Colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare tumor that demonstrates aggressive growth pattern with ingrowth into the tract, metastasis to the other organs, and invasion to the surrounding organs; these clinical characteristics result in poor prognosis. Surgical resection appears as an effective approach; however, because it is difficult to accurately diagnose NEC during the early stage and owing to its aggressive growth pattern, development of a reliable standard chemotherapy regimen and management strategies are essential. CASE SUMMARY: Here, we report the case of patient with NEC showing an aggressive growth pattern that resulted in the rupture of the tumor to the outside the colon after stenting of the internal colonic stenosis. In addition, the tumor invaded into the duodenum, thereby causing duodenal stenosis that required an additional stent in the duodenum. This aggressive growth pattern is one of the main features of the NEC that is different from adenocarcinoma. To clarify the clinical characteristics, we reviewed 60 recently reported cases, including data on tumor location, size, treatment, and prognosis. CONCLUSION: We consider that the information presented here is of great significance for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of symptoms of the patients with NEC.

[A Case of Radical Resection after CapeOX Therapy for Locally Advanced Sigmoid Colon Cancer with Anemia and Abscess Formation in a Jehovah's Witness].

The patient-a Jehovah's Witness-was a woman in her 60s, with locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer. She had severe anemia, and a computed tomography scan of her abdomen showed a tumor with abscess formation and perforation that had invaded into the left urinary duct and the left ovary, without distant metastasis. It was difficult to perform curative resections without transfusion; therefore, CapeOX therapy was plannedas the neoadjuvant treatment. After 3 courses of CapeOX therapy, the patient's anemia improved, and the tumor and abscess had shrunk. Subsequently, a sigmoidectomy with D3 lymph node dissection, partial resection of the small intestine, and the left adnexectomy, as a radical surgery, were performed without blood transfusion. In cases of concomitant colon cancer with anemia that are treated with highly invasive surgery, it might be necessary to conduct systematic treatment in order to complete non-transfusion therapy.

[A case of locally advanced rectal cancer had a pathological complete response to XELOX Therapy].

The patient was a 62-year-old man with bowel obstruction in a locally advanced rectal cancer. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen showed tumor enlargement(11.4 × 9.0 cm)that invaded the urinary bladder, but no distant metastasis. XELOX therapy was planned in order to shrink or eliminate the tumor after a sigmoid colostomy. Four courses of XELOX therapy were perfomed. Consequently, the level of the tumor marker had been restored to a normal range. CT scan revealed marked shrinkage of the tumor (6.1 × 5.2 cm) and a sharply-defined border between the tumor and the urinary bladder. Three weeks after chemotherapy, a low anterior resection as a radical surgery, and a temporary ileostomy were performed. The post-operative course was good. The histological effect was judged to be grade 3. There were no viable cancer cells in the rectal tumor and lymph nodes. The patient is alive and has been disease-free for 10 months after the operation. XELOX therapy as pre-operative chemotherapy might be safe and effective for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Phase II study of S-1 as first-line treatment for elderly patients over 75 years of age with advanced gastric cancer: the Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: This prospective multicenter phase II study was carried out to investigate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients over 75 years of age, with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients had measurable or evaluable lesions according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. S-1 (25-60 mg determined by the body surface area and creatinine clearance) was given orally, twice daily. A course of treatment consisted of 4-week administration followed by a 2-week rest period, and the patients received repeated courses. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Pharmacokinetics of S-1 was studied in six patients, and the maximum plasma concentrations of respective metabolites after S-1 administration were found to be similar to those reported for younger cancer patients. The overall response rate in 33 patients was 21.2% (95% CI, 10.7-37.8%), and median progression-free survival was 3.9 months, with a median overall survival of 15.7 months. Frequently noted adverse events include leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, anorexia, and fatigue. As for serious adverse events, relatively higher frequencies of anemia (9%) and anorexia (12%) of grade 3 severity were found, but there were no grade 4 episodes. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that S-1 monotherapy is safe and useful for elderly patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer when the dose is selected with caution, taking into account renal function.

Phase I/II trial of combination therapy with S-1 and weekly paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: We aimed to examine the safety and antitumor effects of a combination of S-1 and paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer in a phase I/II setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was designed as a phase I/II clinical trial. In phase I portion, the dose of paclitaxel was escalated to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel with fixed dose of S-1. S-1 (daily dose, 80 mg/m(2)) was given orally on days 1-21 every 35-day cycle (rest on days 22-35). Paclitaxel was administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15, at an initial dose of 40 mg/m(2), stepping up to 70 mg/m(2) in 10-mg/m(2) increment. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 hematological toxicity, grade 3 or higher nonhematological toxicity, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions during the first course of treatment. In phase II portion, the efficacy and toxicity at the RD of paclitaxel with S-1 were assessed. RESULTS: The MTD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 60 mg/m(2), because >33.3% of patients (2/3) developed DLTs. DLT included postponement of treatment due to grade 2 neutropenia, and grade 3 stomatitis, anorexia, and nausea. Therefore, the RD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 50 mg/m(2). In the phase II portion, 22 patients were evaluated with 50 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and 80 mg/m(2) S-1 in a 35-day cycle. The response rate was 54.5% (95% CI, 32.2-75.6%). The median survival time was 283 days (95% CI, 218-508 days). The median number of treatment courses was 4 (range 1-10), indicating that this regimen could be given repeatedly. CONCLUSIONS: This phase I/II trial of combination therapy with S-1 and paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer showed that this regimen has substantial antitumor activity and can be given safely.