Total Full-Thickness Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: Combination of Mustardé Eyelid Switch Flap with a Bipedicled Periosteal and Tenzel Flap Technique.

INTRODUCTION: In recent decades, two techniques for large full-thickness upper eyelid reconstruction have been described, the Cutler-Beard lid sharing flap and the Mustardé eyelid switch flap. In the literature, modifications are being introduced to improve those techniques. Here, we present our approach for the reconstruction of total full-thickness upper eyelid defects and compare it with these established upper lid reconstruction techniques. METHODS: Three patients presented with upper eyelid tumors and required extensive excision resulting in total full-thickness upper eyelid defects. Reconstruction consisted of a two-stage procedure: a Mustardé eyelid switch flap was performed followed by division of the rotation flap and lateral canthoplasty using a periosteal bipedicled flap and Tenzel flap. Patients were followed-up every 3 months for at least 1 year. During every preoperative and postoperative check-up, palpebral fissure height, levator function, margin reflex distance, and presence of lagophthalmos were measured. RESULTS: Histopathological examination revealed a Merkel cell carcinoma in two cases and a Basal cell carcinoma in one case. Postoperatively, all patients showed a stable reconstructed upper eyelid with preserved motility and satisfying aesthetic results when compared to the fellow eye. In one case, a lagophthalmos of 1.5 mm was observed, which was treated conservatively to prevent exposure keratopathy. CONCLUSION: The eyelid switch flap combined with a bipedicled periosteal and a Tenzel flap is a good alternative for the reconstruction of total upper eyelid defects with the advantage of leaving the contralateral eye untouched. It achieves satisfying anatomical results, including an upper eyelid margin with eyelashes and well-matched skin color.

Preserflo MicroShunt: Efficacy and Endothelial Cell Density.

PRCIS: A main safety concern associated with new glaucoma implants is corneal endothelial cell loss, which could even be observed in already established procedures. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and corneal safety, especially corneal endothelial cell loss (ECL), after Preserflo MicroShunt implantation. METHODS: A monocentric, prospective clinical observational study of patients with a follow-up of at least 12 months who underwent Preserflo MicroShunt implantation at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Germany, between January 2020 and October 2021. Endothelial cell density (ECD), the distance between the tip of the implant and the corneal endothelium, and the success of the surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 14 eyes of 12 patients were included. After a mean follow-up of 20±2.7 months intraocular pressure was significantly reduced by 8.2 mm Hg (P=0.0041); in 28.6% of patients, a revision surgery was necessary. Reduction of preoperative and follow-up ECD was not statistically significant (ECL of 45 cells/mm2, ECDpreoperative=2074±703.6 cells/mm2, ECDlast follow-up=2029±742.3 cells/mm2, P=0.42). A longer intracameral shunt tube length correlated significantly with a higher distance between the shunt tip and corneal endothelium (r=0.61, P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Preserflo MicroShunt effectively lowered intraocular pressure without substantial ECL after a minimum follow-up period of 17 months.

Iris Obstruction Following PRESERFLO Microshunt Implantation and Surgical Management.

PURPOSE: The aim was to present a case of lumen obstruction after implantation of microshunt with subconjunctival drainage and subsequent management. CASE REPORT: A 56-year-old male with primary open angle glaucoma underwent uneventful PRESERFLO MicroShunt (PMS) implantation in both eyes. Five months after surgery the patient presented with an intraocular pressure (IOP) of 26 mm Hg in the right eye because of iris obstruction. RESULTS: The iris fibers were severed and removed surgically to free the lumen. Follow-up showed a normalized IOP of 10 mm Hg and a free lumen. CONCLUSION: Uncontrolled IOP because of iris obstruction following PMS was addressed by surgical removal of iris fibers at the lumen entrance without the need for tube repositioning.

SARS-CoV-2: Impact on, Risk Assessment and Countermeasures in German Eye Banks.

INTRODUCTION: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic there has been some debate regarding the risk of transmission through tissue transplantation and tissue banking processes. AIM OF THE STUDY: To analyze the changes that SARS-CoV-2 has caused regarding the harvesting of corneal donor tissue and eye bank activities in Germany. METHODS: A questionnaire was provided to 26 eye banks in Germany, consisting of questions about adaptations made in the screening of potential donors and the harvesting of corneal tissue following the pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Eighteen eye banks actively reduced recruitment of donors and two banks ceased all activity. Additional diagnostic screening was performed in eight banks, using conjunctival swabs and/or nasopharyngeal swabs. In six eye banks, additional protective measures, such as FFP2 masks and/or facial shields, were implemented. Overall, a mean reduction in the number of obtained donor tissues of 17% was observed. DISCUSSION: Conjunctival and/or nasopharyngeal swabs of donors have been implemented by a minority. Reasons for not performing additional tests may be moderate sensitivity and lack of validation for postmortem use of RT-PCR testing. Also, the hazard of SARS-CoV-2 entering the corneal donor pool with subsequent transmission might be perceived as theoretical. Face shields provide a sufficient barrier against splash and splatter contamination but may be insufficient against aerosols. Additional face masks would provide support against aerosols, but it remains debatable if corneal harvesting can be considered an aerosol-producing procedure. In the future we expect to see changes in current guidelines because of a surge in scientific activities to improve our understanding of the risks involved with cornea donation in the COVID-19 pandemic, and because current practice may reduce the availability of donor corneas due to new exclusion criteria while the demand remains unchanged.

Fifteen years of IOL exchange: indications, outcomes, and complications.

PURPOSE: To report the indications, frequency, and outcomes regarding intraocular lens (IOL) exchange in 2 university hospital tertiary referral settings over a period of 15 years. SETTING: Ophthalmology departments of the University Hospital Antwerp and the University Hospital Leuven, Belgium. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: In this retrospective study, included were patients who underwent an IOL exchange between 2002 and 2017. Patient demographics, surgical indication, comorbidities, visual outcomes, and complications were reported. Patients who underwent IOL repositioning or add-on IOL implantation or extraction, and patients who were left aphakic, were excluded. RESULTS: Included in the study were 492 eyes. The mean age was 66.0 ± 13.3 years (range 19-91 years). The mean time between primary surgery and IOL exchange was 54.61 ± 67.07 months (range 0-343 months). Primary indication for explantation was IOL opacification, and the most common ophthalmic comorbidity was a previous history of vitreoretinal surgery. Preoperatively, the mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were 0.47 ± 0.27 (range 0-1) and 0.61 ± 0.32 (range 0-1.2), respectively. Postoperative UCVA and CDVA was 0.7 ± 0.3 (range 0-1.2) and 0.8 ± 0.28 (range 0.05-1.6), respectively. The increase in both CDVA and UCVA was statistically significant (P < .001, paired t test). The most common complication perioperatively was vitreous prolapse, which occurred in 61 eyes (16%). CONCLUSIONS: IOL exchange is a challenging yet valuable treatment option for a wide spectrum of problematic IOL outcomes. The most common indication remains IOL opacification, although IOL dislocation and patient dissatisfaction are increasing as indications.