A preliminary comparison of fluent and non-fluent speech through Turkish predictive cluttering inventory-revised.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare the speech fluency performance of non-fluent participants namely people with stuttering (PWS), people with cluttering (PWC) and people with cluttering and stuttering (PWCS) with a fluent control group using the Turkish version of Predictive Cluttering Inventory-revised (TR-PCI-r). METHODS: The study recruited non-fluent individuals (n = 60) and fluent controls (n = 60) between the ages of 6 and 55. The non-fluent group was perceptually evaluated by two speech and language pathologists (SLP). The speaking, reading and retelling samples were collected from 18 PWC, 17 PWCS, 25 PWS and 60 controls. The scores of each factor were compared. Age and gender differences were analyzed. Validity and reliability were calculated. RESULTS: The agreement between two SLPs was found to be at the barely acceptable level (κ = 0.378). PWC and PWCS produced parallel outcomes in the speech motor area. In every other domain and in total scores, PWC were different from PWCS, PWS, and the controls. There was a variation in the total scores obtained by the children and adolescents in the PWS and between males and females in the controls. Except for three items (namely items 8, 22, 27), TR-PCI-r met the content validity criterion. Furthermore, TR-PCI-r was found to be a reliable tool as shown by ɑ> 0.70 and ICC values of between 0.75 and 0.90. CONCLUSION: The scores from TR-PCI-r indicated that, speech motor characteristics of PWC and PWCS were similar. Other features assessed by the tool seemed to distinguish PWC from PWCS, PWS and controls.

Effects of cadence-compatible melodic rhythmic auditory stimulation implementation on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease.

PURPOSE: Progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in basal ganglia is blamed as the main source of gait disturbance in Parkinson's disease (PD). It is known that the normal step pattern does not disappear in PD, but there is a problem in activating the correct step response. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS), which is an external stimulus, on gait in individuals with PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six individuals, 13 in the PD group and 13 in the control group, participated in the study. All individuals were asked to walk under four different RAS conditions configured with beat frequency and melodic variations. Time-distance parameters and gait performance of the individuals were evaluated. RESULTS: RAS significantly increased the gait speed of the individuals with PD compared to the control group. RAS set to 10% increase in the cadence of the patient with melody (10 M+) was found to be more effective than the RAS set to normal cadence of the patient without melody (0 M-) (p < 0.05). While all RAS implementations increased the stride length of the individuals with PD (p < 0.05), there was no change in the control group. RAS did not affect the return time in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown that RAS implementation improves gait in individuals with PD both in terms of time-distance parameters and performance, especially when set to 10% more than the patient's gait cadence. It was concluded that cadence-compatible melodic RAS can be safely included in PD rehabilitation programs.