In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam alone and in combination with amikacin against MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Greece.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents against MDR non-MBL Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from nine Greek hospitals and we assessed the potential synergistic interaction between ceftolozane/tazobactam and amikacin. METHODS: A total of 160 non-MBL P. aeruginosa isolates collected in 2016 were tested for susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam and seven comparator agents including ceftazidime/avibactam. Time-kill assays were performed for synergy testing using ceftolozane/tazobactam 60 or 7.5 mg/L, corresponding to the peak and trough concentrations of a 1.5 g q8h dose, respectively, in combination with 69 mg/L amikacin, corresponding to the free peak plasma concentration. Synergy was defined as a ≥2 log10 cfu/mL reduction compared with the most active agent. RESULTS: Overall, ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited 64.4% of the P. aeruginosa strains at ≤4 mg/L. Colistin was the most active agent (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L; 96.3% susceptible) followed by ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC50/90, 4/16 mg/L; 80.6% susceptible). GES-type enzymes were predominantly responsible for ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance; 81.6% of the non-producers were susceptible. MICs for the P. aeruginosa isolates selected for synergy testing were 2-32 mg/L ceftolozane/tazobactam and 2-128 mg/L amikacin. The combination of ceftolozane/tazobactam with amikacin was synergistic against 85.0% of all the isolates tested and against 75.0% of the GES producers. No antagonistic interactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated good in vitro activity against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, including strains with co-resistance to other antipseudomonal drugs. In combination with amikacin, a synergistic interaction at 24 h was observed against 85.0% of P. aeruginosa strains tested, including isolates with ceftolozane/tazobactam MICs of 32 mg/L or GES producers.

Inactivation of mgrB gene regulator and resistance to colistin is becoming endemic in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Greece: A nationwide study from 2014 to 2017.

INTRODUCTION: In Greece, the spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in humans has led to the reintroduction of colistin as a therapeutic agent. Unfortunately, colistin resistance with different mechanisms has emerged. The present work aims to determine the prevalence of carbapenem and colistin resistance and the corresponding mechanisms in Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates from Greece. METHODS: From 2014 to 2017, 288 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae clinical strains were gathered from a collection of 973 isolates from eight different hospitals in Greece. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using three different methods. Screening of carbapenem and colistin resistance genes was conducted using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing. RESULTS: Among the 288 (29.6 %) carbapenem-resistant isolates, 213 (73.9%) were colistin-resistant (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] >2 mg/L). The KPC type was the most common carbapenemase gene (116; 40.3%), followed by VIM (41; 14.2%), NDM (33; 11.5%) and OXA-48 (22; 7.6%). Moreover, 44 (15.3%) strains co-produced two types of carbapenemases. No mcr genes were detected for colistin resistance but mutations in chromosomal genes were found. These included inactivation of the mgrB gene for 148 (69.5%) strains, including insertion sequences for 94 (44.1%), nonsense mutations for 4 (1.9%) and missense mutations for 24 (11.3%). Moreover, PCR amplification of mgrB gene was negative for 26 (12.2%) strains. Finally, 65 (30.5%) colistin-resistant strains exhibited a wild-type mgrB, the mechanisms of which remain to be elucidated. CONCLUSION: This study shows that K. pneumoniae clinical strains in Greece are resistant to both carbapenems and colistin and this is endemic and is likely chromosomally encoded.

Acquisition and cross-transmission of Staphylococcus aureus in European intensive care units.

OBJECTIVE: To study the acquisition and cross-transmission of Staphylococcus aureus in different intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: We performed a multicenter cohort study. Six ICUs in 6 countries participated. During a 3-month period at each ICU, all patients had nasal and perineal swab specimens obtained at ICU admission and during their stay. All S. aureus isolates that were collected were genotyped by spa typing and multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis typing for cross-transmission analysis. A total of 629 patients were admitted to ICUs, and 224 of these patients were found to be colonized with S. aureus at least once during ICU stay (22% were found to be colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]). A total of 316 patients who had test results negative for S. aureus at ICU admission and had at least 1 follow-up swab sample obtained for culture were eligible for acquisition analysis. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients acquired S. aureus during ICU stay (31 acquired methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA], and 14 acquired MRSA). Several factors that were believed to affect the rate of acquisition of S. aureus were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses, including the amount of hand disinfectant used, colonization pressure, number of beds per nurse, antibiotic use, length of stay, and ICU setting (private room versus open ICU treatment). Greater colonization pressure and a greater number of beds per nurse correlated with a higher rate of acquisition for both MSSA and MRSA. The type of ICU setting was related to MRSA acquisition only, and the amount of hand disinfectant used was related to MSSA acquisition only. In 18 (40%) of the cases of S. aureus acquisition, cross-transmission from another patient was possible. CONCLUSIONS: Colonization pressure, the number of beds per nurse, and the treatment of all patients in private rooms correlated with the number of S. aureus acquisitions on an ICU. The amount of hand disinfectant used was correlated with the number of cases of MSSA acquisition but not with the number of cases of MRSA acquisition. The number of cases of patient-to-patient cross-transmission was comparable for MSSA and MRSA.