Simple Advanced Preparation Method for Improving the Thickness Stability of Powder Thickening Agents in Dysphagia Management.

Texture modification of foods by using thickening agents is a routine practice for assessing and treating dysphagic patients. However, a powder-thickened fluid's viscosity might change over time, and little has been proposed to overcome this inconsistency. This study aimed to evaluate variations in the thickness of a fluid thickened with a common xanthan gum-based powder and to explore the feasibility of a simple advanced preparation method for thickened liquids to improve thickness stability. Thickened fluids with concentrations of 1.0 g/100 mL, 0.7 g/100 mL, and 0.5 g/100 mL were prepared from both freshly opened and previously opened thickening powders. Fluid thickness was measured every 10 min in a series of International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative flow tests. A significant time-dependent decline in thickness was observed for all three concentrations in both groups, namely those prepared with freshly opened and previously opened thickening powders, and the shortest periods to achieve a stable viscosity after liquid preparation for the two groups were 80 and 70 min, respectively. On diluting the thickened liquids from the base liquid, which was prepared at a concentration of 1.0 g/100 mL and stored at room temperature for 90 min, no significant time-dependent thickness changes were observed over the following 60 min. The simple protocol of preparing the thickest "base" liquid in advance and then diluting it to the desired thickness resulted in a consistent liquid thickness, with the prepared liquids ready to be clinically applied and consumed, with high stability within 60 min.

Effects of implants with steroids after endoscopic sinus surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis affects approximately 5%-2% of the general population worldwide. Steroid implants after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have drawn considerable interest for their cost savings, but relevant guidelines indicate that evidence on this topic is of low quality with high heterogeneity. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of steroid implants after ESS by synthesizing relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of potential references from five biomedical databases. They further extracted relevant data from the included studies, including (a) mean, standard deviation, or standard error for Lund-Kennedy endoscopic (LKE) score and Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) score and (b) events and sample sizes of each group for further intervention. Data were pooled in a random-effects model, and results were presented as the weighted mean difference (WMD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and I2 . RESULTS: Eleven RCTs (n = 853) were included and showed that the steroid implant group had lower LKE scores (WMD, -1.19; 95% CI, -1.75 to -0.62; I2  = 0%) and POSE scores (WMD, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.47 to -0.76; I2  = 48%) than the placebo implant group at postoperative week 2. Moreover, the reoperation rate in the steroid implant group was also lower than in the placebo implant group (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.80; I2  = 0%). However, no significant difference was observed in the postoperative oral steroid requirement between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, steroid implant decreases LKE and POSE among patients receiving ESS in the short term, but long-term effects remain unclear. Patient-based outcomes are worth further discussion in the future.

Effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries: a systemic review and meta-analysis / Efeito do tamponamento nasal infiltrado com anestésicos locais na dor e ansiedade pós-operatórias após cirurgias nasosinusais: revisão sistêmica e metanálise

Abstract Introduction: Packing of the nasal cavity has traditionally been used for postoperative bleeding control and decreasing synechia formation in patients undergoing nasal surgeries. Although absorbable nasal packing has been gaining popularity in the recent years, nonabsorbable nasal packing is still often used in nasal surgeries in various parts of the world. It is known to be associated with pain and discomfort especially upon and during removal, and previous reviews have only evaluated the effects of local anesthetic infiltration of nasal packing in septal surgeries. Objective: To evaluate the effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries Materials and methods: We searched the PubMed and Embase databases from their earliest record to April 27, 2019, randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials for review, and included only randomized controlled trials for data analysis. We included studies using topical anesthetics-infiltrated nasal packing following sinonasal surgeries and evaluated the effectiveness compared to placebo packing in pain reduction during postoperative follow up, as well as the effectiveness in anxiety reduction. Results: Among 15 studies included for review, 9 studies involving 765 participants contributed to the meta-analysis. In terms of pain reduction, our analysis showed significant standard mean differences regarding effectiveness at postoperative 1, 12, 24 h interval for all surgical groups combined, in the sinus surgery group, as well as during nasal packing removal. There was no consistent evidence to support the effectiveness in anxiety reduction. Conclusions: Our study supports anesthetics infiltration of nasal packing as an effective method in managing pain in patients with nasal packing after sinonasal surgeries. However, the level of evidence is low. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish its effectiveness in reducing anxiety. We believe this review is of great clinical significance due to the vast patient population undergoing sinonasal surgeries. Postoperative local hemorrhage remains the greatest concern for ear nose and throat surgeons due to the rich vasculature of the nose and sinuses. Sinonasal packing provides structural support and serves as an important measure for hemostasis and synechia formation. Although absorbable packing has been gaining popularity in the recent years, nonabsorable packing materials are still used in many countries due to lower cost. Infiltration of nasal packing with local anesthetic provides a solution to the discomfort, nasal pressure and nasal pain experienced commonly by the patients as evidenced by our analysis.

Resumo Introdução: O tamponamento da cavidade nasal tem sido usado tradicionalmente para controle do sangramento pós-operatório e diminuição da formação de sinéquia em pacientes submetidos a cirurgias nasais. Embora o tamponamento nasal absorvível tenha ganhado popularidade nos últimos anos, o tampão nasal não absorvível ainda é frequentemente usado em várias partes do mundo. Sabe-se que o tamponamento está associado a dor e desconforto, especialmente na sua remoção, e revisões anteriores avaliaram apenas os efeitos do tampão com anestésico local em cirurgias do septo nasal. Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito do tamponamento nasal infiltrado com anestésicos locais na dor e ansiedade pós-operatórias após cirurgias nasosinusais. Material e métodos: Para a revisão, pesquisamos nos bancos de dados PubMed e Embase desde o registro mais antigo até 27 de abril de 2019, incluímos ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados, a ensaios clínicos prospectivos controlados e apenas ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados para análise de dados. Incluímos estudos que usaram tamponamento nasal infiltrado com anestésicos tópicos após cirurgias nasosinusais e avaliamos a eficácia em comparação com o tamponamento com placebo na redução da dor durante o acompanhamento pós-operatório, bem como os efeitos na redução da ansiedade. Resultados: Entre os 15 estudos incluídos, 9, que envolveram 765 participantes, contribuíram para a metanálise. Em termos de redução da dor, nossa análise mostrou diferenças médias padrão significantes em relação à eficácia no pós-operatório nos intervalos de 1, 12, 24 horas para todos os grupos cirúrgicos combinados, no grupo da cirurgia sinusal e durante a remoção do tamponamento nasal. Não houve evidências consistentes para apoiar a eficácia na redução da ansiedade. Conclusões: Nosso estudo apoia o uso de tamponamentos nasais infiltrados com anestésicos locais como um método eficaz no tratamento da dor em pacientes após cirurgias nasosinusais. No entanto, o nível de evidência é baixo. São necessários mais ensaios clínicos randomizados de alta qualidade para estabelecer sua eficácia na redução da ansiedade. Acreditamos que esta revisão seja de grande significado clínico devido à vasta população submetida a cirurgias nasosinusais. A hemorragia local pós-operatória continua a ser a maior preocupação para os cirurgiões otorrinolaringológicos devido à rica vasculatura do nariz e seios nasais. O tamponamento nasosinusal fornece suporte estrutural e serve como uma medida importante para a hemostasia e formação de sinéquias. Embora o tamponamento absorvível tenha ganhado popularidade nos últimos anos, os materiais de tamponamento não absorvíveis ainda são usados em muitos países devido ao menor custo. A infiltração do tamponamento nasal com anestésicos locais fornece uma solução para desconforto, pressão e dor nasal comumente referida pelos pacientes, como evidenciado por nossa análise.

Effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Packing of the nasal cavity has traditionally been used for postoperative bleeding control and decreasing synechia formation in patients undergoing nasal surgeries. Although absorbable nasal packing has been gaining popularity in the recent years, nonabsorbable nasal packing is still often used in nasal surgeries in various parts of the world. It is known to be associated with pain and discomfort especially upon and during removal, and previous reviews have only evaluated the effects of local anesthetic infiltration of nasal packing in septal surgeries. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the PubMed and Embase databases from their earliest record to April 27, 2019, randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials for review, and included only randomized controlled trials for data analysis. We included studies using topical anesthetics-infiltrated nasal packing following sinonasal surgeries and evaluated the effectiveness compared to placebo packing in pain reduction during postoperative follow up, as well as the effectiveness in anxiety reduction. RESULTS: Among 15 studies included for review, 9 studies involving 765 participants contributed to the meta-analysis. In terms of pain reduction, our analysis showed significant standard mean differences regarding effectiveness at postoperative 1, 12, 24 h interval for all surgical groups combined, in the sinus surgery group, as well as during nasal packing removal. There was no consistent evidence to support the effectiveness in anxiety reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports anesthetics infiltration of nasal packing as an effective method in managing pain in patients with nasal packing after sinonasal surgeries. However, the level of evidence is low. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish its effectiveness in reducing anxiety. We believe this review is of great clinical significance due to the vast patient population undergoing sinonasal surgeries. Postoperative local hemorrhage remains the greatest concern for ear nose and throat surgeons due to the rich vasculature of the nose and sinuses. Sinonasal packing provides structural support and serves as an important measure for hemostasis and synechia formation. Although absorbable packing has been gaining popularity in the recent years, nonabsorable packing materials are still used in many countries due to lower cost. Infiltration of nasal packing with local anesthetic provides a solution to the discomfort, nasal pressure and nasal pain experienced commonly by the patients as evidenced by our analysis.