RESUMEN
About 40 % of new-onset epilepsy is drug refractory. If epilepsy surgery is not an option or fails, vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) can be considered. VNS efficacy is reported as more than 50 % seizure frequency reduction in 50-56 % of patients. Features in the newer models offer additional treatment optimization possibilities. Side effects include hoarseness, cough, and dyspnoea. Caution is advised for patients with sleep apnoea or lung disease. VNS has specific limitations concerning MRI. This review presents an overview of VNS treatment in Denmark and discusses future challenges.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria , Estimulación del Nervio Vago , Humanos , Estimulación del Nervio Vago/efectos adversos , Epilepsia Refractaria/terapiaRESUMEN
After several decades, the ILAE has adopted a new classification of epileptic seizures and the epilepsies. Two classifiers for focal seizures - awareness and presence of motor symptoms - are introduced but otherwise the existing seizure types are retained. Seizure types can be classified within more than one groups of focal, generalised, or unknown onset. Simultaneous occurrence of focal and generalised features in the same person is particularly recognised. The new expanded classification of the aetiologies as well as the comorbidities of epilepsy are incorporated. This review provides an overview of the new classification.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Convulsiones , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Convulsiones/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mortality is increased in epilepsy, but the important issue is that a proportion of epilepsy-related death is potentially preventable by optimized therapy and therefore needs to be identified. A new systematic classification of epilepsy-related mortality has been suggested to identify these preventable deaths. We applied this classification to an analysis of premature mortality in persons with epilepsy who were <50 years of age. METHODS: The study was a population-based retrospective cohort of all Danish citizens with and without epilepsy 1 to 49 years of age during 2007 to 2009. Information on all deaths was retrieved from the Danish Cause of Death Registry, autopsy reports, death certificates, and the Danish National Patient Registry. The primary cause of death in persons with epilepsy was evaluated independently by 3 neurologist, 1 neuro-pediatrician, and 2 cardiologists. In case of uncertainty, a pathologist was consulted. All deaths were classified as either epilepsy related or not epilepsy related, and the underlying causes or modes of death were compared between persons with and without epilepsy. RESULTS: During the study period, 700 deaths were identified in persons with epilepsy, and 440 (62.9%) of these were epilepsy related, 169 (38%) directly related to seizures and 181 (41%) due to an underlying neurologic disease. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy accounted for 80% of deaths directly related to epilepsy. Aspiration pneumonia was the cause of death in 80% of cases indirectly related to epilepsy. Compared with the background population, persons with epilepsy had a nearly 4-fold increased all-cause mortality (adjusted mortality hazard ratio 3.95 [95% confidence interval [CI] 3.64-4.27], p < 0.0001) and a higher risk of dying of various underlying causes, including alcohol-related conditions (hazard ratio 2.91 [95% CI 2.23-3.80], p < 0.0001) and suicide (hazard ratio 2.10 [95% CI 1.18-3.73], p = 0.01). DISCUSSION: The newly proposed classification for mortality in persons with epilepsy was useful in an unselected nationwide cohort. It helped in classifying unnatural causes of death as epilepsy related or not and in identifying potentially preventable deaths. The leading causes of premature mortality in persons <50 years of age were related to epilepsy and were thus potentially preventable by good seizure control.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita , Epilepsia , Causas de Muerte , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Muerte Súbita/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita/etiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Younger adults with epilepsy have an increased mortality. Some deaths are seizure-related, for example, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), whereas others, for example, suicide, have multiple causes, including adverse effects of the treatment on mood. In this retrospective population-based study of all Danish persons with epilepsy aged 18 to 49 years during 2007 to 2009 we evaluated the risk of death from seizures and suicide. SUDEP comprised 82.7% of all seizure-related death. Younger adults with epilepsy had an 8.3-fold increased risk of death from seizure-related causes compared with suicide. This underpins the importance of effective seizure control in preventing premature death. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:983-987.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia/mortalidad , Convulsiones/mortalidad , Muerte Súbita e Inesperada en la Epilepsia , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Persons with epilepsy have an increased mortality including a high risk of sudden unexplained death (SUD), also referred to as sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). We aimed to evaluate the risk of SUDEP in comparison to other causes of death and the risk of SUD in persons with and without epilepsy. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective population-based cohort study of all Danish citizens with and without epilepsy aged 1-49 years during 2007-2009. All deaths in the population were evaluated, and all cases of SUD identified. Primary causes of death in persons with epilepsy were evaluated independently by three neurologists and one neuropediatrician, using the unified SUDEP criteria. RESULTS: The three most frequent causes of death in persons with epilepsy were cancer (2.38 per 1000 person-years), SUDEP (1.65 per 1000 person-years), and pneumonia (1.09 per 1000 person-years) compared with cancer (.17 per 1000 person-years), accident-related deaths (.14 per 1000 person-years), and cardiovascular disease (.09 per 1000 person-years) in persons without epilepsy. Considering definite, definite plus, and probable cases, the SUDEP incidence was .27 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] = .11-.64) in children aged 1-17 years and 1.21 per 1000 person-years (95% CI = .96-1.51) in adults aged 18-49 years. Adjusted for age and sex, persons with epilepsy younger than 50 years had a 10.8-fold (95% CI = 9.97-11.64, p < .0001) increased all-cause mortality and a 34.4-fold (95% CI = 23.57-50.28, p < .0001) increased risk of SUD compared with persons without epilepsy. SUDEP accounted for 23.3% of all SUD. SIGNIFICANCE: This nationwide study of all deaths in persons with epilepsy younger than 50 years found a lower SUDEP risk in children compared with adults, and that epilepsy was a major risk factor for SUD in the background population. This underlines the importance of addressing risk factors for SUDEP to prevent premature death.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Muerte Súbita e Inesperada en la Epilepsia , Adulto , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Muerte Súbita/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita/etiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Todd's paralysis is a clinical entity consisting of acute focal neurological deficits following an epileptic seizure. It occurs after 6-13% of seizures, and the symptoms may last from minutes to 36 hours. Stroke with seizure at symptom onset is difficult to differentiate clinically from Todd's paralysis. The use of advanced imaging such as cerebral CT and MRI with angiography is recommended. This is a review of the current knowledge on pathogenesis, clinical presentation and differential diagnoses, and we propose an investigation plan for patients presenting with symptoms of Todd's paralysis.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Parálisis/diagnóstico , Parálisis/etiología , Convulsiones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Up to 11% of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy experience somatosensory auras, although these structures do not have any somatosensory physiological representation. We present the case of a patient with left mesial temporal lobe epilepsy who had somatosensory auras on the right side of the body. Stereo-EEG recording demonstrated seizure onset in the left mesial temporal structures, with propagation to the sensory cortices, when the patient experienced the somatosensory aura. Direct electrical stimulation of both the left amygdala and the hippocampus elicited the patient's habitual, somatosensory aura, with afterdischarges propagating to sensory cortices. These unusual responses to cortical stimulation suggest that in patients with epilepsy, aberrant neural networks are established, which have an essential role in ictogenesis.
RESUMEN
Surgery is the only treatment option with the potential to cure epilepsy. This review is a description of the multidisciplinary and multimodal presurgical evaluation process and the outcome of the Danish epilepsy surgery programme. The outcome aligns with international results and serious complications to surgery are very rare. The annual number of operations per capita compares to neighbouring countries and is equally distributed across Denmark. In accordance with international recommendations, Danish drug-resistant patients should be referred to epilepsy surgery evaluation at an early stage of the disease.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Vías Clínicas , Dinamarca , Epilepsia Refractaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Epilepsia Refractaria/cirugía , Electroencefalografía , Epilepsia/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Selección de Paciente , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón ÚnicoRESUMEN
Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an inherited disorder with a prevalence of 1/20,000. The diagnosis is based on clinical criteria and/or genetic testing. Most cases are found during childhood. Yet, the intra- and interfamiliar expressivity is variable, so the diagnosis should be considered in adults too. This is a case report about a 20-year-old female with an atypical presentation of TSC. The case highlights that TSC can be suspected in adults with a first-time seizure. The diagnosis is important because it leads to multidisciplinary follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Tuberosa/diagnóstico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Convulsiones/etiología , Esclerosis Tuberosa/complicaciones , Esclerosis Tuberosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Corteza Cerebral/fisiopatología , Epilepsias Parciales/diagnóstico , Epilepsia Tipo Ausencia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia Generalizada/diagnóstico , Epilepsia Mioclónica Juvenil/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Errores Diagnósticos , Electroencefalografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Epilepsias Parciales/fisiopatología , Epilepsia Tipo Ausencia/fisiopatología , Epilepsia Generalizada/fisiopatología , Femenino , Lateralidad Funcional/fisiología , Humanos , Epilepsia Mioclónica Juvenil/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess adverse events with use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) by the method of sequence symmetry analysis. METHODS: We used data from two population-based sources in Funen County, Denmark (population 2006: 479,000); prescription data from Odense University Pharmacoepidemiological Database (OPED) for the period of 1 August 1990-31 December 2006, and diagnoses from the County Hospital register for the period of 1994-2006 to perform sequence symmetry analysis. The method assesses the distribution of disease entities and prescription of other drugs (ODs), before and after initiation of AED treatment, as asymmetry in these distributions may indicate adverse events of AED use. Crude and adjusted sequence ratios (ASRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 24,882 incident AED users during the study period. Analysis with predefined drugs and diagnoses detected known AED adverse events of unspecific (constipation, nausea) and specific character (hyponatraemia, osteoporosis). Unanticipated signals from analysis without any preselection of drugs and diagnoses were the association of topiramate with dopaminergic agents (ASR 10.4; 95%CI 1.5-448), of gabapentin with glaucoma (ASR 8.0; 95%CI 1.1-355) and of valproic acid with hypothyroidism (ASR 8.0; 95%CI 1.1-355). CONCLUSIONS: Few unsuspected adverse AED effects were recognized in our study. Sequence symmetry analysis is a feasible method of monitoring for adverse AED effects.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Intervalos de Confianza , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate whether the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) increases the risk of hip fracture. METHODS: We performed a case-control study using data from the Funen County (population 2004: 475,000) hip fracture register. Cases (n = 7,557) were all patients admitted to county hospitals with a hip fracture during the period 1996-2004. Controls (n = 27,575) were frequency matched by age and gender. Information on use of AEDs, other drugs, and hospital contacts was available from local registers. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for hip fracture were estimated by unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Fracture risk was increased with ever use of any AED (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.16-1.48). The risk was also increased with use of only enzyme inducing (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.14-1.51), but not with use of only noninducing AEDs (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.77-1.37). Current (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.58-2.33) and recent use, as well as high daily (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.24-1.82) and cumulative dose increased fracture risk, but long treatment duration or previous use did not. The risk was modified by the presence of an epilepsy diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Use of AEDs modestly increases the risk of hip fracture. The risk increase is probably associated to a higher degree with a dose dependent effect on CNS with current and recent use, than with an effect on bone tissue.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Fracturas de Cadera/inducido químicamente , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Riesgo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Intervalos de Confianza , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Most migraine patients with infrequent attacks are currently not treated with migrainespecific medication such as triptans. The response of these patients to triptans is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan 50 mg vs. placebo in migraine patents with infrequent migraine attacks when medication is taken during the mild phase of an attack. The study design was double-blind, placebocontrolled, parallel-group and randomised. Migraine patients were recruited by general practitioners and referred to one of 4 study centres. Additional patients were recruited by advertising. The patients were eligible for the study if they had between 6 and 12 migraine attacks with or without aura per year. The patients were instructed to take the medication during the mild phase of a single attack. The primary efficacy measure was the percentage of patients pain-free after 2 h. Fortysix percent of treated attacks were moderate or severe. In the intention-to-treat analysis, sumatriptan was superior (20/51 patients were pain-free) to placebo (8/47 patients pain-free) (p=0.03). Adverse events (AEs) occurred more frequently after sumatriptan (40%) than after placebo (13%) (p=0.003) and most AEs were mild or moderate. In this migraine population with infrequent attacks, sumatriptan was superior to placebo and was generally well tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Sumatriptán/uso terapéutico , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Satisfacción del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with bleeding complications and may affect the risk of hemorrhagic stroke through inhibition of platelet cyclooxygenase-1. We performed a population-based case-control study to estimate the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and ischemic stroke in users of NSAIDs. METHODS: We used a population-based patient registry to identify all patients with a first-ever stroke discharge diagnosis in the period of 1994 to 1999. All diagnoses were validated according to predefined criteria. We selected 40 000 random controls from the background population. Information on drug use for cases and controls was retrieved from a prescription registry. Odds ratios were adjusted for age, sex, calendar year, and use of other medication. To evaluate the effect of various potential confounders not recorded in the register, we performed separate analyses on data from 2 large population-based surveys with more detailed information on risk factors. RESULTS: The cases were classified as intracerebral hemorrhage (n=659), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=208), and ischemic stroke (n=2717). The adjusted odds ratio of stroke in current NSAID users compared with never users was 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.6) for intracerebral hemorrhage, 1.2 (95% CI, 0.7 to 2.1) for subarachnoid hemorrhage and 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.4) for ischemic stroke. The survey data indicated that additional confounder control would not have led to an increase in relative risk estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Current exposure to NSAIDs is not a risk factor for intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Furthermore, NSAIDs probably offer no protection against first-ever ischemic stroke.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Isquemia Encefálica/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Cerebral/inducido químicamente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Sistema de Registros , Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Fumar/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/epidemiología , Estudios en Gemelos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been associated with increased risk of bleeding complications, possibly as a result of inhibition of platelet aggregation. Little is known about the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage in users of SSRIs and whether the effect on platelet aggregation reduces the risk of ischemic stroke. We used population-based data to estimate the risk of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke in users of SSRIs. METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study in Funen County (465 000 inhabitants), Denmark. All patients with a first-ever stroke discharge diagnosis in the period of 1994 to 1999 were identified, and a validated diagnosis of stroke was reached in 4765 cases. In all, 40 000 controls were randomly selected from the background population. Information on drug use for cases and controls was retrieved from a prescription registry with full coverage of the county. Odds ratios were adjusted for age, sex, calendar year, and use of other medication. To evaluate the effect of various potential confounders not recorded in the register data, we performed separate analyses on data from 2 large population-based surveys with more detailed information on risk factors. RESULTS: Of 659 patients with hemorrhagic stroke, 21 were current users of SSRIs. The adjusted odds ratio of hemorrhagic stroke in current SSRI users compared with never users was 1.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6 to 1.6]. Of 2717 patients with ischemic stroke, 100 were current users of SSRIs, and the adjusted odds ratio of ischemic stroke in cases compared with controls was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4). The survey data indicated that additional confounder control would not have led to an increase in the relative risk estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Current exposure to SSRIs is not associated with increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and is probably not associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke.