and PD parameters of loop diuretics between individuals.

Loop Diuretics: An Overview of Its History and Evolution.

The loop of Henle plays a key role in kidney function, especially in retaining solutes and concentrating urine. Diuretic agents, crucial for managing fluid overload and related conditions like hypertension and heart failure (HF), enhance water and electrolyte excretion. The history of diuretics dates back to 1775 with the discovery of Digitalis, evolving significantly with the introduction of chlorothiazide in 1957, which revolutionized diuretic therapy. Loop diuretics, developed in the 1950s and including drugs like torsemide, furosemide, and ethacrynic acid, are potent agents acting on the loop of Henle. They are vital for treating severe fluid overload conditions and require careful monitoring to manage potential side effects.

Torsemide as a Primary Choice in Edema Associated with Heart Failure.

Heart failure (HF) is the fastest-growing disease with a higher fatality rate. The most differentiating feature of HF is pulmonary or peripheral edema, which is characterized by a gradient between intravascular and extravascular pressure. Loop diuretics were chosen as the primary treatment for edema associated with HF due to their efficacy and early onset of action. If an oral dose had not been provided, intravenous (IV) administration of torsemide, or equal doses of furosemide and bumetanide, was preferred. However, the key variables for selecting and administering loop diuretics are their pharmacological qualities as well as their clinical efficacy. Torsemide has greater bioavailability, a higher rate of absorption, a longer duration of action, and lesser ototoxicity, making it the primary choice in the management of edematous HF.

Torsemide in Edema Associated with Hepatic Impairment.

Hepatic edema is caused by decreased hepatic protein synthesis, a consequence of decompensated liver cirrhosis. Fluid accumulation occurs when there is an increase in hydrostatic pressure in the hepatic sinusoids and splanchnic capillaries, as well as low albumin. The first-line treatment for cirrhosis-related ascites is an aldosterone antagonist (spironolactone); however, in severe and recurring ascites, a combination of aldosterone antagonists and loop diuretics (torsemide, furosemide, and bumetanide) is preferable. Torsemide outperformed furosemide in terms of natriuretic and diuretic effects at an equivalent dose. Pharmacological features of torsemide, such as lesser hypokalemia effect, longer duration of action, higher bioavailability, and extended half-life, make it a better alternative than furosemide. In clinical studies, it is considered a safer and more acceptable choice with fewer complications.

Torsemide in the Management of Essential Hypertension.

Torsemide, a loop diuretic, is increasingly recognized for its role in managing essential hypertension. Its mechanism of action involves inhibiting the reabsorption of sodium and chloride ions in the ascending loop of Henle in the kidneys. By doing so, torsemide promotes diuresis, which refers to increased urine production, and subsequently lowers blood pressure. Studies have shown that torsemide is comparably effective to other antihypertensive agents in lowering blood pressure, with the added benefit of potentially improving renal function. However, while torsemide shows promise in hypertensive management, further research is necessary to fully understand its long-term effects and to establish optimal dosing strategies. Future research should focus on clarifying its role in long-term blood pressure control and refining its use in clinical practice to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse effects.

Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy and Semaglutide: What is This All About?

Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) was first documented by a French physician Jean-Pierre Saint-Yves in 1817 (19th century). The clinical description of NAION was not known until 1935 when C. Miller Fischer thoroughly described it. Briefly, NAION is a rare (2.5-11.8 per 1,00,000 cases in men above 50 years) but serious condition that causes sudden painless loss of vision due to ischemia of the optic nerve.1 It is more common in Caucasians compared with Asians and is associated with various risk factors such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes (T2D), smoking, hyperlipidemia, obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, small optic nerve cup ("disk at risk"), optic nerve drusen, and certain drugs, especially phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE-5I), amiodarone, and cabergoline.2 Although the clinical development programs and real-world studies of semaglutide [a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) approved for the treatment of T2D and obesity] did not report any significant increase in the risk of NAION, a recent retrospective cohort study suggested a possible link between NAION and semaglutide.3 This editorial briefly summarizes the current knowledge about NAION and its relation to metabolic disorders, cardiovascular, and antidiabetes drugs and puts a perspective concerning semaglutide.

Management of Hypertension in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Indian Guideline 2024 by Association of Physicians of India and Indian College of Physicians.

In India and the Southeast Asian population, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are the leading lifestyle-related diseases, responsible for a majority burden of morbidity and mortality. Multiple population-spanning studies have revealed the staggering prevalence of both diseases in India, and the prevalence of both will only increase further due to factors such as an aging population, rapid urbanization, increased obesity, and sedentary lifestyles. More than 50 percent of hypertensive patients in India are also diagnosed with T2DM, and a detailed management protocol for the same is required, especially when a major portion of the disease is managed at the primary care level. The Association of Physicians of India (API) guidelines for the management of hypertension in patients with T2DM have been formulated based on consultation with leading physicians, cardiologists, diabetologists, and endocrinologists of India and Southeast Asia, keeping in mind the challenges faced by the patients in these countries and the appropriate management protocols that will be beneficial. While standard office-based blood pressure (BP) measurement forms the cornerstone of hypertension diagnosis and demands a uniform methodology to be followed, home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is recommended for long-term follow-up with validated devices. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) offers comprehensive insights crucial for cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification. The complications of diabetic hypertension can span from increased CV risk, heart failure (HF), and renal dysfunction, and nonpharmacological and pharmacological management should be aimed toward not only control of the BP values but also protecting the end organs. While nonpharmacological measures include a focus on nutrition and diet, they also focus on approaches to weight loss, including a novel section covering the benefits of yoga. The guideline also focuses on a novel section of factors influencing CV risk, especially in the Indian population. For the pharmacological management, the guidelines address each of the categories of antihypertensive drugs, emphasizing the significance of combination therapies in the management of diabetic hypertension. In line with leading global guidelines for the management of hypertension in T2DM, for diabetic patients who often struggle with BP management and carry a high CV risk, the recommended dual combination antihypertensive therapy is particularly crucial and should be considered as first-line management therapy. While angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) play a highly beneficial role in the management of diabetic hypertension, a combination of ACEi or ARB with dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP-CCBs) is recommended to reduce the risk of complications and enhance patient adherence. To achieve the target of effective BP control and end-organ protection, it is beneficial and recommended to include newer CCBs (e.g., cilnidipine) in the management protocol in combination with ACEi/ARBs. Combination therapy including ARBs and DHP-CCBs should be preferred over ß-blockers and thiazides. Among the CCBs, cilnidipine, a novel molecule, is a more effective and safer option for diabetic hypertensive patients in India. ß-blockers should be used if there is a history of myocardial infarction (MI), HF, coronary artery disease (CAD), or stable angina along with the initial hypertensive regimen. The guideline also focuses on the novel reno- and cardioprotective molecules such as finerenone and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and their benefits in the management of diabetic hypertension.

Navigating Cardiovascular Risk and Lipid Management in Indian Patients: Key Messages from the Lipid Association of India 2024 Consensus Statement IV.

Effective lipid management is crucial for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The Western lipid guidelines may not apply to Indian subjects because of the vast differences in cardiovascular (CV) disease epidemiology. To overcome this challenge, the Lipid Association of India (LAI) in 2016 proposed an ASCVD risk stratification algorithm. The appropriate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals for various risk groups were proposed, with an LDL-C target of <50 mg/dL recommended for the first time globally for patients in the very high-risk group. Subsequently, in 2020, an extreme risk group was added because of observations that patients with more severe or extensive ASCVD, along with multiple risk factors and comorbidities, had increased rates of adverse CV events and could benefit from more intensive LDL-C lowering. The extreme risk group was subdivided into categories A and B, with LDL-C targets as low as 30 mg/dL or lower. The availability of further evidence regarding the significance of novel risk factors and the availability of new LDL-C lowering therapies necessitated refining the ASCVD risk assessment algorithm, defining LDL-C targets for subjects with these risk factors, and incorporating recommendations for attaining very low LDL-C levels in a defined, select group of patients. Accordingly, the LAI expert group recently published the Consensus Statement IV, which is a comprehensive document addressing several key issues about risk stratification and dyslipidemia management in Indian subjects. LDL-C and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) are not only primary and co-primary targets for lipid-lowering therapy but also risk factors for ASCVD risk stratification. Apolipoprotein B is a secondary target. The risk assessment algorithm has been updated to incorporate several nonconventional yet relevant CV risk factors. Additionally, the role of subclinical atherosclerosis has been highlighted. The CV risk due to subclinical atherosclerosis has been considered equivalent to that of established ASCVD, and hence, similar LDL-C targets have been recommended. Furthermore, a new risk category-extreme risk group category C has been added for the small subgroup of patients who continue to experience ASCVD sequelae despite achieving LDL-C levels of 30 mg/dL or lower. An ultralow LDL-C target (10-15 mg/dL) has been recommended along with optimal control of risk factors and guideline-directed management of comorbidities. Dyslipidemia management should be effective with sustained LDL-C lowering. In high-risk situations (e.g., acute coronary syndrome), the LDL-C target should be achieved as early as possible, preferably within the first 2 weeks. The present document summarizes the key messages from the LAI Consensus Statement IV.

Edema India: Executive Summary of Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Edema.

The management of edema requires a systematic approach to screening, diagnosis, and treatment, with an essential initial assessment to differentiate between generalized and localized edema. The Association of Physicians of India (API) aimed to develop the first Indian Edema Consensus (Edema India), offering tailored recommendations for screening, diagnosing, and managing edema based on the insights from the expert panel. The panel suggested when evaluating edema symptoms, important factors to consider include the patient's current illness, medical history, risk factors, family history, and medications. Key diagnostic investigations for edema include complete blood count, cardiovascular imaging and markers, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) assessment, along with renal, hepatic, and thyroid function tests. Edema management involves a combination of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, including limb elevation, physiotherapy, compression therapy, fluid removal, diuretics (loop diuretics: first-line therapy), and a sodium-restricted diet. The panel believed that educating patients could foster a preventive mindset, helping to prevent the worsening of edema.

Prevalence and Association of Risk Factors According to Liver Steatosis and Fibrosis Stages among Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in India: A Cross-sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are linked to the global diabetes epidemic, leading to increased disease progression and adverse health outcomes. The renaming of NAFLD to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) at the 2023 European Association for the Study of the Liver Congress highlights the complex relationship between metabolic disorders and liver health. Taking this into consideration, we aimed this study to identify prevalence and risk factors associated with the stages of NAFLD in individuals with T2DM in the Indian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study was conducted on 1,521 T2DM patients at Dr Panikar's Speciality Care Centre, Mumbai, between September 1, 2022 and October 31, 2022. Demographic parameters such as age, gender, height, weight, and anthropometric parameters such as body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference were measured. Liver fibrosis and steatosis stages were identified by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) using FibroScan®. RESULTS: The prevalence of liver steatosis was 75.1% among the 1,521 diabetes cases [S0 (24.9%), S1 (15.1%), S2 (24%), and S3 (36%)], whereas the prevalence of liver fibrosis was 28.0% [F0 (72%), F1 (19%), F2 (5%), F3 (1.5%), and F4 (3.4%)]. The S1 (p = 0.012), S3 (p = 0.001), F1 (p = 0.001), and F2 (p = 0.001) grades showed significant gender-related changes, demonstrating a positive connection. Furthermore, waist circumference was associated with disease severity in both liver steatosis and fibrosis stages (p = 0.001), but BMI was solely associated with the degree of steatosis (p = 0.001). The mean age differences between these categories, however, did not reach statistical significance (p-values of 0.149 and 0.078, respectively, for the steatosis and fibrosis grades). CONCLUSION: The study reveals a high prevalence of NAFLD (steatosis and fibrosis) in T2DM patients, increasing the risk of advanced fibrosis. In T2DM patients with risk factors including waist circumference and BMI, appropriate screening and intervention are required.

Responsible Use of Oral Corticosteroids in People with Comorbid Diabetes: An Expert Consensus.

Globally, diabetes mellitus (DM) is a substantial contributor to morbidity and mortality. Comorbidities and intercurrent illnesses in people with diabetes may necessitate the use of steroids. Acute as well as chronic use of steroids contributes substantially to the development of various complications. Despite this, there are no standard guidelines or consensus to provide a unified approach for the rational use of steroids in people with diabetes. Also, there is scant harmonization among clinicians with the use of different steroids in routine practice. To address the inconsistencies in this clinical arena, the consensus working group (CWG) formulated a unified consensus for steroid use in people with diabetes. In people with diabetes, the use of steroids causes hyperglycemia and may precipitate diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). An increase in weight is directly related to the dose and duration of the steroid therapy. Steroid-related alterations in hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension (HTN) add to the increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. The risk of complications such as infections, osteoporosis, myopathy, acne, cataracts, and glaucoma may increase with the use of steroids. Appropriate and timely monitoring of these complications is necessary for early detection and treatment of such complications. Given the systemic effects of various antihyperglycemic drugs, there is a possibility of aggravating or diminishing the specific complications. Preference to a safer steroid is required matching the steroid dose equivalence and individualizing patient management. In conclusion, short-, intermediate-, or long-term use of steroids in people with diabetes demands their rational use and holistic approach to identify, monitor, and treat the complications induced or aggravated by the steroids.

Evolution of Metabolic Syndrome in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Asian-Indian Patients Over the Last 15 Years using Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program, World Health Organization, and International Diabetes Federation Criterion.

AIM: A retrospective observational study was undertaken to assess the changing trends in the incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Asian-Indian patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D) using Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP-ATP III), World Health Organization (WHO), and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria. The overall and gender-wise pattern of MetS and its components were also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Newly diagnosed T2D patients (n = 10,950)visiting Dr Panikar's Diabetes Care Centre from 2004 to 2019 with retrievable electronic medical records were selected. The incidence of MetS in these patients was studied using NCEP-ATP III, WHO, and IDF criteria in three separate timelines, namely, group I (2004-2008), group II (2009-2013), and group III (2014-2019). Overall and gender-wise, the incidence of various components of the MetS was also studied and compared across the three groups. All data were analyzed by using the Statistical Software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 10.0. Continuous variables were summarized by the number of observations (mean, standard deviation or median with minimum and maximum) and categorical values (calculating frequencies with percentages). Chi-square was used to estimate the incidence of MetS using different criteria and gender-wise patterns of the MetS components for the three periods. Other variables, such as mean body mass index (BMI), were assessed by applying variance analysis (ANOVA test). All values were reported based on a two-sided ANOVA test, and all the statistical tests were interpreted at a 5% level of significance. RESULTS: In the current study, the overall incidence of MetS observed among the study population was 80.9, 65.4, and 69.8% using NCEP-ATP III, WHO, and IDF criteria, respectively. The incidence of MetS across the three timelines (i.e., from 2004 to 2019) with all the diagnostic criteria showed a steady increase. An analysis of the individual components of MetS revealed a high incidence of central obesity across all subgroups, followed by hypertension and dyslipidemia. Central obesity was prevalent in nearly 85.9% of patients in 2014-2019 vs 78.6% in the 2004-2008 subgroup. Similarly, the incidence of hypertension and overall dyslipidemia [i.e., high triglycerides (TGs) and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C)] was 77.8% and 68.2% in the former vs 67.9% and 59.6% in the latter, respectively. The incidence of all three MetS components, along with fasting sugar, showed a statistically significant and progressive increase over the years, with prevalence in group III (2014-2019) being the highest. Women were found to be more centrally obese and more dyslipidemic compared to men, whereas men were found to be more hypertensive. CONCLUSION: The study shows a high incidence of MetS in Asian-Indian patients with newly diagnosed T2D. The incidence of MetS was significantly higher with the NCEP-ATP III diagnostic criteria than with WHO and IDF criteria. A steady rise in the incidence of MetS was observed over the study period of 2004-2019. Among the components of MetS, the incidence of central obesity, elevated TG levels, and low HDL-C were found to be higher in the female population than in males, whereas the incidence of hypertension was higher in males. Stringent lifestyle measures, along with appropriate pharmacological management, might help mitigate the risks associated with MetS.

Consensus Statement from India on the Renal Benefits of ARNi, SGLT-2i, and Bisoprolol in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in India. CKD often coexists with heart failure (HF), diabetes, and hypertension. All these comorbidities are risk factors for renal impairment. HF and CKD are pathophysiologically intertwined, and the deterioration of one can worsen the prognosis of the other. There is a need for safe renal pharmacological therapies that target both CKD and HF and are also useful in hypertension and diabetes. Neurohormonal activation achieved through the activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), and the natriuretic peptide system (NPS) is fundamental in the pathogenesis and progression of CKD and HF. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), and selective ß1-blocker (B1B) bisoprolol suppress this neurohormonal activation. They also have many other cardiorenal benefits across a wide range of CKD patients with or without concomitant HF, diabetes, or hypertension. This consensus statement from India explores the place of ARNi, SGLT-2i, and bisoprolol in the management of CKD patients with or without HF and other comorbidities.

Fortifying Micronutrient Supplementation in India: Indian Expert consensus.

Micronutrients play a key role in human health, being involved in energy metabolism, immunity, cellular functioning, growth, and development. Deficiencies in micronutrients occur in individuals of all ages due to several factors, including inadequate diets, disease states, and overweight/obesity. Guidelines from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) Expert Group on Nutrient Requirements for Indians (2023) have specified the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) for macronutrients and micronutrients. In addition, a healthy diet is crucial for overall health and should be the first step toward addressing micronutrient deficiencies. When diet is inadequate, micronutrient supplements can be provided to compensate. An expert panel of Indian doctors was convened to develop a pathway toward micronutrient supplementation among the Indian population. This Consensus Statement recognizes that different populations have varying needs for specific micronutrients, and ensuring adequate intake of such micronutrients can improve health outcomes. The panel provided recommendations for dietary practices and micronutrient supplementation when diet is inadequate. Addressing micronutrient deficiencies at the primary care level can prevent chronic deficiencies and their consequences. This Consensus Statement can serve as a primer for physicians to monitor and address deficiencies and thus help individuals maintain their health.

Cilnidipine, a Dual L/N-type Ca2+ Channel Blocker in Hypertension Management: A Review.

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely used antihypertensive agents due to their effectiveness in reducing blood pressure (BP), along with their good tolerability and evidence of reducing hypertension (HTN)-related cardiovascular and renal diseases. Cilnidipine, a unique dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, exhibits potent inhibitory action on both N-type and L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels. With excellent oral absorption and a prolonged duration of action, it demonstrates a significant antihypertensive effect. It effectively reduces BP both systolic and diastolic while providing renal, neurological, and cardiovascular protection. Unlike L-type CCBs, cilnidipine does not increase pulse rates (PRs) and is associated with reduced occurrence of pedal edema. Cilnidipine is an effective treatment choice for individuals with mild to moderate essential HTN, whether it is administered alone or in conjunction with other treatment modalities.

Screening for Lung Cancer in India: Expert Opinion Statement.

Lung cancer (LC) has the highest rate of disability-adjusted life years (DALY) of all cancers in India. A large majority of patients with LC present with advanced disease, resulting in poor survival rates. Early diagnosis can improve survival outcomes as the patients can be treated with curative intent. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), in 53,454 persons at high risk for LC in the US, showed a 20% (95% confidence interval of 6.8-26.7; p = 0.004) relative reduction in LC-specific mortality in the patients screened with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) compared with chest X-ray. To date, India does not have a formal LC screening (LCS) program. As a panel of experts, we reviewed a synthesis of a targeted literature search on the burden of LC, the current status of diagnosis of LC, barriers to early diagnosis, current referral pathways, LC risk patterns, use of artificial intelligence (AI) and risk calculators for risk assessment, and a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to diagnosis LC. We used the existing international LCS guidelines, data from published literature, and clinical experience to depict the characteristics of the population at risk of LC in India-young age (<40 years), smoking, especially the predominance of bidi smoking (an indigenous form of tobacco smoking), exposure to biomass fuel smoke, especially in rural women, and air pollution being the prominent features. LC in India is characterized by a higher rate of driver mutations and adenocarcinomatous histology. Here, we present the expert opinion on risk-based LCS in India and discuss the challenges, facilitators, and research priorities for the effective rollout of LCS in India.