How Do Different Indices of Hepatic Enhancement With Gadoxetic Acid Compare in Predicting Liver Failure and Other Major Complications After Hepatectomy?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of gadoxetic acid hepatic enhancement indices in predicting posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and other major complications (OMCs). METHODS: Sixty-five patients underwent prehepatectomy gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Enhancement indices were calculated by obtaining regions of interest on magnetic resonance images and segmented volumes of the liver and spleen. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to predict PHLF and OMC as a function of the indices, and areas under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curves were calculated. RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operator characteristic values varied from 0.412 to 0.681 and 0.462 to 0.738 in predicting PHLF and OMC, respectively. The most accurate indices in predicting PHLF were the region of interest-based, fat-normalized relative liver enhancement and liver enhancement index (AUROC, 0.681). The most accurate index in predicting OMC was the volumetric least-squares regression slope of a pharmacokinetic model (Khep_V, AUROC, 0.738). CONCLUSIONS: Indices of gadoxetic acid liver enhancement demonstrate variable performance in predicting PHLF and OMC.

The economics of recovery after pancreatic surgery: detailed cost minimization analysis of an enhanced recovery program.

BACKGROUND: Clinical pathways (CPW) are considered safe and effective at decreasing postoperative length of stay (LoS), but the effect on economic costs is uncertain. This study sought to elucidate the effect of a CPW on direct hospitalization costs for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: A CPW for PD patients at a single Canadian institution was implemented. Outcomes included LoS, 30-day readmissions, and direct costs of hospital care. A retrospective cost minimization analysis compared patients undergoing PD prior to and following CPW implementation, using a bootstrapped t test and deviation-based cost modeling. RESULTS: 121 patients undergoing PD after CPW implementation were compared to 74 controls. Index LoS was decreased following CPW implementation (9 vs. 11 days, p = 0.005), as was total LoS (10 vs. 11 days, p = 0.003). The mean total cost of postoperative hospitalization per patient decreased in the CPW group ($15,678.45 CAD vs. $25,732.85 CAD, p = 0.024), as was the mean 30-day cost including readmissions ($16,627.15 CAD vs. $29,872.72 CAD, p = 0.016). Areas of significant cost savings included laboratory tests and imaging investigations. CONCLUSIONS: CPWs may generate cost savings by reducing unnecessary investigations, and improve quality of care through process standardization and decreasing practice variation.

The impact of a clinical pathway on patient postoperative recovery following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) are complex surgical procedures. Clinical pathways (CPW) are surgical process improvement tools that guide postoperative recovery and are associated with high quality care. Our objective was to report the quality of surgical care following implementation of a CPW. METHODS: We developed and implemented a CPW for patients undergoing PD at a single high volume hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) centre. Patient outcomes were collected prospectively during the implementation period. A comparator cohort was selected by identifying patients that underwent a PD prior to CPW development. RESULTS: 122 patients underwent a PD during the CPW implementation period; 83 patients were initiated on the CPW. 74 patients underwent PD during the 12-month period prior to the CPW. The median hospital stay decreased after the implementation of the CPW (11 vs 8 days, p < 0.01) with no significant changes to mortality, morbidity, reoperation, or readmission rates. In-hospital complications were significantly higher in patients that were not initiated on the CPW (54% vs 74%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Results suggest the CPW reduced variability and allowed a greater proportion of patients to receive all elements of care, resulting in improved quality and efficiency of care based on current best evidence recommendations.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes following Glue versus Polyvinyl Alcohol Portal Vein Embolization for Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant prior to Right Hepatectomy.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes after portal vein embolization (PVE) and right hepatectomy in patients receiving embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) glue + central AMPLATZER Vascular Plug (AVP; glue group) or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles ± coils (PVA group). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2008 and August 2013, all patients having PVE with NBCA + AVP or PVA ± coils before right hepatectomy were retrospectively reviewed; 85 patients underwent PVE with NBCA + AVP (n = 45) or PVA ± coils (n = 40). The groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests. RESULTS: Technical success of embolization was 100%. Degree of hypertrophy (16.2% ± 7.8 vs 12.3% ± 7.62, P = .009) and kinetic growth rate (3.5%/wk ± 2.0 vs 2.6%/wk ± 1.9, P = .016) were greater in the glue group versus the PVA group. Contrast volume (66.1 mL ± 44.8 vs 189.87 mL ± 62.6, P < .001) and fluoroscopy time (11.2 min ± 7.8 vs 23.49 min ± 11.7, P < .001) were significantly less during the PVE procedure in the glue group. Surgical outcomes were comparable between groups, including the number of patients unable to go onto surgery (P = 1.0), surgical complications (P = .30), length of hospital stay (P = .68), and intensive care unit admissions (P = .71). There was 1 major complication (hepatic abscess) in each group after PVE. CONCLUSIONS: PVE performed with NBCA + AVP compared with PVA ± coils resulted in greater degree of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant, less fluoroscopic time and contrast volume, and similar complication rates.