Hereditary renal mass syndromes: a pictorial review.

Hereditary renal mass syndromes, although rare, account for at least 3-5% of kidney cancers and significantly impact affected families. Accurate diagnosis and management by radiologists are crucial as these syndromes often present at imaging with both renal and extra-renal manifestations. The radiologist may be the first to recognize these stigmata at imaging, some of which satisfy major features for diagnosis and obviate the need for genetic testing. Furthermore, radiologists contribute to lifelong imaging surveillance and locoregional treatment. This pictorial review discusses the following major hereditary renal mass syndromes with their typical renal mass appearance, extrarenal manifestations, inheritance pattern, diagnosis, and management strategies based on the most recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines: Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, tuberous sclerosis complex, Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome, hereditary paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma (PGL/PCC) syndrome/succinate dehydrogenase deficiency, hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC)/fumarate hydratase deficiency, PTEN hamartoma syndrome, BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) tumor disposition syndrome, hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma, and familial clear cell renal cell cancer with chromosome 3 translocation.

Large language models' responses to liver cancer surveillance, diagnosis, and management questions: accuracy, reliability, readability.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy, reliability, and readability of publicly available large language models in answering fundamental questions on hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and management. METHODS: Twenty questions on liver cancer diagnosis and management were asked in triplicate to ChatGPT-3.5 (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), and Bing (Microsoft). Responses were assessed by six fellowship-trained physicians from three academic liver transplant centers who actively diagnose and/or treat liver cancer. Responses were categorized as accurate (score 1; all information is true and relevant), inadequate (score 0; all information is true, but does not fully answer the question or provides irrelevant information), or inaccurate (score - 1; any information is false). Means with standard deviations were recorded. Responses were considered as a whole accurate if mean score was > 0 and reliable if mean score was > 0 across all responses for the single question. Responses were also quantified for readability using the Flesch Reading Ease Score and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Readability and accuracy across 60 responses were compared using one-way ANOVAs with Tukey's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: Of the twenty questions, ChatGPT answered nine (45%), Gemini answered 12 (60%), and Bing answered six (30%) questions accurately; however, only six (30%), eight (40%), and three (15%), respectively, were both accurate and reliable. There were no significant differences in accuracy between any chatbot. ChatGPT responses were the least readable (mean Flesch Reading Ease Score 29; college graduate), followed by Gemini (30; college) and Bing (40; college; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Large language models provide complex responses to basic questions on hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and management that are seldomly accurate, reliable, or readable.

Differentiation of Hepatocellular Adenoma Subtypes and Focal Nodular Hyperplasia on Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI: An Updated Diagnostic Algorithm.

This study evaluated an updated diagnostic algorithm for distinguishing HCA subtypes and FNH on gadoxetate disodium­enhanced MRI. The algorithm included a pathway recommending biopsy for indeterminate lesions that could represent HCA with beta-catenin mutations (which are at risk of malignant transformation) or I-HCA with an atypical MRI appearance.

Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) among patients with non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease (SLD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This IRB-approved, retrospective study included 119 observations from 77 adult patients (36 women, 41 men; median 64 years) who underwent liver CT or MRI from 2010 to 2023. All patients had histopathologic evidence of SLD without cirrhosis. Three board-certified abdominal radiologists blinded to tissue diagnosis and imaging follow-up assessed observations with LI-RADS. The positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and inter-reader agreement were calculated. RESULTS: Seventy-five observations (63%) were benign and 44 (37%) were malignant. PPV for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 0-0% for LR-1, 0-0% for LR-2, 0-7% for LR-3, 11-20% for LR-4, 75-88% for LR-5, 0-8% for LR-M, and 50-75% for LR-TIV. For LR-5 in identifying HCC, sensitivity was 79-83%, specificity was 91-97%, and accuracy was 89-92%. For composite categories of LR-5, LR-M, or LR-TIV in identifying malignancy, sensitivity was 86-89%, specificity was 85-96%, and accuracy was 86-93%. The most common false positives for LR-5 were hepatocellular adenomas. Only 59-65% of HCCs showed non-peripheral washout at CT versus 67-83% at MRI, though nearly all had an enhancing capsule. PPV and accuracy of LR-5 for HCC did not differ by modality. Inter-reader agreement for major features ranged from 0.667 to 0.830 and was 0.766 for the final category. CONCLUSION: Despite challenges such as the lower prevalence of non-peripheral washout at CT and overlapping imaging features between HCC and hepatocellular adenomas, LI-RADS may serve as an effective tool in assessing focal liver lesions in SLD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: LI-RADS in non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease can effectively diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma and malignancy at computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, thereby guiding clinical management decisions and expediting patient care pathways. KEY POINTS: Performance of LI-RADS is unknown in non-cirrhotic patients with steatotic liver disease. LI-RADS 5 category showed a high pooled specificity of 91-97% for hepatocellular carcinoma. LI-RADS can non-invasively risk stratify focal liver observations in non-cirrhotic patients with steatotic liver disease.

The Role of Imaging for Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Consensus Recommendations From the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high healthcare utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including computed tomography angiography, catheter angiography, computed tomography enterography, magnetic resonance enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided.

Gastrointestinal devices: common and uncommon foreign bodies.

Devices for the gastrointestinal tract are widely available and constantly advancing with less invasive techniques. They play a crucial role in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and are commonly placed by interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons. These devices frequently appear in imaging studies, which verify their proper placement, identify any complications, or may be incidentally detected. Radiologists must be able to identify these devices at imaging and understand their intended purpose to assess their efficacy, detect complications such as incorrect positioning, and avoid misinterpreting them as abnormalities. Furthermore, many patients with these devices may require MRI, making assessing compatibility essential for safe patient care. This review seeks to provide a succinct and practical handbook for radiologists regarding both common and uncommon gastrointestinal devices. In addition to textual descriptions of clinical indications, imaging findings, complications, and MRI compatibility, the review incorporates a summary table as a quick reference point for key information and illustrative images for each device.

Beta-Catenin-Mutated Hepatocellular Adenomas at Hepatobiliary Phase MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Beta-catenin-mutated hepatocellular adenomas (ß-HCAs) can appear iso- to hyperintense at the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Given the relatively lower prevalence of ß-HCAs, prior studies had limited power to show statistically significant differences in the HBP signal intensity between different subtypes. PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of HBP MRI to discriminate ß-HCA from other subtypes. STUDY TYPE: Systemic review and meta-analysis. POPULATION: Ten original studies were included, yielding 266 patients with 397 HCAs (9%, 36/397 ß-HCAs and 91%, 361/397 non-ß-HCAs). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T and 3.0 T, HBP. ASSESSMENT: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to August 31, 2023, for all articles reporting HBP signal intensity in patients with histopathologically proven HCA subtypes. QUADAS-2 was used to assess risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability. STATISTICAL TESTS: Univariate random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. Heterogeneity estimates were assessed with I2 heterogeneity index. Meta-regression (mixed-effect model) was used to test for differences in the prevalence of HBP signal between HCA groups. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: HBP iso- to hyperintensity was associated with ß-HCAs (pooled prevalence was 72.3% in ß-HCAs and 6.3% in non-ß-HCAs). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 72.3% (95% confidence interval 54.1-85.3) and 93.7% (93.8-97.7), respectively. Specificity had substantial heterogeneity with I2 of 83% due to one study, but not for sensitivity (I2 = 0). After excluding this study, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 77.4% (59.6-88.8) and 94.1% (88.9-96.9), with no substantial heterogeneity. One study had high risk of bias for patient selection and two studies were rated unclear for two domains. DATA CONCLUSION: Iso- to hyperintensity at HBP MRI may help to distinguish ß-HCA subtype from other HCAs with high specificity. However, there was heterogeneity in the pooled estimates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

The Role of Imaging for GI Bleeding: ACG and SAR Consensus Recommendations.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high health care utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including CT angiography, catheter angiography, CT enterography, MR enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist, which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided. © Radiological Society of North America and the American College of Gastroenterology, 2024. Supplemental material is available for this article. This article is being published concurrently in American Journal of Gastroenterology and Radiology. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Citations from either journal can be used when citing this article. See also the editorial by Lockhart in this issue.

World Health Organization 2022 Classification Update: Radiologic and Pathologic Features of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinomas.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To describe imaging and pathology features of newly defined papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) based on the WHO 2022 update. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 87 patients with 93 pathologically proven papillary renal cell carcinomas who underwent pre-treatment renal mass protocol CT or MRI. Baseline and post-treatment follow-up imaging was evaluated by two radiologists systematically based on established lexicon. RESULTS: At pathology, 63 (68%) were grade 1-2, 29 (31%) were grade 3-4, and 1 (%) was unreported. At surgical pathology, 84 (90%) were localized (≤pT2b), 5 (5%) were pT3a, and none were ≥pT3b; 4 (4%) had unknown pT stage (core biopsies). 33 (35%) had necrosis and 39 (41%) had hemorrhage. None had sarcomatoid or rhabdoid differentiation. At imaging, 73 (83%) were solid and 16 (17%) were cystic. Of 16 cystic masses, four were Bosniak class IIF (three were heterogeneously T1 hyperintense) and 12 were class IV. All were well-circumscribed. 92 (99%) were hypovascular. Median follow-up for 74 patients was 30 months (IQR 12-56). One untreated patient had non-regional nodal metastasis at presentation, and one patient had metastasis to lymph nodes and bones after surgery, but the patient had unresected renal masses elsewhere without pathology. Otherwise, no recurrence or metastases were detected. CONCLUSION: Most pRCCs present as a hypovascular, circumscribed, solid renal mass. A few pRCCs present as the newly defined Bosniak class IIF subtype. Our results can form the basis of a non-invasive, likelihood score to identify this relatively indolent pathology in the era of virtual biopsy and active surveillance.

Discrepant guidelines in the evaluation of hematuria.

PURPOSE: To assess discrepancies in current imaging recommendations for hematuria among North American societies: American College of Radiology (ACR), American Urological Association (AUA), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA). METHODS: The latest available ACR Appropriateness Recommendations, AUA guidelines, and CUA guidelines were reviewed. AUA and CUA guidelines imaging recommendations by variants and level of appropriateness were converted to match the style of ACR. Imaging recommendations including modality, anatomy, and requirement for contrast were recorded. RESULTS: Clinical variants included microhematuria without risk factors, microhematuria with risk factors, gross hematuria, and microhematuria during pregnancy. CUA recommends ultrasound kidneys as the first-line imaging study in the first 3 variants; pregnancy is not explicitly addressed. For hematuria without risk factors, ACR does not routinely recommend imaging, while AUA recommends shared decision-making to decide repeat urinalysis versus cystoscopy with ultrasound kidneys. For hematuria with risk factors and gross hematuria, ACR recommends CT urography; MR urography can also be considered in gross hematuria. AUA further stratifies intermediate- and high-risk patients, for which ultrasound kidneys and CT urography are recommended, respectively. For pregnancy, ACR and AUA both recommend ultrasound kidneys, though AUA additionally recommends consideration of CT or MR urography after delivery. CONCLUSION: There is no universally agreed upon algorithm for diagnostic evaluation. Discrepancies centered on the role of upper tract imaging with ultrasound versus CT. Prospective studies and/or repeat simulation studies that apply newly updated guidelines are needed to further clarify the role of imaging, particularly for patients with microhematuria with no and intermediate risk factors.

Growth Kinetics of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms by Histopathologic Grade.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study are to describe the growth kinetics of pathologically proven, treatment-naive pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) at imaging surveillance and to determine their association with histopathologic grade and Ki-67. METHODS: This study included 100 panNENs from 95 patients who received pancreas protocol computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging from January 2005 to July 2022. All masses were treatment-naive, had histopathologic correlation, and were imaged with at least 2 computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging at least 90 days apart. Growth kinetics was assessed using linear and specific growth rate, stratified by grade and Ki-67. Masses were also assessed qualitatively to determine other possible imaging predictors of grade. RESULTS: There were 76 grade 1 masses, 17 grade 2 masses, and 7 grade 3 masses. Median (interquartile range) linear growth rates were 0.06 cm/y (0-0.20), 0.40 cm/y (0.22-1.06), and 2.70 cm/y (0.41-3.89) for grade 1, 2, and 3 masses, respectively (P < 0.001). Linear growth rate correlated with Ki-67 with r2 of 0.623 (P < 0.001). At multivariate analyses, linear growth rate was the only imaging feature significantly associated with grade (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Growth kinetics correlate with Ki-67 and grade. Grade 1 panNENs grow slowly versus grade 2-3 panNENs.

External Validation of a Five-Tiered CT Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Five-Reader Study.

BACKGROUND. In 2022, a five-tiered CT algorithm was proposed for predicting whether a small (cT1a) solid renal mass represents clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this external validation study was to evaluate the proposed CT algorithm for diagnosis of ccRCC among small solid renal masses. METHODS. This retrospective study included 93 patients (median age, 62 years; 42 women, 51 men) with 97 small solid renal masses that were seen on corticomedullary phase contrast-enhanced CT performed between January 2012 and July 2022 and subsequently underwent surgical resection. Five readers (three attending radiologists, two clinical fellows) independently evaluated masses for the mass-to-cortex corticomedullary attenuation ratio and heterogeneity score; these scores were used to derive the CT score by use of the previously proposed CT algorithm. The CT score's sensitivity, specificity, and PPV for ccRCC were calculated at threshold of 4 or greater, and the NPV for ccRCC was calculated at a threshold of 3 or greater (consistent with thresholds in studies of the MRI-based clear cell likelihood score and the CT algorithm's initial study). The CT score's sensitivity and specificity for papillary RCC were calculated at a threshold of 2 or less. Interreader agreement was assessed using the Gwet agreement coefficient (AC1). RESULTS. Overall, 61 of 97 masses (63%) were malignant and 43 of 97 (44%) were ccRCC. Across readers, CT score had sensitivity ranging from 47% to 95% (pooled sensitivity, 74% [95% CI, 68-80%]), specificity ranging from 19% to 83% (pooled specificity, 59% [95% CI, 52-67%]), PPV ranging from 48% to 76% (pooled PPV, 59% [95% CI, 49-71%]), and NPV ranging from 83% to 100% (pooled NPV, 90% [95% CI, 84-95%]), for ccRCC. A CT score of 2 or less had sensitivity ranging from 44% to 100% and specificity ranging from 77% to 98% for papillary RCC (representing nine of 97 masses). Interreader agreement was substantial for attenuation score (AC1 = 0.70), poor for heterogeneity score (AC1 = 0.17), fair for five-tiered CT score (AC1 = 0.32), and fair for dichotomous CT score at a threshold of 4 or greater (AC1 = 0.24 [95% CI, 0.14-0.33]). CONCLUSION. The five-tiered CT algorithm for evaluation of small solid renal masses was tested in an external sample and showed high NPV for ccRCC. CLINICAL IMPACT. The CT algorithm may be used for risk stratification and patient selection for active surveillance by identifying patients unlikely to have ccRCC.

Accuracy of Information Provided by ChatGPT Regarding Liver Cancer Surveillance and Diagnosis.

ChatGPT did not reliably provide accurate information to 20 questions about liver cancer surveillance and diagnosis, as assessed by six physicians who actively diagnose and/or treat liver cancer. Answers deemed inaccurate commonly related to questions on specific LI-RADS categories and included contradictory or falsely reassuring, if not wrong, information.

Risk of malignancy in T1-hyperintense Bosniak version 2019 class II and IIF cystic renal masses.

BACKGROUND: Bosniak classification version 2019 includes cystic masses in class II and IIF based partly on their hyperintense appearance at T1-weighted MRI. The prevalence of malignancy in non-enhancing heterogeneously T1-hyperintense masses is unknown, nor whether the pattern of T1 hyperintensity affects malignancy likelihood. PURPOSE: To determine the malignancy proportion among six patterns of T1 hyperintensity within non-enhancing cystic renal masses. METHODS: This retrospective, single-institution study included 72 Bosniak class II and IIF, non-enhancing, T1-hyperintense cystic renal masses. Diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology or by follow-up imaging demonstrating 5-year size and morphologic stability, decreased in size by ≥ 30%, resolution, or Bosniak down-classification. Six patterns of T1 hyperintensity were pre-defined: homogeneous (pattern A), fluid-fluid level (pattern B), peripherally markedly T1-hyperintense (pattern C), containing a T1-hyperintense non-enhancing nodule (pattern D), peripherally T1-hypointense (pattern E), and heterogeneously T1-hyperintense without a distinct pattern (pattern F). Three readers independently assigned each mass to a pattern. Individual and mean malignancy proportion were determined. Mann-Whitney test and Fischer's exact test compared the likelihood of malignancy between patterns. Inter-reader agreement was analyzed with Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC). RESULTS: Among 72 masses, the mean number of masses assigned was 11 (15%) to pattern A, 21 (29%) to pattern B, 6 (8%) to pattern C, 7 (10%) to pattern D, 5 (7%) to pattern E, and 22 (31%) to pattern F. Five of 72 masses (7%) were malignant; none was assigned pattern A, B, or D. Mean malignancy proportion was 5% (0/9, 1/6, and 0/4) for pattern C, 13% (0/4, 1/3, and 1/7) for pattern E, and 18% (5/20, 3/21, and 4/25) for pattern F. Malignant masses were more likely assigned to pattern E or F (p = 0.003-0.039). Inter-reader agreement was substantial (Gwet's AC: 0.68). CONCLUSION: Bosniak version 2019 class IIF masses that are non-enhancing and heterogeneously T1-hyperintense with a fluid-fluid level are likely benign. Those that are non-enhancing and heterogeneously T1-hyperintense without a distinct pattern have a malignancy proportion up to 25% (5/20).

Diagnostic performance of the "drooping" sign in CT diagnosis of exophytic renal angiomyolipoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of angular interface and the "drooping" sign in exophytic renal angiomyolipomas (AMLs) and the diagnostic performance in differentiating exophytic lipid-poor AMLs from other solid renal masses. METHODS: This IRB-approved, two-center study included 185 patients with 188 exophytic solid renal masses < 4 cm with histopathology and pre-operative CT within 30 days of surgical resection or biopsy. Images were reviewed for the presence of angular interface and the "drooping" sign qualitatively by three readers blinded to the final diagnosis, with majority rules applied. Both features were assessed quantitatively by cohort creators (who are not readers) independently. Free-marginal kappa was used to assess inter-reader agreement and agreement between two methods assessing each feature. Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney test, and multivariable logistic regression with two-tailed p < 0.05 were used to determine statistical significance. Diagnostic performance was assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients had 96 AMLs, and 91 patients had 92 non-AMLs. Seventy-four (77%) of AMLs were lipid-poor based on quantitative assessment on CT. The presence of angular interface and the "drooping" sign by both qualitative and quantitative assessment were statistically significantly associated with AMLs (39% (qualitative) and 45% (quantitative) vs 15% (qualitative) and 13% (quantitative), and 48% (qualitative) and 43% (quantitative) vs 4% (qualitative) and 1% (quantitative), respectively, all p < 0.001) in univariable analysis. In multivariable analysis, only the "drooping" sign in either qualitative or quantitative assessment was a statistically significant predictor of AMLs (both p < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement for the "drooping" sign was moderate (k = 0.55) and for angular interface was fair (k = 0.33). Agreement between the two methods of assessing the "drooping" sign was substantial (k = 0.84) and of assessing the angular interface was moderate (k = 0.59). The "drooping" sign both qualitatively and quantitatively, alone or in combination of angular interface, had very high specificity (96-100%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (89-100%), moderate negative predictive value (62-68%), but limited sensitivity (23-49%) for lipid-poor AMLs. CONCLUSION: The "drooping" sign by both qualitative and quantitative assessment is highly specific for lipid-rich and lipid-poor AMLs. This feature alone or in combination with angular interface can aid in CT diagnosis of lipid-poor AMLs with very high specificity and PPV.

Hepatocellular Adenomas: Molecular Basis and Multimodality Imaging Update.

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are a family of liver tumors that are associated with variable prognoses. Since the initial description of these tumors, the classification of HCAs has expanded and now includes eight distinct genotypic subtypes based on molecular analysis findings. These genotypic subtypes have unique derangements in their cellular biologic makeup that determine their clinical course and may allow noninvasive identification of certain subtypes. Multiphasic MRI performed with hepatobiliary contrast agents remains the best method to noninvasively detect, characterize, and monitor HCAs. HCAs are generally hypointense during the hepatobiliary phase; the ß-catenin-mutated exon 3 subtype and up to a third of inflammatory HCAs are the exception to this characterization. It is important to understand the appearances of HCAs beyond their depictions at MRI, as these tumors are typically identified with other imaging modalities first. The two most feared related complications are bleeding and malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma, although the risk of these complications depends on tumor size, subtype, and clinical factors. Elective surgical resection is recommended for HCAs that are persistently larger than 5 cm, adenomas of any size in men, and all ß-catenin-mutated exon 3 HCAs. Thermal ablation and transarterial embolization are potential alternatives to surgical resection. In the acute setting of a ruptured HCA, patients typically undergo transarterial embolization with or without delayed surgical resection. This update on HCAs includes a review of radiologic-pathologic correlations by subtype and imaging modality, related complications, and management recommendations. © RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Hepatocellular Adenoma Subtypes Based on 2017 Classification System: Exploratory Study of Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI Features With Proposal of a Diagnostic Algorithm.

BACKGROUND. The classification of hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) was updated in 2017 on the basis of genetic and molecular analysis. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate features on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of HCA subtypes on the basis of the 2017 classification and to propose a diagnostic algorithm for determining subtype using these features. METHODS. This retrospective study included 56 patients (49 women, seven men; mean age, 37 ± 13 [SD] years) with histologically confirmed HCA evaluated by gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI from January 2010 to January 2021. Subtypes were reclassified using 2017 criteria: hepatocyte nuclear factor-1α mutated HCA (HHCA), inflammatory HCA (IHCA), ß-catenin exon 3 activated HCA (ß-HCA), mixed inflammatory and ß-HCA (ß-IHCA), sonic hedgehog HCA (shHCA), and unclassified HCA (UHCA). Qualitative MRI features were assessed. Liver-to-lesion contrast enhancement ratios (LLCERs) were measured. Subtypes were compared, and a diagnostic algorithm was proposed. RESULTS. The analysis included 65 HCAs: 16 HHCAs, 31 IHCAs, six ß-HCA, four ß-IHCA, five shHCA, and three UHCAs. HHCAs showed homogeneous diffuse intralesional steatosis in 94%, whereas all other HCAs showed this finding in 0% (p < .001). IHCAs showed the "atoll" sign in 58%, whereas all other HCAs showed this finding in 12% (p < .001). IHCAs showed moderate T2 hyperintensity in 52%, whereas all other HCAs showed this finding in 12% (p < .001). The ß-HCAs and ß-IHCAs occurred in men in 63%, whereas all other HCAs occurred in men in 4% (p < .001). The ß-HCAs and ß-IHCAs had a mean size of 10.1 ± 6.8 cm, whereas all other HCAs had a mean size of 5.1 ± 2.9 cm (p = .03). The ß-HCAs and ß-IHCAs showed fluid components in 60%, whereas all other HCAs showed this finding in 5% (p < .001). Hepatobiliary phase iso- or hyperintensity was observed in 80% of ß-HCAs and ß-IHCAs versus 5% of all other HCAs (p < .001). Hepatobiliary phase LLCER was positive in nine HCAs (eight ß-HCAs and ß-IHCAs; one IHCA). The shHCA and UHCA did not show distinguishing features. The proposed diagnostic algorithm had accuracy of 98% for HHCAs, 83% for IHCAs, and 95% for ß-HCAs or ß-IHCAs. CONCLUSION. Findings on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, including hepatobiliary phase characteristics, were associated with HCA subtypes using the 2017 classification. CLINICAL IMPACT. The algorithm identified common HCA subtypes with high accuracy, including those with ß-catenin exon 3 mutations.