RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) involves wide resection of the tumor, which can necessitate soft tissue reconstruction with local or free tissue flaps. This retrospective study compares cost, surgical and oncologic outcomes between patients undergoing reconstruction with immediate versus delayed flap coverage following STS resection. METHODS: Thirty-four patients who underwent planned flap reconstruction following resection of primary STS were identified retrospectively. Twenty-four (71%) received immediate reconstruction during the index surgery and 10 (29%) underwent planned delayed reconstruction. Preoperative patient-specific metrics, tumor characteristics, and surgical and patient outcomes were collected. Total hospital charges associated with every encounter during the perioperative period were obtained. RESULTS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, tumor metrics, and surgical characteristics were equivalent between groups. Postoperative wound complications, reoperations, readmissions, and disease-specific survival did not differ between cohorts. Costs associated with each reconstruction strategy were equivalent on bivariate and multivariate testing, when accounting for operating room time, hospital length of stay, and reoperation rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies no significant difference in patient outcome measures or cost between planned immediate and delayed flap reconstruction following STS resection. These results support the implementation of either treatment strategy in keeping with patient-centered, multidisciplinary care principles.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether open (O) or closed (C) geriatric ankle fractures had different patient characteristics or outcomes. METHODS: . DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Urban Level 1 trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients, age 60 years and older, who underwent operative fixation of a rotational ankle fracture (OTA/AO 44A-C) between January 2012 and September 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Morbidity, defined as 90-day reoperation, 90-day readmission, or loss of mobility, as well as 1-year mortality compared between patients with closed and open fractures. RESULTS: The open cohort was older (75 years vs. 68 years; P = 0.003) but had similar Charlson comorbidity indices (4.6 O vs. 4.0 C; P = 0.323) and preinjury rates of independent ambulation (70.4% O vs. 80.9% C; P = 0.363). There were higher rates of 1-year mortality (11% vs. 0%; P < 0.001), deep infection (14.8% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.019), and loss of mobility (64.7% vs. 23.0%; P < 0.001) in the open cohort. Multivariate regression identified open fracture as an independent predictor of 90-day reoperation (OR: 20.6; P = 0.022) and loss of mobility (OR: 5.1; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Despite having comorbidities and preinjury function similar to the closed geriatric ankle fracture cohort, open ankle fracture was independently predictive of greater loss of mobility. Nearly two-thirds of geriatric patients with open ankle fractures experienced a decline in functional independence, compared with 1 in 4 of those with closed fractures. Open fracture was associated with higher rates of deep infection, reoperation, and 1-year mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
