The presence of doping agents in dietary supplements: A glimpse into the Brazilian situation.

Dietary supplements (DS) are intended for healthy people to maintain or improve their overall health. Its consumption is widespread in large part of the general population and at all levels of athletes. Nevertheless, DS use can also pose health risks to individuals and, in the case of athletes, may lead to adverse analytical findings (AAFs) due to the possibility of DS contamination or adulteration with doping agents banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency. Although educational initiatives are being performed in Brazil to warn the sports community about inadvertent doping cases, AAFs connected to the DS administration have been increasingly growing. The findings of DS analyzed by the Brazilian Doping Control Laboratory (LBCD), between 2017 and 2022, after Testing Authorities (TAs) analysis requests, showed an alarming number of tainted samples. Diuretics were the most common adulterants found in all supplement types. However, the profile of prohibited substances in manufactured and compounded dietary supplements (MDS and CDS, respectively) were distinct, with stimulants being most prevalent in MDS and anabolic agents in CDS products. Additionally, MDS samples generally presented higher estimated concentrations of banned substances (mg/g) than CDS samples (µg/g). The common practice of DS intake by athletes continues to be of great concern for a doping-free sport, given the high prevalence of prohibited substances detected in the analyzed samples by the LBCD. The current Brazilian scenario reinforces the importance of raising awareness in the sports community of the possible consequences of an unintentional doping case linked to DS use.

Untargeted LC-HRMS metabolomics reveals candidate biomarkers for mucopolysaccharidoses.

BACKGROUND: Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) are inherited genetic diseases caused by an absence or deficiency of lysosomal enzymes responsible for catabolizing glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Undiagnosed patients, or those without adequate treatment in early life, can be severely and irreversibly affected by the disease. In this study, we applied liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS)-based untargeted metabolomics to identify potential biomarkers for MPS disorders to better understand how MPS may affect the metabolome of patients. METHODS: Urine samples from 37 MPS patients (types I, II, III, IV, and VI; untreated and treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT)) and 38 controls were analyzed by LC-HRMS. Data were processed by an untargeted metabolomics workflow and submitted to multivariate statistical analyses to reveal significant differences between the MPS and control groups. RESULTS: A total of 12 increased metabolites common to all MPS types were identified. Dipeptides, amino acids and derivatives were increased in the MPS group compared to controls. N-acetylgalactosamines 4- or 6-sulfate, important constituents of GAGs, were also elevated in MPS patients, most prominently in those with MPS VI. Notably, treated patients exhibited lower levels of the aforementioned acylaminosugars than untreated patients in all MPS types. CONCLUSIONS: Untargeted metabolomics has enabled the detection of metabolites that could improve our understanding of MPS physiopathology. These potential biomarkers can be utilized in screening methods to support diagnosis and ERT monitoring.