RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of studies on the efficacy and safety of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors osimertinib (OSI) and gefitinib (GEF) in treating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), even in patients with poor performance status (PS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed and compared data of 113 patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 2-4 who were administered OSI 80 mg/day or GEF 250 mg/day from May 2016 to March 2022. RESULTS: The GEF group (39 patients; median age: 74 years) included 20 patients with a PS of 2, 17 with a PS of 3, and 2 with a PS of 4. The OSI group (74 patients; median age: 76 years) included 48 patients with a PS of 2, 24 with a PS of 3, and 2 with a PS of 4. The overall response rates were 69% and 66% in the GEF and OSI groups, respectively. The disease control and PS improvement rates were 89% and 51% in both groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival in the GEF and OSI groups was 6.9 and 9.2 months, respectively (p = 0.15). The OSI group experienced better overall survival than the GEF group (median: 20.9 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.0031). The incidence of pneumonitis was 10% and 11% in the GEF and OSI groups, respectively. One treatment-related death owing to pneumonitis occurred in the GEF group. CONCLUSIONS: OSI may be a useful treatment for untreated EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with poor PS.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown the antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BM). However, it is unclear whether the efficacy of ICI is similar between patients with and without BM. It is yet unclear whether the efficacy of ICI in patients with BM increases with higher levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, as observed in patients without BM. METHODS: We compared the outcomes of ICI treatment between patients with and without BM using a cohort containing 1741 prospectively enrolled patients with lung cancer. We investigated whether there were differences in the outcomes of ICI based on PD-L1 expression levels between these patients. RESULTS: We enrolled 240 patients with NSCLC with or without BM who were treated with ICI or both chemotherapy and ICI. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) between all patients with or without BM (p = 0.489). However, OS was significantly shorter in patients with BM than in those without in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group (16.5 M vs. 30.6 M, p = 0.003) but not in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% or negative group. BM was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio: [95% confidence interval], 2.045; [1.058-3.953], p = 0.033) in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group. CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that the outcomes of patients with or without BM treated with ICI were not significantly different. The efficacy of ICI in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% would be lower in patients with BM than in those without.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ONCO DVT study (Edoxaban for 12 Months Versus 3 Months in Patients With Cancer With Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis) revealed superiority of 12-month relative to 3-month edoxaban treatment for the thrombotic risk in cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis. However, it is unknown whether the superiority could be common in different modified Ottawa score subgroups. OBJECTIVES: To identify more preferable candidates for extended anticoagulation in patients with cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis using the modified Ottawa score. METHODS: In this post-hoc subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study, we stratified 601 patients into the low (≤-1, N = 126), intermediate (0, N = 323), and high (≥1, N = 152) modified Ottawa score subgroups and compared clinical outcomes between the 12-month and 3-month edoxaban treatment groups. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism or venous thromboembolism-related death was not different between the 12-month and 3-month edoxaban treatment groups in the low score subgroup (0.0% vs 2.2%), whereas it was lower in the 12-month than in the 3-month edoxaban treatment group in the intermediate (0.8% vs 7.6%) and high (3.1% vs 15.6%) score subgroups. There were no significant differences in the cumulative incidences of the major bleeding between the 12-month and 3-month edoxaban treatment groups in the low (10.1% vs 7.6%), intermediate (8.8% vs 5.0%), and high (13.9% vs 12.6%) score subgroups. CONCLUSION: A 12-month compared with 3-month edoxaban treatment showed a lower risk of thrombotic events in patients with cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in the intermediate and high modified Ottawa score subgroups but not in the low score subgroup, suggesting a limited benefit of extended anticoagulation therapy beyond 3 months in patients with low modified Ottawa score.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ONCO DVT study demonstrated potential benefits of extended edoxaban treatment in patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in terms of thrombotic risk. However, the risk-benefit balance in patients with anemia remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prespecified subgroup analysis included 601 patients, divided into anemia (n=402) and no-anemia (n=199) groups. The primary endpoint was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin <12 g/dL for women and <13 g/dL for men. In the anemia subgroup, the primary endpoint occurred in 3 (1.5%) and 17 (8.4%) patients in the 12- and 3-month edoxaban treatment groups, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.58), compared with 0 and 5 (4.9%) patients, respectively, in the no-anemia subgroup (P interaction=0.997). Major bleeding occurred in 26 (13.1%) and 17 (8.4%) patients with anemia in the 12- and 3-month edoxaban treatment groups, respectively (OR 1.64; 95% CI 0.86-3.14), compared with 2 (2.1%) and 5 (4.9%) patients without anemia (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.26-1.73; P interaction=0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the presence of anemia, edoxaban treatment for 12 months was superior to treatment for 3 months in reducing thrombotic events, whereas the risk of major bleeding did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment groups.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) inhibit receptor-mediated signals in cells. Axitinib is a TKI with high specificity for vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs). AIM: We determined whether axitinib could induce senescence in human cancer cells and be lysed by the senolytic drug ABT-263. METHODS: Human lung and breast adenocarcinoma cell lines were used. These cells were cultured with axitinib or a multi-target TKI lenvatinib. The expression of ß-galactosidase, VEGFRs, Ki-67, reactive oxygen species (ROS) of cancer cells, and their BrdU uptake were evaluated by flow cytometry. The mRNA expression of p21 and IL-8 was examined by quantitative PCR. The effects of TKIs on phosphorylation of Akt and Erk1/2, as downstream molecules of VEGFR signaling, were examined by immunoblot. The in vivo anti-cancer effect was examined using a xenograft mice model. RESULTS: Axitinib, but not lenvatinib, induced cellular senescence (increased cell size and enhanced expression of ß-galactosidase) in all adenocarcinoma cell lines. Axitinib-induced senescence was unrelated to the expression of VEGFRs on cancer cells. ROS were involved in axitinib-induced senescence. Axitinib-induced senescent lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells were drastically lysed by ABT-263. In A549-xenografted mice, combination therapy with axitinib and ABT-263 significantly suppressed tumor growth with the induction of apoptotic cancer cells.
RESUMEN
A 61-year-old man presented to our hospital with a chief complaint of chronic cough. He was diagnosed with lung squamous cell carcinoma at clinical stage cT2aN3M1a. He received chemotherapy up to the fourth line, but both the primary tumor and lymph node metastases increased in size. Nivolumab, administered as the fifth line, resulted in a complete response (CR) that continued for 2 years and 8 months. Treatment was stopped due to the appearance of common terminology criteria for adverse events grade 1 pneumonitis. He was followed up without treatment for 3 years and 8 months, but a left supraclavicular fossa lymph node metastasis appeared. Retreatment with nivolumab was initiated, and the patient achieved CR again. One year and 6 months after retreatment, CR was maintained with nivolumab. This case represents a rare instance in which nivolumab yielded a significant response after a prolonged immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-free interval. Our experience has shown that the long-term response to ICIs may deteriorate in the future. Therefore, retreatment with ICIs may be effective when the initial therapy is successful.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Nivolumab , Humanos , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , RetratamientoRESUMEN
Pembrolizumab is a major treatment for recurrent or advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on its use and pharmacokinetics (PK) in older patients are limited. This open-label, multicenter, observational study evaluated real-world data on the safety, efficacy, and PK of pembrolizumab in older patients with NSCLC. In 99 patients aged ≥75 years, PK was determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry on pretreatment samples. Performance status (PS), geriatric assessment (GA), overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The median age was 78 (75-87) years. PS was 2-3 in 14 patients. The median ORR, PFS, and OS were 47.5%, 8.0, and 20.5 months, respectively. Although PK and ORR were not significantly associated, patients with the lowest Cycle 1-trough quartile (Q1) experienced poorer PFS (Q1 vs. Q2-4; 3.4 vs. 11.8 months, P = 0.006) and OS (Q1 vs. Q2-4; 9.9 vs. 21.7 months, P = 0.005) than in other quartiles overall, and even in the PD-L1 ≥50% subset (PFS, Q1 vs. Q2-4; 4.1 vs. 14.7 months, P = 0.005; OS, Q1 vs. Q2-4; 9.4 vs. 22.1 months, P = 0.010). The Q1 subgroup was characterized by poor PS and lower albumin, and more frequent "weight loss ≥ 10%" on the GA. Pembrolizumab therapy had similar PK and efficaciousness in older as well as younger patients. In patients with PS ≥2, low albumin, and vulnerable GA, early increases in PK levels are less likely, potentially diminishing efficacy even when PD-L1 ≥50%.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Factores de EdadRESUMEN
Background: There is no established standard 3rd line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents that are not used as 1st or 2nd line treatment are administrated as 3rd line treatment, their anti-tumor efficacy is insufficient. Anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)/programmed death-1 (PD1) treatment is more effective and less toxic than chemotherapy in anti-PD-L1/PD-1 treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC. Therefore, anti-PD-L1/PD-1 therapy is considered an appropriate 3rd line treatment. However, the anti-tumor efficacy is limited in patients previously treated with anti-PD-L1/PD-1 antibody. Today, new drugs are needed to increase the efficacy of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 antibodies. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, investigator-initiated phase II study is designed to evaluate combination treatment of nivolumab and TM5614, a plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) inhibitor as 3rd or more line treatment in NSCLC patients who underwent standard treatment. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate and the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and safety. Recruitment began in September 2023 and is expected to continue for approximately three years. Discussion: Currently, there is no standard 3rd line treatment for advanced NSCLC, and we hope that the findings of this study will facilitate more effective treatments in this setting. Ethics and dissemination: the study protocol conformed to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients will provide written informed consent prior to enrollment. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed publication. Trial Registration: This study is registered to Japan Registry of Clinical Trials with number: jRCT2061230039 (19/July/2023).
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Cancer is a well-known risk factor for venous thromboembolism. The D-dimer level is used to predict venous thromboembolism; however, reports on an appropriate D-dimer cut-off value in Japanese patients with advanced lung cancer are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to calculate the D-dimer cut-off value for venous thromboembolism at the time of lung cancer diagnosis. METHODS: The Rising-venous thromboembolism/NEJ037 study was a multicenter, prospective observational study. Patients with lung cancer who were contraindicated for radical resection or radiation were enrolled and followed up for 2 years. In the present study (jRCT no. 061180025), a receiver operating characteristic curve for D-dimer levels was created using the dataset of the Rising-venous thromboembolism/NEJ037 study. RESULTS: The Rising-venous thromboembolism/NEJ037 study included a total of 1008 patients, of whom 976, whose D-dimer levels had been measured at the time of cancer diagnosis, were included in the present study. At the time of lung cancer diagnosis, 62 (6.3%) and 914 (93.7%) patients presented with and without venous thromboembolism, respectively. The D-dimer values ranged from 0.1 to 180.1 µg/ml and from 0.1 to 257.2 µg/ml in patients with and without venous thromboembolism, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve was discriminative with a cut-off value of 3.3 µg/ml and an area under the curve of 0.794 (sensitivity, 0.742; specificity, 0.782; 95% confidence interval, 0.725-0.863). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to calculate the D-dimer cut-off value in Japanese patients with advanced lung cancer. Patients with D-dimer levels ≥3.3 µg/ml at the time of initial diagnosis may have coexisting venous thromboembolism.
Asunto(s)
Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangre , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/sangre , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Japón/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Curva ROC , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ONCO DVT study revealed the superiority of 12-month relative to 3-month edoxaban treatment for cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) regarding the thrombotic risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this pre-specified subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study, we stratified the patients into those with a standard edoxaban dose (60 mg/day; N = 151) and those with a reduced edoxaban dose (30 mg/day; N = 450) and evaluated the clinical outcomes for the 12- and 3-month treatments. The cumulative 12-month incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower in the 12-month than 3-month group for both the 60 mg (1.3% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.02; odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.97) and 30 mg (1.1% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.002; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.60) edoxaban subgroups, which was consistent across the edoxaban doses without a significant interaction (P = 0.90). The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding was higher in the 12-month group than in the 3-month group for the 60 mg edoxaban subgroup (14.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.046; OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 0.97-13.52), whereas it did not significantly differ between the two groups for the 30 mg edoxaban subgroup (8.7% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.89; OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.49-1.91), signalling there was a potential interaction (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: A 12-month edoxaban regimen for cancer-associated isolated distal DVT was consistently superior to a 3-month regimen, across the edoxaban doses for the thrombotic risk. However, caution was suggested for the standard dose of edoxaban due to the potential for an increased risk of bleeding with prolonged anticoagulation therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03895502 (ONCO DVT Trial): https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03895502.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Neoplasias , Piridinas , Tiazoles , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiazoles/administración & dosificación , Tiazoles/efectos adversos , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Recurrencia , Esquema de Medicación , Incidencia , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
Lung cancer is a type of cancer that can metastasize to the lungs, brain, bones, liver, adrenal glands, and other organs; however, the occurrence of brain metastases is the most common event. Symptoms of brain metastasis include motor dysfunction, mental dysfunction, seizures, headaches, nausea, and vomiting, and significantly reduce the quality of life of cancer patients. Brain metastases are a poor prognostic factor, and controlling them is extremely important for prolonging prognosis and improving the quality of life. Currently, local surgery and radiotherapy are recommended for their treatment. However, recently, cancer treatments using molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced, which may also be effective against brain metastases. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether local or systemic therapy is optimal for each case. In this review, we focus on recent findings regarding drug therapy in treating brain metastases from advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial ONCO DVT compared 3-month and 12-month edoxaban treatment regimens for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and suggested potential benefits of prolonged edoxaban treatment in terms of thrombotic risk. However, the risk-benefit balance of prolonged edoxaban treatment in patients with renal function remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of 3-month and 12-month edoxaban treatment regimens in patients with cancer-associated isolated distal DVT and different renal functions. METHODS: This pre-specified subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study included 601 patients divided into subgroups according to renal function using a 50 mL/min creatinine clearance (Ccr) cutoff. The primary endpoint was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related death at 12 months and the major secondary endpoint was major bleeding at 12 months. RESULTS: Among the 601 patients, 131 (21.8 %) comprised the renal dysfunction subgroup. The primary endpoint occurred in 6 (9.7 %) and 1 (1.4 %) patients in the 3-month and 12-month edoxaban groups in the renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively, and in 16 (6.6 %) and 2 (0.9 %) patients in the no renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively. The major secondary endpoint occurred in 9 (14.5 %) and 7 (10.1 %) patients in the 12-month and 3-month edoxaban groups in the renal dysfunction subgroup, and in 13 (5.3 %) and 21 (9.3 %) patients in the no renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A 12-month edoxaban regiment was superior to a 3-month treatment in terms of thrombotic risk irrespective of renal function. A higher bleeding risk was not identified in patients with renal dysfunction who received prolonged edoxaban treatment.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales , Neoplasias , Piridinas , Tiazoles , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , RiñónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are ineffective against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients who were treated or not treated with ICIs, and of those who benefit from immunotherapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. METHODS: We analyzed patients with unresectable stage III/IV or recurrent NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations using a prospective umbrella-type lung cancer registry (CS-Lung-003). RESULTS: A total of 303 patients who met the eligibility criteria were analyzed. The median age was 69 years; 116 patients were male, 289 had adenocarcinoma, 273 had major mutations, and 67 were treated with ICIs. The duration of EGFR-TKI treatment was longer in the Non-ICI group than in the ICI group (17.1 vs. 12.7 months, p < 0.001). Patients who received ICIs for more than 6 months were categorized into the durable clinical benefit (DCB) group (24 patients), and those who received ICIs for less than 6 months into the Non-DCB group (43 patients). The overall survival in the DCB group exhibited longer than the Non-DCB group (69.3 vs. 47.1 months), and an equivalent compared to that in the Non-ICI group (69.3 vs. 68.9 months). Multivariate analysis for time to next treatment (TTNT) of ICIs showed that a poor PS was associated with a shorter TTNT [hazard ratio (HR) 3.309; p < 0.001]. Patients who were treated with ICIs and chemotherapy combination were associated with a longer TTNT (HR 0.389; p = 0.003). In addition, minor EGFR mutation was associated with a long TTNT (HR 0.450; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: ICIs were administered to only 22% of patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer, and they had shorter TTNT of EGFR-TKI compared to other patients. ICI treatment should be avoided in EGFR mutated lung cancer with poor PS but can be considered for lung cancer with EGFR minor mutations. Pathological biomarker to predict long-term responders to ICI are needed.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores ErbB/genética , Mutación , Pulmón/patologíaRESUMEN
Despite the occurrence of various hemorrhagic events during advanced lung cancer treatment, few researchers have reported on their risk factors. Moreover, the development of cancer-related thromboembolism indicates anticoagulant use. However, adverse events such as bleeding should be monitored. In this study, we aimed to identify factors that influence the onset of hemorrhagic events in patients with lung cancer. The Rising-VTE/NEJ037 study was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. A total of 1008 patients with lung cancer who were unsuitable for radical resection or radiation were enrolled and followed up for 2 years. Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model was performed to compare the outcomes of the time to the onset of hemorrhagic events for 2 years after registration. Hemorrhagic events occurred in 115 patients (11.4%), with 35 (30.4%) experiencing major bleeding. Significant risk factors included venous thromboembolism (VTE) (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.003, p < 0.001) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 1 (HR: 2.476, p < 0.001). Factors that significantly reduced hemorrhagic event risk were female sex (HR: 0.454, p = 0.002) and M1a status (HR: 0.542, p = 0.038). VTE is a risk factor for hemorrhagic events in patients with advanced lung cancer, and risks associated with anticoagulant therapy should be considered.
RESUMEN
Primary lung cancer with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) is a rare condition. We present a case of a patient with primary lung cancer with PAP treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). A 62-year-old man was diagnosed with autoimmune PAP 8 years prior to current admission. Lung adenocarcinoma was found in his right lung, and platinum-based chemotherapy was administered, followed by atezolizumab. He experienced disease progression after atezolizumab treatment, whereas ICI-induced pneumonia or exacerbation of PAP did not occur. This indicates that ICI may be safely used in patients with primary lung cancer with PAP.
RESUMEN
A 59-year-old man presented with esophageal achalasia complicated by lipoid pneumonia. Dysphagia and diffuse ground-glass shadows on computed tomography led to the diagnosis of esophageal achalasia. An analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) revealed yellow BAL fluid, with two distinct layers. Oil droplets were observed in the upper layer. Macrophages that phagocytosed lipids were also observed. He was diagnosed with lipoid pneumonia secondary to esophageal achalasia. His lipoid pneumonia improved after peroral endoscopic myotomy because of the reduction in aspiration risk.
Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago , Neumonía Lipoidea , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Lipoidea/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía Lipoidea/etiología , Acalasia del Esófago/complicaciones , Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar , Lavado Broncoalveolar/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A 71-year-old man with advanced lung adenocarcinoma was treated with carboplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab in June 2020. Pemetrexed and pembrolizumab maintenance therapy were continued until November 2022. A fever and severe fatigue occurred in December 2022; however, the cause of the infection was inconclusive based on the patient's symptoms, imaging findings, and culture tests. Although the patient was administered antibiotics, his general condition worsened. Considering the possible diagnosis of immune-related cytokine release syndrome (CRS), the patient was administered prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) and showed improvement. In conclusion, CRS can occur even long after the initial administration of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/etiología , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Pemetrexed/efectos adversos , Pemetrexed/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Older patients with severe respiratory failure have higher mortality rates and are more likely to experience impairments in activities of daily living (ADL). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients (??75 years) who received intubation and artificial ventilation for respiratory failure at Shimane University Hospital between November 2014 and December 2020. We compared the outcomes of frail patients with those of self-sufficient patients. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included. ADL ability before respiratory failure was rated self-sufficient in 18 patients (self-sufficient group) and not self-sufficient in 14 patients (frail group). None of the patients in either group underwent advanced care planning prior to the onset of respiratory failure. In the self-sufficient and frail groups, the in-hospital mortality rates were 33% and 50%, and the incidence of bedridden patients at discharge was 6% and 43%, respectively. Most patients in the frail group (93%) died or were bedridden. The median hospitalization cost was JPY 2,984,000 for the self-sufficient group and JPY 3,008,000 for the frail group. CONCLUSION: The overall prognosis of frail older patients who underwent intubation and artificial ventilation was poor. When providing intensive care to such patients, it is important to carefully consider their suitability for the treatment. J. Med. Invest. 70 : 494-498, August, 2023.