RESUMEN
Human adenoviruses can cause serious, disseminated infections in immunocompromised patients. For pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplant patients, the case fatality rate can reach 80%. Still, there is no available antiviral drug that is specifically approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adenovirus infections. To fill this pressing medical need, we have developed NPP-669, a prodrug of cidofovir with broad activity against double-stranded DNA viruses, including adenoviruses. Here, we report on the in vivo anti-adenoviral efficacy of NPP-669. Using the immunosuppressed Syrian hamster as the model, we show that NPP-669 is highly efficacious when dosed orally at 1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg. In a delayed administration experiment, NPP-669 was more effective than brincidofovir, a similar compound that reached Phase III clinical trials. Furthermore, parenteral administration of NPP-669 increased its efficacy approximately 10-fold compared to oral dosing without apparent toxicity, suggesting that this route may be preferable in a hospital setting. Based on these findings, we believe that NPP-669 is a promising new compound that needs to be further investigated.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Cidofovir , Citosina , Mesocricetus , Organofosfonatos , Profármacos , Animales , Antivirales/farmacología , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Profármacos/farmacología , Profármacos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Cidofovir/farmacología , Cidofovir/uso terapéutico , Organofosfonatos/farmacología , Organofosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Citosina/análogos & derivados , Citosina/farmacología , Citosina/uso terapéutico , Adenovirus Humanos/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Adenovirus Humanos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Adenovirus Humanos/virología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Cricetinae , Administración OralRESUMEN
Adenovirus infections of immunocompromised humans are a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Presently, there is no drug specifically approved for the treatment of adenovirus infections by the FDA. The state-of-the-art treatment of such infections is the off-label use of cidofovir, an acyclic nucleotide phosphonate. While cidofovir inhibits adenovirus replication, it has dose-limiting kidney toxicity. There is an apparent need for a better compound to treat adenovirus infections. To this end, we have been developing acyclic nucleotide phosphonate prodrugs that utilize an amino acid scaffold equipped with a lipophilic modifier. Here, we compare the antiviral potential of two prodrugs of HPMPA that differ only in the amino acid-based promoiety: USC-087, based on an N-hexadecyl tyrosinamide, and USC-093, based on an N-hexadecyl serinamide. Oral administration of both compounds was very efficacious against disseminated HAdV-C6 infection in immunosuppressed Syrian hamsters, suppressing virus replication and mitigating pathology even when treatment was withheld until 4 days after challenge. We saw only marginal efficacy after respiratory infection of hamsters, which may reflect suboptimal distribution to the lung. Importantly, neither compound induced intestinal toxicity, which was observed as the major adverse effect in clinical trials of brincidofovir, a prodrug of cidofovir which also contains a C-16 modifier. Notably, we found that there was a significant difference in the nephrotoxicity of the two compounds: USC-087 caused significant kidney toxicity while USC-093 did not, at effective doses. These findings will be valuable guidepoints in the future evolution of this new class of potential prodrugs to treat adenovirus infections.