Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 299: 96-104, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850898

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess the GAIA! app, designed to assist pregnant women and healthcare professionals in managing infectious diseases during pregnancy, and to bridge the information gap between health professionals and expectant mothers. STUDY DESIGN: This collaborative initiative in Italy involved partnerships with the University of Florence, Careggi University Hospital, and other institutions. The app, built on the Ionic framework, is available on both Apple and Google App Stores. It offers two distinct modes: "healthcare providers" and "patients." Content for the app was derived from extensive literature reviews and clinical guidelines. RESULTS: Since its August 2022 launch, the GAIA! app has garnered over 2,500 downloads, indicating its effectiveness and acceptance within the community. The app differentiates itself from others, such as the Sanford Guide, by focusing specifically on the needs of pregnant women. It ensures cross-platform compatibility, a user-friendly interface, and offline functionality. CONCLUSIONS: The GAIA! app has successfully addressed a niche in infectious disease management for pregnant women, gaining significant traction within the community. While it has seen substantial success, challenges like continuous updates and potential language expansion remain. Future endeavors will address these challenges and further evaluate the app's impact on maternal and child health.


Asunto(s)
Aplicaciones Móviles , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Personal de Salud , Italia
2.
Vet Parasitol ; 329: 110192, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749124

RESUMEN

Giardia duodenalis (syn. G. intestinalis or G. lamblia) is a parasitic protozoan that infects the upper intestinal tract of a broad range of hosts, including humans and domestic animals. Thus, it has raised concerns about the public health risk due to companion animals. Recently, with the improvement of living standards and increasing contacts between pets and humans, the zoonotic transmission of Giardia has dramatically increased. From a genetic point of view, G. duodenalis should be viewed as a complex species that includes eight different species-specific genetic assemblages. The laboratory diagnosis is mainly based on the finding of microscopic cysts in stool samples by coprological examination. Other methods include the detection of antigens, immunoassays or PCR protocols, which allow the identification of Giardia assemblages. The study aimed to compare the performance of Direct Fluorescence Antibody test (DFA), zinc sulfate flotation technique (ZnSO4), rapid diagnostic test (RDT), end-point PCR amplification (PCR) for the detection of Giardia and to identify the concerning assemblages in a canine population from Central Italy. Direct fluorescence antibody test is the reference standard for laboratory diagnosis of Giardia in fecal samples from dogs, despite the microscopic examination after flotation remains the most useful method in many veterinary diagnostic centers. The present findings demonstrate the high performance of DFA and ZnSO4 in detecting Giardia, while RDT may be useful as alternative or complementary method to the DFA and ZnSO4. PCR performance was low, but it allowed determining Giardia B zoonotic assemblage in 25% of the PCR-positive specimens (15 out of 60), while the remaining PCR-positive isolates belonged to the dog-specific assemblage C. The 26% prevalence of G. duodenalis detected by DFA in owned dogs and the identification of potentially zoonotic assemblages underline the potential risk for public health and indicate frequent cross-species transmission of the parasite between humans and dogs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros , Heces , Giardiasis , Zoonosis , Animales , Perros , Giardiasis/veterinaria , Giardiasis/diagnóstico , Giardiasis/parasitología , Enfermedades de los Perros/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Perros/parasitología , Zoonosis/diagnóstico , Zoonosis/parasitología , Heces/parasitología , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/veterinaria , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Giardia/aislamiento & purificación , Giardia/genética , Giardia lamblia/aislamiento & purificación , Giardia lamblia/genética , Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente Directa/veterinaria , Italia/epidemiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 166(3): 1218-1224, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619337

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Public health interventions promoted during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic to control viral spread have impacted the occurrence of other communicable disease. Yet no studies have focused on perinatal infections with the potential for neonatal sequelae, including cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Toxoplasma gondii (TG). Here we investigate whether incidence rates of maternal primary CMV and TG infection in pregnancy were affected by the implementation of pandemic-related public health measures. METHODS: A retrospective study including all pregnant women with confirmed primary CMV or TG infection in pregnancy, managed between 2018 and 2021 at two university centers. The incidence rate was calculated as the number of CMV and TG infections per 100 consultations with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Data were compared between pre-pandemic (2018-2019) and pandemic (2020 and 2021) years. The Newcombe Wilson with Continuity Correction method was employed to compare incidence rates. RESULTS: The study population included 215 maternal primary CMV and 192 TG infections. Rate of maternal primary CMV infection decreased in 2021 compared with 2018-2019 (4.49% vs 6.40%, attributable risk [AR] 1.92, P = 0.019). By contrast, the rate of TG infection substantially increased in 2020 (6.95% vs 4.61%, AR 2.34, P = 0.006). Close contact with cats was more common among patients with TG infection in 2020 and 2021 than among pre-pandemic TG-infected women (26.3% and 24.4% vs 13.3%, P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Pandemic-related public health interventions and associated behavioral and lifestyle changes exerted a divergent effect on the incidence of primary CMV and TG infection in pregnancy, likely due to modulation of exposure to risk factors for these infections.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Toxoplasmosis , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , COVID-19/epidemiología , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Toxoplasmosis/epidemiología , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...