Comparison of 3D and 4D robustly optimized proton treatment plans for non-small cell lung cancer patients with tumour motion amplitudes larger than 5 mm.

Background and purpose: There is no consensus about an ideal robust optimization (RO) strategy for proton therapy of targets with large intrafractional motion. We investigated the plan robustness of 3D and different 4D RO strategies. Materials and methods: For eight non-small cell lung cancer patients with clinical target volume (CTV) motion >5 mm, different RO approaches were investigated: 3DRO considering the average CT (AvgCT) with a target density override, 4DRO considering three/all 4DCT phases, and 4DRO considering the AvgCT and three/all 4DCT phases. Robustness against setup/range errors, interplay effects based on breathing and machine log file data for deliveries with/without rescanning, and interfractional anatomical changes were analyzed for target coverage and OAR sparing. Results: All nominal plans fulfilled the clinical requirements with individual CTV coverage differences <2pp; 4DRO without AvgCT generated the most conformal dose distributions. Robustness against setup/range errors was best for 4DRO with AvgCT (18% more passed error scenarios than 3DRO). Interplay effects caused fraction-wise median CTV coverage loss of 3pp and missed maximum dose constraints for heart and esophagus in 18% of scenarios. CTV coverage and OAR sparing fulfilled requirements in all cases when accumulating four interplay scenarios. Interfractional changes caused less target misses for RO with AvgCT compared to 4DRO without AvgCT (≤42%/33% vs. ≥56%/44% failed single/accumulated scenarios). Conclusions: All RO strategies provided acceptable plans with equally low robustness against interplay effects demanding other mitigation than rescanning to ensure fraction-wise target coverage. 4DRO considering three phases and the AvgCT provided best compromise on planning effort and robustness.

Reduction of clinical safety margins in proton therapy enabled by the clinical implementation of dual-energy CT for direct stopping-power prediction.

PURPOSE: To quantifiy the range uncertainty in proton treatment planning using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for a direct stopping-power prediction (DirectSPR) algorithm and its clinical implementation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To assess the overall uncertainty in stopping-power ratio (SPR) prediction of a DirectSPR implementation calibrated for different patient geometries, the influencing factors were categorized in imaging, modeling as well as others. The respective SPR uncertainty was quantified for lung, soft tissue and bone and translated into range uncertainty for several tumor types. The amount of healthy tissue spared was quantified for 250 patients treated with DirectSPR and the dosimetric impact was evaluated exemplarily for a representative brain-tumor patient. RESULTS: For bone, soft tissue and lung, an SPR uncertainty (1σ) of 1.6%, 1.3% and 1.3% was determined for DirectSPR, respectively. This allowed for a reduction of the clinically applied range uncertainty from currently (3.5% + 2 mm) to (1.7% + 2 mm) for brain-tumor and (2.0% + 2 mm) for prostate-cancer patients. The 150 brain-tumor and 100 prostate-cancer patients treated using DirectSPR benefitted from sparing on average 2.6 mm and 4.4 mm of healthy tissue in beam direction, respectively. In the representative patient case, dose reduction in organs at risk close to the target volume was achieved, with a mean dose reduction of up to 16% in the brainstem. Patient-specific DECT-based treatment planning with reduced safety margins was successfully introduced into clinical routine. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial increase in range prediction accuracy in clinical proton treatment planning was achieved by patient-specific DECT-based SPR prediction. For the first time, a relevant imaging-based reduction of range prediction uncertainty on a 2% level has been achieved.