Open Label, Pilot Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravesical Sustained Release System of Lidocaine and Oxybutynin (TRG-100) for Patients With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome, Overactive Bladder and Patients With Retained Ureteral Stents Following Endourological Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Intravesical instillation of analgesic and anticholinergic drugs have shown efficacy in the treatment of pain and voiding symptoms. Unfortunately, drug loss with urination and dilution in the bladder limit their durability and clinical usefulness. We have recently developed and tested in vitro, a sustained delivery system (TRG-100) of fixed-dose combination of lidocaine and oxybutynin designed to allow for a longer exposure of the urinary bladder to the drugs. OBJECTIVE: To asses the safety and efficacy of TRG-100 in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS), overactive bladder (OAB), and endourological intervention stented (EUI) patients in an open-label, prospective study. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled: 10 IC/BPS, 10 OAB, and 16 EUI. EUI patients received a once-weekly installation until stent removal, OAB and IC/BPS patient received weekly installations for 4 consecutive weeks. Treatment effect was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) score for the EUI group, voiding diaries for OAB group and VAS score, voiding diaries and O'Leary Sant Questionnaires for the IC/BPS group. RESULTS: The EUI group showed a mean 4-point improvement in their VAS score. The OAB group showed 33.54% reduction in frequency of urination and IC/PBS group showed a mean of 3.2-point improvement in their VAS score, 25.43% reduction in frequency of urination, and a mean 8.1-point reduction in O'Leary Sant Questionnaires score. All changes were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Intravesical instillation of TRG-100 was found to be safe and efficient in reducing pain and irritative bladder symptoms in our study population. TRG-100 efficacy and safety should be further assessed in a large, randomized control trial.

Intravesical sustained release system of lidocaine and oxybutynin results from in vitro and animal study.

PURPOSE: Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a chronic debilitating condition of unknown etiology. Intravesical lidocaine demonstrated pain relief in patients with IC/BPS. Intravesical oxybutynin has shown therapeutic efficacy in patients with urinary bladder disorders. However, loss of drug with urination requiring multiple administrations and immediate dilution of drug concentration by residual urine in the bladder mitigated intravesical use of both drugs in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination of lidocaine and oxybutynin, forming in the urine a sustained delivery system named TRG-042. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In-vitro, we have quantitatively tested the concentration of lidocaine and oxybutynin released from TRG-042 in artificial urine. Following the successful in-vitro study weekly formulation of TRG-042 was instilled intravesically to six pigs. All pigs were followed with cystoscopy to assess the gradual degradation of the delivery system and to evaluate bladder response over 7 days. Daily blood samples were tested for drug quantization. RESULTS: In-vitro studies have demonstrated oxybutynin and lidocaine sustained release over 1-week period coupled with full degradation of the matrix. None of the animals demonstrated any side effects following instillation. Cystoscopy examination observed gradual disintegration of TRG-042 over 1-week with no adverse reaction to the mucosa. Plasma concentrations of oxybutynin and lidocaine were uniformly stable over the 1-week period [1.46 ± 0.176 ng/ml and 4.29 ± 2.48 ng/ml respectively(mean ± SEM)] with almost undetectable concentration of N-desethyloxybutynin (NDO)[0.032 ± 0.068 ng/ml]. CONCLUSIONS: The in-vitro and animal data demonstrated that TRG-042 can safely be used for intravesical sustained release of lidocaine and oxybutynin in the treatment of BPS/IC.

Interspecies differences in reaction to a biodegradable subcutaneous tissue filler: severe inflammatory granulomatous reaction in the Sinclair minipig.

Soft tissue filler products have become very popular in recent years, with ever-increasing medical and aesthetic indications. While generally considered safe, the number of reported complications with tissue fillers is growing. Nevertheless, there is no specific animal model that is considered as the gold standard for assessing safety or efficacy of tissue fillers, and there are very little data on interspecies differences in reaction to these products. Here, we report on interspecies differences in reaction to a subcutaneous injectable co-polyester, composed of castor oil and citric acid. Comparison of the histopathological local tissue changes following 1-month postimplantation, indicated that in rats the reaction consisted of cavities, surrounded by relatively thin fibrotic enveloping capsule. In contrast, an unexpected severe inflammatory granulomatous reaction was noticed in Sinclair minipigs. To our knowledge, this is the first report on significant interspecies differences in sensitivity to tissue fillers. It emphasizes the importance of using the appropriate animal model for performing preclinical biocompatibility assays for biodegradable polymers, tissue fillers, and implanted medical devices in general. It also makes the Sinclair minipig subject for scrutiny as an animal model in future biocompatibility studies.