Assessing the Combined Public Health Impact of Pharmaceutical Interventions on Pandemic Transmission and Mortality: An Example in SARS CoV-2.

To assess the combined role of anti-viral monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and vaccines in reducing severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission and mortality in the United States, an agent-based model was developed that accounted for social contacts, movement/travel, disease progression, and viral shedding. The model was calibrated to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality between October 2020 and April 2021 (aggressive pandemic phase), and projected an extended outlook to estimate mortality during a less aggressive phase (April-August 2021). Simulated scenarios evaluated mAbs for averting infections and deaths in addition to vaccines and aggregated non-pharmaceutical interventions. Scenarios included mAbs as a treatment of COVID-19 and for passive immunity for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) during a period when variants were susceptible to the mAbs. Rapid diagnostic testing paired with mAbs was evaluated as an early treatment-as-prevention strategy. Sensitivity analyses included increasing mAb supply and vaccine rollout. Allocation of mAbs for use only as PEP averted up to 14% more infections than vaccine alone, and targeting individuals ≥ 65 years averted up to 37% more deaths. Rapid testing for earlier diagnosis and mAb use amplified these benefits. Doubling the mAb supply further reduced infections and mortality. mAbs provided benefits even as proportion of the immunized population increased. Model projections estimated that ~ 42% of expected deaths between April and August 2021 could be averted. Assuming sensitivity to mAbs, their use as early treatment and PEP in addition to vaccines would substantially reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission and mortality even as vaccination increases and mortality decreases. These results provide a template for informing public health policy for future pandemic preparedness.

A drug-disease model for predicting survival in an Ebola outbreak.

REGN-EB3 (Inmazeb) is a cocktail of three human monoclonal antibodies approved for treatment of Ebola infection. This paper describes development of a mathematical model linking REGN-EB3's inhibition of Ebola virus to survival in a non-human primate (NHP) model, and translational scaling to predict survival in humans. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data from single- and multiple-dose REGN-EB3 studies in infected rhesus macaques were incorporated. Using discrete indirect response models, the antiviral mechanism of action was used as a forcing function to drive the reversal of key Ebola disease hallmarks over time, for example, liver and kidney damage (elevated alanine [ALT] and aspartate aminotransferases [AST], blood urea nitrogen [BUN], and creatinine), and hemorrhage (decreased platelet count). A composite disease characteristic function was introduced to describe disease severity and integrated with the ordinary differential equations estimating the time course of clinical biomarkers. Model simulation results appropriately represented the concentration-dependence of the magnitude and time course of Ebola infection (viral and pathophysiological), including time course of viral load, ALT and AST elevations, platelet count, creatinine, and BUN. The model estimated the observed survival rate in rhesus macaques and the dose of REGN-EB3 required for saturation of the pharmacodynamic effects of viral inhibition, reversal of Ebola pathophysiology, and survival. The model also predicted survival in clinical trials with appropriate scaling to humans. This mathematical investigation demonstrates that drug-disease modeling can be an important translational tool to integrate preclinical data from an NHP model recapitulating disease progression to guide future translation of preclinical data to clinical study design.

Cardiovascular disease models: A game changing paradigm in drug discovery and screening.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Although investment in drug discovery and development has been sky-rocketing, the number of approved drugs has been declining. Cardiovascular toxicity due to therapeutic drug use claims the highest incidence and severity of adverse drug reactions in late-stage clinical development. Therefore, to address this issue, new, additional, replacement and combinatorial approaches are needed to fill the gap in effective drug discovery and screening. The motivation for developing accurate, predictive models is twofold: first, to study and discover new treatments for cardiac pathologies which are leading in worldwide morbidity and mortality rates; and second, to screen for adverse drug reactions on the heart, a primary risk in drug development. In addition to in vivo animal models, in vitro and in silico models have been recently proposed to mimic the physiological conditions of heart and vasculature. Here, we describe current in vitro, in vivo, and in silico platforms for modelling healthy and pathological cardiac tissues and their advantages and disadvantages for drug screening and discovery applications. We review the pathophysiology and the underlying pathways of different cardiac diseases, as well as the new tools being developed to facilitate their study. We finally suggest a roadmap for employing these non-animal platforms in assessing drug cardiotoxicity and safety.