Beyond the Surface: Unveiling Hidden Hurdles to Primary Biliary Cholangitis Care.

INTRODUCTION: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) slows disease progression among patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), yet not all patients receive this standard-of-care medication. Our study aims to identify reasons why PBC patients did not receive the recommended UDCA treatment. METHODS: Using medical record data collected by the Fibrotic Liver Disease (FOLD) Consortium for 2006-2016, we identified PBC patients from a single site with no UDCA therapy record. Two independent reviewers used a structured data collection instrument to systematically confirm and record the reasons for the lack of treatment. RESULTS: Among 494 PBC patients (11% men and 13.2% Black patients) with a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 35 (7%) had never received UDCA (16% men and 24% Black patients). Of these, 18 (51%) had laboratory indications of PBC but were not formally diagnosed. Among the remaining 17 patients with recognized PBC, six were never offered UDCA, seven declined treatment, and four remained untreated despite being offered treatment. We did not find a statistically significant association between the lack of PBC diagnosis and treatment and patients' age (p = 0.139), gender (p = 0.222), race (p = 0.081), or insurance coverage (p = 0.456), perhaps due to our small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors influencing the lack of evaluation and treatment in PBC patients were identified at the provider and patient levels. The most common reasons included financial barriers, loss to follow-up, severe decompensated disease at diagnosis, and lack of referral to specialists for further evaluation. Future interventions targeting modifiable provider and patient barriers may improve rates and timeliness of PBC diagnosis and treatment.

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of seladelpar for adults with primary biliary cholangitis.

INTRODUCTION: Seladelpar (MBX-8025) is a once-daily administered highly specific PPAR-δ agonist in Phase 3 and extension trials for use in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). AREAS COVERED: This review provides background on current treatment options for PBC, and summarizes clinical trial data regarding the safety and effectiveness of seladelpar within the context of these treatments. EXPERT OPINION: Clinical trials results demonstrate the safety and tolerability of seladelpar use for PBC, including in patients with cirrhosis. The primary composite endpoint (ALP <1.67 times ULN, decrease ≥ 15% from baseline, and TB ≤ULN) was met in 61.7% of the patients treated with seladelpar and in 20% receiving placebo (p < 0.001). Moreover, pruritus - a cardinal and often intractable symptom of PBC - was improved with seladelpar treatment, as were overall quality of life measurements. Improvements in markers of inflammation were likewise observed. These biochemical and clinical findings therefore represent landmark developments in PBC treatment and offer a therapeutic option for PBC.

Exception Policy Change Increased the Simultaneous Kidney-Liver Transplant Probability of Polycystic Disease in the Centers With High Median MELD at Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In 2019, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing changed the exception policy for liver allocation to the median model for end-stage liver disease at transplantation (MMaT). This study evaluated the effects of this change on-waitlist outcomes of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) for patients with polycystic liver-kidney disease (PLKD). METHODS: Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing registry, 317 patients with PLKD listed for SLKT between January 2016 and December 2021 were evaluated. Waitlist outcomes were compared between prepolicy (Era 1) and postpolicy (Era 2) eras. RESULTS: One-year transplant probability was significantly higher in Era 2 than in Era 1 (55.7% versus 37.9%; P  = 0.001), and the positive effect on transplant probability of Era 2 was significant after risk adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.54; P  = 0.002 [ref. Era 1]), whereas waitlist mortality was comparable. Transplant centers were separated into the high and low MMaT groups with a score of 29 (median MMaT) and transplant probability in each group between eras was compared. In the high MMaT transplant centers, the 1-y transplant probability was significantly higher in Era 2 (27.5% versus 52.4%; P  = 0.003). The positive effect remained significant in the high MMaT center group (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-5.46; P  = 0.003 [ref. Era 1]) but not in the low MMaT center group. Although there was a difference between center groups in Era 1 ( P  = 0.006), it became comparable in Era 2 ( P  = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: The new policy increased 1-y SLKT probability in patients with PKLD and successfully reduced the disparities based on center location.

Improved Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Patients With Mid-MELD-Na Scores Listed in Centers Receptive to Use of Organs Donated After Circulatory Death.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplant (LT) using organs donated after circulatory death (DCD) has been increasing in the United States. We investigated whether transplant centers' receptiveness to use of DCD organs impacted patient outcomes. METHODS: Transplant centers were classified as very receptive (group 1), receptive (2), or less receptive (3) based on the DCD acceptance rate and DCD transplant percentage. Using organ procurement and transplantation network/UNOS registry data for 20 435 patients listed for LT from January 2020 to June 2022, we compared rates of 1-y transplant probability and waitlist mortality between groups, broken down by model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) categories. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, patients in group 1 centers with MELD-Na scores 6 to 29 were significantly more likely to undergo transplant than those in group 3 (aHR range 1.51-2.11, P < 0.001). Results were similar in comparisons between groups 1 and 2 (aHR range 1.41-1.81, P < 0.001) and between groups 2 and 3 with MELD-Na 15-24 (aHR 1.19-1.20, P < 0.007). Likewise, patients with MELD-Na score 20 to 29 in group 1 centers had lower waitlist mortality than those in group 3 (scores, 20-24: aHR, 0.71, P = 0.03; score, 25-29: aHR, 0.51, P < 0.001); those in group 1 also had lower waitlist mortality compared with group 2 (scores 20-24: aHR0.69, P = 0.02; scores 25-29: aHR 0.63, P = 0.03). One-year posttransplant survival of DCD LT patients did not vary significantly compared with donation after brain dead. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that transplant centers' use of DCD livers can improve waitlist outcomes, particularly among mid-MELD-Na patients.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of an 8-Week Regimen of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Patients with Hepatitis C and Cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: In 2019, an 8-week regimen of glecaprevir/ pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) was FDA-approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) in patients with cirrhosis. We used data from the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study (CHeCS) to evaluate treatment response and adverse events among patients with HCV and cirrhosis under routine clinical care. METHODS: Using an intention-to-treat (ITT)/modified ITT (mITT) approach, endpoints were (1) sustained virological response (SVR) at 12 weeks (SVR12) post-treatment; and (2) adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs during treatment. Patients with cirrhosis from two CHeCS sites were included if they were prescribed GLE/PIB from August 2017 to June 2020. Detailed treatment and clinical data were collected. Patient baseline characteristics were described with mean/standard deviation (std) for continuous variables, and proportions for categorical variables. Analyses were propensity score adjusted. The final model retained variables that were significant with p value < 0.05. RESULTS: The ITT sample included 166 patients, with 43, 116, and 7 patients in the 8-week, 12-week, and > 12-week planned treatment groups. Among them, 159 had confirmed SVR (95.8%, LCL 93.2%). The mITT analysis included 160 patients after excluding 6 with unknown HCV RNA results; 159 achieved SVR (99.4%, LCL 98.3%). There were no significant differences in rates of SVR between the 8-week and 12-week regimens in either analysis, nor any association with patient characteristics. SAEs were experienced by 1 patient (2%) in the 8-week group, 7 (5%) in the 12-week group (including one death), and 2 (29%) in the > 12-week group; 4 patients (from the 12-week group) experienced serious AEs or hepatic events that were "likely attributable" to GLE/PIB treatment. CONCLUSION: An 8-week regimen of GLE/PIB is well tolerated and highly effective among US patients with HCV and cirrhosis receiving routine clinical care.

Antiviral Treatment and Response are Associated With Lower Risk of Dementia Among Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Eradication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been linked with improvement in neurocognitive function, but few studies have evaluated the effect of antiviral treatment/ response on risk of dementia. Using data from the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study (CHeCS), we investigated how antiviral therapy impacts the risk of developing dementia among patients with HCV. METHODS: A total of 17,485 HCV patients were followed until incidence of dementia, death, or last follow-up. We used an extended landmark modeling approach, which included time-varying covariates and propensity score justification for treatment selection bias, as well as generalized estimating equations (GEE) with a link function as multinominal distribution for a discrete time-to-event data. Death was considered a competing risk. RESULTS: After 15 years of follow-up, 342 patients were diagnosed with incident dementia. Patients who achieved sustained virological response (SVR) had significantly decreased risk of dementia compared to untreated patients, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.32 (95% CI 0.22-0.46) among patients who received direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment and 0.41 (95% CI 0.26-0.60) for interferon-based (IFN) treatment. Risk reduction remained even when patients failed antiviral treatment (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.38-0.51). Patients with cirrhosis, Black/African American patients, and those without private insurance were at significantly higher risk of dementia. CONCLUSION: Antiviral treatment independently reduced the risk of dementia among HCV patients, regardless of cirrhosis. Our findings support the importance of initiation antiviral therapy in chronic HCV-infected patients.

Post-transplant outcomes and financial burden of donation after circulatory death donor liver transplant after the implementation of acuity circle policy.

BACKGROUND: After implementation of the Acuity Circles (AC) allocation policy, use of DCD liver grafts has increased in the United States. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of AC on rates of DCD-liver transplants (LT), their outcomes, and medical costs in a single practice. Adult LT patients were classified into three eras: Era 1 (pre-AC, 1/01/2015-12/31/2017); Era 2 (late pre-AC era, 1/01/2018-02/03/2020); and Era 3 (AC era, 05/10/2020-09/30/2021). RESULTS: A total of 520 eligible LTs were performed; 87 were DCD, and 433 were DBD. With each successive era, the proportion of DCD increased (Era 1: 11%; Era 2: 20%; Era 3: 24%; p < .001). DCD recipients had longer ICU stays, higher re-admission/re-operation rates, and higher incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy compared to those with DBD. Direct, surgical, and ICU costs during first admission were higher with DCD than DBD (+8.0%, p < .001; +4.2%, p < .001; and +33.3%, p = .001). DCD-related costs increased after Era 1 (Direct: +4.9% [Era 2 vs. 1] and +12.4% [Era 3 vs. 1], p = .04; Surgical: +17.7% and +21.7%, p < .001). In the AC era, there was a significantly higher proportion of donors ≥50 years, and more national organ sharing. Compared to DCD from donors <50 years, DCD from donors ≥50 years was associated with significantly higher total direct, surgical, and ICU costs (+12.6%, p = .01; +9.5%, p = .01; +84.6%, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of DCD-LT, especially from older donors, has increased after the implementation of AC policies. These changes are likely to be associated with higher costs in the AC era.

Persistent pruritus associated with worse quality of life in patients with chronic hepatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Prevalence and severity of pruritus among US patients with chronic hepatitis B and C (HBV, HCV) are not well-documented. Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study (CHeCS) patients were surveyed to examine pruritus prevalence and impact on quality of life (QoL). METHODS: Patients who reported experiencing pruritus ≥3 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) within the past 30 days were invited to participate in a 6-month study using the SF-36 questionnaire. General regression (univariate followed by multivariable modelling) was used to analyse pruritus intensity and eight QoL dimensions. RESULTS: Among 1654 patients (HBV = 358, HCV = 1296, HBV/HCV = 6), pruritus prevalence was significantly higher among patients with HCV than those with HBV (44% vs. 35%; p < .05). One hundred and twenty-three patients (21 HBV and 102 HCV) participated in the QoL study (72% ≥60 years; 50% men; 25% Black; 37% with cirrhosis; 66% had BMI > 25). Mean NRS was 4.9-5.3. QoL responses for social functioning and emotional well-being were higher (70-72 points) than responses for energy/fatigue (50-51). Antiviral treatment rates were higher in HCV (92%, SVR 99%) than HBV (71% ever, 43% ongoing). Multivariable analyses showed no significant effect of hepatitis type or antiviral treatments on itch. Antihistamines were associated with severe itch. Higher NRS was associated with significantly reduced QoL. Each unit increase in NRS was associated with a 2-3 unit decline in emotional well-being, general health, physical function, energy/fatigue, social functioning and emotional health. CONCLUSION: Pruritus negatively affects many viral hepatitis patients, regardless of antiviral treatment status. Improved treatment options are needed to address its impact on QoL.

Alcohol-related hepatitis admissions decline in 2021 after a 2020 surge attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: We previously investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on alcohol-related liver disease (ARLD), finding that admissions for alcoholic hepatitis (AH) increased by 50% in the summer of 2020 compared to the same period in 2016-2019. We have now expanded our analysis to consider full years' data and evaluate how rates changed in 2021. We also sought to identify factors associated with ICU admissions, need for dialysis, liver transplant evaluations, and death. METHODS: Using retrospective data, we identified patients admitted to our four Detroit, Michigan area hospitals for acute ARLD for three periods pre-COVID (2016-February 2020), early COVID (June-December 2020), and late COVID (2021). Clustered logistic regression was performed to study rates of AH admissions across the three eras, where the patient was defined as the cluster and the analysis accounted for multiple encounters per cluster. A similar regression approach, univariate followed by multivariable analysis, was also used to study associations between patient characteristics and outcomes during hospitalization for AH. RESULTS: AH-related admissions declined significantly from the early COVID to late COVID eras (OR 0.68, 95% CL 0.52, 0.88), returning to levels similar to that of the pre- COVID period (OR 1.18, 95% CL 0.96, 1.47). In multivariable analysis, baseline MELD score was associated with ICU admission, initiation of dialysis, transplant evaluation, and death while hospitalized for AH. Female patients were at almost twice the risk of death during admission compared to male patients (aOR 1.81, 95% CL 1.1, 2.98). Increasing age was associated with slightly lower odds of transplant (aOR 0.97, 95% CL 0.94, 1) and higher odds of death (aOR 1.03, 95% CL 1.01. 1.06). CONCLUSION: After a spike in AH-related admissions during the first summer of the COVID-19 pandemic, rates declined significantly in 2021, returning to pre-pandemic levels.

Dynamic risk assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) is a primary cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although antiviral treatment reduces risk of HCC, few studies quantify the impact of treatment on long-term risk in the era of direct-acting antivirals (DAA). Using data from the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study, we evaluated the impact of treatment type (DAA, interferon-based [IFN], or none) and outcome (sustained virological response [SVR] or treatment failure [TF]) on risk of HCC. We then developed and validated a predictive risk model. 17186 HCV patients were followed until HCC, death or last follow-up. We used extended landmark modelling, with time-varying covariates and propensity score justification and generalized estimating equations with a link function for discrete time-to-event data. Death was considered a competing risk. We observed 586 HCC cases across 104,000 interval-years of follow-up. SVR from DAA or IFN-based treatment reduced risk of HCC (aHR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08-0.20; and aHR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31-0.65); DAA SVR reduced risk more than IFN SVR (aHR 0.29, 95% CI 0.17-0.48). Independent of treatment, cirrhosis was the strongest risk factor for HCC (aHR 3.94, 95% CI 3.17-4.89 vs. no cirrhosis). Other risk factors included male sex, White race and genotype 3. Our six-variable predictive model had 'excellent' accuracy (AUROC 0.94) in independent validation. Our novel landmark interval-based model identified HCC risk factors across antiviral treatment status and interactions with cirrhosis. This model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy in a large, racially diverse cohort of patients and could be adapted for 'real world' HCC monitoring.

Impact of hepatitis C treatment status on risk of Parkinson's disease and secondary parkinsonism in the era of direct-acting antivirals.

Research suggests a possible link between chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the development of Parkinson's Disease (PD) and secondary Parkinsonism (PKM). We investigated the impact of antiviral treatment status (untreated, interferon [IFN] treated, direct-acting antiviral [DAA] treated) and outcome (treatment failure [TF] or sustained virological response [SVR]) on risk of PD/PKM among patients with HCV. Using data from the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study (CHeCS), we applied a discrete time-to-event approach with PD/PKM as the outcome. We performed univariate followed by a multivariable modelling that used time-varying covariates, propensity scores to adjust for potential treatment selection bias and death as a competing risk. Among 17,199 confirmed HCV patients, we observed 54 incident cases of PD/PKM during a mean follow-up period of 17 years; 3753 patients died during follow-up. There was no significant association between treatment status/outcome and risk of PD/PKM. Type 2 diabetes tripled risk (hazard ratio [HR] 3.05; 95% CI 1.75-5.32; p < .0001) and presence of cirrhosis doubled risk of PD/PKM (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.31-3.47). BMI >30 was associated with roughly 50% lower risk of PD/PKM than BMI <25 (HR 0.43; 0.22-0.84; p = .0138). After adjustment for treatment selection bias, we did not observe a significant association between HCV patients' antiviral treatment status/outcome on risk of PD/PKM. Several clinical risk factors-diabetes, cirrhosis and BMI-were associated with PD/PKM.

Lower Rates of Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations Among Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C With Sustained Virological Response to Interferon-Free Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy (2014-2018).

We compared rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations between patients with hepatitis C virus who achieved sustained virological response after direct-acting antiviral therapy (case patients) and matched controls. Among 3049 pairs, case patients demonstrated lower rates of liver-related emergency department visits (P = .01) than controls; all-cause and liver-related hospitalization rates and number of hospitalized days were also lower in case patients (P < .001).

Availability of PEth testing is associated with reduced eligibility for liver transplant among patients with alcohol-related liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Serum phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a highly sensitive test to detect alcohol use. We evaluated whether the availability of PEth testing impacted rates of liver transplant evaluation terminations and delistings. METHODS: Medical record data were collected for patients who initiated transplant evaluation due to alcohol-related liver disease in the pre-PEth (2017) or PEth (2019) eras. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to balance baseline patient characteristics. Outcomes included termination of evaluation or delisting due to alcohol use; patients were censored at receipt of transplant; death was considered a competing risk. The Fine-Gray method was performed to determine whether PEth testing affected risk of evaluation termination/ delisting due to alcohol use. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-five patients with alcohol-related indications for transplant (157 in 2017; 210 in 2019) were included. The final IPW-adjusted model for the composite outcome of terminations/delisting due to alcohol use retained two significant variables (P < .05): PEth era and BMI category. Patients evaluated during the PEth era were almost three times more likely to experience an alcohol-related termination/delisting than those in the pre-PEth era (sHR = 2.86; 95%CI 1.67-4.97) CONCLUSION: We found that availability of PEth testing at our institution was associated with a higher rate of exclusion of patients from eligibility for liver transplant. Use of PEth testing has significant potential to inform decisions regarding transplant candidacy for patients with alcohol-related liver disease.

Alcohol-related hepatitis admissions increased 50% in the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.

Early reports suggest that alcohol misuse increased in 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using retrospective data from Henry Ford Health System in Detroit MI-an area that experienced an early and severe COVID-19 outbreak-we investigated the impact of the pandemic on alcohol-related liver disease (ARLD) in the summer of 2020 compared with the same period in 2016-2019. Both the number of ARLD admissions and the proportion of total admissions represented by ARLD patients increased significantly in 2020 compared with previous years. The number of ARLD admissions as a proportion of all hospitalizations was 50% higher in 2020 than in 2016-2019 (0.31% vs 0.21%; P = .0013); by September 2020, the number of admissions was 66% higher than previous years. Despite racial and geographical disparities in direct and indirect COVID-related stressors across the Detroit metropolitan area, the demographic profile of ARLD patients did not change compared with previous years.

Trends in Cirrhosis and Mortality by Age, Sex, Race, and Antiviral Treatment Status Among US Chronic Hepatitis B Patients (2006-2016).

BACKGROUND: Changing US demographics and evolving chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatments may affect longitudinal trends in CHB-related complications. We studied trends in the prevalence of cirrhosis (past or present) and incidence of all-cause mortality, stratified by patient age, sex, race, and antiviral treatment status, in a sample from US health care systems. METHODS: Joinpoint and Poisson regression (univariate and multivariable) were used to estimate the annual percent change in each outcome from 2006 to 2016. RESULTS: Among 5528 CHB patients, cirrhosis prevalence (including decompensated cirrhosis) rose from 6.7% in 2006 to 13.7% in 2016; overall mortality was unchanged. Overall rates of cirrhosis and mortality were higher among treated patients, but adjusted annual percent changes (aAPC) were significantly lower among treated than untreated patients (cirrhosis: aAPC +2.4% vs. +6.2%, mortality: aAPC -3.9% vs. +4.0%). Likewise, among treated patients, the aAPC for mortality declined -3.9% per year whereas among untreated patients, mortality increased +4.0% per year. CONCLUSIONS: From 2006 to 2016, the prevalence of cirrhosis among CHB patients doubled. Notably, all-cause mortality increased among untreated patients but decreased among treated patients. These results suggest that antiviral treatment attenuates the progression of cirrhosis and the risk of death among patients with CHB.

Laboratory monitoring and antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B among routine care patients in the United States.

We investigated factors associated with rates of recommended monitoring of chronic hepatitis B (HBV) patients for viral DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and initiation of antiviral treatment among eligible patients, in a US cohort of patients under routine care. Patients were categorised by treatment indication: definite, equivocal or ineligible. Baseline covariates included demographics, clinical characteristics and specialist care status. 'Recommended monitoring' was defined ≥1 ALT or HBV DNA test per year. Logit models, univariate then multivariable, were used to evaluate factors associated with monitoring and treatment. Among 3,830 patients, treatment was received by 67.5% (788/1168 patients) in the 'definite' category, and 34.1% (208/610 patients) in the 'equivocal' category, of whom 109 moved up to 'definite' status at some point during follow-up. Sex, age and specialist care were independently associated with receipt of treatment in 'definite' patients. Routine monitoring rates were high prior to treatment in 'definite/ treated' patients (ALT: 77%; DNA: 85%) but declined afterwards (ALT 63%; DNA 36%). Rates of monitoring were lower in 'definite/ untreated' patients (ALT: 48%; DNA: 32%). Among 'equivocal/ treated' patients, lower age and comorbidity scores were associated with receipt of treatment; ALT monitoring rates were similar before and after treatment initiation (41% and 46%, respectively), while rates of DNA monitoring declined (55% and 29%). Monitoring among 'treatment ineligible' patients was similar to those in the 'equivocal' and untreated 'definite' groups. A large proportion of US HBV patients under routine care did not receive recommended annual laboratory monitoring, especially after initiation of antiviral treatment, and nearly one-third of patients with 'definite' indications for antiviral therapy remained untreated.