Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 42(6): 1284-1292, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33877418

RESUMEN

Normalizing cardiovascular measurements for body size allows for comparison among children of different ages and for distinguishing pathologic changes from normal physiologic growth. Because of growing interest to use height for normalization, the aim of this study was to develop height-based normalization models and compare them to body surface area (BSA)-based normalization for aortic and left ventricular (LV) measurements. The study population consisted of healthy, non-obese children between 2 and 18 years of age enrolled in the Pediatric Heart Network Echo Z-Score Project. The echocardiographic study parameters included proximal aortic diameters at 3 locations, LV end-diastolic volume, and LV mass. Using the statistical methodology described in the original project, Z-scores based on height and BSA were determined for the study parameters and tested for any clinically significant relationships with age, sex, race, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). Normalization models based on height versus BSA were compared among underweight, normal weight, and overweight (but not obese) children in the study population. Z-scores based on height and BSA were calculated for the 5 study parameters and revealed no clinically significant relationships with age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Normalization based on height resulted in lower Z-scores in the underweight group compared to the overweight group, whereas normalization based on BSA resulted in higher Z-scores in the underweight group compared to the overweight group. In other words, increasing BMI had an opposite effect on height-based Z-scores compared to BSA-based Z-scores. Allometric normalization based on height and BSA for aortic and LV sizes is feasible. However, height-based normalization results in higher cardiovascular Z-scores in heavier children, and BSA-based normalization results in higher cardiovascular Z-scores in lighter children. Further studies are needed to assess the performance of these approaches in obese children with or without cardiac disease.


Asunto(s)
Estatura , Superficie Corporal , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Corazón/anatomía & histología , Adolescente , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Corazón/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidad Infantil/epidemiología , Pediatría , Valores de Referencia
2.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr ; 30(5): 468-477, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28268110

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Single right ventricles (SRV) are postulated to be disadvantaged compared with single left ventricles (SLV). We compared the evolution of SRV versus SLV function during infancy using conventional measures and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE). We hypothesized that the SRV is mechanically disadvantaged during early infancy. METHODS: SRVs (n = 32) were compared with SLVs (n = 16) at the neonatal (presurgery) and pre-bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis (pre-BCPA) stages. Functional measures (fractional area change, indexed ventricular annular plane systolic excursion [iVAPSE], isovolumic acceleration [IVA], myocardial performance index, E and A velocities, tissue Doppler imaging annular velocities and STE-measured global longitudinal and circumferential strain, strain rate [SR], and early diastolic SR [EDSR]) were compared between SRV and SLV at each stage and between presurgery and pre-BCPA. RESULTS: Compared with SLV, presurgery SRV had lower circumferential strain (-10.6% vs -16.5%; P = .0002) and EDSR (1.41%/sec vs 2.13%/sec; P = .001). Pre-BCPA SRV had decreased IVA (1.2 vs 2.1 m/sec2; P = .006): longitudinal strain (-15.3% vs -19.1%; P = .001), SR (-0.97%/sec vs -1.53%/sec; P = .0001), EDSR (1.5%/sec vs 2.1%/sec; P = .001); circumferential strain (-10.6% vs -14.9%; P = .002), SR (-0.8%/sec vs -1.21%/sec; P = .0001), and EDSR (1.3%/sec vs 1.8%/sec; P = .009). SRV showed reduction of iVAPSE, IVA, s', e', a' velocities, longitudinal strain, SR, EDSR, and circumferential SR (P < .05) from presurgery to pre-BCPA, while circumferential strain was unchanged. SLV showed no significant change in these parameters during this interval. CONCLUSIONS: The progressive reduction in SRV longitudinal and circumferential function suggests that SRV may have a mechanical disadvantage from birth and progressive impairment with age.


Asunto(s)
Ventrículos Cardíacos/anomalías , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/fisiopatología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Femenino , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Volumen Sistólico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/cirugía , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA