Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transplant Proc ; 48(9): 3142-3144, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27932167

RESUMEN

Tacrolimus is a widely used macrolide immunosuppressant in transplant surgery, with mild and major neurologic side effects. A 21-year-old woman had undergone preemptive transplantation of a kidney from her mother. On the 1st postoperative day, the patient had headache, nausea, vomiting, and agitation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed hyperintensity and a lesion in the right mesial temporal lobe. After we switched from tacrolimus to cyclosporine, the symptoms regressed. Persistence of the lesion, confirmed by repeated MRI, required that the patient be operated on. Pathologic examination showed the gangliocytoma, a rare brain tumor. Our case shows that preexisting brain lesions may cause tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity in the early postoperative period.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/complicaciones , Ganglioneuroma/complicaciones , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología , Tacrolimus/efectos adversos , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Receptores de Trasplantes , Adulto Joven
2.
Transplant Proc ; 45(9): 3273-8, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24182799

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome, which is closely related to insulin resistance, is highly prevalent in renal transplant recipients. PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate prevalence, risk factors, and progression of metabolic syndrome in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight renal transplant recipients who had been on transplantation for more than 1 year and 79 age-sex matched healthy controls were included in the cross-sectional phase of the study. We measured baseline characteristics, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and lipid profiles and we defined metabolic syndrome using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. One hundred twenty-four renal transplant recipients were eligible for the second evaluation after 22.9 ± 3.8 months. Metabolic syndrome prevalence and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance levels were evaluated during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Overall, metabolic syndrome was present in 34.2% of the patients and 12.7% of the controls at the cross-sectional phase of the study (P = .000). Only the hypertension component of metabolic syndrome was significantly increased in patients compared to controls (P = .000). Pretransplantation weight and body mass index were significantly higher in patients who had metabolic syndrome (P = .000). During the follow-up period, prevalence of metabolic syndrome did not change (P = .510); however, body mass index and blood pressure increased and the high density lipoprotein cholesterol component of metabolic syndrome decreased (P = .001). We did not find any significant difference in glomerular filtration rate change among patients with and without metabolic syndrome (-2.2 ± 11.36 vs -6.14 ± 13.19; P = .091). Glucose metabolism parameters including hemoglobin A1c, insulin, and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance were disturbed in patients with metabolic syndrome (P = .000, P = .001, P = .002, respectively). CONCLUSION: Metabolic syndrome is highly prevalent in renal transplant recipients and closely associated with insulin resistance. The prominent criterion of metabolic syndrome in patients seems to be hypertension, especially high systolic blood pressure. The identification of metabolic syndrome as a risk factor may yield new treatment modalities to prevent it.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Síndrome Metabólico/patología , Glucemia/metabolismo , Presión Sanguínea , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Homeostasis , Humanos , Resistencia a la Insulina , Lípidos/sangre
3.
Transplant Proc ; 40(1): 160-6, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18261575

RESUMEN

We sought to compare the treatment modalities of alendronate, alfacalcidol, and alendronate combined with alfacalcidol in renal transplant recipients with low bone mineral density. Sixty-four kidney graft recipients (22 women, 42 men) were recruited to this study. Of these 64 patients, 9 served as the control group with T scores more than -1. The remaining 55 patients randomly assigned to treatment had T scores less than -1 and were assigned to 3 groups: group 1 received alfacalcidol (0.5 microg/d); group 2, alendronate (10 mg/d); and group 3, alendronate (10 mg/d) + alfacalcidol (0.5 microg/d per os). Twenty-five patients were allocated to alfacalcidol, 13 patients to alendronate, and 17 patients to alendronate + alfacalcidol treatment. Bone mineral densities of the lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured before and 12 months after treatment. The groups were compared for risk factors of osteoporosis, biochemistry, and bone mineral density. Kruskal-Wallis, one-way ANOVA, and Student t tests were used. With the alendronate + alfacalcidol group, bone mineral density at the lumbar spine significantly increased by 7.9% (P = .006) with a significant improvement in T score (P = .003). Bone mineral density at the femoral neck significantly increased by 8% in the alendronate + alfacalcidol group (P = .01) with a significant improvement in T score (P = .02). The use of a combination of alendronate and alfacalcidol seemed to be safe and more effective than the separate use of the 2 agents to improve bone mass in renal transplant recipients.


Asunto(s)
Alendronato/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Hidroxicolecalciferoles/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/fisiología , Creatinina/sangre , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Masculino , Selección de Paciente , Trasplante Homólogo
4.
Nefrologia ; 23 Suppl 2: 127-30, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12778869

RESUMEN

This study was performed to determine risk factors associated with osteoporosis that develops after renal transplantation. Sixty-five kidney graft recipients were included in this study. They were divided into four groups according to the time since transplantation: Group 1 (< 1 year; n = 26), group 2 (1-3 years; n = 16), group 3 (3-5 years; n = 12) and group 4 (> 5 years; n = 11). These groups were matched according to probable risk factors for osteoporosis, findings of serum biochemistry, biochemical markers of bone turnover and measurements of bone mineral density. One way ANOVA test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. Osteoporosis was found in 22 recipients (33.8%). There were significant differences in recipient age, cumulative steroid dose, and episodes of acute rejection between the four groups. Increasing age, cumulative steroid dose and episodes of acute rejection were found to be risk factors for osteoporosis in our study.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Biomarcadores , Densidad Ósea , Calcio/metabolismo , Creatinina/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/complicaciones , Humanos , Hiperparatiroidismo Secundario/complicaciones , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/sangre , Osteoporosis/etiología , Fósforo/metabolismo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prevalencia , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Turquía/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...