Endoscopist-related factors affecting adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Data from the J-SCOUT study.

OBJECTIVES: Colonoscopy withdrawal times are associated with the adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, the relationship between ADR and cecal insertion time has been inadequately characterized. We aimed to evaluate endoscopist-related factors involved in the ADR, including the average individual colonoscopy insertion and withdrawal times. METHODS: This observational study used a colonoscopy database with pathology data from routine clinical practice in Japanese institutions. The odds ratios (OR) of endoscopist-related factors related to ADRs were examined using a generalized linear mixed model. RESULTS: Of the 186,293 colonoscopies performed during the study period, 47,705 colonoscopies by 189 endoscopists in four hospitals were analyzed for ADR. The overall ADR was 38.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37.8, 38.7). Compared to endoscopists with mean cecal insertion times of <5 min, the OR of ADR for those with mean cecal insertion times of 5-9, 10-14, and ≥15 min were 0.84 (95% CI 0.71, 0.99), 0.68 (95% CI 0.52, 0.90), and 0.45 (95% CI 0.25, 0.78), respectively. Compared to endoscopists with mean withdrawal times of <6 min, the OR of ADR for those with mean withdrawal times of 6-9, 10-14, and ≥15 min were 1.38 (95% CI 1.03, 1.85), 1.48 (95% CI 1.09, 2.02), and 1.68 (95% CI 1.04, 2.61), respectively. There were no significant differences in ADRs by endoscopist specialty, gender, or the total number of examinations performed. CONCLUSION: Individual mean colonoscopy insertion time was associated with ADR and might be considered as a colonoscopy quality indicator as well as withdrawal time.

Analysis of the variation in learning curves for achieving competency in convex EUS training: a prospective cohort study using a standardized assessment tool.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The need for mastering standard imaging techniques for convex EUS in the biliopancreatic regions has been increasing; however, large variations in the aptitude for achieving EUS competency hinder expert development. Therefore, we investigated the factors influencing the achievement of expert competency in EUS using a new assessment tool for multiple imaging items. METHODS: Between January 2018 and February 2022, 3277 consecutive EUS procedures conducted by 5 beginners (EUS procedures <250), 7 intermediate trainees (250-749), and 2 experts (≥750) were prospectively evaluated. Immediately after each EUS procedure, the success or failure of imaging for each item was recorded using a newly developed EUS assessment tool that requires 17 items to be photographed. After correcting for missing values using multiple imputation, learning curves of EUS scores were created, and a competency was set based on expert scores. Finally, a comparative analysis between high and low performers was performed to extract factors influencing EUS scores. RESULTS: Although 3 of 7 intermediates (43%; mean, 317 cases) achieved competency, none of the beginners achieved competency. During a comparative analysis, although no significant difference in the number of EUS procedures performed was observed between the high and low performers, the former had significantly higher scores in the written test (theoretical knowledge). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that theoretical knowledge, rather than the number of EUS cases, may be a possible influencing factor for distinguishing high and low performers after treating 250 cases. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000043271.).

The Advantage of Immunohistochemical Staining for Evaluating Lymphovascular Invasion Is Limited for Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invading the Muscularis Mucosa.

The cumulative metastasis rate of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) pathologically invading the muscularis mucosae (pT1a-MM), based on lymphovascular invasion (LVI) evaluated by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining is unknown. This retrospective study included patients with endoscopically resected pT1a-MM ESCC. The primary endpoint was the metastasis rate of pT1a-MM based on LVI, evaluated using IHC and additional prophylactic therapy. The secondary endpoint was the identification of independent factors for metastasis based on lesion characteristics. The prognosis was also analyzed considering the impact of head and neck cancer. A total of 104 patients were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 74 months. The positive rate for LVI was 43.3% (45/104). In 33 patients, IHC was not performed at the time of clinical evaluation, 8 of whom exhibited LVI. However, these patients did not exhibit metastasis. The metastasis rates of patients without LVI, those with LVI and additional therapy, and those with LVI without additional therapy were 5.1%, 20.8%, and 0%, respectively. Lesion size ≥ 25 mm was the only independent factor for metastasis in multivariate analysis. The advantage of IHC for determining additional prophylactic therapy is limited for patients with pT1a-MM ESCC.

Diagnostic Dilemma of Biliopancreatic Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography.

Background: The utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) alone in the biliopancreatic region appears to be limited because it is highly dependent on the experience and skill of the endoscopist. Therefore, the present study aimed to validate the efficacy of CH-EUS in clinical practice. Methods: Between January 2018 and March 2019, 301 consecutive patients who underwent CH-EUS were prospectively enrolled in this study. The diagnostic performance of CH-EUS was compared with that of dynamic computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and all combinations (i.e., CH-EUS, dynamic CT, and MRI) using a Bonferroni correction. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to extract each disease that allowed the CH-EUS diagnosis to be consistent with the final diagnosis. Results: In multiple comparisons of diagnostic performance, no significant differences were observed among dynamic CT, MRI, and CH-EUS (p = 1.00), but the diagnostic performance was significantly higher when all modalities were combined (p < 0.001). Moreover, only intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm comprising adenoma or carcinoma (IPMN, n = 161) showed significance with respect to the agreement with the final diagnosis (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Our results showed that CH-EUS-based diagnosis of IPMN may be possible in clinical practice. On the contrary, to accurately diagnose biliopancreatic diseases other than IPMN, comprehensive diagnosis using multiple modalities may be necessary, rather than relying on CH-EUS alone.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy histology with a 22-gauge Franseen needle and fine-needle aspiration liquid-based cytology with a conventional 25-gauge needle provide comparable diagnostic accuracy in solid pancreatic lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles obtain more core samples and support the shift from cytologic to histologic evaluation; however, recent studies have proposed a superior diagnostic potential for liquid-based cytology (LBC). This study compared the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided FNB histology with a 22-gauge Franseen needle (22G-FNB-H) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) LBC with a conventional 25-gauge needle (25G-FNA-LBC). METHODS: We analyzed 46 patients who underwent both 22G-FNB-H and 25G-FNA-LBC in the same lesion during the same endoscopic procedure. This study evaluated the diagnostic ability of each needle, diagnostic concordance between needles, and incremental diagnostic effect of both needles compared to using each needle alone. RESULTS: The agreement rate for malignancy between both techniques was 93.5% (kappa value = 0.82). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic ability of both methods. 22G-FNB-H and 25G-FNA-LBC provided an incremental diagnostic accuracy in two (4.3%) cases and one (2.2%) case, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of 25G-FNA-LBC and 22G-FNA-H for solid pancreatic lesions were comparable. A conventional 25-gauge needle that punctures lesions with ease can be used in difficult cases and according to the skill of the endoscopist.

The milestone for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis using novel simplified predictive scoring system: a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) with trans-papillary approach remains a major issue, and the multi-factorial etiology can lead to the development of unpredictable PEP. Therefore, the early identification of PEP is highly desirable to assist with the health cost containment, the reduction in unnecessary admissions, earlier appropriate primary care, and intensive care for preventing progression of severe pancreatitis. This study aimed to establish a simplified predictive scoring system for PEP. METHODS: Between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019, 3362 consecutive trans-papillary ERCP procedures were retrospectively analyzed. Significant risk factors were extracted by univariate, multivariate, and propensity score analyses, and the probability of PEP in the combinations of each factor were quantified using propensity score analysis. The results were internally validated using bootstrapping resampling. RESULTS: In the scoring system with four stratifications using combinations of only five extracted risk factors, the very high-risk group showed 28.79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.30%-41.25%; P < 0.001) in the predicted incidence rate of PEP, and 9.09% (95% CI, 3.41%-18.74%; P < 0.001) in that of severe PEP; although the adjusted prevalence revealed 3.74% in PEP and 0.90% in severe PEP, respectively. The prediction model had an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.89) and the optimism-corrected model as an internal validation had an area under the curve of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: We established and validated a simplified predictive scoring system for PEP using five risk factors immediately after ERCP to assist with the early identification of PEP.

Best period to replace or change plastic stents with self-expandable metallic stents using multivariate competing risk regression analysis.

In endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) for various benign and malignant biliary disorders, the appropriate timing to replace or change a plastic stent (PS) with a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) remains unclear. This study aimed to define the best period to replace or change a PS with a SEMS. Between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, 1,887 consecutive EBD procedures, including 170 SEMS placements, were retrospectively identified. The period to recurrent biliary obstruction (PRBO) was estimated and compared between the malignant and benign groups and according to each disease using time to event analysis and competing risk analysis. Compared with the benign group, the malignant group had significantly shorter median PRBO with interquartile range (IQR) after PS placement [108 (39 - 270) vs. 613 (191 - 1,329) days, P < 0.001], even on multivariate analysis, with a subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) of 3.58 (P < 0.001). The shortest PRBO distribution from the first quartile of the non-RBO period was seen in Mirizzi syndrome cases (25 days, P = 0.030, SHR = 3.32) in the benign group and in cases of pancreatic cancer (32 days, P = 0.041, SHR = 2.06); perihilar bile duct cancer (27 days, P = 0.006, SHR = 2.69); and ampullary cancer (22 days, P = 0.001, SHR = 3.78) in the malignant group. Our study supports that stent replacement for the benign group is feasible after 6 months, and the best period to replace or change a PS with a SEMS should be decided on the basis of the underlying disease to prevent RBO.

Dual-focus versus conventional magnification endoscopy for the diagnosis of superficial squamous neoplasms in the pharynx and esophagus: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Conventional magnification narrow-band imaging (CM-NBI) endoscopy has demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for superficial squamous neoplasms in the pharynx and esophagus. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the newly developed dual-focus NBI (DF-NBI) compared with that of CM-NBI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the head and neck, or esophagus, or with a history of SCC. The primary endpoint of this prospective controlled non-inferiority trial was the sensitivity of DF-NBI and CM-NBI for detecting superficial carcinoma in the pharynx and esophagus. Secondary endpoints included other diagnostic values and the resolving power of each endoscope. Superficial carcinoma was defined as high grade dysplasia and SCC invading up to the submucosal layer. RESULTS: The study included 93 patients. A total of 28 superficial carcinomas were detected in the pharynx and esophagus. The sensitivities of DF-NBI and CM-NBI for superficial carcinoma were 82 % and 71 %, respectively. The lower limit of the 90 % confidence interval for the difference between the sensitivities exceeded the non-inferiority threshold. The specificity and overall accuracy of DF-NBI vs. CM-NBI were 93 % vs. 90 % and 91 % vs. 86 %, respectively (both non-significant differences). The maximum resolving power of a conventional magnification endoscope was significantly higher than a dual-focus endoscope (7.2 µm vs. 11.6 µm: P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate the non-inferiority of DF-NBI versus CM-NBI in detecting superficial carcinoma in the pharynx and esophagus. DF-NBI appears to have a resolving power that, although significantly lower, is sufficient to achieve high diagnostic accuracy, comparable to that of CM-NBI.University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN, No. 000007585).

Narrow-Band Imaging Magnifying Endoscopy versus Lugol Chromoendoscopy with Pink-Color Sign Assessment in the Diagnosis of Superficial Esophageal Squamous Neoplasms: A Randomised Noninferiority Trial.

Previous studies have shown the high diagnostic accuracy of narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopy (NBI-ME) and Lugol chromoendoscopy with pink-color sign assessment (LCE-PS) for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). However, there has been no controlled trial comparing these two diagnostic techniques. We conducted a randomized noninferiority trial to compare the diagnostic accuracy of NBI-ME and LCE-PS. We recruited patients with, or with a history of, squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region or in the esophagus. They were randomly assigned to either NBI-ME or LCE-PS. When lesions > 5 mm in diameter were found as brownish areas on NBI or as Lugol-voiding lesions (LVL), they were evaluated to determine whether they are SESCC on the basis of the findings of NBI-ME or PS in the LVL. NBI-ME and LCE-PS were completed in 147 patients each. There was no significant difference in all diagnostic values between the two techniques. Compared with LCE-PS, NBI-ME showed a significantly shorter examination time but a larger number of misdiagnosed lesions especially in patients with many irregularly shaped multiform LVLs. Compared with LCE-PS, NBI-ME might be similarly accurate and less invasive, but less reliable in patients with many LVLs, in the diagnosis of SESCC.

A novel second-generation multibending backward-oblique viewing duodenoscope in ERCP.

INTRODUCTION: Successful access to the papilla and cannulation of the desired duct can be technically challenging. A novel second-generation multi-bending backward-oblique viewing duodenoscope (2nd M-D scope) was developed to overcome this difficulty. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of 2nd M-D scope during biliary ERCP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 53 patients with native papilla who underwent biliary ERCP with the 2nd M-D scope. RESULTS: Biliary cannulation and interventional procedures were successfully completed in all patients. In two of these patients, ERCP was initially attempted with a conventional single bending duodenoscope, but biliary cannulation was unsuccessful; one had Billroth-I gastrectomy, and the other had a Type III choledochal cyst. However, with the 2nd M-D scope, biliary cannulation and interventional procedures were successfully achieved. Finally, in nine patients, upward or downward angulation of the proximal bending portion in addition to the distal bending portion was used during ERCP, and the operator's comments demonstrated that it was helpful for obtaining an appropriate en face view to look up to the papilla and facilitate successful biliary cannulation. CONCLUSION: The newly developed 2nd M-D scope could safely facilitate biliary cannulation in selected patients during ERCP.

A feasibility study of chemically assisted endoscopic submucosal mechanical dissection using mesna for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Injection of mesna into submucosal layers was recently reported to chemically soften connective tissue and facilitate the gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of similarly using mesna for esophageal ESD (mesna ESD). METHODS: We performed mesna ESD in 20 consecutive patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (SESCCs). To do this, a submucosal fluid cushion was initially formed using sodium hyaluronate, and the esophageal lesion was circumferentially isolated with a short blade needle-knife. Mesna solution was then injected into the submucosal layer, which was dissected mechanically by cleavage using the tip of a cap-fitted endoscope. The number of electrosurgical incisions was recorded by computer software in real time. The data from 20 conventional ESD procedures without mesna (consecutive 10 SESCCs pre and post the 20 consecutive mesna ESD) were used for comparison to evaluate the mesna ESD. RESULTS: The mesna ESDs achieved en bloc and R0 resection success rates of 100 and 95 %, respectively. There was no perforation or uncontrollable hemorrhage during and after mesna ESD, and the median procedural time of submucosal dissection was significantly less with mesna ESD than with conventional ESD (median; 8 vs. 15 min, P < 0.05). There were also significantly fewer electrosurgical incisions made during the mesna ESD than with conventional ESDs (median; 65 vs. 183 times, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Mesna ESD for SESCCs is a safe procedure with the potential to facilitate esophageal ESD.

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Differentiation of gallbladder (GB) carcinoma from benign GB wall thickening is challenging. The recent introduction of second-generation ultrasonic contrast agents has made contrast harmonic imaging with EUS possible. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) for the differential diagnosis of GB wall thickening. METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients with GB wall thickening imaged by CH-EUS and then underwent surgery were enrolled in this study. After the lesions were observed with conventional harmonic EUS (H-EUS), CH-EUS was performed with intravenous injection of 0.015 ml/kg of Sonazoid. Three reviewers with various levels of experience of EUS (Reviewer A: experienced endosonographer, B: EUS trainee, C: experienced gastroenterologist with expertise in transabdominal ultrasound but no EUS experience) were blinded to findings of recorded video of H-EUS and CH-EUS. The diagnostic accuracy of H-EUS and CH-EUS for malignant GB wall thickening was compared. RESULTS: Final diagnoses based on surgical histology were GB carcinoma in 16, cholecystitis in 11, adenomyomatosis in 6 and cholesterolosis in 3. Overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing malignant GB wall thickening of H-EUS and CH-EUS were 83.3 versus 89.6, 65 versus 98% (p < 0.001) and 73.1 versus 94.4% (p < 0.001). The inter-observer agreement for H-EUS was moderate (κ = 0.51), whereas that for CH-EUS was substantial (κ = 0.77). The inhomogeneous enhanced pattern on CH-EUS was a strong predictive factor of malignant GB wall thickening. CONCLUSION: CH-EUS has the potential to improve the preoperative diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement in the differential diagnosis of GB wall thickening.

A double-blind, block-randomized, placebo-controlled trial to identify the chemical assistance effect of mesna submucosal injection for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: Previous animal studies and a pilot clinical trial demonstrated that submucosal injection of a thiol compound called mesna could chemically soften connective tissues and thus facilitate endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether mesna injection could reduce procedural times for gastric ESD. DESIGN: Double-blind, block-randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 101 patients with superficial gastric cancer indicated for ESD were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the mesna or control (saline solution) group. INTERVENTION: Traditional ESD was performed with a single bolus injection of mesna or saline solution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Time for submucosal dissection (TSD). RESULTS: En bloc resection was achieved for all lesions in the mesna group (53/53) and 51 of 52 lesions (98.08%) in the control group. TSD was not statistically different between the groups (18.62 ± 13.9 [mean ± SD] minutes for the mesna group and 24.58 ± 24.55 [mean ± SD] minutes for the control group; P = .128), and there were fewer time-consuming cases (times over 30 minutes) in the mesna group compared with controls (7/53 vs 15/52; P = .049). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that use of mesna, specimen size, and the presence of fibrous scars were significantly correlated with TSD (P < .05). LIMITATIONS: Single-center study. CONCLUSION: TSD was not significantly different between the mesna and control injection groups, but multivariate analysis indicated that mesna injection reduced procedural challenges associated with the submucosal dissection. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000003786.).

Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow band imaging may help to predict neoplasia coexisting with gastric hyperplastic polyps.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Although focal cancer occasionally coexists with gastric hyperplastic polyps, previous studies have reported that white light endoscopy (WLE) and biopsy sampling cannot effectively predict the coexistence of cancer. The aim of this study was to elucidate efficacious predictors for cancer coexistence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective single academic center study analyzed consecutive patients with gastric polyps diagnosed as hyperplastic before endoscopic resection. Using an image catalog of WLE and magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) performed as part of the preresection work-up, three endoscopists independently assessed the coexistence of cancer and the presence of predefined ME-NBI findings in the microvasculature (MV) and fine mucosal structure (FMS). RESULTS: Twelve of 64 gastric polyps (19%) resected from 51 patients enrolled in the study showed the coexistence of neoplasia. Polyps with coexisting neoplasia were significantly larger than those without (22.6 ± 10.1 vs. 15.5 ± 7.7 mm, respectively). Multivariate analysis of factors significantly associated with the coexistence of neoplasia identified lesion size and three specific endoscopic findings, that is, WLE diagnosis of cancer coexistence, ME-NBI findings of abnormal MV and micrification (size reduction) of the FMS. Combining lesion size (≥20 mm) and ME-NBI findings of FMS micrification had a diagnostic accuracy of 100% sensitivity and 58% specificity for coexisting neoplasia. However, combinations of WLE diagnosis and any other criteria could not achieve a diagnostic sensitivity of 100%. CONCLUSION: ME-NBI enhances the prediction of cancer coexistence in gastric hyperplastic polyps, with lesion size (≥20 mm) and FMS micrification the most effective predictive findings.

Early duodenal adenocarcinoma resembling a submucosal tumor cured with endoscopic resection: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Primary adenocarcinomas resembling submucosal tumors are rare in the gastrointestinal tract. Almost all the submucosal tumor-like adenocarcinomas previously reported invaded the submucosa or deeper. Therefore, submucosal tumor-like lesions are usually treated by surgical resection, and those that arise in the duodenum have been treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old Japanese man was diagnosed with a submucosal tumor-like adenocarcinoma in his duodenum. We considered it possible that the tumor invasion was limited to the mucosal or submucosal layers and could be removed by endoscopic resection. Tumor histopathology revealed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma confined to the muscularis mucosae with no lymphovascular invasion. Complete resection of the carcinoma was achieved and there has been no recurrence three years after endoscopic resection. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that submucosal tumor-like adenocarcinomas arising in nonampullary duodenal sites should be diagnosed carefully with a view to possible endoscopic resection.

Bacteremia and endotoxemia after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia: pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Because the invasive procedure of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) entails a large mucosal defect which is left open, with extensive submucosal exposure to the indigenous bacterial flora, the procedure may have a substantial risk for bacteremia. Our aim was to examine gastric ESD-related bacteremia and endotoxemia in gastric neoplasia patients. METHODS: In patients who underwent ESD for superficial gastric neoplasia, blood cultures and plasma endotoxin measurements were done before, immediately after, and on day 2 after ESD. Clinically manifest infections and inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cells, were monitored. RESULTS: Fifty patients (aged 69 ± 8 years; mean ± SD) were enrolled. The diameter of the resected specimens was 38 ± 18 mm and the procedure time of ESD was 66 ± 53 min. Two percent (2/100) of blood cultures after ESD were positive, with findings as follows: Propionibacterium species immediately after ESD, and Enterobacter aerogenes on day 2 after ESD, but no clinically manifest infection was observed. In 30% of the enrolled patients, CRP on day 2 after ESD had increased to levels higher than 1.0 mg/l. Plasma endotoxin levels, immediately after and on day 2 after ESD were correlated with CRP levels on day 2 after ESD. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the invasive procedure with massive submucosal exposure to the indigenous bacterial flora, gastric ESD has a low risk for bacteremia. Gastric ESD-related endotoxemia may be linked to inflammatory reactions such as those shown by the increase of CRP or fever observed after ESD.

Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging achieves superior accuracy in the differential diagnosis of superficial gastric lesions identified with white-light endoscopy: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Conventional, white-light imaging endoscopy (WLE) results in a significant number of misdiagnoses in early gastric cancer. Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) is more accurate in the diagnosis of gastric cancer when the diagnostic triad of the disappearance of fine mucosal structure, microvascular dilation, and heterogeneity is used. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the superiority of ME-NBI in the differential diagnosis of superficial gastric lesions identified with conventional WLE. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative study. SETTING: Single academic center. PATIENTS: This study involved patients who underwent WLE and ME-NBI for surveying synchronous or metachronous cancers because they had a high risk of gastric cancer. INTERVENTION: Patients with superficial gastric lesions that were diagnosed by WLE as cancer or non-cancer with a slight suspicion of cancer were prospectively enrolled in the study. ME-NBI was used to further characterize lesions picked up with WLE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of gastric cancer, with pathology as the criterion standard. RESULTS: A total of 201 lesions (mean diameter [+/- SD] 7.0 +/- 4.0 mm) from 111 patients (98 men, 13 women; mean age 66.3 years) were evaluated. Fourteen of the 201 lesions were pathologically proven as gastric cancer; the others were noncancerous lesions. The sensitivity and specificity for ME-NBI diagnosis with the use of the triad (92.9% and 94.7%, respectively) were significantly better than for WLE (42.9% and 61.0%, respectively; P < .0001). LIMITATIONS: Single center and a highly selected population at high risk for gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: ME-NBI achieved superior accuracy in the differential diagnosis of superficial gastric lesions identified with WLE. Thus, ME-NBI may increase the diagnostic value of endoscopy in a population at high risk of gastric cancer.

Trimodal imaging endoscopy may improve diagnostic accuracy of early gastric neoplasia: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: A considerable number of superficial gastric neoplasias are overlooked with conventional white light imaging (WLI) endoscopy. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the diagnostic potential of trimodal imaging endoscopy (TME), which combines WLI, autofluorescence imaging (AFI), and narrow-band imaging (NBI), for superficial gastric neoplasia. DESIGN: Feasibility study. SETTING: Single academic center. PATIENTS: Sixty-two patients with or without gastric neoplasia. INTERVENTION: Each patient serially assessed with WLI, AFI, and magnifying endoscopy with NBI (ME-NBI) by an endoscopist blinded for clinical information. ME-NBI over WLI and AFI was designated as TME. Histopathology of biopsy and ESD specimens was evaluated and used as the gold standard. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic diagnosis of pathology-proven neoplasia by per-patient and per-lesion analyses. RESULTS: The study included 47 pathology-proven neoplasias and 44 pathology-proven nonneoplasias that were detected as neoplasias with any of the modalities. By a per-lesion analysis, the sensitivity of TME (89.4%) was higher than that of WLI (76.6%) and AFI (68.1%). The specificity of TME (98.0%) was higher than that of WLI (84.3%) and AFI (23.5%). By a per-patient analysis, the sensitivity of TME (90.9%) was higher than that of WLI (75%) and AFI (68.2%). The specificity of TME (100%) was higher than that of WLI (72.2%) and AFI (44.4%). LIMITATIONS: Case-enriched population at a single center. CONCLUSIONS: Higher diagnostic accuracy of TME over conventional WLI indicates the feasibility of TME for the efficacious diagnosis of early gastric neoplasia.

Ultrathin endoscopy versus high-resolution endoscopy for diagnosing superficial gastric neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Ultrathin endoscopy (UTE) is an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to EGD with the patient under sedation, although the diagnostic accuracy of UTE is not well established. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of UTE and high-resolution endoscopy (HRE) for superficial gastric neoplasia. DESIGN: Prospective comparative study. SETTING: Academic center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Patients with or without superficial gastric neoplasia underwent peroral UTE and HRE, back-to-back in a random order while under standard sedation. The procedures were performed by 2 endoscopists who were blinded to the clinical information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The rate of missed lesions and misdiagnosis, sensitivity, and specificity for the diagnosis of gastric neoplasia when using pathology as the reference standard. RESULTS: In total, 126 lesions (41 superficial gastric neoplasias, 85 nonneoplastic lesions) were recorded in 57 enrolled patients. For the diagnosis of gastric neoplasia, the sensitivity of UTE (58.5%) was significantly (P = .021) lower than that of HRE (78%), and the specificity of UTE (91.8%) was significantly (P = .014) lower than that of HRE (100%). The rate of missed lesions and misdiagnosis of gastric neoplasias when using UTE (41.5%) was significantly (P > .001) higher than that of HRE (22.0%). The corresponding rate of neoplasias at the proximal portion (fornix and corpus) when using UTE (29%) was significantly (P = .002) higher than that of HRE (7.2%), although the rates of neoplasias at the distal portion (angulus and antrum) were comparable for UTE and HRE. LIMITATION: Small sample numbers in an enriched population. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of UTE is significantly lower than that of HRE for superficial gastric neoplasia, and this difference is particularly striking for neoplasias in the proximal stomach. For UTE to be used as an alternative modality, improvements in optical quality and the incorporation of additional procedures, including close-range observations and chromoendoscopy, are required to enhance visualization.